Cartoon : First
published on POLITICO.eu, Belgium, July 25, 2020 | By Rytis Daukantas
Mark Rutte: Too frugal and not frugal enough
Dutch prime minister was attacked by fellow EU leaders
and has faced criticism at home.
By ELINE
SCHAART 7/23/20, 10:04 PM CET Updated 7/25/20, 6:13 AM CET
Dutch Prime
Minister Mark Rutte was portrayed as the king of the frugal faction in the EU’s
marathon budget talks, but back home they think he wasn’t frugal enough.
As the
figurehead of a group of small, rich countries urging restraint during the
summit — dubbed the "Frugal Four" — Rutte succeeded in changing the
balance of grants and loans in the EU's coronavirus recovery fund. He also got
a discount on the annual budget contribution and extra income from customs
duties for the Netherlands.
It earned
him a great deal of criticism from fellow leaders.
French
President Emmanuel Macron compared Rutte to David Cameron — the former U.K.
prime minister who often took an obstructionist position in EU talks — and
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán said he didn't know why the Dutch leader
“hate[s] me or Hungary, but he is attacking so harshly.”
But Rutte
appeared more concerned about not upsetting Dutch voters and keeping the
Euroskeptic opposition at bay ahead of national elections next March.
Far-right
Party for Freedom leader Geert Wilders said Tuesday’s deal was a “horribly bad
result."
Support for
his liberal VVD party has increased during the coronavirus crisis, with the
party currently projected to win 41 seats in the election, up from its current
32. A poll in March rated Rutte, one of Europe's longest-serving heads of
government, as the country’s greatest post-war prime minister.
However,
his four-party coalition no longer holds a majority in the Dutch parliament.
That means any deal struck in Brussels might not be ratified in The Hague.
Public
opinion seems to back Rutte's hard-line stance: A recent poll found that 61
percent of Dutch voters did not support the EU recovery plan as proposed by the
European Commission (before it was amended by Rutte and his fellow EU leaders),
while only 4 percent said they were fully happy with the proposal. Resistance
was highest among voters on the far right.
Welcome
home
The Dutch
have a deep Euroskeptic streak (they rejected the European constitutional
treaty and did the same to an EU-Ukraine Association Agreement), and Rutte has
been fighting in Brussels for years for a smaller EU budget and less lofty
ambitions.
Now he has
to defend a deal in The Hague that does neither of those.
Far-right
Party for Freedom leader Geert Wilders said Tuesday’s deal was a “horribly bad
result."
Another
far-right party, the Forum for Democracy, also said that far too much money was
going to Southern European countries and denounced the amount of spending in
the European budget.
Anne
Mulder, an MP from Rutte’s party, told the newspaper NRC that the prime
minister would “rather not interfere at all with Italy's pensions, but the
Italians are forcing us to do so. Because the European Commission isn't doing
its job, Mark Rutte has to be the bogeyman to enforce those reforms.”
Pro-Europe
parties, meanwhile, lambasted Rutte for agreeing to a deal that cut funding
proposals for EU climate and research programs, as well as watered down wording
linking the rule of law to EU funding.
"Unfortunately,
once again insufficient reform in agriculture and regional money has been
achieved, which limits the necessary modernization of the European
budget," said Rob Jetten, leader of the D66 party.
Dutch MEP
Bas Eickhout, from the Greens, scolded the frugal group during an extraordinary
session of the European Parliament in Brussels on Thursday morning, asking:
"What were you thinking?"
Rutte
speaks with Spain's Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez | Pool photo by Francisco Seco
via Getty Images
"Dear
frugals, you had your rebates. But we are discussing the future of Europe here.
And that is in everyone’s interest and certainly in yours," he said.
Attacked by
all sides, Rutte has a get-out clause: He announced earlier this month that he
will only decide in December, three months ahead of the election, if he wants
to carry on as party leader and run again. By then, the EU budget could well
have been replaced as a major talking point.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário