Behind Woodward’s September surprise: White House
aides saw a train wreck coming, then jumped aboard
The president’s participation in Woodward’s latest
book is triggering a wave of unease inside the White House.
As the White House and Trump campaign sought to tell a
different story this fall about their handling of coronavirus, the book’s
release is renewing attention on the President Donald Trump's early missteps.
By NANCY
COOK and ALEX THOMPSON
09/09/2020
07:35 PM EDT
Updated:
09/09/2020 08:03 PM EDT
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/09/09/trump-bob-woodward-book-411225
He offered
lengthy meetings in the Oval Office and made phone calls at night from the
White House — delivering Bob Woodward an unprecedented nine hours of access
across 18 interviews.
Aides spent
months fretting about President Donald Trump opening up to the famous Watergate
journalist, fearing the consequences all the way through Wednesday’s bombshell
revelations.
Trump
bulldozed through them all, believing he could charm the man who helped take
down a president and chronicled half a dozen administrations over the past
half-century.
Now,
Trump’s impulse may cost him as the interview transcripts and recordings are
released this week, just under just eight weeks from Election Day and as some
Americans start receiving mail-in ballots. The revelations in “Rage” have sent
the Trump White House scrambling, with aides blaming one another for the
predictable fallout from injecting even more chaos into an already challenging
reelection race.
“You don’t
talk the president out of things,” one White House official said Wednesday, one
of 10 current and former White House officials who described the circumstances
leading up to the latest book.
The
interviews revealed that Trump was not candid with the public about the dangers
of Covid-19, with the president telling Woodward he was “playing it down” even
though it was possibly five times “more deadly” than the flu. “I still like
playing it down, because I don't want to create a panic,” Trump said in one
audio clip released Wednesday.
As the
White House and Trump campaign sought to tell a different story this fall about
their handling of coronavirus, the book’s release is renewing attention on the
president’s early missteps in a crisis that continues to disrupt hundreds of
millions of American lives. The book’s rollout will continue this weekend as
Woodward sits for a “60 Minutes” interview ahead of its wide release on Sept.
15. CBS said Wednesday the segment will also feature audio recordings of the
president’s interviews.
In 2018,
White House aides shielded Trump from an interview for his book “Fear” because
they didn’t want to give the author more ammunition than he already had. The
book was withering — portraying the Trump administration suffering a “nervous
breakdown” with anecdotes from current and former aides inside and outside the
administration.
Trump
learned about the book late in the process and called Woodward in frustration.
“It’s really too bad, because nobody told me about it, and I would have loved
to have spoken to you,” he said in audio released by The Washington Post at the
time.
He made
clear to aides that he would participate in the next book, convinced that he
could charm and cajole a veteran Washington journalist into seeing his point of
view.
At least
two sit-downs with the president occurred in the Oval Office — and far more
frequently, Trump would call Woodward directly at night with the White House
call log as a record. (The log records the time and length of the president’s
calls but not the content, one aide said.)
Trump also
urged his senior staff members to grant Woodward access and time, allowing him
to interview several top aides, including senior adviser Jared Kushner,
national security adviser Robert O’Brien, deputy national security adviser
Matthew Pottinger and former chief of staff Mick Mulvaney, among others. Often
Trump would urge aides to call Woodward directly during the reporting process
and kept asking West Wing aides when the book would come out.
Throughout
the process, several top aides raised concerns among themselves about the
access and where it would lead. And they worried about the president’s tendency
to overshare his ideas in often blunt language. But aides also resigned
themselves to the months-long process of Woodward interviews and calls, knowing
the president was interested himself.
“Sometimes the
president does a nontraditional thing, and you get a surprising result,” said
one senior administration official. “But I don’t think any of us recommended
doing it.”
On
Wednesday, Trump called the book “another political hit job” — despite the
recordings of the president’s own words. And he defended the way he downplayed
the virus early on by saying that “you cannot show a sense of panic or you're
going to have bigger problems that you ever had before. Please.”
When asked
why the president would sit down with Woodward for 18 interviews when his first
book was so critical, White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany said it was
because Trump was the “the most transparent president in history.”
McEnany
spent most of a press briefing on Wednesday answering questions about the
excerpts of the book, contradicting the president’s own words released in audio
recordings. "The president never downplayed the virus. Once again, the
president expressed calm,” she said in trying to explain the gap between the
president’s public versus private comments on the virus.
Democrats
pounced on the revelations, believing they demonstrated why Trump did not
deserve reelection this fall. “It was a life and death betrayal of the American
people,” former Vice President Joe Biden told reporters Wednesday ahead of an
event in Warren, Mich. "He knew and purposely played it down. Worse, he
lied to the American people.”
“The
president’s own words spell out the devastating truth: Trump was fully aware of
the catastrophic nature of the coronavirus but hid the facts and refused to
take the threat seriously, leaving our entire country exposed and unprepared,”
Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said.
In response
to the book’s revelations, White House aides quickly started blame one another.
Newer White House staffers tried to pin the decision to help Woodward on
previous offices or particular aides, even though the president himself made
the call to work with the author.
The
interviews took place over a few iterations of the White House staff, including
during the tenures of acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney and current chief of
staff Mark Meadows, with Woodward reporting through most of the summer. His
first meeting with Trump occurred in early February at the White House.
As
distressing as several White House aides found the excerpts, they spent part of
the day just trying to track down a copy of the book. The White House struggled
to respond to audio of the president’s interviews, as well as on-the-record
quotes from Kushner — evidence that forced them to argue that, at best, some of
the remarks deserved more context.
The access
does not seem to have brightened Woodward’s view of the president. The author
bluntly concludes his book with the assessment that “Trump is the wrong man for
the job."
Trump’s
decision to cooperate was seen as partly based on his respect for the Watergate
reporter as an institution, the officials said, a rite of passage ritual
numerous other presidents have gone through. They compared it to his 1980s
cultural mindset that put special value on Time magazine covers and The New
York Times.
“Trump
loves brands, and Woodward has been the gold standard for 50 years of
investigative journalism around the presidency, so it's the same reason why he
likes the Gray Lady, he likes The New York Times. It's the paper of record
traditionally in his hometown, so even though both excoriate him, he's
attracted to them the way a low-IQ small moth would be to a flame,” said
Anthony Scaramucci, who briefly served as White House communications director
under Trump. “Trump is always convinced that if he talks to the person, he is
going to elucidate and enlighten that person and get them to like him.”
Trump
thought he could curry favor and shape the coverage similar to the way he did
in New York City in the 1980s and ’90s with the tabloids, one Republican close
to the White House said, but “it’s different when you control the nuclear codes
and when you are the most powerful man in the world. The stakes are higher.”
Republican
Sen. Lindsey Graham also helped to persuade Trump to participate in the book
and told him that President George W. Bush once cooperated with a Woodward book
and it turned out far better as a result, one White House aide said. Graham did
not return a call for comment.
Bush’s
longtime strategist Karl Rove remembered it differently, however. “Every
president does a Bob Woodward book and gives him plenty of interviews and then
later comes to regret it, and this is probably one of those instances,” he told
Fox News on Wednesday.
The desire
to speak to Woodward reminded some aides of Trump’s insistence that he could
also sit down with special counsel Robert Mueller. In that case, Trump’s
lawyers feared the president would say something untrue under oath, and they
managed to negotiate supplying only written answers to Mueller’s questions.
Still, the
level of access stunned many political communications professionals. Jennifer
Palmieri, White House communications director under President Barack Obama,
called it “bonkers” and “hubris.”
Before
Palmieri’s tenure, the Obama administration gave what was then considered
significant access to Woodward for his 2010 book on Afghanistan. That included
a sit-down interview for just over an hour.
One White
House aide tried to wave it off as yet another damning Trump book in an already
crowded field, one that wouldn’t add much to what’s already known.
“Everyone
has a book,” a second senior administration said with a shrug.
Daniel
Lippman contributed to this report.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário