Trump admits he is undermining USPS to make it
harder to vote by mail
The president says he opposes providing additional
money to the postal service to help it deliver mail-in ballots
Sam Levine
in New York
Thu 13 Aug
2020 17.25 BSTLast modified on Thu 13 Aug 2020 19.49 BST
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/aug/13/donald-trump-usps-post-office-election-funding
Donald
Trump admitted on Thursday he opposed additional funding for the United States
Postal Service (USPS) in order to make it more difficult to deliver mail-in
ballots.
Trump’s
comments lend evidence for critics who say the president is deliberately trying
to hamstring the USPS in advance of the November elections to help his
re-election bid.
Trump said
on Thursday that congressional negotiations over stimulus aid were held up in
part because of Democratic proposals to provide $3.6bn to states to run
elections and $25bn in aid to the postal service. The president, who has
falsely claimed that widespread mail-in voting will lead to fraud, suggested
that without the funding it would be harder to vote by mail.
“They need
that money in order to have the post office work so it can take all of these
millions and millions of ballots,” Trump said in an interview with Fox
Business’s Maria Bartiromo. “If they don’t get those two items, that means you
can’t have universal mail-in voting because they’re not equipped to have it.”
Congress
has allocated just $400m to help states run elections, a small fraction of the
$4bn the Brennan Center for Justice estimates is needed this year. Many
election officials are scrambling to figure out how they will run an election
where there is expected to be an unprecedented level of mail-in and in-person
voting. The lack of funding may already be having an effect; in Kentucky, the
state’s top election official said this week he did not support expanding
mail-in voting for the fall because the state did not have the capacity to do
so.
The
president’s comments also come amid accusations that Louis DeJoy, the new
postmaster general and a major Republican donor, is making cuts at the agency
to intentionally slow down the mail. There are reports of severe mail delays in
places across the country and the Washington Post and other news organizations
published internal USPS documents last month saying there was a blanket ban on
overtime and that workers were being told to leave mail behind if it will delay
them on their routes. A USPS spokesman denied there was a blanket ban on
overtime, but did not address questions about whether employees were being told
to leave the mail behind.
A slower
mail service could have a big impact this fall because an unprecedented number
of Americans are expected to vote by mail and many states require a ballot to
arrive at an election office by election day, regardless of when it was put in
the mail, in order to be counted. At least 65,000 ballots were rejected during
the 2020 primaries because they arrived too late.
“If we
don’t make a deal that means they don’t get the money. That means they can’t
have universal mail-in voting. They just can’t have it. Sort of a crazy thing,”
Trump said on Thursday.
Andrew
Bates, a spokesman for Joe Biden, the presumptive Democratic presidential
nominee, said in a statement Trump was attacking the US economy and democracy.
“The
president of the United States is sabotaging a basic service that hundreds of
millions of people rely upon, cutting a critical lifeline for rural economies
and for delivery of medicines, because he wants to deprive Americans of their
fundamental right to vote safely during the most catastrophic public health
crisis in over 100 years,” he said.
USPS
officials have not said they need additional funding to deliver mail-in ballots
this fall. “The Postal Service has ample capacity to deliver all election mail
securely and on-time in accordance with our delivery standards, and we will do
so,” DeJoy said at a meeting of the USPS board of governors on Friday.
In a
separate interview on Thursday, Larry Kudlow, the president’s top economic
adviser, dismissed efforts to make it easier to vote in negotiations over
stimulus money.
“So much of
the Democratic asks are really liberal left wishlists,” he said. “Voting
rights, aid to aliens and so forth. That’s not our game.”
The new
postmaster general, Louis DeJoy, who took office in June, has reportedly
prohibited overtime, amid other changes that have raised fears about voting by
mail. Photograph: Spencer Platt/Getty Images
Postal service changes pose threat to voting,
says former USPS deputy
Ron Stroman, who stepped down as deputy postmaster
general this year, warned new policies at USPS could disenfranchise voters
Sam Levine
in New York
Thu 13 Aug
2020 11.00 BSTLast modified on Thu 13 Aug 2020 13.21 BST
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/aug/13/united-states-postal-service-trump-republicans
A former
top official at the United States Postal Service (USPS) has warned that recent
changes at the agency, now led by a Trump ally, could “disenfranchise” voters
as they are implemented just months ahead of an election in which a record
number of Americans are expected to vote by mail.
Amid
reports of significant mail delays, Ronald Stroman, who stepped down earlier
this year as the second in command at USPS, said he was concerned about the
speed and timing of changes that appeared to be implemented after Louis DeJoy,
the new postmaster general, took office in June. USPS faces a financial crisis
and every postmaster general is interested in cost savings and efficiency,
Stroman said, but the question was how to balance those changes with the
public’s needs.
“The
concern is not only that you’re doing this in a pandemic, but a couple of
months before an election with enormous consequences,” said Stroman, now a
senior fellow at the Democracy Fund. “If you can’t right the ship, if you can’t
correct these fast enough, the consequence is not just, OK, people don’t get
their mail, it’s that you disenfranchise people.
“Making
these changes this close to an election is a high-risk proposition,” he added.
Some delays
this year have been because USPS workers have been unable to work during the
Covid-19 pandemic. But fears increased after DeJoy, a major Trump donor with no
prior USPS experience, took over the agency. Shortly after he started at the
postal service, the Washington Post and other news organizations obtained
internal documents saying the agency was prohibiting overtime and that postal
workers should leave mail behind at processing plants if it would cause them to
leave late.
Mark
Jamison, a former postmaster in North Carolina who retired from the agency in
2012, said the idea of leaving first class mail – which includes letters with a
regular stamp – was anathema to the culture of USPS. “The rule has always been
you clear every piece of first class mail out of a plant every day, period,” he
said. “There has never been, never, in the 30 years I worked for the post
office, there has never been a time when you curtail first class mail.”
Philadelphia
residents have reported going upwards of three weeks without mail and postal
workers told the Philadelphia Inquirer mail was piling up in local offices.
Veterans and employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs have reported mail
delays in fulfilling prescriptions. In Minneapolis, USPS temporarily stopped
mail-delivery to a high-rise building, home to many low-income and immigrant
residents, over concern of Covid-19 spread. In April, some Wisconsin residents
reported never receiving ballots they requested for a statewide election.
Democrats in Congress have opened an investigation into the delays and asked
the USPS inspector general to probe the matter as well.
“I mean
come on, we’ve got a pandemic, you’re social distancing, people are calling in
sick, you’re going to cut out overtime now? That just makes no sense,” Jamison
said. “It’s unconscionable what they’re doing.”
David
Partenheimer, a USPS spokesman, said there was no blanket ban on overtime. The
agency declined to say whether employees were being instructed to leave mail
behind.
There is
concern the delays could last into November and disenfranchise many Americans.
The majority of US states require absentee ballots to arrive by election day,
regardless of when the voter puts them in the mail, in order to be counted.
USPS has long advised voters to put their ballots in the mail a week ahead of
election day to ensure they arrive in time to be counted (some states continue
to allow voters to request a ballot up until days before the election). At
least 65,000 ballots were rejected in primaries this year because they arrived
too late, according to NPR.
USPS denies
it is slowing down the mail and DeJoy said the agency had “ample capacity” to
deliver mail ballots on time. “While I certainly have a good relationship with
the president of the United States, the notion that I would ever make decisions
concerning the Postal Service at the direction of the president, or anyone else
in the administration, is wholly off-base,” he said on Friday at a meeting of
the USPS board of governors.
There is
also some concern about the cost different states will have to pay to send
ballots. Some states send ballots as marketing mail, which is less expensive
than first class mail and has an expected delivery time of three to 10 days
(first class mail is typically delivered faster). In the past, USPS has quickly
moved official election mail regardless of the class of service, but in recent
weeks the agency has signaled it will not expedite election mail and election
officials will get the service they pay for.
Some
Democrats have suggested this amounts to a USPS threat to raise postage on
mail-in ballots, a characterization USPS strongly disputes.
“There are
currently no pending changes to the rates and classes of mail impacting
ballots,” Martha Johnson, a USPS spokeswoman said in a statement. “The baseless
assertion that we intend to raise prices in advance of the upcoming
presidential election in order to restrict voting by mail is wholly without
merit, and frivolous. The Postmaster General and the organization he leads is
fully committed to fulfilling our role in the electoral process.”
While
Stroman agreed the agency had capacity to handle the volume of mail-in ballots,
he said DeJoy should make it unequivocally clear that mail-in ballots need to
be delivered consistent with USPS delivery standards and be transparent about
how the agency was going to address apparent delays ahead of the November
election.
“I would
like him to say to the employees, ‘This is a priority to me, and I expect 100%
of the ballots that we have be processed and delivered consistent with our
service standards,’” he said. “Just making that statement, I think, would be
important to send a signal to the workforce [that] that is your expectation and
that you’re going to put the resources in to make sure that happens.”
Art
Sackler, manager of the Coalition for a 21st Century Postal Service, an
industry group that represents heavy mailers including Amazon and eBay, said he
had heard a “mixed bag” from businesses over the last few weeks, some of which
have reported delays. He questioned why the agency was moving ahead with the
changes now.
“If there’s
a takeaway from the business side of this it would be that the timing of this
is problematic,” he said. “In the teeth of a national emergency, voting is
coming up in November, well sooner, their peak season comes up after that. A
lot of folks are saying: why not do this in January?”


Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário