Nancy Pelosi’s Taiwan trip puts US analysts and
Democrats on edge
Experts and officials raise concern over timing of
trip even as Republicans hail House speaker
David Smith
David Smith
in Washington
@smithinamerica
Tue 2 Aug
2022 19.28 BST
Typically a
plane crash is big news, whereas a plane taking off or landing is not news at
all.
But the
sight on Tuesday of Nancy Pelosi’s US military aircraft touching down at Taipei
Songshan airport in Taiwan – smoothly and without incident – was certainly
news, and cause for a collective sigh of relief.
In this
instance, however, the destination is as important as the journey. China claims
sovereignty over Taiwan and its bellicose response to the House speaker’s
arrival suggested that the risk of unintended consequences remains high. For
those who believe a confrontation between the US and China over the
self-governing island is one day inevitable, the speaker’s provocation may have
just accelerated the timeline.
Pelosi,
second in line to the presidency, defied a series of increasingly stark threats
from China that have fuelled tensions. The Chinese president, Xi Jinping, told
Joe Biden during a phone call last week that “whoever plays with fire will get
burnt”.
Biden
himself acknowledged that the US military felt it was “not a good idea right
now” but also knew better than to try to meddle in the plans of Pelosi, who has
long marched to the beat of her own drum.
She wrote
in the Washington Post: “We cannot stand by as the CCP [Chinese Communist
party] proceeds to threaten Taiwan – and democracy itself.
“Indeed, we
take this trip at a time when the world faces a choice between autocracy and
democracy. As Russia wages its premeditated, illegal war against Ukraine,
killing thousands of innocents – even children – it is essential that America
and our allies make clear that we never give in to autocrats.”
Even as
American democracy crumbles internally, there is nothing like a rallying cry
for democracy abroad to bring the major political parties together. Twenty-six
Republican senators, including the minority leader, Mitch McConnell, issued a
joint statement in support of Pelosi’s visit. Even Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News
lauded her.
Newt
Gingrich, a Republican who was the last House speaker to visit Taiwan in 1997,
told the Guardian: “Once it became public, she had to go through with it.
Otherwise Xi Jinping would have got the impression that we could be bullied.
She had no choice once it was public and it was disappointing to have the Biden
administration confused by that reality.”
Which is
reassuring up to a point, although, as a general rule, earning the
full-throated endorsement of McConnell and Gingrich would normally give Pelosi
cause to at least take a second look at her course of action. Some analysts
believe they have all got it wrong.
Lyle
Goldstein, director of Asia engagement at the Defense Priorities thinktank,
said: “This foolish political stunt is unlikely to cause a war in itself, but
it will only accelerate the sad process of sleepwalking into a global and
national catastrophe at some unspecified time in the future. Preserving
Washington’s One China policy and strategic ambiguity are the best approaches to
maintain Taiwan’s autonomy.”
Some have
also questioned: why now? For Pelosi, it may simply be electoral arithmetic as
she seems poised to lose the speaker’s gavel to Republicans in November’s
midterm elections and, at the age of 82, potentially retire. The Taiwan visit
could be the culmination of a long career calling out Beijing’s human rights
abuses.
But for
critics, while the cause is just, the timing is off. Thomas Friedman, an
opinion columnist at the New York Times, described the visit as “utterly
reckless, dangerous and irresponsible”, not least because the White House has
been involved in delicate negotiations to prevent China providing military
assistance to Russia in Ukraine.
Bonnie
Glaser, director of the Asia programme at the US-based German Marshall Fund
thinktank, argues that it would have been better to wait until after the
Chinese Communist party’s 20th national congress later this year, when Xi is
expected to secure a third term, and after the US clarifies its Taiwan policy.
Biden raised eyebrows earlier this year by promising to defend the island
militarily, throwing the longstanding policy of “strategic ambiguity” into
doubt.
Glaser
said: “There have been many statements about our policy toward Taiwan, some of
which have been contradictory, and there is a need for some consistency and
clarity in US policy. One of the reasons why China is responding as it is – and
there are many drivers – is that they are losing confidence in the US
commitment to One China and they see a gap between US words and deeds.
“The
Chinese see a need to bolster their red lines to head off a bigger crisis with
the United States down the road. They want to get US attention and react
strongly enough now so that they can avoid a crisis later that might lead to a
decision in China that they have to use force in order to stop the United
States from going down this path. There is a need for the US to be more
consistent and more disciplined.”
Indeed,
China’s foreign affairs ministry wasted no time in condemning Pelosi’s visit,
saying it “has a severe impact on the political foundation of China-US
relations, and seriously infringes upon China’s sovereignty and territorial
integrity”. It could respond by breaching Taiwan’s air defense identification
zone or firing missiles into the Taiwan Strait – risking an accident that leads
to escalation.
Democrats
around the world may thank Pelosi for making a stand against autocrats – while
praying that she can also keep the peace.
.webp)
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário