segunda-feira, 31 de maio de 2021

Europe’s farm fail // PM forced into ‘damage control’ intervention over Covid ‘blackspot’ of Odemira.

 


Portugal, Agriculture Minister Maria do Céu Antunes talking about the future of farming in the EU ?!?

Read what is happening in Odemira ( and other places ) below, in the second article.

OVOODOCORVO

 

Europe’s farm fail

 

A week of negotiations crashed and burned after EU countries pulled back on plans to make farming greener.

 

BY EDDY WAX AND GABRIELA GALINDO

May 28, 2021 6:33 pm

https://www.politico.eu/article/europe-eu-farming-fail-common-agricultural-policy-budget-environment/

 

EU governments showed their true colors on reforming the bloc's mammoth farm policy this week — and that color's not green.

 

Four days of negotiations billed as the prime moment to finalize a new Common Agricultural Policy blew up on Friday in a skull-crunching head-to-head clash between governments and members of the European Parliament over how much of the €270 billion budget should be set aside for greener kinds of farming.

 

The CAP is the single biggest tranche of the regular EU budget and campaigners have pressed the European Commission's green supremo Frans Timmermans to ensure that those payments secure a paradigm shift from business-as-usual industrial farming to more environmentally friendly methods.

 

That switch to greener farming looked a remote prospect after Friday's breakdown, with talks now shunted into June. The failed negotiations revealed a chasm of divergent views between governments, EU officials and MEPs on how to make agriculture more climate-friendly, and left the bloc's 10 million farmers in the dark about what's in store in the next five-year CAP, which has already been delayed by two years.

 

"Some member states have zero willing, but really zero, to change anything. They wanted a reform that does not change anything at all," said European People's Party lawmaker Herbert Dorfmann.

 

As talks reached their climax on Thursday afternoon, MEPs were seething at a proposal from EU countries that walked back the environmental ambition even further than what countries had offered the previous day, and was light-years away from what the European Parliament wanted.

 

The proposal would have given countries a loophole to spend just 18 percent of their main subsidies pot on the new "eco-scheme" programs, a flagship element of the CAP meant to encourage more sustainable farming from agro-forestry to organic agriculture. Countries argued the loophole was needed in case farmers don't take up the green schemes, but Parliament rejects that and has pushed for a higher 30 percent ring-fence.

 

MEPs flatly rejected the offer from countries, as represented by the Council of the EU. They regarded the offer as an attempt to bulldoze the Parliament, an institution which is often considered the junior partner in EU negotiations.

 

Agriculture ministers reacted furiously at a 2 a.m. roundtable. Greece's Spilios Livanos accused MEPs of blackmailing democratically elected governments by daring to turn down their proposal. "I sincerely don’t understand how the European Parliament reacts to this dialogue and I find it totally disrespectful to all of us," he told ministers and diplomats, to a round of applause.

 

Into the dark

Shortly afterward, the Council turned off the cameras despite the session having been advertised to journalists as a public session and ministers continued their talks in what was described by an EU diplomat as "a very bad atmosphere." Countries ultimately did not give Portugal, which holds the rotating presidency of the Council, a fresh mandate to keep negotiating with Parliament, torpedoing the talks early on Friday.

 

The reluctant decision to postpone talks for another month represents a blow for Portugal, whose Agriculture Minister Maria do Céu Antunes had stressed that the end of May was the latest possible moment for tying up the CAP.

 

At a press conference, she put a positive spin on the talks, saying: “We did say that we would have liked to conclude this process in May but that doesn’t mean we are giving up.” She said that Portugal still aims to wrap up the CAP reform before the end of its presidency and insisted that "there are a whole host of points on which we do agree."

 

But the reality was that negotiating sides drifted further apart, rather than converging, across the week.

 

Negotiations broke off with Parliament still pushing the Council to be greener on a host of other issues. These included linking the CAP strongly to the EU's broader Green Deal plans, the basic land management conditions farmers will have to meet to receive any EU subsidies, how much money to set aside for longer-term green investments, and also which payments should be classed as climate-friendly.

 

Diplomats from two EU countries said they felt Portuguese diplomats had made a grave error by presenting the provocative proposal to the Parliament, as there was no way it could have formed the basis for a reasonable compromise.

 

"In Council last night it became really clear that it was impossible to get a new proposal that would allow for a deal today. It was a clusterfuck," one of the EU diplomats commented. They described the week of talks as "so unprofessional from every side."

 

But on Friday France was keen to project an image of unity among countries, stressing that Portugal still had the full backing of the Council. Turning its guns on MEPs, the French agriculture ministry signaled to journalists that all ministers were united in opposing the Parliament’s proposals, deeming them unworkable, and arguing that the Parliament showed little willingness to listen.

 

MEPs from across the political spectrum were united in criticizing the Council's attitude toward them. The EPP's Norbert Lins told journalists: "I expect the Council to respect us as co-legislators." This was echoed by Green lawmaker Benoît Biteau, who said: “The Council has not understood that the Parliament is a co-legislator, that it is not for the Council to impose their vision of things, of the CAP, of European agriculture."

 

The bitter post-mortem of the breakdown of talks was not limited to a spat between MEPs and governments.

 

EU Agriculture Commissioner Janusz Wojciechowski defended the role he and his superior Timmermans played in the talks, having taken flak from powerful agricultural ministers of Germany and Spain for so strongly supporting the Parliament's greener push. "The role of the Commission is as a kind of facilitator and mediator, but I don't think it can be a completely neutral role."

 

Styling himself as the champion of real farmers, he took a dig at pesky national administrations, whom he blamed for whipping up fears that eco-schemes money would go to waste.

 

 

The skirmish leaves MEPs emboldened to push home their demands for a greener CAP during the next set-piece negotiations in Luxembourg on June 28 and 29.

 


PM forced into ‘damage control’ intervention over Covid ‘blackspot’  of Odemira

By Natasha Donn -12th May 2021

https://www.portugalresident.com/pm-forced-into-damage-control-intervention-over-covid-blackspot-of-odemira/

 

Following a manic week of news and revelations from the ‘Covid-blackspot’ of Odemira, prime minister António Costa cancelled his agenda on Tuesday afternoon in order to wrestle back control.

 

From now on, the housing of immigrant agricultural workers employed by intensive salad greens and berry explorations will have some structure to ensure adult men are not packed cheek-by-jowl into unsanitary accommodation paying small fortunes for the privilege as they eke out a living that can only be described as ‘modern-day slavery’.

 

Temporary workers brought in for specific moments (harvesting, etc.) are to be offered decent conditions of housing by their employing entities, while the living conditions of permanent workers will be the responsibility of the municipality.

 

On the basis that there are not enough homes to offer permanent workers, EU funding is to be used to construct what is necessary.

 

This is clearly a ‘long-term’ plan and doesn’t fully explain ‘what happens in the meantime’. But it is a solid step in the right direction.

 

President Marcelo waded into the developing crisis over a week ago, demanding reports from his advisors on everything that was ‘wrong’ in Odemira.

 

He said on Tuesday as António Costa was still on his way to what is the largest municipality in the country, there will have to be ‘many political consequences’ from this episode that began with ‘the alarm’ that cases of Covid in the municipality were ‘running out of control’.

 

This has been ‘dealt with’ now in that the cases were largely within the immigrant population – by dint of their miserable living conditions (which have been an open secret for the best part of a decade) – and these have been isolated and are recovering without any reports of serious illness.

 

The sanitary cordon that had barricaded citizens of two parishes from the outside world for the last 12 days is now over, and a robust vaccination and testing programme underway.

 

With certainly one of the political consequences likely being the performance through this drama of the ministry of interior administration Eduardo Cabrita (notably absent in Mr Costa’s damage control intervention on Tuesday), others have been highlighted by local politicians – particularly when it comes to the total lack of ‘joined up thinking’ over territorial order.

 

Mayor José Gonçalves in the neighbouring borough of Aljezur – which was also blighted by an outbreak of Covid infections among immigrants employed on Odemira’s explorations – explains that everything that is wrong stems from successive governments having allowed “the practice of unrestrained, unregulated, intensive agriculture” in an area that has been designated as a natural park (the Parque Natural do Sudoeste Alentejano e Costa Vicentina, or ‘PNSACV’).

 

Irrespective of the effects on the environment, on communities, the lack of control has meant that nothing is being done with regards to addressing issues over water. These explorations – many of them unlicensed – are ‘guzzling’ the area’s precious supplies; every year issues with water become that more acute.

 

It’s time, says the mayor for much more than the rehousing thousands of ‘pawns’ in this insidious game. It’s time to define:

 

Says Mr Gonçalves, “the challenge is enormous”. But it makes no sense that people living legally within the natural park (that stretches from Vila do Bispo in the south round Sagres and up to Sines) are not even allowed to undertake the simplest of home-improvements, while companies can come in, cover huge tracts of land with plastic-covered greenhouses, pollute the soil and groundwater with chemicals, guzzle water and exploit Third World citizens living in unimaginable poverty.

 

“It’s time to face this situation with realism”, the mayor concluded in a statement, while on television commentator Miguel Sousa Tavares praised the concerted efforts of journalists throughout the country in ramming home Odemira’s problems, to the point that they have finally started being addressed at the highest level of government.

 

Leader writer Eduardo Damâso, director of Sâbado magazine, warns that even this however is not enough.

 

“What Odemira needs cannot be resolved with mere episodes of political protagonism even from the highest level”, he wrote on Wednesday. “It needs rigorous decision-making and good planning, investment and respect from those in Lisbon who think Portugal exists between the Palaces of São Bento (the prime minister’s official residence) and Belém (the official residence of the president).

 

Odemira has ‘no health care system to speak of, no roads, no quality employment’, says Mr Damâso. It needs much more in the way of education and environmental protection, or what is one of the most beautiful coastal areas of Europe that is meant to be ‘protected’ will simply continue to be ravished.

 

Immigrants pay up to €17,000 for ‘the privilege’ of working in Odemira explorations

 

This is just one of the ‘shocks’ coming out of journalistic investigations into the plight of immigrant workers employed in explorations in Odemira. Many of these workers do not have contracts with their employers (only with employment agencies), Miguel Sousa Tavares told TVI, and they have paid anything between €12,000 – €17,000 for the privilege of securing their jobs, unaware that part of this money goes to the companies employing them. “This is scandalous”, said Tavares.

 

The ‘scandals’ don’t appear to stop coming, but the more they come out, the more local authorities that have for years been demanding solutions may at last start seeing them.

Sem comentários: