France defeats EU push to prune back vineyard
protections
Wine industry holds onto planting limits that it says
prevent ‘Coca-Cola wine’ from flooding the market.
BY EDDY WAX
February
19, 2021 1:14 pm
https://www.politico.eu/article/france-wins-wine-battle-with-brussels-vineyard-protection/
France may
be a nation of wine drinkers but its government wants grapes to be grown in
moderation.
The country
of Chablis and Champagne has won a battle in Brussels to prolong special EU
rules that were designed to stop wine flooding the markets by tightly capping
the growth of Europe’s vineyards.
Winegrowers
enjoy these protections which guarantee them profits and predictability, on top
of their generous EU farm subsidies, but the French victory is a blow to the
European Commission, which has spent years arguing they are strangling the
sector and preventing it from modernizing in an era of rising global competition
and climate change.
As the
future EU farm policy is hammered out in Brussels, the Commission’s
liberalizing agenda was outgunned by a French-led coalition of wine-growing
countries and powerful industry lobbyists determined to cling onto a system
they say preserves Europe's patchwork model of family-run vineyards, as opposed
to larger scale production in countries like the U.S. and Australia.
“By
managing the potential of production and maintaining more or less the current
level, we can guarantee this mosaic effect," said Thierry Coste, a French
winegrower from EU farmers’ lobby Copa & Cogeca, who warned that pruning
back the vine rules could lead to an "industrial, Coca-Cola kind of
wine" taking root in Europe.
Under EU
rules, farmers in the bloc's main wine-producing countries such as France,
Spain and Italy, can only grow grapes if they obtain special vine-planting
permits, which are in limited supply because each year a country can only
expand its vineyards by 1 percent of the space they already take up.
Producers
of top-of-the-range wines from Bordeaux to Rioja who benefit from lucrative EU
labels that secure their intellectual property and increase their market access
abroad, are afraid that an oversupply of wine will devalue their precious
vintages.
The French
and Spanish governments agree, warning in an 11-country declaration last year
that “untangled deregulation would lead to an industrialization of wine
production and to the disappearance of family holdings."
During
closed-door negotiations in recent weeks on the Common Agricultural Policy
(CAP) reform, EU governments and the European Parliament struck a provisional
deal to extend the supply controls from their planned end in 2030 until 2045,
three EU diplomats told POLITICO. The Commission wanted no decision to be taken
until after a scheduled review in 2023.
French
Socialist lawmaker Éric Andrieu, who was the Parliament’s lead on the file and
was pushing for an extension to 2050, can claim an almost total success, while
his shadow rapporteur and compatriot Anne Sander, a center-right MEP, welcomed
the deal as “great news.”
France vs.
the Commission
The
French-driven agreement was tied up despite dire warnings from the Commission
about the long-term consequences of maintaining such a system.
EU civil
servants say the extension will lock in exorbitant land prices barring younger,
greener and more innovative farmers from replenishing Europe's ageing stock of
winegrowers, and that it leaves the sector ill-prepared to respond to the
curveball of climate change or variations in the kinds of wine consumers want
to drink.
"There
is no political and economic justification for the continuation of these
restrictions," a Commission spokesperson said, as CAP talks kicked off
late last year.
The
Commission wants to chip away at the unique protections enjoyed by the wine
industry, which is now the only agricultural sector in the bloc to still
benefit from cushy production quotas, after Brussels abolished limits on sugar
and dairy in recent years.
But winegrowers’
lobbyists appear to have dug a deep moat around the EU protections they
currently enjoy, no doubt emboldened by their experience during the last reform
of the CAP, when they helped to topple plans cooked up by EU governments to
fully liberalize the wine market.
Seeing
itself outmuscled, the Commission acquiesced to an extension of the system
during CAP talks in recent weeks, on the proviso that the annual limit be
doubled to 2 percent after 2030, according to an insider who is familiar with
the Commission's position in the talks.
"The
risk is that there will be a legal challenge from a young winegrower [for
example] in Provence, to say it is rigged, there’s no access to the sector and
it’s basically a privileged few who enjoy a monopoly," the person said.
But that
appears to have got short shrift from the other EU institutions and was
publicly rejected as “detrimental” by EU wine lobbyists such as independent
winegrowers’ group CEVI.
What is
more, young farmers themselves are against it.
“A limit of
1 percent is not limiting access for young farmers to get access to new
plantations,” said Samuel Masse, a 32-year-old French farmer who grows organic
grapes outside Montpellier, said over the phone, as the sound of his electric
vine-pruning shears whirred in the background.
Masse, who
is the president of the European Council of Young Farmers, said the 1 percent
limit is crucial for securing high-quality wine production and decent incomes
for farmers but that the system should be tweaked so that young farmers are
first in line for authorizations.
Fizzing for
flexibility
Italy, the
bloc's largest exporter by volume, has a more nuanced stance than France or the
bulk of the EU winegrowers’ lobby when it comes to the future of vine planting.
That is
partly down to a boom in demand for Italian wines such as Prosecco, which has
led to a gold-rush for new planting rights in the north east of the country,
and is prompting some growers to chafe at the restrictions of the EU supply
controls.
Although
only around 7,000 hectares of new vineyards were up for grabs in 2018 in Italy,
requests were made to plant some 64,000 hectares, far more than in any other
country where the same EU scheme applies, according to Commission stats.
Italy's
wine lobby doesn't want a higher percentage cap, but it would like the system
to allow countries to recycle the authorizations that are currently lost when a
vineyard is abandoned.
There may
still be time for the Italians to get their way in the CAP talks because
nothing is agreed until everything is agreed, and the negotiations aren’t
expected to be finalized until May.
Wine mulled
The
Commission's agenda is also being rejected because of the grim prospect of
slashing away the protective vine limits just as Europe's wine sellers are
finding themselves hemmed in by eye-watering U.S. tariffs and restaurant
closures.
“In this
moment, liberalization could produce a severe impact on the sector," said
Roberta Sardone, from CREA, an agricultural research center linked to the
Italian farm ministry.
But although
Sardone said a full bonfire of red tape would be too risky, she nevertheless
argued the current way the system functions is overly burdensome.
She also
said the limitations bode ill for the onslaught of climate change, which has
already started forcing growers to turn to consider more heat-resistant grape
varieties or change their hallowed planting techniques.
Spain —
another giant wine producer, which has backed the French push — only uses half
of its 1 percent quota for vineyard expansion, justifying its super-cautious
approach by arguing that climate change risks turbo-charging wine production.
"Climate
change is readily evolving and all this may require more capability of the
sector to adapt to the new conditions. And I think that this scheme is a limit
to this development,” Sardone said.
Giorgio Leali contributed reporting.


Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário