Dismay in
Brussels as Boris Johnson finally reveals Brexit plan
Michel
Barnier scathing in his reaction, describing PM’s Irish border proposals as a
trap
Daniel
Boffey in Brussels, and Heather Stewart
Wed 2 Oct
2019 21.34 BSTFirst published on Wed 2 Oct 2019 15.19 BST
Boris
Johnson appears to be fighting a losing battle to avoid Britain staying in the
European Union beyond 31 October after Michel Barnier privately gave a scathing
analysis of the prime minister’s new plan for the Irish border, describing it
as a trap.
The
European commission also refused to go into the secretive and intensive
“tunnel” talks with the UK’s negotiators before a crunch summit on 17 October
from which the UK had hoped to deliver a breakthrough deal.
Despite
concerted attempts to avoid publicly trashing the UK proposals, there was
dismay behind the scenes in Brussels after Johnson tabled his first concrete
proposal for replacing the Irish backstop.
The prime
minister had set out the outline of the government’s offer in a speech to Tory
party faithful in Manchester that also laid down the battle lines for a general
election. On Wednesday night, he was hopeful a parliamentary majority could be
assembled to back it.
Johnson’s
plan involves Northern Ireland leaving the EU’s customs union at the end of
transition along with the rest of the UK, necessitating checks and controls on
the island of Ireland.
Northern
Ireland would also stay aligned with EU standards on goods if Stormont agreed
by December 2020, the end of the transition period, and then in a vote every
four years.
But the UK
has also requested that both sides commit at treaty level “never to conduct
checks at the border” even if Stormont vetoes the arrangements laid out in the
new 44-page Irish protocol.
Barnier
said that this commitment would prevent Brussels from protecting its internal
market if the Northern Ireland assembly blocked the arrangement in 2020 or at a
later date.
“The EU
would then be trapped with no backstop to preserve the single market after
Brexit,” he warned, according to someone present in the room.
The Irish
taoiseach, Leo Varadkar, issued a sombre statement after a phone call on
Wednesday afternoon with Johnson. Varadkar warned the prime minister that the
legal texts tabled “do not fully meet the agreed objectives of the backstop”.
Jean-Claude
Juncker, the European commission president, told the prime minister in his
phone call that there remained “problematic points”.
It is
understood that the European parliament’s Brexit steering group will say on
Thursday that MEPs will not vote in support of the deal proposed by the UK
government. “The reaction of the Brexit steering group was not positive,” the
group’s coordinator, Guy Verhofstadt, told reporters after a briefing from
Barnier. “Not positive in that we don’t think really there are the safeguards
that Ireland needs.”
EU sources
said that such were the flaws in the UK’s proposals that there appeared scant
chance of agreement by a crunch EU summit on 17 October. “Unfortunately we are
heading for an extension,” said one diplomatic source. Under the Benn act,
Johnson will be instructed to request and agree an extension if a deal is not
passed by parliament by 19 October.
In his
speech in Manchester, the prime minister attacked parliament for seeking to
block Brexit, repeatedly praised the NHS and warned the EU27 that he was
determined to take Britain out of the EU on 31 October.
He sought
to ramp up the pressure on Brussels by insisting Britain is now ready to leave
without a deal at the end of this month. “That is not an outcome we want, it is
not an outcome we seek at all – but let me tell you, my friends, it is an
outcome for which we are ready,” he said.
He then
asked the packed hall in Manchester: “Are we ready for it?” The audience
shouted back: “Yes!”
On a
carefully choreographed day, more details of his five-point Brexit offer were
then laid out in a letter to Juncker, in which he warned there is now “very
little time” left in which a deal can be done.
“This
government wants to get a deal, as I’m sure we all do. If we cannot reach one,
it would represent a failure of statecraft for which we would all be
responsible,” Johnson said.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário