Why the US military would welcome a decisive 2020
election win
Military
chiefs keen to stay out of the way – a decisive result lowers risk of prolonged
crisis and the protests it could generate
Guardian
staff and agencies
Fri 30 Oct
2020 12.54 GMT
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/oct/30/us-military-election-decisive-win
But Donald
Trump’s unsubstantiated warnings about widespread voting irregularities and
exhortations to his supporters to become an “army for Trump” as uncertified
poll watchers have raised questions about a possible military role next week.
If any
element of the military were to get involved, it would probably be the national
guard under state control.
These
citizen soldiers could help state or local law enforcement with any major
election-related violence, especially in the event of a contested result.
But the
guard’s more likely roles will be less visible – filling in as poll workers,
out of uniform, and providing cybersecurity expertise in monitoring potential
intrusions into election systems.
Unlike
regular active-duty military, the national guard answers to its state’s
governor, not the president.
Under
limited circumstances, Trump could federalize them, but in that case, they
would generally be barred from doing law enforcement.
A contested
vote could stir the kind of wild speculation that forced America’s top general
to assure lawmakers the military would have no role in settling any election
dispute between Donald Trump and Joe Biden.
A decisive
result could allay such concerns by lowering the risk of a prolonged political
crisis and the protests it could generate, say current and former officials as
well as experts.
“The best
thing for us [the military] would be a landslide one way or another,” a US
defense official, speaking on condition of anonymity, told Reuters, voicing a
sentiment shared by multiple officials.
A week
before the election, a Reuters/Ipsos opinion poll showed Biden leading Trump
nationally by 10 percentage points, but the numbers are tighter in battleground
states that will decide the election and gave Trump his surprise 2016 win.
The
coronavirus pandemic has added an element of uncertainty this year, changing
how and when Americans vote.
The best thing for us [the military] would be a
landslide one way or another
US defense official
The
president, who boasts about his broad support within military ranks, has
declined to commit to a peaceful transfer of power if he believes that results
coming in on election day next Tuesday or, more likely with postal ballots
still being counted, a day or days thereafter, are fraudulent.
He has even
proposed mobilizing federal troops under the 200-year-old Insurrection Act to
put down unrest, and his tendency to be provocative on Twitter adds an extra
element of tension, which caused discomfort among some military top brass.
“Look, it’s
called insurrection. We just send them in and we do it very easy,” Trump told
Fox News in September.
For his
part, Biden has suggested the military would ensure a peaceful transfer of
power if Trump loses and refuses to leave office after the election.
US army
general Mark Milley, selected last year by Trump as chairman of the joint
chiefs of staff, has been adamant about the military staying out of the way if
there is a contested ballot.
“If there
is, it’ll be handled appropriately by the courts and by the US Congress,” he
told National Public Radio this month.
“There’s no
role for the US military in determining the outcome of a US election. Zero.
There is no role there,” he added.
Peter
Fever, a national security expert at Duke University, cautioned that America’s
willingness to look to the military when there is a crisis could create a
public expectation, however misguided, that it could also help resolve an
electoral crisis.
“If things
go poorly and it’s November 30 and we still have no idea who the president is …
that’s when the pressure on the military will grow,” Fever said, imagining a
scenario where street protests escalate as faith in the democratic process
erodes.
Steve
Abbot, a retired Navy admiral who has endorsed Biden, said the danger that
Trump would invoke the Insurrection Act “undoubtedly concerns those who are in
uniform and in the Pentagon”.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário