Government puts inquiry into Sue Gray departure
on hold
Cabinet Office says investigation paused until after
watchdog decides whether to delay start of job with Keir Starmer
Pippa
Crerar Political editor
@PippaCrerar
Tue 2 May
2023 18.04 BST
The
government has paused an internal inquiry into Sue Gray’s departure from
Whitehall which was widely expected to have concluded that she had broken the
civil service code.
In a
written statement, the Cabinet Office minister Oliver Dowden said the former
senior official had not engaged with the investigation into her departure so it
would be suspended while the government considered “next steps”.
The
potentially explosive report was now not expected to be published until after
the government’s appointments watchdog decided whether to delay Gray’s start
date as Keir Starmer’s chief of staff.
Whitehall
insiders said the Cabinet Office’s decision follows 24 hours of intense
negotiations over the timing of the report’s release between the cabinet
secretary, Simon Case, who had initially wanted it published but then changed
his mind, and Tory ministers.
They
claimed Case, who has faced criticism for his involvement in a series of crises
including the Partygate scandal and Richard Sharp’s resignation as BBC chair,
had “over-reached” by initially allowing plans for the publication of the
findings to go ahead.
An interim
report, which ministers are understood to have wanted to be made public, was
said to have concluded that she breached the rules by holding talks with Labour
about the new role without informing civil service bosses in advance.
Sources
suggested that, despite originally backing publication, Case had become
uncomfortable that a senior official could face such an investigation after
they had already left the civil service, with the Cabinet Office so far unable
to explain under what process the inquiry took place.
Senior
civil servants were also said to have been concerned about releasing such a
politically charged report just days before the local elections, potentially in
breach of purdah rules, and the wider implications of publicly discussing the
confidential details of a former employee.
Allies of Gray
said the investigation, which they claim was politically motivated as she had
not worked in a sensitive role for five years, was designed to put pressure on
the advisory committee on business appointments (Acoba) to delay her start
date.
While the
report into Gray’s departure is separate from the Acoba deliberations, it is
still due to be submitted as evidence. The body can suggest cooling-off periods
of between three months and two years for senior ex-ministers or civil servants
who want to take up new jobs, to minimise concerns over conflicts of interest.
Whitehall
insiders believe the outcome of the internal investigation was intended to
influence Acoba over whether there had been a perceived conflict of interest,
as opposed to an actual one.
After its
own process is completed, Acoba will share its recommendation with Rishi Sunak,
who will make a final ruling, but the prime minister does not have the power to
block an appointment. He is also likely to take advice from Case at this stage.

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário