Trump says overturning Roe v Wade 'possible' with Barrett on supreme court

 

Trump says overturning Roe v Wade 'possible' with Barrett on supreme court

 

President tells Fox & Friends ‘maybe they’d give it back to the states’ regarding 1973 ruling which made abortion legal in the US

 

Amy Coney Barrett: what will she mean for women’s rights?

 

Martin Pengelly and Richard Luscombe

Sun 27 Sep 2020 18.49 BSTFirst published on Sun 27 Sep 2020 15.34 BST

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/sep/27/trump-amy-coney-barrett-supreme-court-roe-v-wade

 

Donald Trump has said it “is certainly possible” Amy Coney Barrett will be part of a supreme court decision overturning Roe v Wade, the 1973 ruling which made abortion legal in the US.

 

“She is certainly conservative in her views, in her rulings, and we’ll have to see how that all works out but I think it will work out,” the president told Fox & Friends Weekend of his new nominee to the court.

 

Asked if Barrett, if confirmed, would be part of a 6-3 conservative-liberal ruling “on a life issue”, Trump said: “It’s certainly possible. And maybe they do it in a different way. Maybe they’d give it back to the states. You just don’t know what’s going to happen.”

 

Progressives and Democrats fear the Indiana appeals judge’s strict Catholicism and conservative views will colour any rulings on abortion rights arising from any of 17 cases currently making their way through the courts.

 

They also worry about the Affordable Care Act, which provides health insurance to millions. An attempt to strike it down is due before the court on 10 November.

 

On Sunday, Trump’s opponent in the 3 November presidential election, Joe Biden, framed the battle over Barrett’s confirmation as a fight for the healthcare law. Speaking in Wilmington, Delaware, he said Trump had “laid out clearly what his objective is, terminate Obamacare.

 

“Women could once again be charged higher premiums just because they are women; pregnancy could become a pre-existing condition again; seniors will see their prescription drug prices go up and the funding for Medicare go down.

 

“It doesn’t matter what the American people want, President Trump sees the chance to fulfill his explicit mission, steal away the vital protections of the ACA from countless families who’ve come to rely on it for their health, their financial security and the lives of those they love.”

 

Republicans in the Senate are rushing to confirm Barrett. Democrats opposing them are backed by polling which shows majorities saying the next president should choose the replacement for the liberal justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who died aged 87 last week. But on Sunday the Senate minority whip, Dick Durbin of Illinois, told ABC’s This Week: “We can slow it down perhaps a matter of hours, maybe days at the most, but we can’t stop the outcome.”

 

Biden made an impassioned plea to Republicans.

 

“Take a step back from the brink, take off the blinders of politics for just one critical moment, stand for the constitution you swore to uphold,” he said.

 

“This is a time to de-escalate, to put an end to the shattering of precedents, the strong-arming of the nation and the chaos of this president. Just because you have the power to do something doesn’t absolve you of the responsibility to do right by the American people.”

 

Any effect on the election result remains of course to be seen. Biden leads national and most swing state polls. Trump focused on the issue in Pennsylvania on Saturday night. Debbie Stabenow, a Democratic senator from Michigan, another battleground state, told Fox News Sunday she thought Barrett would strike down the ACA.

 

A focus on healthcare and the ACA, rather than a narrower emphasis on abortion, worked for Democrats in 2018, when they took back the House. On Sunday, the House speaker, Nancy Pelosi, told CNN’s State of the Union: “The antidote to whatever [Trump] does is to vote, vote, vote. Vote for affordable care, vote for your pre-existing condition, vote for your safety and vote for your health.”

 

The court upheld the ACA in 2012, with Chief Justice John Roberts the swing vote. On Fox News Sunday, Eugene Scalia, the US labor secretary and son of the late conservative justice Antonin Scalia, for whom Barrett clerked, dismissed the importance of Barrett having attacked Roberts for that decision.

 

“It’s a red herring,” Scalia said. “It reflects frustration on the part of the Democrats as to how they might attack the nomination.”

 

Trump has placed two conservatives on the court. The second was Brett Kavanaugh, whose confirmation was dominated by allegations of sexual assault he vehemently denied.

 

On Saturday, the Senate judiciary chair, Lindsey Graham, told Fox News it was “appropriate to challenge the nominee” but if Democrats “treat Judge Barrett like they did Justice Kavanaugh, it’s going to blow up in their face big time”.

 

John Kennedy of Louisiana told Fox News Sunday: “If my Democratic friends want to turn [hearings] into an intergalactic freak show, bring back the protesters with the genitalia-shaped headgear, I can’t stop them.” The Republican also said he wanted “to be assured [Barrett was] not one of these justices that tries to rewrite the constitution to advance a political agenda that the voters won’t accept”.

 

According to Pew Research, about six in 10 Americans “say abortion should be legal in all or most cases”. Majorities support the ACA.

 

The court has not always ruled in Trump’s favour, recently upholding LGBTQ+ rights and blocking moves on immigration. The president told Fox: “You know, you think you know somebody and then you get rulings a little bit different than you think could happen.”

 

Those rulings saw Roberts and in the LGBTQ+ case Trump appointee Neil Gorsuch side with the liberals. With Barrett, the balance would be 6-3.

 

Shoring up support from evangelical groups, whose leaders he met before unveiling Barrett, Trump has committed to choosing anti-abortion justices. He told Fox that in meetings with Barrett, he “didn’t discuss certain concepts and certain things. And some people say you shouldn’t. I don’t see any reason why you shouldn’t. But I decided not to do it.”

 

When nominating Kavanaugh, Trump was reported to have said he was “saving” Barrett “for Ginsburg”.

 

In a statement, Alexis McGill Johnson of the Planned Parenthood Action Fund, said: “Barrett’s history of hostility toward reproductive health and rights, expanded healthcare access and more demonstrate that she will put Justice Ginsburg’s long record of ensuring that everyone receives equal justice under the law at risk.”