quarta-feira, 30 de outubro de 2019

California wildfires: how bad are they and is the climate crisis linked?



California wildfires: how bad are they and is the climate crisis linked?
Firefighters across the state are racing to control flames exacerbated by extreme winds. Is this normal?

Guardian staff
Mon 28 Oct 2019 23.58 GMTLast modified on Tue 29 Oct 2019 14.57 GMT

Thousands of firefighters are battling wind-fueled wildfires across California, as warm temperatures, strong winds and low humidity turned the state into a “tinderbox”.

Gavin Newsom, the California governor, declared a state of emergency on 27 October, as crews worked to control several large blazes, including the Tick fire in the Santa Clarita Valley and a brush fire near the Getty Museum in Los Angeles. The largest of the fires, the Kincade fire in Sonoma county, forced almost 200,000 people to evacuate.

Meanwhile, millions of people across California are without power, as utilities blacked out entire swathes of the state in an effort to prevent more blazes. Extreme weather has contributed to the wildfires’ intensity. The past weekend saw a “historic” wind event in the northern San Francisco Bay Area with gusts of nearly 100mph. “I’ve been in the business 30 years and I’ve never seen anything like this,” said Steve Anderson, a forecaster in the San Francisco office of the National Weather Service.

Here’s what else you need to know about the crisis:

Is this normal, or is it global heating?
Wildfires are part of life in California and a natural part of the ecosystem, and autumn is the traditional high-risk season for fires to break out.

However, experts broadly agree that the climate crisis is making the conditions for wildfires worse, and extending the season for longer.

Since 1970, temperatures in the western US have increased by about double the global average, lengthening the western wildfire season by several months and drying out large tracts of forests, making them more fire-prone.

“Climate change is increasing the vulnerability of many forests to ecosystem changes and tree mortality through fire, insect infestations, drought and disease outbreaks,” a major climate assessment by the US government states.

Cal Fire, the state’s wildfire disaster agency, says that “while wildfires are a natural part of California’s landscape, the fire season in California and across the west is starting earlier and ending later each year. Climate change is considered a key driver of this trend.”

Prominent figures, including the congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and the environmental scholar Bill McKibben, have called the fires an urgent reminder that we need to cut carbon emissions drastically or face irreversible climate breakdown.

Why are there power outages?
California’s power companies fear that their equipment may start new fires amid high-risk weather conditions, including the fierce winds the state saw in past days. Rather than risk trees toppling power lines or other equipment malfunctioning, Pacific Gas & Electricity and Southern California Edison have preventively cut off power to more than a million customers, sometimes for days on end.

PG&E, California’s largest utility company, filed for bankruptcy in January as a result of numerous litigation over its role in the 2017 northern California fires and the 2018 Camp fire, the deadliest in state history.

The current power shutoff is not the first this year, but it is the largest so far and unprecedented in the state’s history.

Authorities have not yet confirmed what sparked the Kincade fire, but PG&E said a 230,000-volt transmission line near the wine-country town of Geyserville malfunctioned minutes before that blaze erupted on Wednesday night.

What’s going on with the wind?
Strong fall winds are typical in California, so typical in fact that local residents refer to them by proper names – “the Diablos” in the north and “the Santa Anas” in the south.

The winds are caused when high-pressure air inland warms, dries and picks up speed as it travels down the Sierra Nevada mountains toward the Pacific coast.

This year’s record heat in Alaska, as well as unseasonable cold in other western US states, have made that wind pattern even more extreme than usual.

How do these fires compare to previous years?
The 2017 and 2018 were the two deadliest wildfire years on record. The Kincade fire is still only a fraction of the size of the 2017 northern California fires, which killed 44, and there have been no fatalities linked to the fires yet.

But in a state still reeling from the aftermath of the 2017 fires, as well as the 2018 Camp fire in Paradise, which left 86 dead, the shadow of previous disasters is looming large. Rebuilding in places like Paradise has only begun, while some people have only recently returned home now face having to leave again.

And from northern California to Los Angeles, residents are grappling with the sinking sense of that their state has become unlivable amid a “new normal” of debilitating heat, an endless fire season, mandatory mass evacuations and forced power shutdowns to prevent new blazes.

Brexit reduced to a petty squabble. Classic Dom


 
Boris Johnson’s special adviser, Dominic Cummings, arrives in Downing Street with the appropriate headgear for a December election. Photograph: Mark Thomas/REX/Shutterstock

General election 2019
Brexit reduced to a petty squabble. Classic Dom
John Crace
Johnson and Corbyn only cared about election timing – leaving this parliament to expire as it had lived. A laughing stock

 @JohnJCrace
Tue 29 Oct 2019 21.14 GMTLast modified on Tue 29 Oct 2019 21.20 GMT

It came down to a matter of days. Once Lindsay Hoyle, the deputy speaker, a man with both eyes on the top job had – as expected – chosen not to select amendments on EU citizens and votes for 16-year-olds, the only issue was about timing.

The Tories wanted 12 December because that was the day they had first thought of and didn’t want to look like they were making any concessions. So tough. So brave. Classic Dom. Not wanting to be looking like the only leader too timid to vote for an election, Jeremy Corbyn muscled in on the Lib Dems and the SNP to insist that it took place on 9 December instead.

Nine was the magic number. The only day that could possibly do. Partly because it would get darker three minutes later. But mainly because it wasn’t the date the Conservatives had picked. Too bad – 12 December it was. Brexit reduced to a petty squabble over something entirely trivial, because it was far too hard to consider the things that really mattered. This parliament was determined to expire as it had lived. A laughing stock.

Proceedings had begun with Jacob Rees-Mogg putting forward a truncated programme motion to allow the government to pass its general election bill inside six hours. It was a simple matter, he said. For once he was almost telling the truth, as all the opposition parties had already indicated they would pretty much vote for whatever was put in front of them. Many MPs are now so Brexited out, they are incapable of rational thought. Rather, it’s become a race to be the last party to lose consciousness.

Once Stella Creasy’s amendment to allow further amendments at the committee stage of the bill had been passed, it was over to Boris Johnson to open the debate. The Chronicle of a Death Foretold. The death in question being that of the entire UK, which was about to get six weeks of the same mediocrities telling the same lies and making the same unverifiable claims. The cruellest of punishments for a country hellbent on slipping out of the G7.

In his dreams – those private moments he spends in front of the mirror, serenading the person he loves best – the prime minister is the master orator. The man with the golden voice who can charm all those with whom he comes in contact. The reality is that he struggles for coherence, his voice barking out subconscious pleas for help via morse code. A speaker who can just about scrape by as a feelgood after-dinner turn, recycling the same tired gags, but lacks the sincerity and concentration to survive sustained scrutiny. The only thing he really cares about is himself.

Johnson had opened on auto-pilot. Labour had blocked Brexit by forcing him to have a massive sulk once MPs had insisted on having more than three days to debate his withdrawal agreement. The extension to the end of January would cost the UK an extra £1bn per month. Both statements blatantly untrue, but sure to be dragged out in every stump speech throughout the election campaign until enough people – possibly even Boris himself, if his lack of conscience allowed – came to accept as fact.

As so often, Johnson then began to get bored with saying the same stuff he had said the day before and the day before that. So he just ad-libbed. The Commons chamber is really only an extension of the Oxford Union for him, with Tory backbenchers merely fawning acolytes. If anything, his contempt for his own MPs exceeds that for the opposition. There was no apology for breaking a commitment he had made to leave – “do or die” – by 31 October. Just a long moan about how difficult Brexit had become. It was the most passionate argument in favour of remain anyone was to make all day. Classic Dom.

Corbyn had more than enough fantasies of his own. It was a complete lie that Labour had consistently resisted the chance to contest an election. The party had been gagging for one all along and it was only the absurd contortions of the Tories that had prevented one. Then he went into full stump mode. This wasn’t an election about Brexit. It was an election about public services and austerity. No one on the Labour front bench could quite bring themselves to break it to their leader that the entire reason the election was taking place was because of Brexit. The other stuff was nice and worth a mention but this was a Brexit election.

Unbelievably, these opening speeches were pretty much the highpoint. Ian Blackford merely shrugged and said an election was a win-win for the SNP. If the Tories were defeated then all well and good but if they won then Scottish independence was one step closer. Bill Cash merely gave the edited highlights of all his speeches over the past 40 years. He won’t be missed. Not even by himself.

“I’m going to carry on with my thoughts,” declared the Tory Vicky Ford to the astonishment of the five MPs left in the house. Because it hadn’t been obvious up till then that she had had any. One can only feel sorry for her constituents. Bob Seely wondered out loud why no one appeared to trust Boris before realising he had answered his own question. Because he’s Boris.

The one standout moment was a passionate defence of futility from Labour’s Jess Phillips. The coming election would not answer any of the questions that had precipitated it. People would interpret the results to suit their own ends, she argued, and Brexit wouldn’t be resolved for years.

All that was happening was that MPs had run out of ideas. An election was an admission of collective failure. Unable to resolve their differences, MPs had turned their sights on each other. A collective act of self-harm. We were heading for the Gunfight at the OK Corral. There would be blood. Many MPs wouldn’t be back in December. But everyone was banking on the fact it wouldn’t be them.

John Crace’s new book, Decline and Fail: Read in Case of Political Apocalypse, is published by Guardian Faber. To order a copy go to guardianbookshop.com or call 0330 333 6846. Free UK p&p over £15, online orders only. Phone orders min. p&p of £1.99

Um “passe social” para a Cultura



Um “passe social” para a Cultura

No programa do Governo que agora inicia funções, de tantas vezes se “repensar a Cultura”, parece que a imaginação se esgotou. E nada se diz quanto àquela que poderia ser a mais eficaz medida de promoção da cidadania cultural.

Luís Raposo
30 de Outubro de 2019, 7:32

Em entrevista publicada neste jornal, a directora do Mosteiro dos Jerónimos e da Torre de Belém advogou bilhetes mais baratos para os portugueses, naqueles monumentos pelo menos. Houve quem aplaudisse e chamasse a atenção para casos ainda mais escandalosos, como os de Serralves ou da Parques de Sintra, empresas de capitais públicos que, pelos preços praticados (mesmo aos domingos de manhã, ou seja, em desafio da norma estabelecida pelo anterior Governo), obrigam famílias inteiras a voltar para trás. Houve quem discordasse devido à inconsistência política, ou até flagrante ilegalidade à luz do direito europeu, de discriminações com base em nacionalidades.

Julgo que ambos os lados têm razão. A proposta de preços mais baixos, ou até de gratuitidades muito mais alargadas, faz sentido e é motivada por preocupações pertinentes, mas seria insustentável, nos termos exactos em que foi apresentada. O ponto é que existem alternativas. Uma delas, a mais recuada, é a que foi adoptada pelo “governo da geringonça”. Recordo conversa que tive com o ministro Luís Filipe Castro Mendes, na qual lhe disse que o ICOM Europa já tinha estudado o problema e havia uma solução simples: praticar preços especiais não com base no critério da nacionalidade, mas no da residência – o que depois veio a ser adoptado. Mas apontei também naquela altura para horizonte bem mais audacioso, que infelizmente não foi prosseguido. Falei, usando algo que estava no então programa governativo, do chamado “cartão Cultura +”, que surgia a meus olhos como algo estimável, mas pífio (tão pífio que se finou antes de nascer). Assim chamado, ou de outra qualquer forma, o que verdadeiramente estaria em causa, e continua a estar, seria aplicar à Cultura o conceito, e bem assim o ímpeto social, que depois se viu na revolução do “passe social” nos transportes.

No programa do Governo que agora inicia funções, de tantas vezes se “repensar a Cultura”, parece que a imaginação se esgotou. Fala-se novamente em “lotaria do património” (o que será bom se for bem feito, quer dizer, se se tornar regular, como noutros países europeus, e não somente uma iniciativa celebratória ou ocasional), acenam-se depois cenouras sem grande substância estrutural (como bem poderá ser a campanha “um cidadão, um euro” e certamente será a baixa magia de conferir à Cultura, em final da legislatura, 2% do orçamento “discricionário” – que bem sabemos ser contingente e muito reduzido, não podendo além do mais acorrer aos investimentos estruturais em despesas fixas, nomeadamente com pessoal, de que se carece como de pão para a boca). No resto, postulam-se generalidades. Mas nada se diz quanto àquela que poderia ser a mais eficaz medida de promoção da cidadania cultural.

O que fazer, então? Bom, creio ser tão simples como o ovo de Colombo: o Governo deveria legislar no sentido da criação de um “passe Cultura” que favorecesse o acesso à mesma, mediante a prática de preços reduzidos, ou no limite da gratuitidade, em função dos rendimentos pessoais e/ou do agregado familiar, em sede de IRS. O passe em questão, sempre pessoal e nominativo, poderia ser obtido automaticamente, aquando da emissão dos comprovativos de liquidação do imposto. Poderia ser enviado pela administração fiscal ou descarregado pelos contribuintes. Alternativamente, poderia ser por estes requerido em repartições de finanças, lojas e espaços do cidadão ou juntas de freguesia.

À partida, este cartão, ou passe, deveria incluir as instituições directamente administradas pelo Ministério da Cultura (desde logo os museus, monumentos e teatros nacionais) e por outros organismos governamentais ou de capitais exclusivamente públicos (caso da Imprensa Nacional, cujas edições deveriam ser acessíveis mediantes descontos generosos; casos de Serralves, da Parques de Sintra ou da Fundação Côa Parque, entre outros). Só isso já lhe daria indiscutível validade. Mas, com a dinâmica gerada, deveria ser negociado o envolvimento de outras entidades, autárquicas, associativas, fundacionais e privadas. Estou certo que muitas haveriam de querer aderir, nuns casos com a devida compensação por parte do Estado, noutros mesmo sem isso, porque os descontos praticados seriam contrabalançados pelo aumento das receitas em visitantes, espectadores ou compradores. Criar-se-ia, desejavelmente, uma espécie de bola de neve em que todos ganhariam: os residentes pagadores de impostos em Portugal (portugueses na sua esmagadora maioria, claro), que veriam o acesso à Cultura embaratecido, no limite gratuito, toda a fileira de instituições e entidades fornecedoras de conteúdos culturais, que veriam o mercado aumentar consideravelmente, e também o Estado, pela promoção da maior fruição cultural por parte dos cidadãos. Os museus e monumentos nacionais, em especial, veriam finalmente reconhecido o seu estatuto de suportes estruturantes das políticas da Cultura e âncoras do contrato nacional.

Repito que é como na questão dos passes sociais para os transportes: o ovo de Colombo. Só faltam vontade e visão política, coisas que parecem estar ainda arredadas do presente programa governativo.


Além do direito de acesso aos Museus Nacionais a Holanda tem dois cartões de acesso à Cultura :




Join We Are Public now or get the We Are Public Gift Card!
The We Are Public Gift Card gives you 3 months access to the best art and culture in 12 Dutch cities for € 50.



Join nearly 45.000 other film lovers
With your Cineville card you can see as many films as you like in movie theaters across The Netherlands. A Cineville card gives you unlimited access to all the latest film releases plus previews, classics, specials and awesome film festivals.
30 and up
Go to the movies as much as you like for € 21,- per month.


By the way, as a Cineville member you aren't just supporting your own film addiction, you're also supporting filmmakers and independent movie theaters, because 90% of your contribution goes to them.

Cheers! To countless great films!

Fim do carvão em Portugal: vitória com pontas soltas



João Camargo
OPINIÃO
Fim do carvão em Portugal: vitória com pontas soltas

As centrais a carvão do Pego e de Sines são responsáveis por até 20% das emissões nacionais de gases com efeito de estufa. O seu encerramento é um passo em frente na efectiva descarbonização.

30 de Outubro de 2019, 4:21

O que era impossível já não é: na tomada de posse do Governo, António Costa anunciou que as centrais a carvão de Sines e do Pego encerrarão até ao final da legislatura. Esta é uma grande vitória do movimento pela justiça climática em Portugal e a primeira grande conquista das greves climáticas estudantis (em cujos manifestos sempre esteve esta reivindicação).

O Parlamento foi empurrado pelas ruas para a declaração de emergência climática, mas o anterior governo recusou-se a efectivar esta declaração. Na altura, o ministro Matos Fernandes disse mesmo que se Pego e Sines fechassem “metade do país ficaria às escuras”. Felizmente não foi preciso esperar nem um ano para que esta mentira do actual ministro do Ambiente e Acção Climática fosse exposta publicamente.

As centrais a carvão do Pego e de Sines são responsáveis por até 20% das emissões nacionais de gases com efeito de estufa. O seu encerramento é um passo em frente na efectiva descarbonização. O Plano Nacional de Energia e Clima (PNIEC) e o Roteiro para a Neutralidade de Carbono 2050 (RNC2050), que usam como base dos seus cálculos o ano de 2005, pico de emissões nacionais, fazem um golpe de judo nas metas climáticas ao prometerem um corte de 45 a 55% das emissões, fazendo com que o corte real seja de apenas 35% (tendo como base as emissões de 2016). Além disso, omitem futuros projectos, como novos aeroportos e expansões portuárias. Os cortes reais de emissões, implícitos no encerramento das centrais a carvão, são a chave do avanço, ao contrário de declarações vagas e magia contabilística, mas há ainda pontas soltas.

O programa do Governo continua a apostar no comércio europeu de emissões, uma fraude cuja responsabilidade na redução de emissões é mínima, se alguma. A redução de emissões na Europa fez-se à conta da deslocalização das suas fábricas para outros países, principalmente para a China, para depois importar as manufacturas e os produtos industriais, um truque contabilístico que na verdade faz aumentar as emissões globais, imputando à China as emissões do consumo europeu. Por aí não vamos a lado nenhum.

Ficam por responder questões centrais neste processo: o que vai acontecer às pessoas que trabalham em Sines e no Pego? Não houve qualquer referência por parte do primeiro-ministro a estes trabalhadores. Ou o processo de descarbonização é uma transição justa que inclui os impactos sociais da modificação económica, ou será um processo anti-social e anti-popular, quando ele é o contrário disso e a única ferramenta para evitar o colapso climático.

É necessário começar imediatamente a requalificação profissional das centenas de trabalhadores de Sines e do Pego. Estes devem ter prioridade de contratação em todos os novos postos de trabalho associados à instalação de mais 2 gigawatts de energia solar nos próximos dois anos, na melhoria da interligação eléctrica, no reforço dos parques eólicos, nas renováveis offshore e nas smartgrids. Os trabalhadores mais velhos devem ter a possibilidade de reforma antecipada e os trabalhadores precários, mantidos à margem pelas empresas de trabalho temporário, devem ser integrados nesta transição.

Tal como propõe a campanha Empregos para o Clima, pelo menos um dia da semana de trabalho destas pessoas tem de ser dedicado a esta requalificação sem qualquer penalização salarial.

Importa finalmente saber se não haverá substituição da energia eléctrica do Pego ou Sines por electricidade de origem fóssil, com acréscimo de uso das centrais a gás (que também têm de fechar brevemente) ou vinda de Espanha ou Marrocos. Para garantir uma descarbonização real, o Estado deve deixar de titubear à volta do problema: é preciso uma produtora pública de electricidade renovável, deixando de alimentar a fantasia de que os mercados estão a resolver ou sequer podem resolver a crise climática.

A EDP está em liquidação dos seus activos em Portugal – e é também no âmbito desta realidade que a central de Sines será encerrada. A nacionalização desta empresa é um imperativo perante a ameaça clara de desmantelamento e a necessidade da transição energética justa. A descarbonização da economia precisa de planeamento e não existe outra ferramenta de planeamento no curto prazo que não seja ter empresas públicas com garantias de controlo da origem da energia e distribuição adequada para as reais necessidades sociais. Para isso é óbvio que as regras da “competitividade” do capitalismo têm de ser desmanteladas para construir uma economia justa, estacionária e redistributiva que trave o colapso climático. O movimento pela justiça climática tem de continuar a construir a força e as ideias políticas para o futuro, atando as pontas soltas.

terça-feira, 29 de outubro de 2019

Lisboa: um retrato dos “engarrafamentos turísticos” por um ex-condutor de tuk-tuk



“Os moradores de Lisboa estão fartos. À porta de suas casas há enchentes de pessoas de auscultadores nos ouvidos a tirar fotografias.”

FOTOGRAFIA
Lisboa: um retrato dos “engarrafamentos turísticos” por um ex-condutor de tuk-tuk

Durante dois anos, Janine Barreto foi guia turístico e condutor de tuk-tuk e fotografou o que viu. “Corremos o risco de Lisboa se transformar apenas numa montra sem identidade.”

P3 22 de Outubro de 2019, 13:23

“Há dias em que chegam a Lisboa, ao mesmo tempo, dois ou três cruzeiros. De repente, dez mil turistas entram na cidade de uma só vez e tudo se transforma no caos.” Janine Barreto, ex-guia turístico e ex-condutor de tuk-tuk em Lisboa, recorda a azáfama vivida no centro da cidade quando trabalhava no sector. “Tudo cheio. Ao ponto de considerar que a cidade estava no limite da sua capacidade.” Em 2017, ainda havia espaço para todos os profissionais, o trabalho era mais rentável e mais desafogado, explica. No ano seguinte, surgiram mais empresas turísticas, “muito mais concorrência”. E a resposta da autarquia, no que toca a infra-estruturas, manteve-se igual. “Tornou-se manifestamente insuficiente. Havia, por exemplo, muito mais tuk-tuks do que lugares de aparcamento para os mesmos.”

Janine Barreto regressou à Figueira da Foz, de onde é natural, no início de 2019. Abandonou a área, tornou-se num céptico do turismo de massas. “Os moradores de Lisboa estão fartos. À porta de suas casas há enchentes de pessoas de auscultadores nos ouvidos a tirar fotografias.” Por isso, durante os dois anos de trabalho, retratou quem visitava Lisboa para lançar um alerta: “tem de haver regras, tem de haver limites”. “Sobretudo para proteger quem vive em bairros típicos, como Alfama, Mouraria, para que os locais não fiquem descaracterizados, para que não percam o que está no interior. Corremos o risco de Lisboa se transformar apenas numa montra sem identidade.”

Janine, hoje com 31 anos, recorda a sua própria vida, em Belém, entre a enchente de turistas. “Enquanto morador, chateava-me o tempo que perdia nas deslocações, nas filas. Incomodavam-me os transportes sempre a abarrotar, as filas intermináveis para os pastéis de nata, para a entrada no Mosteiro dos Jerónimos.” “Verdadeiros engarrafamentos turísticos”, que hoje recorda sem saudade.



Merkel lack of Leadership ?



 IMAGENS DE OVOODOCORVO


'Lack of leadership': Merkel under fire after far-right gains in regional German election
AFP
news@thelocal.de
@thelocalgermany
29 October 2019

'Lack of leadership': Merkel under fire after far-right gains in regional German election
The pressure is on Angela Merkel after the Thuringia vote. Photo: DPA
German Chancellor Angela Merkel faces renewed pressure from within her Christian Democrats after the centre-right party was beaten by the populist, far-right AfD in the Thuringia state election on Sunday.

Her conservative critics charge that Merkel has dragged the CDU too far to the left on immigration, climate and other issues, allowing the rise of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) on the extreme right.

A long-time rival who hopes to succeed Merkel, Friedrich Merz, suggested the veteran leader dubbed "Mutti" (mummy) is already a lame duck and should bow out long before she plans to leave politics in 2021.

In his most direct attack yet, 63-year-old Merz said that "for years the chancellor's inactivity and lack of leadership have covered this country like a blanket of fog.

"I simply cannot imagine that this kind of governance will last another two years in Germany," said Merz, an executive of the German arm of US investment firm BlackRock.

'Barely heard or seen'

Merkel, in power for almost 14 years, has faced heightened pressure ever since 2015 when she decided to keep open German borders to a mass influx of refugees and migrants.

The move earned her much praise but also sparked an angry backlash that fuelled the rise of the anti-immigration and anti-Islam AfD, now the biggest opposition party.

In recent months it has topped 20 percent in three state polls in the ex-communist east -- most recently Sunday when it narrowly beat Merkel's CDU in Thuringia to second spot behind the far-left Die Linke.

It was the CDU's worst ever result there and seemed to echo the demise of Germany's other mainstream party, the Social Democrats (SPD), which scored just nine percent.

News website Spiegel Online asserted that the state election showed that "the state of the CDU is at least as desolate" as that of the SPD.

The big difference for now was that the CDU remains the party of the chancellor, it said, adding however that "this could easily be missed given that Angela Merkel is barely heard or seen these days".

'Something must change'

It was after a similar state poll setback last year that Merkel dramatically handed over the CDU leadership to her preferred successor, Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer, widely known by her initials AKK.

AKK in a later vote beat Merz for the party chair's position and more recently also took on the post of defence minister, but in recent months her political star has dimmed.

Doubts about AKK have grown after several blunders and gaffes, including a spat with a YouTube personality, a joke about intersex people and a surprise proposal for a peacekeeping mission to Syria that sparked open discord within
the cabinet.

Tilman Kuban, head of the CDU's youth wing, which leans towards Merz, this week openly asked whether AKK is the right candidate to lead the party.

Another critic who took aim at both Merkel and her crown princess was parliamentary group co-leader Axel Fischer, who called the latest defeat "thelogical consequence of national CDU policies that seems to lack any substance".

An outsider, the Free Democrats' co-leader Wolfgang Kubicki, put it more bluntly, declaring that Kramp-Karrenbauer simply "lacks the stature" to lead the CDU or run for chancellor.

Things are likely to come to a head toward the end of the year, when the SPD will decide whether to stay in Merkel's coalition or leave, which could spark new elections.

Before then, the CDU will face their own fireworks, at a party congress in late November.

Merz has so far held his fire against AKK, preferring to attack the government as a whole.

"The image of the government is simply abysmal," he thundered this week, demanding that "something must change".

By Yacine Le Forestier



'We Are Doing What We Can'
German Domestic Intellience Chief on the New Wave of Hate
In an interview, Thomas Haldenwang, the president of Germany's domestic intelligence agency, discusses the new threat of extremism in the wake of the Halle attack and his agency's need for greater authority in the monitoring of such threats.

Interview Conducted by Martin Knobbe and Wolf Wiedmann-Schmidt
October 23, 2019  10:35 AM

DER SPIEGEL: Mr. Haldenwang, the perpetrator in Halle who attempted to conduct a mass murder at a synagogue on Oct. 9 appears to have come out of nowhere. He seems to have struck without the authorities ever having noticed his extremism. As president of Germany's Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV) what's your explanation for this?


Haldenwang: He must have had a long-term plan of action -- he built his weapons using his own resources. To do that, he must have obtained material from the internet. But as far as we know so far, he didn't share his plans for the anti-Semitic attack with anyone.

DER SPIEGEL: Perpetrators like him radicalize themselves in forums and networks on the internet that often have links to the gamer scene. Is Germany's interior minister right when he says that the scene needs to be the subject of greater scrutiny?

Haldenwang: The majority of gamers have nothing to do with right-wing extremism, not even the ones who like the shooting games. But if I perceive that hatred and agitation are developing on these sites, if right-wing extremist ideas are being shared, including the idea of committing a terrorist attack, then we have to deal with these platforms.

DER SPIEGEL: Shouldn't you have done so long ago?

Haldenwang: We are doing what we can, but we need more staff to conduct considerably more intensive internet monitoring. This is a complex task and you need skilled employees who can identify trends and suspicious individuals.

DER SPIEGEL: How many people do you need?

Haldenwang: The 50 percent increase announced when I took office has already taken place. With 300 additional positions, we would move in the right direction, bringing us closer to the size of our department that deals with Islamism and Islamist terrorism. But we also need to be granted the authority commensurate with today's challenges.

DER SPIEGEL: You are referring to the monitoring of chat communications, which are often encrypted?

Haldenwang: Yes. Messenger services, for example. It should make no difference whether we want to be able to read an SMS or a WhatsApp message.

Thomas Haldenwang, 59, has served as president of the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution since November 2018. Prior to that, the lawyer was the deputy of the Cologne-based agency, which is responsible for monitoring and combating extremism in all its forms in Germany.
DER SPIEGEL: Should providers be required to hand the authorities a decrypted version of chats, if required?

Haldenwang: That would be a very far-reaching approach; there are alternatives, such as tapping sources, which would be our preferred approach. We would access extremists' phones at the point before communications become encrypted -- always subject to the strict requirements of the law, according to which all surveillance must be approved by an independent body, and only if the person has the potential to be particularly dangerous.

DER SPIEGEL: That wouldn't have helped at all in Halle. You can't plant a Trojan horse on someone's phone to monitor them if you don't even know who that person is.

Haldenwang: Unfortunately, there will always be cases that can't be detected in advance. But we can increase the chances -- by, for example, observing the internet more closely with additional staff.

DER SPIEGEL: In June, Walter Lübcke, a senior regional government official in Kassel, was shot dead on the terrace of his home, likely by a man who has been deeply rooted in the extreme right-wing scene for years. How could such a thing happen?

Haldenwang: The alleged perpetrator had not appeared to be visibly extremist to the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution since 2005. There was also a seemingly plausible explanation. He had married, built a house, had regular work, children, a dog and he was a member of a club. From all outside appearances, it was a successful resocialization.

DER SPIEGEL: But the suspect, Stephan Ernst, had been involved in an attack on a trade union rally in the city of Dortmund in 2009. Your office wasn't aware of that?

Haldenwang: That didn't make it into the systems of the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution. He had disappeared from our radar four years earlier. That's why our authority deleted all data about him from our files in 2015, after the expiry of the maximum storage period of 10 years. After the revelations about the NSU terrorist group, though, a moratorium was placed on deleting data. That's the only reason there were any documents left.

DER SPIEGEL: Is there a lesson to be learned from the Lübcke murder?

Haldenwang: We should consider extending the deadline for deletion to 15 years. And then you need to check each individual case carefully before you delete it: Has the person really left the scene, or are there any indications to make you doubt it? We shouldn't have automatic deletion any longer.

DER SPIEGEL: Is Ernst an isolated case?

Haldenwang: We have conducted an intensive search of our documents and files to determine whether there are similar cases. As of today, we haven't seen any.

DER SPIEGEL: You often receive tips about suspicious Islamists from foreign partners like the United States. Have you ever received a tip about a right-wing terrorist in the states of Saxony or Hesse?

Haldenwang: In the fight against right-wing extremism, cooperation on the national level is the chief priority. But international exchange has intensified since the attacks in Norway and New Zealand. I am confident that this will lead to the exchange of tips in the future. Given our expertise, we are also a sought-after partner internationally.

DER SPIEGEL: Is there anything novel about the type of perpetrator who emerged in the Halle attack?

Haldenwang: What's new is the international dimension. Right-wing extremism as we know it was long a particularly German phenomenon. But now, we see Anders Breivik in Oslo, Brenton Tarrant in Christchurch, Patrick Crusius in El Paso, the perpetrator in Halle. It's like links in a chain, almost an international competition. Another insight is that it appears that no deep ideology is needed to radicalize and develop plans for attacks. All that's needed is this emotion, hate, incitement, the web-based instigation and this convergence of people who, on the basis of simplistic messages often rooted in fake news, arrive at this world view and think they have to strike immediately.

DER SPIEGEL: Is there a societal discourse that promotes these kinds of crimes?

Haldenwang: There is currently growing acceptance of ideologies in Germany that are crossing the lines. The New Right practices a very intellectual right-wing extremism. On the surface, it distances itself from violence, but it also promotes the conspiracy theory of the "Great Replacement," (Eds: the idea of the government deliberately swapping out the native German population with refugees and foreigners) and conveys the feeling that something needs to be done to stop these alleged developments. That creates the intellectual breeding ground for these kinds of crimes.

DER SPIEGEL: One of the protagonists of the movement is Björn Höcke, the regional leader of the right-wing populist Alternative for Germany (AfD) party in the eastern state of Thuringia and a man known for peppering his language with Nazi rhetoric. Do you consider him to be a right-wing extremist?

Haldenwang: I ask for your understanding that I cannot comment on a leading candidate shortly before a state election for legal reasons.

DER SPIEGEL: What, for you, is the definition of a right-wing extremist?

Haldenwang: If, for example, analogies to National Socialism are drawn in the wording. If historical revisionist, ethnic and xenophobic views are not only held, but also ultimately pursued. If human dignity is denied to large sections of the population with immigration backgrounds.

DER SPIEGEL: Another prominent figure is Andreas Kalbitz, the AfD's chair in the state of Brandenburg. Has he credibly distanced himself from his right-wing extremist past?

Haldenwang: Mr. Kalbitz has made statements that can be categorized under the aforementioned. I cannot recognize that he has distanced himself from his past. Like Höcke, he's one of the leading figures on the AfD's "Flügel" ("Wing"), which we classified as a suspicious case (Eds: meaning it is under observation by Haldenwang's agency) several months ago. We don't see anything that would dissuade us from this assessment. On the contrary, the Flügel is growing increasingly extremist.

DER SPIEGEL: There are also other influential New Right groups, like publisher Götz Kubitschek, who influences Höcke, or the magazine Compact. Are you looking into them, as well?

Haldenwang: There are many organizations that we are scrutinizing very intensively. "Reconquista Germanica," a project of net activists, for example. It has been obvious to us for a few weeks now that they are clearly right-wing extremists. We can use intelligence agency means for such objects of observation.

DER SPIEGEL: Right-wing extremist elements have also been popping up repeatedly in Germany's armed forces, the Bundeswehr, and in the police. Are we talking about individual cases or structures?

Haldenwang: The overwhelming majority of the staffs of German security authorities abide fully by the constitution. But there have been cases of right-wing extremism. You could say they're isolated cases, but one can also say, and this is my opinion, that there are too many isolated cases for me not to look at them systematically. That's why we work together with the state-level agencies under the tutelage of the federal agency to compile all the relevant information. And we plan to set up a telephone hotline for tips that will not only be there for government instances, but for all indications of right-wing extremism. That's already an effective tool in combating Islamist terrorism.

DER SPIEGEL: Your predecessor Hans-Georg Maassen makes no secret of the fact that he views Chancellor Angela Merkel's refugee policy to be the culprit of the current wave of hate. Do you share that view?

Haldenwang: I supported the federal government's policies, also back in 2015. It is part of my Christian worldview that you help people who are in need. Germany did a remarkable job in that respect in 2015. However, it was also right to restore the normal procedures for immigration. So, no, I do not share my predecessor's criticism.

Has the climate crisis made California too dangerous to live in?



Uma antecipação ? Um esboço aterrorizador do futuro de Portugal !?
OVOODOCORVO

Has the climate crisis made California too dangerous to live in?
Bill McKibben
As with so many things, Californians are going first where the rest of us will follow

 @billmckibben
Tue 29 Oct 2019 06.00 GMTLast modified on Tue 29 Oct 2019 06.02 GMT

Monday morning dawned smoky across much of California, and it dawned scary – over the weekend winds as high as a hundred miles per hour had whipped wildfires through forests and subdivisions.

It wasn’t the first time this had happened – indeed, it’s happened every year for the last three – and this time the flames were licking against communities destroyed in 2017. Reporters spoke to one family that had moved into their rebuilt home on Saturday, only to be immediately evacuated again.

The spectacle was cinematic: at one point, fire jumped the Carquinez Strait at the end of San Francisco Bay, shrouding the bridge on Interstate 80 in smoke and flame.

Even areas that didn’t actually burn felt the effects: Pacific Gas and Electric turned off power to millions, fearful that when the wind tore down its wires they would spark new conflagrations.

Three years in a row feels like – well, it starts to feel like the new, and impossible, normal. That’s what the local newspaper, the San Francisco Chronicle, implied this morning when, in the middle of its account of the inferno, it included the following sentence: the fires had “intensified fears that parts of California had become almost too dangerous to inhabit”. Read that again: the local paper is on record stating that part of the state is now so risky that its citizens might have to leave.

On the one hand, this comes as no real surprise. My most recent book Falter centered on the notion that climate crisis was making large swaths of the world increasingly off-limits to humans. Cities in Asia and the Middle East where the temperature now reaches the upper 120s – levels so high that the human body can’t really cool itself; island nations (and Florida beaches) where each high tide washes through the living room or the streets; Arctic villages relocating because, with sea ice vanished, the ocean erodes the shore.

But California? California was always the world’s idea of paradise (until perhaps the city of that name burned last summer). Hollywood shaped our fantasies of the last century, and many of its movies were set in the Golden State. It’s where the Okies trudged when their climate turned vicious during the Dust Bowl years – “pastures of plenty”, Woody Guthrie called the green agricultural valleys. John Muir invented our grammar and rhetoric of wildness in the high Sierra (and modern environmentalism was born with the club he founded).

California is the Golden State, the land of ease. I was born there, and though I left young enough that my memories are suspect, I grew up listening to my parents’ stories. They’d been newlyweds in the late ’50s, living a block from the ocean in Manhattan Beach; when they got home from work they could walk to the sand for a game of volleyball. Date night was a mile or two up the Pacific Coast Highway to the Lighthouse, the jazz club where giants such as Gerry Mulligan showed up regularly, inventing the cool jazz that defined the place and time. Sunset magazine showcased a California aesthetic as breezy and informal as any on earth: the redwood deck, the cedar-shake roof, the suburban idyll among the eucalyptus and the pine. That is to say, precisely the kinds of homes that today are small piles of ash with only the kidney-shaped pool intact.

Truth be told, that California began to vanish fairly quickly, as orange groves turned into airplane factories and then tech meccas. The great voices of California in recent years – writers such as Mike Davis and Rebecca Solnit – chronicle the demise of much that was once idyllic in a wave of money, consumption, nimbyism, tax dodging, and corporate greed. The state’s been booming in recent years – it’s the world’s fifth biggest economy, bigger than the UK – but it’s also home to tent encampments of homeless people with no chance of paying rent. And it’s not just climate change that’s at fault: California has always had fires, and the state’s biggest utility, PG&E, is at this point as much an arsonist as electricity provider.

Still, it takes a force as great as the climate crisis to really – perhaps finally – tarnish Eden. In the last decade, the state has endured the deepest droughts ever measured, dry spells so intense that more than a hundred million trees died. A hundred million – and the scientists who counted them warned that their carcasses could “produce wildfires on a scale and of an intensity that California has never seen”. The drought has alternated with record downpours that have turned burned-over stretches into massive house-burying mudslides.

And so Californians – always shirtsleeved and cool – spend some of the year in face masks and much of it with a feeling of trepidation. As with so many things, they are going first where the rest of us will follow.

Bill McKibben is an author and Schumann Distinguished Scholar in environmental studies at Middlebury College, Vermont. His most recent book is Falter: Has the Human Game Begun to Play Itself Out?

This wave of global protest is being led by the children of the financial crash



This wave of global protest is being led by the children of the financial crash

“What has intensified this urgency is the backdrop of looming ecological catastrophe. Even where protests are not explicitly about environmental concerns, the prospect of planetary catastrophe in our lifetimes raises the stakes for all political action.”
From Hong Kong to South America to London, young people have had enough of economic, social and ecological collapse

Jack Shenker
Tue 29 Oct 2019 06.00 GMTLast modified on Tue 29 Oct 2019 07.31 GMT

 “I’m 22 years old, and this is my last letter,” the young man begins. Most of his face is masked with black fabric; only his eyes, tired and steely, are visible below a messy fringe. “I’m worried that I will die and won’t see you any more,” he continues, his hands trembling. “But I can’t not take to the streets.”

The nameless demonstrator – one of many in Hong Kong who have been writing to their loved ones before heading out to confront rising police violence in the city – was filmed by the New York Times last week in an anonymous stairwell. But he could be almost anywhere, and not only because the walls behind him are white and characterless, left blank to protect his identity.

From east Asia to Latin America, northern Europe to the Middle East, there are young people gathering in stairwells, back alleys and basements whose faces display a similar blend of exhilaration and exhaustion. “The disaster of ‘chaos in Hong Kong’ has already hit the western world,” the former Chinese diplomat Wang Zhen declared in an official Communist party paper, following reports that protesters in Catalonia were being inspired by their counterparts in Hong Kong. “We can expect that other countries and cities may be struck by this deluge.”

 The problem for governments is there is no longer a centre ground to snap back to, and their opponents know it
Wang is right about the deluge. In the same week that those seeking independence from Spain occupied Barcelona airport and brought motorways to a standstill, Extinction Rebellion activists seized major bridges and squares across London, prompting nearly 2,000 arrests. Both mobilisations adopted tactics from Hong Kong, including fluid targets – inspired by Bruce Lee’s famous “be water“ mantra – and a repertoire of hand signals to outwit security forces.

Meanwhile Lebanon has been convulsed by its largest demonstrations in two decades, dozens have been killed during anti-government marches in Iraq, and in Egypt a blanket ban on dissent by President Abdel Fatah al-Sisi’s brutal dictatorship failed to prevent sporadic anti-regime protests breaking out across the country late last month. In the Americas, where Wang once served as a Chinese government envoy, Ecuador, Chile and Haiti are all experiencing citizen uprisings that are virtually unprecedented in recent history, ushering vast numbers of people into the streets – as well as soldiers tasked with containing them.

Each of these upheavals has its own spark – a hike in transport fares in Santiago, or a proposed tax on users of messaging apps like WhatsApp in Beirut – and each involves different patterns of governance and resistance. The class composition of the indigenous demonstrators in Ecuador can’t be compared with most of those marching against the imprisonment of separatist leaders in Catalonia; nor is the state’s prohibition of protest in London on a par with the repression in Hong Kong, where officers shot live ammunition into a teenager’s chest.

And yet it’s clear that we are witnessing the biggest surge in global protest activity since the early 2010s, when a “movement of the squares” saw mass rallies in capital cities across the Arab world, followed by Occupy demonstrations in the global north. Historically speaking, the past decade has seen more protests than at any time since the 1960s. Despite their disparate grievances, some common threads do bind today’s rebellions together. Tracing them may help clarify the nature of our present political volatility.

One obvious link is also the most superficial: the role played by social media, which has been widely noted in the press. While it’s true that digital technologies have enabled more agile and horizontal forms of organising, the ubiquity of these tools in 2019 tells us almost nothing about what is driving people to take to the streets in the first place. Indeed, in many states, social media is now an instrument of state repression as much as it is a tool of revolt.

The most significant connection is generational. The majority of those protesting now are the children of the financial crisis – a generation that has come of age during the strange and febrile years after the collapse of a broken economic and political orthodoxy, and before its replacement has emerged.

One direct impact of the crash has been a rapid diminishment of opportunity for millions of young people in rich countries – who now regard precarious work and rising inequality as the norm. At the same time, the aftermath of the crash has cracked the entrenched structures that had evolved to detach citizens from active participation in politics – be that through authoritarian systems or via an institutional consensus on the inevitability of market logic and technocratic management. Amid widespread economic and social failure, it has become harder than ever for elites to justify power, even on their own terms.

All this has produced a generation charged with hopelessness and hope. Afflicted by what the anthropologist David Graeber calls “despair fatigue”, protesters are putting their bodies on the line because it feels as if they have no other choice – and because those who rule over them have rarely seemed more vulnerable. Most have spent their lives under the maxim “there is no alternative” – and now circumstances have forced them to widen their political imaginations in search of something new. As one poster proclaims in Chile: “It’s not about 30 pesos, it’s about 30 years.”

Facing them down are states determined to put citizens back in their box and reseal the borders of political participation. The problem for governments is that there is no longer an established centre ground to snap back to, and their opponents know it – which is why so many of those involved in the current mobilisations will not settle for token concessions from the authorities.

“We need a whole new system, from scratch,” declared one demonstrator in Lebanon. The crackdown on Catalan separatists by the Spanish government has brought back dark memories of the state’s dirty war in the Basque country in the 1980s and the Franco era that preceded it; troops are marching through city centres in Chile for the first time since Pinochet.

In China, Xi Jinping has claimed that any attempt to divide the nation will result in “bodies smashed and bones ground to powder”. In many places, grassroots victory – and radical political transformation – feels to many like the only possible resolution, lending clashes an “all or nothing” antagonism and urgency that is hard to roll back.

What has intensified this urgency is the backdrop of looming ecological catastrophe. Even where protests are not explicitly about environmental concerns, the prospect of planetary catastrophe in our lifetimes raises the stakes for all political action. “The kids who are walking out of school have a hugely radical understanding of the way that politics works, and they recognise that our democratic processes and structures as they stand are designed to uphold the status quo,” Jake Woodier, one of the organisers behind the UK climate strike movement, told me this year. “They know that they will be worse off than their parents, know that they’ll never own a home, and know that on current trends they could live to see the end of humanity. So for them, for us, politics is not a game, it’s reality, and that’s reflected in the way we organise – relentlessly, radically, as if our lives depend on it.”

The Cambridge political scientist Helen Thompson once argued: “The post-2008 world is, in some fundamental sense, a world waiting for its reckoning.” That reckoning is beginning to unfold globally. They may come from different backgrounds and fight for different causes, but the kids being handcuffed, building barricades, and fighting their way through teargas in 2019 all entered adulthood after the end of the end of history. They know that we are living through one of what the American historian Robert Darnton has called “moments of suspended disbelief”: those rare, fragile conjunctures in which anything seems conceivable, and – far from being immutable – the old rules are ready to be rewritten. As long as it feels like their lives depend on winning, the deluge will continue.

• Jack Shenker is a writer based in London and Cairo. His latest book is Now We Have Your Attention

CORRUPÇÃO EM PORTUGAL.



Paulo de Morais
OPINIÃO
A corrupção mata todos os regimes
Será também a corrupção a razão da queda desta democracia moribunda em que vivemos.

Paulo Morais
29 de Outubro de 2019, 5:45


Da queda da Monarquia, em 1910, ao fim do Estado Novo, em 25 de Abril de 74, passando ainda pelo fim da Primeira República, em 1926, há uma causa que une a morte de todos estes regimes: a corrupção. E será também a corrupção a razão da queda desta democracia moribunda em que vivemos.

No auge da Monarquia, o tráfico de influências e a captura de recursos públicos eram generalizados. Em 1882, o então todo-poderoso banqueiro Henrique de Burnay celebrou um contrato com o Estado, representado por Fontes Pereira de Melo, presidente do Conselho, e Hintze Ribeiro, ministro das Obras Públicas. Um sindicato bancário, dirigido por Burnay, comprometia-se a construir uma linha ferroviária em Espanha, que ligava Salamanca a Barca d'Alva e garantiria a ligação ao Porto. Como contrapartida, o Tesouro pagaria a Burnay uma renda milionária, 135 contos. Nascia assim a primeira parceria público-privada portuguesa. Houve corrupção sem limite, muros desabaram e tiveram de ser refeitos. Prometiam-se avultadas receitas que nunca se concretizaram. Apesar do descalabro do negócio, o Rei Luís I agraciou Burnay com o título de Conde e a linha foi inaugurada em Dezembro de 1887. Mas, volvidos apenas três meses, o projecto falia, apresentando 4000 contos de dívidas e prejuízo anual de 600 contos. Desfez-se o acordo? Não! O consórcio privado foi premiado com a duplicação da renda para 270 contos e ainda com a concessão da exploração do porto de Leixões. Três anos depois, faliam novamente. O Governo teve de intervir no consórcio, com enorme prejuízo para a Fazenda.

Outros escândalos se sucederam. De entre os mais ruinosos, destaca-se a atribuição da concessão do negócio do tabaco à Família Burnay (mais uma vez), por sessenta anos; do concurso foi ilegalmente afastado o concorrente que oferecia melhores condições, a Companhia dos Fósforos. Esta questão levou à queda do governo de Hintze Ribeiro, um dos muitos políticos avençados do Crédito Predial, banco cuja gestão criminosa constituiu a causa maior da queda da Monarquia.

A figura central, a alma negra do Crédito Predial, foi Luciano de Castro. Como deputado, elaborou a Lei que regulou “a criação e o funcionamento das sociedades de crédito predial”, para mais tarde ser ele mesmo o governador do Crédito. Os empréstimos concedidos eram maioritariamente de favor, a políticos e amigos do poder vigente, ora do Partido Progressista de Luciano, ora do Regenerador de Fontes e Hintze, todos membros da administração do banco. Em 1910, detectam-se desfalques sistemáticos desde 1902. Uma auditoria identifica créditos incobráveis de sessenta contos, cai o governo em Junho; uma nova auditoria verifica que os incobráveis não eram de sessenta contos, mas de oitocentos! Vem a bancarrota, esboroa-se a Monarquia e eclode a República, com milhares a clamar “Matem o ladrão do Crédito Predial”, Luciano de Castro.

Chegava finalmente a República, que prometia “eliminar todos os privilégios que, sendo mantidos à custa da depressão e ofensa dos nossos concidadãos, são para mim malditos”, nas palavras do primeiro Presidente eleito, Manuel de Arriaga. Mas o regime que tinha vindo para combater a corrupção viria a sucumbir com mais um escândalo de corrupção na banca.

Em 1925, tinha lugar a maior falsificação de notas da História, as notas de 500 escudos, efígie de Vasco da Gama, crime perpetrado por Alves dos Reis. Alves dos Reis falsificou o seu diploma de engenheiro, comprou (com cheque sem cobertura) os caminhos-de-ferro de Angola, fez desfalques, mas mesmo assim foi protegido pela República, tinha o apoio da elite nacional. Com o produto da falsificação de notas, fundou o “Banco Angola e Metrópole”. A circulação excessiva de dinheiro provocou a pré-bancarrota. Em 1926, o general Gomes da Costa instaurava a ditadura. A República sucumbia, sem honra nem glória. Viriam quarenta e oito anos de ditadura salazarista, também esta contaminada por casos de corrupção.

Chegou o 25 de Abril, em 1974. Os fundadores da democracia, os Capitães de Abril, definiam como uma das prioridades do novo regime “o combate eficaz à corrupção”. Mas a democracia de Abril incorre agora nos mesmos erros dos regimes anteriores: concede rendas milionárias em parcerias público-privadas, promove portas giratórias, assume prejuízos dos bancos, cujos administradores são políticos… Este regime repete os erros dos anteriores, acabará da mesma forma. “Aqueles que não conseguem lembrar o passado estão condenados a repeti-lo” (Santayana).

"Além dos patrocínios aos clubes, a acusação imputa a vários responsáveis do Turismo crimes relacionados com procedimentos de contratação de pessoal e de aquisição de bens, assim como a utilização de meios do turismo para fins pessoais. Em causa está, por exemplo, um ipad do TPNP encontrado na casa de família de Melchior Moreira, em Lamego, onde estava instalada a conta do Facebook do filho mais novo e jogos para a idade deste, além de fotografias da família em actividades de lazer."

Ex-presidente do turismo acusado de patrocinar clubes para chegar a presidente da Liga de Futebol
Vitória de Guimarães e Braga foram acusados no processo conhecido como Operação Éter. Ministério Público vai continuar a investigar num processo autónomo contratação de dezenas de lojas de turismo interactivas da região Norte.

Mariana Oliveira 29 de Outubro de 2019, 6:06

Em causa está, entre outros, o jogo da final da Taça de Portugal entre o Vitória de Guimarães e o Benfica em 2017 LUSA/MIGUEL A. LOPES

O ex-presidente do Turismo do Porto e Norte de Portugal (TPNP), Melchior Moreira, está acusado no âmbito da Operação Éter de ter colocado publicidade nas camisolas dos jogadores de duas equipas desportivas, o Vitória de Guimarães e o Braga, com o intuito de obter o apoio dos dirigentes desportivos daqueles clubes, numa eventual candidatura à presidência à Liga Portuguesa de Futebol Profissional, que nunca chegou a concretizar-se.

Em causa estão dois jogos da equipa de futebol do Vitória de Guimarães, um dos quais a final da Taça de Portugal, em 2017, uma partida em que a equipa minhota defrontou o Benfica. Num dos jogos os futebolistas do Vitória de Guimarães tinham publicidade do Turismo do Porto e Norte nas camisolas e noutra do Geoparque de Arouca. O patrocínio, que custou ao TPNP mais de 100 mil euros, foi dividido por vários contratos, alegadamente para contornar regras da contratação pública.

Relativamente ao Sporting Clube de Braga o que está em causa é um contrato de patrocínio com vista à promoção da região Norte em Madrid, onde a equipa bracarense de futsal disputou, em Novembro de 2017, a Ronda de Elite da UEFA Futsal Cup. No contrato ficou escrito que o Braga receberia 15 mil euros para aparecer a marca do Turismo do Norte nas camisolas que os jogadores envergaram.

Os dois clubes de futebol estão entre as oito entidades colectivas acusadas neste processo. Contactado pelo PÚBLICO, o director de comunicação do Braga, André Viana, recusou-se a fazer declarações sobre o assunto, alegando que o clube não foi ainda notificado de nada. O PÚBLICO tentou obter sem sucesso uma reacção do Vitória de Guimarães. Além das pessoas colectivas foram acusadas 21 pessoas singulares, onde se destaca Melchior Moreira e mais sete profissionais do Turismo do Norte. São eles, segundo uma nota da Procuradoria-Geral Distrital do Porto, divulgada no sábado, os responsáveis que ocupavam o lugar de “presidente, vice-presidente, directora de departamento operacional, membro da comissão executiva, directora de núcleo, directora de departamento, técnica superior e coordenador de gabinete”.

Quem também integra o rol de acusados é a empresária Manuela Couto, administradora da W Global Communication (antiga Mediana) e mulher do ex-presidente da Câmara de Santo Tirso, Joaquim Couto. No entanto, o Ministério Público deixou cair o crime de corrupção relacionado com um jantar que custou cerca de 1350 euros, com mais de 30 pessoas, em Madrid, à margem da Feira Internacional de Turismo (Fitur), em Janeiro do ano passado.

Apesar de ter avançado com a acusação, evitando ter que libertar Melchior Moreira, o Ministério Público optou por continuar a investigar o que até agora era o epicentro do caso: a forma como foram contratadas dezenas de lojas de turismo interactivas da região Norte. A procuradora separou esta parte do processo num inquérito autónomo que vai continuar em investigação, apesar de nos últimos meses a Polícia Judiciária ter feito um contra-relógio em que constituiu como arguidos dezenas de antigos e actuais autarcas arguidos neste caso. Os visados são presidentes de câmara ou vereadores que contrataram, através de ajuste directo, sociedades do empresário de Viseu, José Agostinho, a principal das quais a Tomi World. O empresário é arguido no caso, tendo sido obrigado a prestar uma caução de 50 mil euros.

Na acusação, o Ministério Público pede que o ex-presidente do Turismo do Norte se mantenha em prisão preventiva, uma situação que perdura há mais de um ano. A procuradora alega que se mantêm os pressupostos da medida de coacção mais gravosa, que foi inicialmente justificada com o perigo de perturbação do inquérito, devido à vasta rede de contactos e influências do antigo deputado do PSD.


Fonte ligada à defesa não se conforma com esta posição e insiste que com a acusação termina a investigação, não fazendo sentido continuar a alegar o perigo de perturbar o inquérito. Por isso, a defesa pretende pedir uma alteração da medida de coacção, devendo nos próximos dias haver uma decisão da juíza de instrução.

Além dos patrocínios aos clubes, a acusação imputa a vários responsáveis do Turismo crimes relacionados com procedimentos de contratação de pessoal e de aquisição de bens, assim como a utilização de meios do turismo para fins pessoais. Em causa está, por exemplo, um ipad do TPNP encontrado na casa de família de Melchior Moreira, em Lamego, onde estava instalada a conta do Facebook do filho mais novo e jogos para a idade deste, além de fotografias da família em actividades de lazer.

O ex-presidente do Turismo sempre insistiu que não dera o aparelho ao filho e que apenas o levava ao fim-de-semana para Lamego e que, por vezes, o filho o usava. Inicialmente, o Ministério Público imputava-lhe um crime de peculato, com uma pena que varia entre um e oito anos de prisão, tendo avançado com a acusação por um crime muito menos gravoso, peculato de uso.


O Ministério Público insiste que o ex-presidente do Turismo do Norte recebeu indevidamente ajudas de custo e ofertas provenientes de operadores económicos, como uma semana numa master suite de um hotel de quatro estrelas, em Santa Eulália, no Algarve, no final de Agosto de 2017. A oferta foi feita por um empresário do sector hoteleiro que estava interessado em construir um hotel no Porto e convidou o então presidente daquela região de turismo para ir conhecer os hotéis do grupo no Algarve.

ALMADA
Finanças encontram “despesas ilegais” de câmara do PCP no valor de 1,6 milhões
Compra de relógios e telemóveis de 162 mil euros considerada “ilegal”. Maioria dos ajustes era feito com convites a apenas uma empresa.

Liliana Valente
Liliana Valente 28 de Outubro de 2019, 20:47

Uma auditoria da Inspecção-Geral das Finanças (IGF) à gestão da Câmara Municipal de Almada no período de 2014 a 2016, quando esta era presidida pelo comunista Joaquim Judas, encontrou “despesas ilegais” na autarquia de 1,6 milhões de euros. Um valor que poderia ser maior, uma vez que a auditoria analisou apenas uma amostra de contratos. A CDU de Almada defende-se dizendo que “há diferentes interpretações” sobre a aplicação da lei e que as acusações de ilegalidade são “excessivas”.

Os inspectores da IGF concluíram que existem “diversas irregularidades e insuficiências de natureza administrativa, bem como indícios de infracções de natureza penal e financeira” na gestão da Câmara Municipal de Almada nesse período. Tendo em conta que há irregularidades que têm natureza penal e de responsabilidade financeira, o relatório será enviado “às entidades judiciais competentes”, o que significa que será enviado tanto para o Ministério Público como para o Tribunal de Contas. As responsabilidades irão recair sobre os chefes de departamento e não sobre os então eleitos locais, esclarece a auditoria.

No relatório são apontados problemas administrativos, alguns resultantes da utilização de sistemas informáticos obsoletos, mas sobretudo problemas de procedimentos e controlo interno. Dos contratos analisados, em “54% dos procedimentos por ajuste directo”, “o convite só foi dirigido a uma entidade”. Aliás, o ajuste directo foi a forma de contratação mais utilizada pelo município, em 85% dos processos (154 empreitadas), “enquanto o concurso público foi utilizado em 27 empreitadas”.

O caso que tem sido mais utilizado para ilustrar as irregularidades detectadas prende-se com a compra de relógios e telemóveis por parte da autarquia para oferecer aos trabalhadores com mais de 25 anos de casa. Em relação a estes contratos, a IGF fala em ilegalidades por não terem sido acautelados “os princípios de interesse público e de legalidade” que tornam a despesa associada, de 163 mil euros, ilegal.