In Searing Detail, Trump’s Accuser Tells Her
Story
E. Jean Carroll, who says Donald Trump raped her, told
a chilling story on the stand. The former president harangued her from outside
the courtroom.
By Benjamin
Weiser, Lola Fadulu, Kate Christobek and Karen Zraick
April 26,
2023
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/26/nyregion/carroll-trump-trial-testimony.html
The writer
E. Jean Carroll on Wednesday told a Manhattan jury a harrowing story of being
raped in the mid-1990s by Donald J. Trump in a department-store dressing room —
describing a brutal attack that she tried to fight off by stamping on his foot
and that has left her traumatized for decades.
Just before
she began testifying in federal court, the former president infuriated the
judge overseeing the case by railing against the proceeding on social media.
Mr. Trump, who has so far avoided the trial, was not there as Ms. Carroll
related a tale she said she had waited decades to tell.
“Being able
to get my day in court, finally, is everything to me,” she said, her shaky
voice rising. “I’m happy. I’m glad that I got to tell my story.”
Ms. Carroll
spoke of an encounter that haunted her and ended her romantic life for good.
“I was
ashamed. I thought it was my fault,” she said, describing how she had initially
been laughing and joking with Mr. Trump after she ran into him at Bergdorf
Goodman in Manhattan. “It was high comedy. It was funny, and then to have it
turn into the …” Her voice then trailed off.
Ms.
Carroll, 79, testified on Day 2 of the civil trial stemming from the lawsuit
she filed against Mr. Trump last year under a New York law that granted adult
sexual assault victims a one-year window to seek redress for long-ago events.
Her suit, heard in federal court because she and Mr. Trump live in different
states, added to a litany of legal action against him.
She is
seeking damages for battery in connection with the rape allegations and also for
defamation for the attacks he made on her on his Truth Social platform last
October, when he called her case a “Hoax and a lie.”
Mr. Trump,
76, who has denied Ms. Carroll’s allegations, has not said whether he will
testify in his own defense and has not appeared in court so far. Seeking to
regain the presidency, he is scheduled to make a campaign appearance in New
Hampshire Thursday. But from outside the courtroom, he attacked the proceedings
within.
On
Wednesday morning, Mr. Trump used Truth Social to call Ms. Carroll’s case a
“made up SCAM” and a “fraudulent & false story,” which led the judge, Lewis
A. Kaplan of Federal District Court, to suggest that the former president was
trying to influence the jury.
Speaking
without the jury present, Judge Kaplan told Mr. Trump’s lawyer Joseph Tacopina
that Mr. Trump’s statements seemed “entirely inappropriate.”
“Your
client is basically endeavoring certainly to speak to his ‘public,’” Judge
Kaplan said, “but, more troublesome, to the jury in this case about stuff that
has no business being spoken about.”
Sign up for
the New York Today Newsletter Each
morning, get the latest on New York businesses, arts, sports, dining, style and
more. Get it sent to your inbox.
The judge
implied the statements could lead to a contempt sanction by the court.
Mr.
Tacopina said he would talk with his client, but attacks continued, with Mr.
Trump’s son, Eric, posting later in the day on Twitter that a prominent backer
of Ms. Carroll’s case had been motivated by “pure hatred, spite or fear of a
formidable candidate.”
The Truth
Social and Twitter posts were brought to the judge’s attention by Ms. Carroll’s
lawyer, Roberta A. Kaplan. Mr. Tacopina said that he had not seen or been aware
of them.
Nonetheless,
after Eric Trump’s attack, Judge Kaplan implied that stronger action might be
required.
“Remedies
that might be available from this court may not be the only relevant remedies,”
the judge told Mr. Tacopina. “If I were in your shoes, I’d be having a
conversation with the client.”
Mr.
Tacopina and Ms. Carroll’s lawyer, Ms. Kaplan, had no comment after court.
One legal
expert, Daniel C. Richman, a criminal law professor at Columbia Law School and
a former prosecutor, said the judge might have been referring to a federal
obstruction statute that outlaws efforts to corruptly influence or intimidate a
juror, whether in a criminal or civil trial.
It would be
another in a series of legal matters facing the former president: Mr. Trump
already is facing several criminal investigations, a lawsuit by the New York
attorney general and fraud charges filed by the Manhattan district attorney
stemming from hush money paid to a porn star. Mr. Trump has pleaded not guilty
to those charges and has denied wrongdoing in all cases.
While the
former president has so far shunned the courtroom where Ms. Carroll’s case is
being heard, his accuser relished her chance to speak in an official forum. On
the witness stand, she was questioned by one of her lawyers, Michael Ferrara.
“Why are
you here today?” Mr. Ferrara asked.
“I am here
because Donald Trump raped me, and when I wrote about it, he said it didn’t
happen,” Ms. Carroll said. “He lied and shattered my reputation, and I am here
to try to get my life back.”
Thus began
testimony by Ms. Carroll that lasted most of the day, during which she appeared
poised and deliberate but also acknowledged some lapses in her memory. When she
was asked precisely when the encounter occurred, she said, “The date has just
been something that I am constantly trying to pin down. It’s very difficult.”
There were
moments of humor from Ms. Carroll, who once wrote for “Saturday Night Live.” At
one point, Mr. Ferrara asked pointedly, “How do you feel about men?”
“I like
them!” she said, eliciting a laugh from at least one male juror.
But the
courtroom was silent when Ms. Carroll testified in excruciating detail about
the events that she said took place nearly 30 years ago.
Ms.
Carroll, a longtime advice columnist for Elle magazine, told the jury how she
had bumped into Mr. Trump as she was leaving Bergdorf’s after work one evening.
“He came
through the door and he said, ‘Hey, you are that advice lady,’” she testified,
adding that she replied, “Hey, you’re that real estate tycoon.”
She said
she was delighted when he asked for her help selecting a gift for a woman. “I
love to give advice, and here was Donald Trump asking me for advice about
buying a present,” Ms. Carroll testified. “It was a wonderful prospect for me.”
They made
their way to the lingerie section, where Mr. Trump found a bodysuit, directing
her to put “go put this on.” She declined and said he should put it on instead.
She recalled how he motioned her over to a dressing room; she said did not see
anybody else in the area.
Once they were
inside, Mr. Trump immediately shut the door, and the sexual assault began, she
said.
“I was
extremely confused and suddenly realizing that what I thought was happening was
not happening,” Ms. Carroll said. She said she didn’t want to anger Mr. Trump, explaining,
“I didn’t want to make a scene.”
She said
she pushed him back and he again shoved her against the wall, banging her head.
She described how Mr. Trump used his weight to hold her against the wall, then
pulled down her tights. Ms. Carroll grew emotional as she testified. “I was
pushing him back,” she said. “I was almost too frightened to think if I was
afraid or not,” she added later.
“His
fingers went into my vagina, which was extremely painful,” Ms. Carroll
testified. Then, she said, he inserted his penis. She testified that she had
not had sex since.
After the
attack, Ms. Carroll said, she fled Bergdorf’s onto Fifth Avenue in a state of
shock. She said she blamed herself afterward, saying her decision to go into
the dressing room was “very stupid.”
Ms. Carroll
testified that she told two friends about her experience within a day of the
attack. One, Lisa Birnbach, the author and journalist, told her she had been
raped and that she needed to go to the police. A second friend, Carol Martin,
told her not to tell anyone because Mr. Trump was powerful and had a team of
lawyers who would bury her.
Ms. Carroll
remained silent for more than 20 years. “I was frightened of Donald Trump,” she
explained.
When Mr.
Ferrara asked whether she was afraid of how others might react to her story,
Ms. Carroll said rape victims are “looked at as soiled goods.” Although people
profess sympathy, they can also be judgmental, she said: A victim should have
been smarter, screamed louder, dressed differently. And she said that she had
never wanted to tell her family.
Ms. Carroll
said “visions” of the incident filled her mind repeatedly over the years. “I’ve
had them ever since the attack. They were more frequent right after the attack,
and they stayed,” Ms. Carroll said.
She said
that the experience had robbed her of an essential sense of possibility.
“I am a
happy person, basically, but I’m aware that I have lost out on one of the
glorious experiences of any human being,” Ms. Carroll said. “Being in love with
somebody else, making dinner with them, walking the dog together.”
“I don’t
have that,” she said.
Benjamin
Weiser is a reporter covering the Manhattan federal courts. He has long covered
criminal justice, both as a beat and investigative reporter. Before joining The
Times in 1997, he worked at The Washington Post. @BenWeiserNYT
Lola Fadulu
is a general assignment reporter on the Metro desk.
Karen
Zraick is a breaking news and general assignment reporter. @karenzraick


Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário