Pentagon chief opposes Trump threat to deploy
military at protests
Mark Esper categorically opposes using the
Insurrection Act
Mounting disquiet over the increasingly militarized
response
Julian
Borger in Washington
Published
onWed 3 Jun 2020 19.42 BST
The US
defence secretary has opposed Donald Trump’s threatened use of the Insurrection
Act to allow active duty troops to be deployed in American cities, and is
withdrawing airborne units that had been sent to Washington earlier this week.
Mark Esper
was speaking to journalists in the Pentagon amid mounting disquiet about the
increasingly militarized response to the George Floyd protests.
About 700
troops from the 82nd airborne division, mostly military police and combat
engineers, were flown to bases around Washington on Monday night, but they were
ordered to leave. The Associated Press reported that 200 would fly out on
Wednesday.
Trump has
threatened to invoke the 1807 Insurrection Act that would allow him to deploy
troops on city streets, against the wishes of state and city authorities. The
president said he would use the law if local authorities failed “to defend the
life and property of their residents”.
Esper
categorically opposed using the act on Wednesday.
“I say this
not only as secretary of defence, but also as a former soldier, and a former
member of the national guard, the option to use active-duty forces in a law
enforcement role should only be used as a matter of last resort, and only in
the most urgent and dire of situations,” the defence secretary said. “We are
not in one of those situations now. I do not support invoking the Insurrection
Act.”
Esper has
been supportive of Trump and has avoided contradicting him until now. But there
is reported to be mounting unease about senior officers about the
politicisation of the armed forces, and concern over Esper’s own actions.
“Esper has
directly challenged Trump,” Thomas Wright, director of the centre on the United
States and Europe on the Brookings Institution, said on Twitter. “Trump hates
being boxed in. If he fires Esper, it could set in motion a crisis that may
lead to a wider revolt within the GOP.”
Esper was
due in the White House to meet Trump straight after his Wednesday morning press
briefing.
Trump’s
spokeswoman, Kayleigh McEnany, told reporters: “As of right now, Secretary
Esper is still Secretary Esper.”
She added
that the press would hear if Trump lost confidence in him and noted: “The
president has the sole authority to invoke the Insurrection Act.”
There has
been widespread outrage – including from former officers – over the
participation of Esper and the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff who were
present at a photo op outside a church near the White House on Monday after the
surrounding area had been cleared with gas canisters, mounted police and baton
charges.
Esper’s
participation provoked the resignation of a member of the defense science
board, James Miller, who alleged the defence secretary had “visibly supported”
the use of force.
Esper said
he was not aware of the measures that had been taken to drive protesters out.
He said he was under the impression that he and Milley would inspect damage in
Lafayette Park, just in front of the White House and in St John’s Episcopal
church, where there had been a fire in the basement.
“I was not
aware a photo op was happening,” Esper said. “Of course, the president drags a
large press pool along with him. And look, I do everything I can to try to stay
apolitical and try and stay out of situations that may appear political and
sometimes I’m successful with doing that, and sometimes I’m not as successful,
but my aim is to keep the department out of politics, to stay apolitical.”
But Esper
defended his call to state governors on Monday “to dominate the battlespace” in
responding to protests over the police killing of George Floyd.
“The sooner
that you mass and dominate the battlespace, the quicker this dissipates, and we
can get back to the right normal,” Esper said on the call with Trump and the
governors.
Speaking on
Wednesday he said battlespace was “part of our military lexicon”.
“It’s what
we routinely use to describe a bounded area of operations. It’s not a phrase
focused on people, and certainly not on our fellow Americans,” Esper said.
But he
added: “In retrospect I would use different wording, so as not to distract from
the more important matters at hand.”
Esper also
said he had asked the army secretary, Ryan McCarthy, to launch an inquiry into
a national guard medevac helicopter which was filmed hovering low over
protesters in Washington, in an apparent effort to disperse them.
Esper
refused to be drawn in making an initial assessment but he did offer an
alternative to the view that the helicopter was used for intimidation.
“I got a
report back that they were asked by law enforcement to look at a checkpoint, a
national guard checkpoint, to see if there were protesters around. So there’s
conflicting reports.”
He did not
explain why a helicopter would be needed to spot protesters when the streets
were full of law enforcement officers from various agencies, nor why a
helicopter would have to hover so low to confirm the presence of protesters on
the street.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário