Belgian PM wants to hit ‘pause’ on nature
restoration rules
The Commission wants to boost efforts against
biodiversity loss. But that’s dividing Belgium along familiar lines.
BY CAMILLE
GIJS, LOUISE GUILLOT AND BARBARA MOENS
MAY 24,
2023 9:00 AM CET
BRUSSELS —
Politics in Belgium often devolves into battles between Flanders and Wallonia —
and the EU's call to boost nature restoration efforts is no exception.
Flanders
wants the proposal watered down, hoping to spare angry farmers, while Wallonia
wants a more ambitious law. It's also splitting the federal government, with
Prime Minister Alexander De Croo on Tuesday saying it's time to “hit the pause
button” on the EU's Nature Restoration Regulation, while his climate minister
is pushing in the opposite direction.
That
political deadlock means Belgium has no unified national position on the file,
and without that, it can't take a stance in ongoing talks at the Council of the
EU, which are expected to conclude on June 20.
The
proposed regulation aims to restore at least 20 percent of the EU’s degraded
ecosystems by 2030, and all areas in need of restoration by mid-century. But
that could wreak havoc on farmers — a powerful political constituency in
Flanders.
The
European Parliament is also hitting the brakes; the agriculture committee on
Tuesday voted to reject the legislation, sending it back to the European
Commission.
In a speech
Monday, De Croo called for focusing on climate change rather than pushing new
green legislation on biodiversity and chemical pollution.
“Is this
the right time for these new legislations when our industry is crucial to make
the energy transition happen? By overburdening people with rules and
regulations, we risk losing public support for the green agenda,” De Croo said.
The
right-wing Flemish government is acutely aware of the political cost of the
regulation as the country heads into federal and regional elections next
spring.
Belgium
also takes over the presidency of the Council of the EU in January, which may
coincide with talks to hammer out a final deal on the nature file.
“The goals
are very ambitious, and are imposed from higher up without taking into account
local realities,” said Jo Brouns, the Flemish agriculture minister. “In
Flanders or the Netherlands, with the high population density and limited
space, you can't do as much as in the Nordics or Eastern Europe.”
It's not
the first such fight. Earlier this year, farmers protested over mandatory cuts
in nitrogen emissions — almost toppling the Flemish government, said Belgian
MEP Tom Vandenkendelaere.
"You
definitely have a general feeling of discontent among farmers with the way in
which legislation is coming their way," he said. "There's ever more
obligations ... and not as much compensation for the efforts they're
doing."
Take it or leaf it
While De
Croo is moving to support the Flemish government, where his liberal Open VLD
party is part of the ruling coalition, his Climate Change, Environment and
Green Deal Minister Zakia Khattabi, a member of the Ecolo green party, is
pushing in the opposite direction. She is calling for strengthened targets and
arguing that restoring nature “ensures resilience of our agriculture,
liveability of our cities and good health.”
While De
Croo is moving to support the Flemish government, Climate Change, Environment
and Green Deal Minister Zakia Khattabi is pushing in the opposite direction |
Hatim Kaghat/Belga Mag/AFP via Getty Images
That view
finds support among greens in both the federal and Walloon governments.
"Taking
into account the crucial benefits of a preserved and restored nature, this text
must be completed as soon as possible while ensuring that the measures are both
ambitious and realistic,” said Céline Tellier, Wallonia’s environment minister
and an Ecolo party member.
But the
Flemish government wants to weaken the law, worrying about the lack of data on
the impact of the new rules on its farming sector. It accuses the European
Commission of not sufficiently taking into account national differences.
Andy
Pieters, a spokesperson for Flemish Environment Minister Zuhal Demir — who also
called for a "pause" on the EU nature legislation — said the current
text isn’t clear on the implications of a proposed ban on the deterioration of
certain biodiversity habitats.
“We see
some question marks about that. We have also asked for a cost-benefit analysis,
and a legal analysis to be sure about what we are going to agree on,” he added.
Other EU
countries, like the Netherlands, are also opposed to the law, echoing the
Flemish position.
“Far-reaching
legally binding targets at EU level do not help restore nature, but only lock
everything down," said liberal Dutch MEP Jan Huitema. "We do
not want a nitrogen crisis 2.0.”

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário