Mike Pence testifies to grand jury about Donald
Trump and January 6
Former vice-president’s proximity to the ex-president
during the Capitol attack makes him a key witness in the criminal inquiry
Hugo Lowell
@hugolowell
Fri 28 Apr
2023 00.50 BST
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/apr/27/mike-pence-testifies-donald-trump-january-6
Mike Pence
testified before a federal grand jury on Thursday in Washington about Donald
Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election results, according to a source
familiar with the matter, a day after an appeals court rejected a last-ditch
motion to block his appearance.
The former
vice-president’s testimony lasted for around seven hours and took place behind
closed doors, meaning the details of what he told the prosecutors hearing
evidence in the case remains uncertain.
His
appearance is a moment of constitutional consequence and potential legal peril
for the former president. Pence is considered a major witness in the criminal
investigation led by special counsel Jack Smith, since Trump pressured him to
unlawfully reject electoral college votes for Joe Biden at the joint session of
Congress, and was at the White House meeting with Republican lawmakers who
discussed objections to Biden’s win.
The two
interactions are of particular investigative interest to Smith as his office
examines whether Trump sought to unlawfully obstruct the certification and
defrauded the United States in seeking to overturn the 2020 election results.
Pence had
privately suggested to advisers that he would provide as complete an account as
possible of what took place inside and outside the White House in the weeks
leading up to the 6 January Capitol attack, as well as how Trump had been told
his plans could violate the law.
His appearance
came the morning after the US court of appeals for the DC circuit rejected an
emergency legal challenge seeking to block Pence’s testimony on executive
privilege grounds, and Trump ran out of road to take the matter to the full DC
circuit or the supreme court.
The
government has been trying to get Pence’s testimony for months, starting with
requests from the justice department last year and then through a grand jury
subpoena issued by Smith, who inherited the complicated criminal investigation
into Trump’s efforts to stay in power.
The
subpoena came under immediate challenges from Trump’s lawyers, who invoked
executive privilege to limit the scope of Pence’s testimony, as well as from
Pence’s lawyer, who argued his role as president of the Senate on 6 January
meant he was protected from legal scrutiny by the executive branch.
Both
requests to limit the scope of Pence’s testimony were largely denied by the new
chief US judge for the court James Boasberg, who issued a clear-cut denial to
Trump and a more nuanced ruling to Pence that upheld that he was protected in
part by speech or debate protections.
Still,
Boasberg ruled that speech or debate protections did not shield him from
testifying about any instances of potential criminality.
The former
vice-president’s team declined to challenge the ruling. But Trump’s legal team
disagreed, and filed the emergency motion that was denied late on Wednesday by
judges Gregory Katsas, Patricia Millett and Robert Wilkins.
Starting
weeks after the 2020 election, Trump tried to cajole Pence into helping him
reverse his defeat by using his largely ceremonial role of the presiding
officer of the Senate on 6 January to reject the legitimate Biden slates of
electors and prevent his certification.
The effort
relied in large part on Pence accepting fake slates of electors for Trump – now
a major part of the criminal investigation – to create a pretext for suggesting
the results of the election were somehow in doubt and stop Biden from being
pronounced president.
The pressure
campaign involved Trump, but it also came from a number of other officials
inside and outside the government, including Trump’s lawyer John Eastman, other
Trump campaign-affiliated lawyers such as Sidney Powell and Rudy Giuliani, and
dozens of Republican members of Congress.
Pence was
also unique in having one-on-one discussions with Trump the day before the
Capitol attack and on the day of, which House January 6 select committee
investigators last year came to believe was a conspiracy that the former president
had at least some advance knowledge.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário