Trump is a buffoon – but the next aspiring
autocrat won't be so incompetent
Richard
Wolffe
Our concern shouldn’t focus on whether Trump can
derail Biden’s inauguration. Instead we should be deeply concerned about
whether this cult can derail our democracy
‘It’s not that Trump doesn’t try. Yoda says there is
no try, but Trump really does try.’
Mon 4 Jan
2021 20.50 GMT
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/jan/04/donald-trump-autocrat-cult-democracy
Eleven
Christmases ago, a student boarded a Northwest Airlines plane flying from
Amsterdam to Detroit with a singular mission.
As the
plane crossed the US border, he spent 20 minutes in the bathroom and then
returned to his seat. There he tried to detonate his underwear, but only
succeeded in burning his leg. The likely reason Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab
failed to kill almost 300 people was because he was sweating too much.
The US has
often been lucky that its enemies are too incompetent to detonate their own
devices. But rather than relying on good fortune, successive presidents have
spent trillions of dollars building a post-9/11 military order that is supposed
to protect our freedoms.
After
listening to the outgoing president’s call with Georgia officials, it’s
painfully clear that Donald Trump is the underwear bomber of our democracy. We
are blessed to have such incompetent enemies, but the next assailant will not
sweat quite so much, or so obviously. We cannot wait until someone comes along
who knows how to light the fuse.
How
incompetent is the soon-to-be-ex-president? Trump wields the awesome power of
the presidency with all the subtlety of a sledgehammer trying to crack a safe.
“So what
are we going to do here, folks,” he asked Georgia’s secretary of state, Brad
Raffensperger. “I only need 11,000 votes. Fellas, I need 11,000 votes. Give me
a break. You know, we have that in spades already. Or we can keep it going, but
that’s not fair to the voters of Georgia because they’re going to see what
happened, and they’re going to see what happened.”
By “keeping
it going” Trump meant he would wield his delusional sledgehammer on stage at
his Georgia rally on Monday night, the day before the state’s crucial run-off
elections that will determine which party controls the US Senate for the next
two years.
It’s not
that Trump doesn’t try. Yoda says there is no try, but Trump really does try.
He tries to sound precise with all the numbers of votes he dreams up. He tries
to threaten the state election officials with unspecified crimes and political
punishment.
“Well,
under law, you’re not allowed to give faulty election results, okay? You’re not
allowed to do that. And that’s what you done. This is a faulty election
result,” Trump warns his fellow Republican.
“You should
meet tomorrow because you have a big election coming up, and because of what
you’ve done to the president – you know, the people of Georgia know that this
was a scam – and because of what you’ve done to the president, a lot of people
aren’t going out to vote. And a lot of Republicans are going to vote negative
because they hate what you did to the president. Okay? They hate it. And
they’re going to vote. And you would be respected. Really respected, if this
thing could be straightened out before the election.”
One of the
many challenges of this era is the distortion field that surrounds Donald
Trump. Because he only cares for himself, and because he represents such a
grotesque distortion of leadership, we focus on the individual. We try to
understand his sociopathy and we talk about Trumpism, assuming it will all
dissipate after inaugural day.
But at this
point, our concern should not focus on whether Trump and his allies can still
derail Joe Biden’s inauguration: they can’t. Instead we should be deeply
concerned about whether this cult can derail our democracy.
Long after
Trump shuffles down the ramp to his post-presidency, there will be another: a
Josh Hawley or a Ted Cruz or a Tom Cotton. We won’t call their autocratic
politics Trumpism, but they will be Trump-like.
The roots
of this ideology are deep and the network is extensive. At the end of this
post-9/11 era, we are waking up to an insidious and far-reaching series of
threats to our democracy and way of life. Some of its agents are directed by
leaders like Trump; others are self-starting, independent actors. Some are
inspired and organized internationally, but many are now home-grown.
The racist,
undemocratic wing of American politics moved briefly to the kooky fringes after
the civil rights movement. But it burst back onto the main stage in the Obama
years with the Tea party and its congressional outgrowth, the ironically-named
Freedom Caucus. At the heart of the caucus were Mick Mulvaney and Mark Meadows
– past and present chiefs of staff to one Donald Trump.
It was
Meadows who was polishing the turd as he teed up Trump’s call to Georgia’s
state officials on Saturday.
“What I’m
hopeful for is there some way that we can, we can find some kind of agreement
to look at this a little bit more fully,” Meadows ventured. “Mr Secretary, I
was hopeful that, you know, in the spirit of cooperation and compromise, is
there something that we can at least have a discussion to look at some of these
allegations to find a path forward that’s less litigious?”
By less
litigious, Meadows meant less engaged with those pesky judges who tossed out
all those Trump campaign lawsuits. When Georgia’s secretary of state said the
courts decide these issues, Trump himself sounded befuddled.
“Why do you
say that, though? I don’t know,” he said. “I mean, sure, we can play this game
with the courts, but why do you say that?
The funny
thing about this Freedom Caucus ideology is that it doesn’t respect the freedom
of the judicial branch.
Trump was
planning to award the presidential medal of freedom – the highest civilian
honor – to another Freedom Caucus chair, Jim Jordan. And he was traveling to
Georgia on Monday with yet another member, Marjorie Taylor-Greene, who just
happens to support the QAnon conspiracy.
A dozen
senators are now openly defying their leader, Mitch McConnell, by promising to
challenge the votes of the electoral college this week. They will fail to stop
Biden’s presidency, but they are succeeding in splitting their own party
between Trumpist autocrats and conservative Republicans.
McConnell
should have seen the splinter-group threat of the Tea party from the outset but
chose instead to keep them inside his tent. Now he faces the impossible task of
pleasing people who are neither conservative nor supporters of the republic.
It is easy
to brush this kind of nonsense aside as some temporary fever that will surely
break some day. Biden often sounds like he believes he can help administer some
centrist medicine with a spoonful of personal charm.
But
autocratic politicians nowadays don’t dress in black or brown, and have learned
how to sound occasionally normal. Hungary and Poland are still members of the
EU. Turkey still has newspapers, just not nearly so many independent ones.
Russia still has elections, but its opposition leaders tend to be either jailed
or poisoned.
The only
reason American democracy survived 2020 is because of historic voter turnout, a
handful of principled Republican election officials, and an independent
judiciary. None of those factors are guaranteed to survive, and without one of
them, the whole system would collapse.
We don’t
know precisely why so many former defense secretaries warned Trump and his
supporters against involving the military in their last-gasp effort to destroy
democracy and the 2020 election results. But we do know the general fear, and
the name of the organizer: one Dick Cheney.
It may seem
weird that the man who led so many abuses of power in the post-9/11 era should
seek to warn us about the abuses of power in the post-Trump era.
But the
underwear bomber was no less real for all of Cheney’s promotion of war and
torture. And the threat to our democracy is no less real for all of Trump’s
buffoonish attempts at autocracy.


Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário