Of all the legal threats Trump is facing, is this
the one that could take him down?
The quiet workings of a Georgia grand jury hearing
evidence of election fraud could represent the ex-president’s greatest danger
Any case against Trump is likely to be built around
his call to Georgia’s secretary of state to demand he ‘find’ enough votes to
overturn Biden’s victory.
Chris
McGreal
Sat 27 Aug
2022 09.00 BST
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/aug/27/trump-georgia-investigation-grand-jury-election
Donald
Trump’s lawyers are earning their keep.
The former
president’s attorneys have raced to put out one fire after another in recent
months as they defend Trump from investigations into the squirrelling away of
secret documents at Mar-a-Lago, his part in the storming of the Capitol during
his last days in office, and twin probes into his business dealings in New
York.
But the greatest
legal danger to Trump may come from the quiet workings of a grand jury in
Georgia hearing evidence of his illegal attempts to overturn the state’s 2020
presidential election result and prevent from Joe Biden taking power.
“It’s a
greater legal threat to the president and some of his followers than any of the
other investigations which are going on right now,” said Ronald Carlson, a
leading Georgia trial lawyer and professor at the University of Georgia’s law
school.
“Some of
the potential charges carry very serious penalties.”
Carlson
said that even if Trump were prosecuted for removing classified papers from the
White House, other officials who have mishandled secret material received only
misdemeanor convictions and probation, such as the former CIA director David
Petraeus.
He said the
New York investigations into allegations of financial fraud are focussed more
on Trump’s businesses than on the former president. It remains unclear what, if
any, criminal charges might come out of Congresses investigation into the 6
January, 2021 assault on Congress.
But Carlson
said the strong evidence of Trump’s wide-ranging effort to overturn his narrow
loss to Biden in Georgia by pressuring state officials to commit fraud puts the
former president squarely at the heart of an investigation into alleged crimes
that carry more serious penalties than those he might face in the other probes.
An analysis
by the Brookings Institution, a Washington thinktank, concluded that Trump is
“at substantial risk of possible state charges predicated on multiple crimes”
after what it described as his “sustained assault” on the Georgia electoral
process.
Among other
charges, prosecutors appear to be considering indictments under anti-conspiracy
laws written to combat organised crime which potentially carry lengthy prison
sentences.
In Atlanta,
the Fulton county district attorney, Fani Willis, has assembled a “special
purpose grand jury” to spend up to a year focused on Trump’s multi-faceted
attempt to fix Georgia’s election result.
Willis
appears to be building a substantial body of testimony from some of Trump’s
closest allies who witnessed the defeated president’s actions and in some cases
intervened themselves, including his lawyer and advisor, Rudolph Giuliani, the
former New York mayor. Two days before he testified last month, Giuliani was
informed he is also a target of the criminal investigation.
The grand
jury is also seeking testimony from Senator Lindsey Graham, an ardent convert
to Trump who contacted Georgia officials looking to alter the vote, and the
former White House chief of staff, Mark Meadows.
Lawyers
said that given that any charges against Trump would further inflame America’s
already raw politics, Willis will want to make sure she has an airtight case to
head off accusations of a political prosecution. But that also means that any
decision to prosecute could come at about the time the next presidential
campaign is getting off the ground, with Trump hinting that he will run again.
Evidence
presented to the grand jury is secret but any case against Trump is likely to
be built around a tape recording of his call to Georgia’s Republican secretary
of state, Brad Raffensperger, to demand he “find” enough votes to overturn
Biden’s victory in the state.
When Raffensperger
rebuffed the demand, Trump made vague threats of charging him with a crime for
failing to investigate allegations that Democrats had rigged the vote.
“You know
what they did and you’re not reporting it. You know, that’s a criminal offence.
And you know, you can’t let that happen. That’s a big risk to you,” he told
Raffensperger.
The then
president spoke to other senior Georgia Republicans, including the governor, Brian
Kemp, and attorney general, Chris Carr, to urge them to contest the state’s
vote count. They too resisted the pressure.
Raffensperger
and Carr have already testified to the grand jury. Kemp is resisting a
subpoena.
Trump also
tried to get federal officials at the justice department to intervene. His
lawyers filed a series of lawsuits making extraordinary claims of foreign
interference and other conspiracy theories. All of them were dismissed.
When all of
that failed, Giuliani and others pushed a false claim that the law allowed the
Georgia legislature to replace its members of the electoral college with a
slate that would vote for the defeated president. Legislators refused to play
along and the Trump campaign instead sent 16 “fake electors” using false
election certificates – another failed attempt to overturn the election
replicated in six other states lost by Trump.
Willis has
told some of those involved in the fake electors plot that they are the target
of criminal investigation by the grand jury, including the Georgia Republican
party chair, David Shafer, and a state senator, Brandon Beach.
Carlson
said the combination of Trump’s actions potentially amount to a substantial
body of evidence of wide wrongdoing.
“The focus
for this grand jury is solicitation of election fraud. Presumably most of the
evidence that they’re receiving will focus on that. Then there will be making
false statements to state or other governmental bodies. The creation of a slate
of electors, which took the position that Trump had won the election, will come
under that sort of umbrella. Then we’ll probably have the grand jury looking at
criminal conspiracy and violation of oath of office,” he said.
A
combination of all or some of these charges could also open the way for Trump
to be prosecuted for a pattern of criminal acts under Georgia’s Racketeer
Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (Rico) statute. Although Rico is more
commonly associated with prosecution of organised crime, Willis used it seven
years ago to convict 11 Atlanta teachers of fixing test scores for their
students.
The
district attorney has brought in a Rico specialist for the Trump investigation.
The special
grand jury can sit until next May, giving it plenty of time to gather evidence.
But unlike regular grand juries, which meet for only two months and issue
indictments, it can only submit a report recommending prosecution. Willis must
then decide whether to follow that recommendation and appoint a regular grand
jury to seek an indictment against Trump or anyone else.
Carlson
predicted that if the special grand jury recommends prosecution, the district
attorney will go ahead.
“She’s a
very vigorous and bold advocate. I believe that she will follow through,” he
said.
The
Brookings Institution said that if Trump is charged with a crime, he is likely
to claim that he cannot be held criminally liable for his actions as president.
But it said that defence is likely to fail, because immunity from liability
only extends to actions taken by the president that were within the scope of
his lawful duties.
.webp)
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário