Why would Elon Musk want to deliberately destroy
X?
Arwa
Mahdawi
After an outburst this week, theories resurfaced about
why he bought the platform. Is Musk just a narcissist who let his ego get in
the way of sensible decisions?
Sat 2 Dec
2023 14.00 GMT
Is Elon
Musk deliberately sabotaging X?
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/dec/02/elon-musk-x-advertisers-week-in-patriarchy
Look, I’ll
be the first to admit that I am not a billionaire, nor am I the CEO of multiple
companies. Nevertheless, I think I’ve got a good grasp of some business
fundamentals. For example: it’s generally not a good idea to tell the people
your company relies on for revenue to fuck off.
While that
may seem like common sense to a normie like me, Elon Musk – a visionary and
genius whose brain operates on a dimension a mere mortal can never hope to
understand–has other ideas. During a interview this week at the New York Times’
DealBook Summit, Musk took vocal and profane umbrage with the fact that
advertisers are leaving X (formerly Twitter) in droves. The exodus comes after
Musk seemed to endorse an antisemitic conspiracy theory on the platform and a
Media Matters report found many ads on Twitter were being shown alongside
pro-Nazi post.
“What this
advertising boycott is going to do is, it is going to kill the company,” the
billionaire seethed on Wednesday. “And the whole world will know that those
advertisers killed the company.”
Well, yes,
my friend, that is how capitalism (something I thought Musk was fond of) works.
If it hurts a company’s brand to advertise on a platform where users with names
like Catturd are peddling conspiracy theories and hate speech, then they will
not advertise on your platform. The advertisers didn’t kill the company, your
incompetent management did.
Again: all
that seems like common sense. But Musk seems to think advertisers are out to
get him. “If someone’s going to try to blackmail me with advertising, blackmail
me with money, go fuck yourself,” he said defiantly onstage.
Musk’s
latest outburst comes at a dire time for X. The New York Times recently
reported that, based on internal sales documents, the company could lose as
much as $75m in ad money by the end of 2023. Meanwhile X’s value has dropped by
almost two-thirds since Musk acquired the company for $44bn in 22 October.
Alienating advertisers even further right now seems suicidal, an extraordinary
act of self-sabotage.
Perhaps,
one line of thinking goes, that’s exactly what it is. Ever since Musk took over
Twitter there have been theories circulating that the billionaire’s main
interest in buying the platform was to kill it. Those theories resurfaced in
full force after Musk’s outburst on Wednesday.
Why would
Musk want to destroy Twitter after paying $44bn for it? Well, one idea some
people have is that Musk isn’t actually all that fond of free speech. Nor are
the Saudis: Saudi Arabia’s Kingdom Holding Company (KHC), along with the
private office of Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, are the second largest investors
in Twitter following Musk. According to this line of reasoning, Musk’s plan all
along was to stop free expression – mainly leftwing expression – on Twitter
and, instead, turn it into a rightwing echo chamber. That would be extremely
convenient for authoritarian regimes who want to police online expression and
crackdown on dissent.
Another
line of reasoning is that Musk wants to kill Twitter because his investment was
in user accounts rather than a social network. There’s a mysterious method to
his madness and he wants to destroy the current business model so he can
transform it into something a lot more profitable.
Lou
Paskalis, former head of global media at Bank of America, seems to be one of
the proponents of this theory. “[Musk] is smart, he knows it’s illegal –
although usually hard to prove – to intentionally devalue an asset to
manipulate creditors, and he knows how to make money so I have to believe he
sees an entirely new revenue model that the rest of us don’t yet recognize,”
Paskalis told Business Insider. In other words, everything that looks like
self-sabotage to the common man is actually a genius business decision.
It’s
possible that there is some substance to these theories. But it’s also possible
that the simplest answer is the correct one: Musk is a narcissist who has let
his enormous ego get in the way of making sensible business decisions. He’s
realized that he can’t actually make X profitable so he’s letting it all burn
to the ground while casting himself as some sort of free speech martyr.
Again, I
don’t know exactly what’s going on in Musk’s brain (I’m not sure he does
either) but I do know this: theories that Musk is playing some sort of
four-dimensional chess with his bizarre decisions and unprofessional outbursts
demonstrate that an awful lot of people find it hard to believe that a rich
white guy might not be as smart as he thinks.

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário