UK coastguard ‘left Channel migrants adrift’ in
lead-up to mass drowning
Investigation reveals that at least 440 people appear
to have been abandoned in the weeks before the worst Channel disaster in 30
years
Aaron
Walawalkar, Eleanor Rose and Mark Townsend
Sat 29 Apr
2023 18.44 BST
Hundreds of
vulnerable migrants were abandoned to their fates after the UK coastguard
“effectively ignored” reports of small boats in distress during the days
leading up to the worst Channel disaster in 30 years when at least 27 people
died, an Observer investigation suggests.
Around 440
people appear to have been left adrift after the coastguard sent no rescue
vessels to 19 reported boats carrying migrants in UK waters, according to an
analysis of internal records and marine data seen by the Observer and Liberty
Investigates.
Experts
said the failure to act appears to breach international law.
The
incidents occurred across four dates in early November 2021, weeks ahead of the
mass drowning when a dinghy carrying migrants capsized.
Although
evidence relating to the 24 November tragedy has yet to be released ahead of an
official report, the documents raise questions over under-staffing in the
coastguard and a lack of vital resources in the period immediately before the
disaster.
Documents
also reveal that the number of operators on shift in the Dover control room
fell below internal targets that month, including on the night of the tragedy.
Last night
MPs called for an urgent review of coastguard staffing levels and a fundamental
review into its available resources.
“No
government that cares about human rights would allow staffing levels to drop so
low that it endangers human lives,” said Mark Serwotka, general secretary of
the Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS), which represents coastguard
staff.
UK
coastguard policy is to treat all reports of migrant vessels as distress
incidents, meaning they require “immediate assistance” – and should be found
and rescued.
But records
from 3 November 2021 show incidents were closed down without staff
“[establishing] the safety of those on board”, according to a former senior
coastguard who analysed them.
At least
112 people were left adrift amid delays and errors in responding to five
incidents that day alone.
An internal
database suggests a further 14 boats carrying 328 people were not rescued on
the 11, 16 and 20 November, according to experts who examined the evidence.
The
investigation cross-referenced coordinates from a coastguard database disclosed
under the Freedom of Information Act (FoI), with data from the ship-tracking
site Marine Traffic.
It
confirmed that in these cases no rescue boat or helicopter belonging to the
coastguard, Border Force or RNLI came within one nautical mile of the logged
coordinates within four hours. Five maritime experts confirmed that in the
absence of an explanation from the Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA), it was
reasonable to conclude no help was sent in these 14 cases.
It remains
unclear whether or not the 440 people on the 19 reported small boats identified
in this investigation survived. The MCA refused FOI requests for the details of
outcomes, relying partly on an exemption for “vexatious” requests.
When asked
for an explanation over why it had sent no boats to help on numerous occasions,
an MCA spokesperson said: “There are ongoing investigations into the UK’s
emergency response to the Channel crossing fatalities and it would be
inappropriate for HM Coastguard to comment further at this time.
“Our
thoughts remain with the family and friends of those affected by these
incidents.”
Reporters
tracked down a survivor of one of the incidents whose boat was recorded in a UK
coastguard spreadsheet as having been in British waters at around 8am on 20
November.
The boat,
carrying 23 people, had been floating adrift after running out of fuel with
Amjad (not his real name), from Iraq, claiming he only survived due to the
intervention of the NGO Utopia 56 after UK and French call handlers told him he
was not in their waters and should call the other side.
“We were
lucky,” said Amjad. “Maybe the [24 November] tragedy happened because they
[also] tried to call the UK and the French, [and] it was useless.”
The new
revelations will add to the intense scrutiny faced by UK coastguard over its
activity on 24 November. French coastguard logs, disclosed to lawyers, suggest
crucial hours were wasted that night as authorities on either side of the
Channel passed the buck.
The UK logs
remain secret, but a full report by the Marine Accident Investigation Branch
(MAIB) is expected this summer.
Alistair
Carmichael MP, home affairs spokesman for the Lib Dems, called for an “urgent
review” of coastguard staffing levels driven to “crisis through underfunding
and political grandstanding”.
Olivia
Blake, Labour MP for Sheffield Hallam, said: “We need to review the resource
available for the coastguard, but we also need a fundamental change of
approach.”
A Home
Office spokesperson said: “Our operational teams stand ready to respond 365
days a year and work tirelessly to respond to every small boat incident
encountered in the Channel.
“Our
thoughts are with the families of all of those who lost their lives in the
tragic incident in November 2021. It would be inappropriate to comment further
on this incident while investigations are ongoing.”“We are determined to stop
the gangs behind this illegal trade, and our Small Boats Operational Command is
working alongside our French partners and other agencies to disrupt the people
smugglers who put people’s lives at risk.”
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário