‘We’re watching you’: incidents of voter
intimidation rise as midterm elections near
Drop box watchers, threatening letters and harassment
– voters and election officials alike report increase in occurrences
Rachel
Leingang in Phoenix, Arizona
Fri 4 Nov
2022 11.00 GMT
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/nov/04/voter-intimidation-midterm-elections-arizona
In suburban
Mesa, Arizona, people staked out an outdoor ballot drop box, taking photos and
videos of voters dropping off ballots. Some wore tactical gear or camouflage.
Some were visibly armed.
Kari Lake,
who is running for governor of Arizona, recently said she would not lose to her
opponent, driving fears that she might be unwilling to concede defeat in the
2022 midterms.
Others
videotaped voters and election workers at a ballot drop box and central
tabulation office in downtown Phoenix. They set up lawn chairs and camped out
to keep watch through a fence which had been added around the facility for
safety after 2020 election protests.
Some voters
claim the observers approached or followed them in their vehicles. Other
observers hung back, watching and filming from at least 75ft from the drop
boxes.
In total,
the Arizona secretary of state has received more than a dozen complaints from
voters about intimidation from drop box watchers, many of which have been
forwarded to the US Department of Justice and the Arizona attorney general as
of late October, as well as a threat sent to the secretary of state herself. A
federal judge issued a temporary restraining order on 1 November to limit the
watchers’ activities.
These
activities have led to calls from Maricopa county officials to “decrease the
temperature” of heated rhetoric and actions in advance of Tuesday’s midterm
elections. But though Arizona has become a hotbed for these tactics, it is also
a sign of the mounting national threats to security that voters are facing as
the 8 November elections near – part of an orchestrated countrywide strategy
pushed by rightwing groups who believe baseless conspiracy theories that the
2020 presidential election was rife with fraud and irregularities.
“I think
that this drop box monitoring could very likely take hold in a number of
different states,” said Jared Davidson, an attorney with Protect Democracy, a
non-profit, non-partisan organization involved in one legal challenge against
the drop box watchers. “I certainly hope it doesn’t and I hope that a win in
our case will send a strong deterrent effect to folks who are organizing in
other places.”
‘All of a
sudden now, we’re reaching voter intimidation’
Drop box
watching efforts have been largely coordinated by election deniers belonging to
several different groups across the country, usually inspired by the viral
movie 2000 Mules, which makes false, debunked claims about so-called “mules”
stuffing drop boxes with ballots in a widespread spree of fraudulent voting
during the 2020 presidential election. In recent months, drop box watchers
spread the word on rightwing-friendly social media platforms like Truth Social
and Telegram. One of the groups, Clean Elections USA, intends to send the
photos, videos and information it collects to True the Vote, the organization
behind 2000 Mules, Votebeat reported.
The US
attorney general, Merrick Garland, said in recent days that the justice
department “has an obligation to guarantee a free and fair vote by everyone
who’s qualified to vote and will not permit voters to be intimidated”. The
department also filed a “statement of interest” in one of the Arizona drop box
lawsuits, saying that the behavior probably violates federal voting rights law.
In
Michigan, a local offshoot of a group called the America Project is training
volunteers to set up hidden cameras to monitor drop boxes and to carry guns in
case they encounter criminals while watching the boxes, the Detroit Free Press
reported.
A pastor in
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, told PennLive he had seen increased traffic in his
community, where trucks with Maga flags drive through regularly, which he sees
as an attempt to intimidate the largely Black community. In response to
concerns over such intimidation and efforts by election deniers to recruit and
train poll observers and workers, the faith community in Philadelphia is
encouraging people to become poll monitors.
‘We will be
watching’
Arizona
became a sort of ground zero for drop box watching during early voting in
October. Arizona voters extensively use no-excuse mail-in voting, and early
voting at the polls and via mail and drop boxes begins 27 days before election
day.
“There’s
nothing in and of itself that’s unlawful to sit and film a drop box – it’s odd
behavior in my opinion,” Bill Gates, the Republican chairman of the Maricopa
county board of supervisors, said in an interview. “When you have a weapon, and
then you have camouflage on, and then you make a statement like ‘I’m out here
hunting mules’ – all of a sudden now, we’re reaching voter intimidation.”
Rural
Yavapai county saw plans for drop box watches in what was dubbed “Operation
Drop Box”, organized by the Lions of Liberty, a rightwing group that claims the
US has been “hijacked and undermined by global elites, communists, leftists,
deep state bureaucrats and fake news”, and the Yavapai County Preparedness
Team, which is affiliated with the Oath Keepers extremist group, according to
its website. Those groups told their volunteers to “stand down” after they were
sued in federal court.
But drop
box watchers have been encouraged by some rightwing elected officials and
candidates who have feigned credulity of false claims of a stolen election. One
state lawmaker, the Arizona senator Kelly Townsend, encouraged “vigilantes” to
stake out drop boxes (the same lawmaker then said last month that “wearing
tactical gear while watching a ballot drop box could be considered voter
intimidation”, so people shouldn’t do it). The Republican candidate for Arizona
secretary of state, Mark Finchem, tweeted in late October to tell his followers
to “WATCH ALL DROP BOXES. PERIOD.” He also urged followers to record voters
using them.
Voters who
have filed complaints against the practice said they felt intimidated and found
the drop box watchers’ behavior alarming.
“I’m a
senior and was very intimidated by his actions,” one complaint about a Phoenix
drop box watcher reads.
“Camo clad
people taking pictures of me, my license plate as I dropped our mail in ballots
in the box. When I approached them asking names, group they’re with, they
wouldn’t give anything,” another complaint from Phoenix reads.
“I felt
very intimidated and scared about who was watching me deposit my ballot in the
box. A man with a camera was snapping shots of me, my car and my license plate.
Definitely without my permission,” yet another reads.
The
Maricopa county sheriff, Paul Penzone, said that he was increasing security and
directing more deputies to monitor the drop box situation in response to claims
of voter intimidation. But the presence of uniformed law enforcement can also
be a concern for voters who may distrust police, particularly voters of color.
On 28
October, federal judge Michael Liburdi ruled against voter advocacy groups in a
case brought by the Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans and Voto Latino.
Liburdi wrote that, while some voters may be “legitimately alarmed” by the drop
box watchers, their activity was protected by the first amendment.
But a
separate lawsuit from the League of Women Voters of Arizona, represented by the
non-profit Protect Democracy, claims the drop box watchers violate the Voting
Rights Act of 1965 and the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871. Also before Judge Liburdi,
that case prevailed in getting the practice curtailed in several ways that
should make watchers’ activities less threatening to voters.
Now,
because of a temporary restraining order that Judge Liburdi issued, observers
affiliated with the Clean Elections USA group cannot take photos or videos of
voters within 75ft of a drop box, nor can they post images online implying
someone is committing a crime. They now have to be 250ft away from a drop box
if they are wearing body armor or carrying guns. Even then, the threat continues.
‘How did we
get here?’
It’s not
just the drop box activities that have election workers, voters and activists
worried. Across the country, elected officials have been receiving threats from
the same groups that are closing in on voters.
One email
sent to several workers at the Arizona secretary of state’s office, including
the secretary of state herself, Katie Hobbs, vulgarly harassed the employees,
threatened to find their addresses using local tax records and referred to the
French Revolution. Hobbs, the Democratic gubernatorial candidate for governor,
has been subjected to threats after 2020, resulting in federal charges for one
man who made a death threat against her. Two other local elected officials, the
Maricopa county supervisor, Clint Hickman, and county recorder, Stephen Richer,
have faced threats that resulted in federal charges this year as well.
The chairs
of all 15 Arizona county Democratic parties also received unsigned threatening
letters, featuring the words “WE ARE WATCHING YOU”. “Retirees with nothing else
to do will be filing hundreds of lawsuits, if not more,” the letter said. “They
will be locating your homes, your social media profiles and pictures and
posting them online as well.”
Bonnie
Heidler, the chair of the Pima county Democratic party, received the letter at
the office’s headquarters and immediately informed the FBI. She wanted the
letter on record, in case anything happens. She pointed out that the language
of the letter was similar to an 14 October social media post from Finchem
directed at Pima county, in which the candidate said: “We will be watching.”
What Trump did was, he let the genie out of the
bottle. And now we can’t get the genie back in
The county
party’s building is up for sale, and someone called the realtor saying they
wanted to buy the building so they could blow it up, Heidler said. The party is
discussing ways to improve security, she added.
“What Trump
did was, he let the genie out of the bottle. And now we can’t get the genie
back in. And that’s the problem. He’s given them credence that they’re ‘very
fine people’,” Heidler said.
Election
workers in other states have also faced harassment and threats for doing their
jobs. Election officials now routinely receive calls, voicemails, emails and
social media posts that range from vitriolic to frightening.
A mother
and daughter who were election workers in Georgia told the January 6 committee
they were threatened and told they should be jailed or killed.
The entire
election staff in rural Gillespie county, Texas, quit earlier this year, having
finally had enough of the onslaught of harassment and false claims after 2020.
The threats
have left polling places understaffed or with inexperienced staff, as seasoned
election workers decide to leave. In some areas, like Akron, Ohio, local
officials have put laws in place to increase penalties for people who harass or
interfere with election workers.
Few
Republicans have stood up to stolen election claims, and the ones who have have
faced harsh electoral consequences from Trump’s rabid base. The Republican
governor, Doug Ducey, who ignored Trump’s phone call while signing off on
Arizona’s 2020 results, is not up for re-election, but he has still largely
remained quiet. Arizona’s house speaker, Rusty Bowers, who refused to overturn
the election results, lost his primary. County elected officials, who have been
steadfast in support of the way the county ran the election, have faced endless
outrage and threats.
“How did we
get here?” Gates said. “We got here because there are a few people that have
normalized this sort of behavior, and then a bunch of my fellow Republicans who
remain silent while that goes on, out of fear of some political ramification.”
He doesn’t
think the fervor will die down unless other Republicans start calling out those
who are undermining democracy.
“Literally,
the eyes of the world are on Maricopa county,” Gates said. “If we engage in
this kooky behavior, that’s not a good image to be providing to the rest of the
country and the rest of the world. We’re better than that.”


Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário