Why this moment for gun politics is different
The response to recent mass shootings will serve as a
measure of how much Democrats can achieve when they occupy the commanding
heights.
By DAVID
SIDERS
03/24/2021
02:21 PM EDT
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/03/24/gun-reform-movement-opportunity-477740
If fallout
from the nation’s two most recent mass shootings runs to form, calls for
stricter gun laws on the left will meet resistance from the right. Washington
will gridlock, and the media will move on.
But the
current debate is taking place under an uncommon alignment of the political
stars, creating a unique moment in the arc of gun politics. Democrats control
the White House and both houses of Congress for the first time since 2011.
Public polling reflects widespread support for background checks and other gun
measures, while the National Rifle Association — a traditional power in
Republican Party politics — has been crippled by financial problems and
infighting.
For the gun
reform movement — a centerpiece of the Democratic Party’s agenda for at least a
quarter century — the question this week has become, if not now, when?
“This is
the moment,” said Shannon Watts, founder of the advocacy group Moms Demand
Action. “The NRA is sidelined by bankruptcy, and we have a gun-sense trifecta
in the White House, the Senate and the House.”
The
shootings in Boulder, Colo., on Monday and in Georgia last week did not just
restart America’s on-again, off-again hostilities over guns. The November
election tilted the field in Democrats’ favor. More than after any shooting in
the past decade, the party’s response to the killings in Colorado and Georgia
will serve as a measure of how much Democrats can achieve when they occupy the
commanding heights.
It’s a
pivotal moment for gun politics. The history of midterm elections suggests
Democrats are at risk of losing the House next year, shrinking their window for
legislative victories.
“The time
is definitely now,” said Peter Ambler, executive director of the gun-control
group Giffords. “We can’t wait.”
It’s in no
small part due to the changing demographics and voting behavior of Georgia and
Colorado that gun reform is on the table in Washington at all. It was the
January runoff elections in Georgia, only recently a solidly Republican state,
that gave Democrats their functional majority in the Senate.
Colorado,
now reliably Democratic after years as a swing state, sent John Hickenlooper to
the Senate in November, defeating the Republican incumbent, Cory Gardner, by
nearly 10 percentage points. And in Colorado, in particular, there are reasons
for Democrats to find optimism in the gun reform movement. Nowhere near a
bastion of far-left politics, lawmakers there nevertheless have enacted
stricter gun laws in recent years. So had the city of Boulder, where a locally
passed assault weapons ban was blocked by a judge earlier this month. Lawmakers
are discussing potential legislation in response — to allow cities to enact
more stringent gun laws than the state.
Tom
Sullivan, a Colorado state lawmaker who sought elected office after his son,
Alex, was killed in the Aurora theater shooting in 2012, said the climate
surrounding gun legislation has “obviously” shifted — as evidenced by his own
election and those of other survivors of victims of gun violence, including
Rep. Lucy McBath of Georgia, whose teenage son was shot to death in 2012. Gun
control was a winning issue for Democrats in some congressional swing districts
nationally in the midterm elections in 2018.
“We can run
on this issue, and we can win elections on this issue,” Sullivan said. “Quite
obviously, the tone has changed.”
Democrats,
of course, lack a filibuster-proof majority. And at least one Senate Democrat,
West Virginia’s Joe Manchin, hails from one of the most pro-gun states in the
nation. But even if legislation ultimately fails in Washington, holding a vote
on a major gun reform bill could be politically significant ahead of the
midterm elections next year. For Democrats, said Floyd Ciruli, a Denver-based
pollster, such legislation “would be, at least to some extent, to get a vote on
it and be able to use it in suburban districts” in Colorado and across the
country.
Still,
Colorado is also the state of Lauren Boebert, the gun-toting congresswoman who
said after the Boulder shooting that she would not “blame society at large for
the sick actions of one man and I will not allow lawbreakers to dictate the
rights of law-abiding citizens.” And she is far from alone in her conference.
While Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has said he will force a vote on
background checks, the legislation’s prospects of drawing the 60 votes necessary
to overcome a filibuster appear dim.
In Colorado
as it is nationally, said Dick Wadhams, a former Colorado Republican Party
chair and longtime party strategist, “It’s a complicated issue for both
parties.”
“It’s a
thorny issue in the suburbs for Republicans,” he said. “It’s a thorny issue for
Democrats in the rural areas.”
Gun
control, like almost everything else, took a back seat in last year’s elections
to concerns about the coronavirus pandemic and then-President Donald Trump’s
handling of it. With fewer people gathering, public mass shootings were down
last year, too, according to The Associated Press.
But as
people have begun to reemerge in public, a gunman killed eight people at three
Atlanta-area spas last week. On Monday, a shooter killed 10 people at a grocery
store in Boulder — including at least one person who was in line for a vaccine.
And for the first time in a decade, advocates of stricter gun laws had a
Democratic president and a Democratic-controlled Congress — though narrowly in
the Senate — to turn to.
“As we
begin to emerge from Covid, there is this emerging sense of foreboding now
among Americans … that what we’re going to return to is going to be constant
headlines about gun violence,” Ambler said. “We can’t let that be the American
experience. That can’t be how we as a nation emerge from the trauma of Covid.
We can’t go reeling from pandemic to epidemic.”
He said,
“In some way, shape or form, the Senate as an institution needs to respond to
this crisis.”
Mathew
Littman, a Democratic strategist and executive director of the gun reform group
97 Percent, said of universal background checks that “it’s ridiculous that it
hasn’t happened. Absolutely ridiculous.”
The gun
control debate has put more pressure on Democrats to abandon the legislative
filibuster in the Senate, broadening the range of constituencies lobbying for
the change. Lonnie Phillips, whose daughter was killed in Aurora and who now
advocates on behalf of survivors of gun violence, said, “The best thing that
can happen right now — the one thing I would give everything up for — is get
rid of the filibuster so we can pass some laws.”
But
Phillips and other gun control advocates are frustrated not only with the
Senate, but with President Joe Biden, who has yet to fulfill a campaign promise
to take unilateral action on gun violence. Phillips’ wife, Sandy, said that “we
were so hopeful that the president would follow through on his promises on Day
One. And that hasn’t happened.”
A
first-hand witness to political difficulties surrounding the issue, Biden was
an author of the now-expired assault weapons ban while in the Senate in 1994.
Later, as vice president, he assumed an instrumental role in a major push for
gun control legislation following the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary in
2012, the failure of which in the Senate marked one of the most significant
defeats of President Barack Obama’s second term.
Biden said
Tuesday that he does not want to “wait another minute” to address gun violence,
calling on Congress to act while his administration considers measures he could
take on his own.
If
Democrats seizing control of Washington raised the expectations of gun reform
advocates, it will also make any defeat that much more painful.
Looking
back over 12 years of disappointment on the issue, Lonnie Phillips said, “Obama
couldn’t get it done, and of course, Trump made it worse, if that’s possible,”
adding that Biden “hasn’t lived up to his promise.”
“Yeah,” he
said. “We’re at a frustrating point.”


Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário