David
Sirota and Andrew Perez
The details of the two tales vary, but the narrative
arcs are eerily similar
Sun 21 Feb
2021 11.16 GMT
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/feb/21/andrew-cuomo-lincoln-project-disasters
In the
chaos of 2020, the national press corps used all of its magical myth-making and
storytelling powers to conjure two towering political heroes for a country in
crisis. From the maw of the media machine, the New York governor, Andrew Cuomo,
and the Lincoln Project emerged as our alleged sentinels bravely battling a
deadly pandemic and an authoritarian president – and supposedly leading us with
principles and morality into a new era of accountability and integrity.
For
millions of credulous liberals already bingeing on West Wing reruns, the twin
tales conjured some more of that good old-fashioned hope-and-change nostalgia,
and seemed to serve as a cheeky reminder that not all heroes wear capes. But in
the last week, the facade has collapsed, revealing that those bravely trying to
sound the alarm for months were right all along – and those benefiting from the
media-driven fraud were attempting to evade accountability and self-servingly
cover up a grotesquerie of mismanagement, corruption and abuse.
Will the
wrongdoers face any consequences or accountability? Or will they be treated
like the purveyors of previous frauds, like the Iraq war and the financial
crisis, and continue to be platformed and valorized by the press corps? And
will our media overlords engage in any self-reflection about the monsters they
manufactured?
The details
of the two tales vary, but the narrative arcs are eerily similar. That they
crescendoed in the same single news cycle makes their cautionary tales all the
more poignant.
In Cuomo’s
case, the Democratic governor’s aides were caught on tape effectively admitting
that they “froze” and did not release the details of thousands of nursing home
deaths from Covid-19 because they feared consequences from federal law
enforcement officials.
“We were in
a position where we weren’t sure if what we were going to give to the
Department of Justice, or what we give to you guys, and what we start saying,
was going to be used against us,” Cuomo’s top aide told New York legislators on
Wednesday. The comments were first reported by the New York Post.
No doubt,
Trump’s justice department was as highly politicized as Cuomo advisers feared –
but that is hardly a legitimate justification for hiding details of thousands
of deaths. And the framing of it as some innocent, unplanned,
deer-in-the-headlights slip-up is absurd, considering the context.
Cuomo’s
administration hid the nursing home casualty data after his administration
slipped provisions into the state budget that helped the governor’s largest
healthcare industry donors obtain legal immunity for nursing home executives.
At the
time, New York legislators like Assemblyman Ron Kim were arguing that such
liability shields were endangering nursing home residents by removing the
threat of lawsuits against nursing home companies that tried to maximize
profits by cutting corners. “Revisionist history aside, this measure was
approved by 111 state legislators — and in more than 12 other states — and was
necessary for facilities to increase capacity, take on healthcare professionals
from across the nation, and fight this pandemic as it was killing New Yorkers
and information was sparse,” Cuomo spokesperson Rich Azzopardi said in a
statement to The Daily Poster. “I understand the politics here, but let’s be
real: If we didn’t do this, our entire healthcare apparatus would have
collapsed — period.” Kim and his allies were successful in repealing and
limiting some aspects of those liability shields in August, but later that
month it became clear the Cuomo administration had not been adequately
disclosing details of the ongoing decimation occurring in nursing homes.
As the
nursing home death toll mounted, the media campaign to valorize the governor
intensified
In effect,
burying the casualty information constructed two liability shields: one for a
healthcare industry that dumped millions into New York Democratic party
coffers, and another for Cuomo himself. It deprived Kim and other legislators
of real-time data buttressing their arguments to halt the corporate immunity
law (which was being replicated by other states and by Republicans in
Congress). It also shielded the governor from political blowback for both his
mismanagement of the crisis and his fealty to donors.
That said,
Cuomo’s political liability shield could only exist because the media built it
for him. As the death toll mounted in New York, whistleblowers like Kim were
all but ignored by a press corps giving Cuomo largely uncritical wall-to-wall
coverage, depicting him as a swashbuckling lionheart saving his state from
certain doom.
CNN granted
Cuomo a recurring primetime segment with his own brother, which was predictably
used to pump up the governor. In one particularly noxious segment weeks after
Cuomo helped his hospital-industry donors insert the corporate immunity
provisions into the state budget, his brother remarked on all of the governor’s
fawning press coverage, declaring: “You’re feeling pretty good about yourself
these days, aren’t you?”
As the
nursing home death toll mounted, the media campaign to valorize the governor
intensified, based on Cuomo’s press conferences. “Help, I Think I’m In Love
With Andrew Cuomo?” Jezebel wrote. Vogue filed a similar piece, headlined: “Why
We Are Crushing on Andrew Cuomo Right Now.”
“The
governor of New York found himself at the center of a deadly crisis,” Rolling
Stone wrote. “His response has helped guide the nation.”
Ultimately,
as New York racked up the nation’s highest body count, and the press ignored
Cuomo’s Democratic critics in the legislature, this deification all culminated
in a macabre scene: standing in the shadow of his own Mount Covid, Cuomo
received a six-figure deal to write a book about his leadership, and he was
awarded an Emmy for his television performances.
Meanwhile,
more than 13,000 nursing home residents in the state have died.
While the
disaster in New York was unfolding, the Lincoln Project was busy launching one
of the most self-enriching political enterprises in history.
Here was a
group of top Republican operatives who had spent their entire careers building
the arch-conservative foundations of the modern Republican party. This rogues’
gallery is led by none other than Steve Schmidt, the operative who helped lift
Sarah Palin out of obscurity and turn her into the precursor of Trump himself,
and who still to this day openly brags about having run the campaigns to
install rightwing justices on the US supreme court.
But in
2020, the group saw a lucrative opportunity to suddenly pretend to be offended
by the Republican party they had built, producing cheesy anti-Trump YouTube
videos designed to separate liberal cable news viewers from their money and
funnel it into their political consulting firms.
This gambit
could not have succeeded without the national press corps. Indeed, the entire
project was created by a media that granted these Republican operatives laudatory
headlines and cable TV news sinecures, billing them as earnest warriors for
truth, justice and the American way – and hardly ever asking them about either
their own own culpability in creating the Republican party or about the merit
of their new ads.
As a
political project, the plan bombed. Data proved the group’s spots were largely
ineffective in swaying voters against Trump, and Trump won more Republican
votes than he did in 2016.
But in
other respects, the Lincoln Project was wildly successful. In one emblematic
segment, fabulist Brian Williams used his cable TV platform to pretend the
group swung the entire 2020 election, and most news outlets never mentioned how
lucrative it all was. The Associated Press recently reported that “of the $90m
Lincoln Project has raised, more than $50m has gone to firms controlled by the
group’s leaders.”
Thanks to
the pundits’ reputation-laundering of the Lincoln Project’s leaders, they
appeared to be positioned to launch their own media outlet.
Only now do
we learn that while the group was vacuuming up those tens of millions dollars
and its leaders were being promoted on TV, Lincoln Project team members were
reportedly hearing allegations that one of its co-founders, John Weaver, had
been sexually harassing young men and pitching them on job opportunities at the
Lincoln Project.
The Lincoln
Project offered a statement late last month saying it was “shocked” by the
claims against Weaver, but according to New York Magazine, “the allegations
against Weaver were an open secret in the company.” The magazine spoke to one
person who recalled Schmidt and consultant Rick Wilson joking with other staff
over drinks about how Weaver was “twisted” and “depraved”.
While
struggling to contain the fallout from the Weaver story, the Lincoln Project
has reverted to Republican form, deploying the same ugly, authoritarian tactics
it had purported to stand against as it pitched itself to liberal donors during
the 2020 election.
On
Thursday, the Lincoln Project sought to spike a story by a reporter talking to
one of its former consultants, Jennifer Horn. The group had already tried to smear
Horn as greedy on her way out and significantly escalated their attacks by
posting apparent screenshots from Horn’s private Twitter messages with the
journalist.
The group
deleted its tweets after former co-founder George Conway wrote: “This looks on its
face to be a violation of federal law and should be taken down immediately.”
The Cuomo
and Lincoln Project debacles are about different things, but they are both
examples of the pervasive culture of impunity. America likes to tell itself it
is about law and order, but its political religion promotes lawlessness and
chaos. That religion is supported by an entire political and media
infrastructure that typically rewards perpetrators and punishes whistleblowers.
With the
end of the Trump presidency, we’ve been told that we are entering a new era of
accountability: one of Biden’s own speechwriters has asserted that “there must
be accountability for lies and lawbreaking and we must learn from our mistakes
… You cannot heal wounds you choose to ignore.”
Cuomo and
the Lincoln Project offer an opportunity to finally make that pivot – but it
isn’t clear that will happen.
In the
former case, New York legislators can strip Cuomo of his emergency powers and
impeach him and the state’s Democratic-controlled law enforcement apparatus can
fully investigate the situation – as can the Biden justice department. At the
same time, the national press corps can stop genuflecting to the governor and
start listening to the warnings of his critics.
In the case
of the Lincoln Project, the press response is even more significant. The group
isn’t an elected official in a public office with inherent relevance and
authority. It is instead a pure creation of the media itself – meaning that the
press corps effectively gets to decide if the organization faces accountability
or not.
So far, it
looks like “not”. The Fox News media critic Howard Kurtz alleged that MSNBC put
Lincoln Project members on its airwaves 17 times after the Weaver allegations
first surfaced. In fact, even as details of the scandal exploded in the last 24
hours, MSNBC today opted to continue providing a platform to the group to
continue to present itself as a legitimate, forthright and credible political
player in the post-Trump era.
To be sure,
Cuomo’s Republican critics and the Lincoln Project’s Trump-aligned critics are
hardly acting in good faith without an agenda. They have axes to grind, and
they don’t have much credibility themselves.
But that
doesn’t negate the deeper questions here.
Will this
be a moment of accountability?
Or will it
go the other way? Will it be a moment when media organizations permanently
establish that infrastructure of impunity, to the point where a governor can
now get away with hiding a death toll and a GOP political group can retain its
megaphone amid a sordid harassment scandal?


Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário