Barr Dismisses Trump’s Request for a Special
Master
The former attorney general, who chose not to indict
Mr. Trump in the Russia inquiry, said the Justice Department was justified in
investigating his handling of government materials.
Former Attorney General William P. Barr defended the
Justice Department’s search of Mar-a-Lago.
Glenn
Thrush
By Glenn
Thrush
Sept. 2,
2022
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/02/us/politics/barr-trump-special-master.html
WASHINGTON
— Former Attorney General William P. Barr dismissed former President Donald J.
Trump’s call for an independent review of materials seized from his Florida
home on Friday — and said an inventory of items recovered in the search last
month seemed to support the Justice Department’s claim that it was needed to
safeguard national security.
“As more
information comes out, the actions of the department look more understandable,”
Mr. Barr told The New York Times in a phone interview, speaking of the decision
by the current attorney general, Merrick B. Garland, to seek a search warrant
of the complex at Mar-a-Lago.
“It seems
to me they were driven by concern about highly sensitive information being
strewn all over a country club, and it was taking them almost two years to get
it back,” said Mr. Barr, who resigned in December 2020, as Mr. Trump pushed him
to support false claims that the election had been stolen.
“It appears
that there’s been a lot of jerking around of the government,” he added. “I’m
not sure the department could have gotten it back without taking action.”
Asked what
he thought of the argument for the appointment of a special master, an
independent arbiter to review the material that could delay the investigation,
Mr. Barr laughed.
“I think
it’s a crock of shit,” he said, adding, “I don’t think a special master is
called for.”
Mr. Barr
has not been afraid to criticize Mr. Trump since leaving office, but he has
seldom been quite so blunt in his assessment as during the interview on Friday
afternoon, or earlier in the day when he expressed similar sentiments on Fox
News.
Mr. Barr’s
comments, which echo the assessment of many Democrats and a few Republicans,
including the former Bush adviser Karl Rove, came as Mr. Trump’s supporters
tried to downplay the importance of the inventory unsealed by a federal judge
in Florida.
The
eight-page document, which was made public with the tacit assent of the former
president’s lawyers, revealed that the F.B.I. recovered 11,179 documents or
photographs without classification markings belonging to the government, and
more than 100 others marked top secret, secret or confidential.
“It’s hard
to wrap your head around him taking so much sensitive materials,” Mr. Barr
said. “I was, let’s just say, surprised.”
As attorney
general, Mr. Barr chose not to pursue criminal charges against Mr. Trump after
the 2019 report into Mr. Trump’s actions in the Russia investigation. Last
month, the department released a memo commissioned by Mr. Barr, in which two
deputies rejected a prosecution, saying that none of Mr. Trump’s actions could
be shown beyond a reasonable doubt to be criminal acts.
And while
he generally backed the department’s investigation into Mr. Trump’s handling of
classified documents and unequivocally supported the government’s retrieval of
sensitive materials, he seemed far less certain about a potential prosecution
on charges of obstruction or the Espionage Act, which prohibits the
unauthorized retention of national security secrets.
“They have
to think about the impact on the country of the precedent set by trying a
former president,” Mr. Barr said.
For his
part, Mr. Garland has repeatedly said that he would go where the evidence leads
him, and that he would act without “fear or favor” when it comes to making
decisions in matters involving Mr. Trump and his allies.
Glenn
Thrush covers the Department of Justice. He joined The Times in 2017 after
working for Politico, Newsday, Bloomberg News, the New York Daily News, the
Birmingham Post-Herald and City Limits. @GlennThrush


Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário