Trump
Offers Putin Economic Relief in Hopes That Russia Will Return the Favor
The Trump
administration is ignoring the will of Congress and waiving new Russia
sanctions amid fears that high energy prices will cost Republicans in next
month’s elections.

President
Trump and President Vladimir Putin of Russia last year in Alaska.Credit...Doug
Mills/The New York Times
Reporting
from Washington
Oct. 17,
2026
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/10/17/business/trump-russia-sanctions-congress.html
For
years, critics of President Trump accused him of welcoming help from Russia to
tilt elections in his favor. Now, with midterm elections in the United States
two weeks away, Mr. Trump is explicitly seeking economic support from Russia.
A week
ago, the Trump administration announced that it was lifting
sanctions on Russian diesel exports. Late on Friday night, the White House
released an executive order exempting
Russia from a sanctions law that Congress passed last month. The moves were
a last-ditch effort to lower the soaring gas prices in America that polls show
are turning voters against Mr. Trump and Republican candidates.
Ukraine
has frustrated Mr. Trump in recent months with its attacks on Russian oil
refineries, which he blames for high global energy prices. Although the attacks
have disrupted global energy supplies, oil prices have been climbing since the
United States attacked Iran at the end of February, leading to violence across
the Middle East and clogging the flow of oil through the Strait of Hormuz. Gas
prices on Saturday averaged $4.31 a gallon in the United States, according to
the AAA motor club, up nearly 45 percent since the start of the war.
The
crumbling of years of work by the United States to put economic pressure on
Russia to end its war in Ukraine raises questions about the Trump
administration’s strategy to broker a peace deal. Mr. Trump’s executive order
on Friday comes as the administration is pushing for Europe to
resume buying more Russian gas, as part of the peace deal.
Mr.
Trump’s waiver of the sanctions also casts doubt on why Congress passed
legislation that was intended to punish Russia but made imposing the sanctions
optional.
On
Saturday, Mr. Trump’s decision was hailed by Russia and assailed by Ukraine.
“The
suspension of some of the provisions of the Graham Act marks an important and
truly historic moment,” said Kirill Dmitriev, who is Mr. Putin’s special envoy
for investment and economic cooperation. “These provisions could have
effectively brought all economic cooperation between Russia and the United
States to a complete halt, inflicting serious damage primarily on the U.S.
economy and global markets.”
President
Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine, who has maintained that Ukraine has a right to
defend itself against Russia, condemned the sanctions relief for Russia and
predicted that there would be more of that to come.
“I want
to thank both Democrats and Republicans who supported his bill,” said
Mr. Zelensky, who posted
a photograph on social media of him with Senator Lindsey Graham, the South
Carolina Republican who died in July after working for more than a year to
build support for the legislation. “That was a major victory: this truly
bipartisan support. And now, the decision to undo all of this, to block all of
it, seems wrong to me. And it definitely helps only the Russians.”
Skeptics
of the law said that they were not surprised that Mr. Trump was ignoring the
will of Congress. The sanctions in the law, which was named after Mr. Graham,
were intended to target Russian officials, oligarchs and financial
institutions. But the law also said that Mr. Trump could decline to impose the
sanctions if he sent a letter to Congress explaining that they were not in the
“national interest.”
The law
also gave Mr. Trump new powers, which he has yet to deploy, to impose high
tariffs on buyers of Russian energy products.
Some top
Republican lawmakers who have recently run afoul of Mr. Trump criticized the
president’s executive order on Saturday as letting President Vladimir V. Putin
of Russia off the hook.
“Congress
Must Investigate Trump’s Aid and Comfort to Putin,” Senator John Cornyn, a
Texas Republican, wrote in a post on social media.
Senator
Thom Tillis, a North Carolina Republican, called the decision “beyond
irresponsible.”
“It’s
unconscionable that this administration is capitulating to a Russian dictator
who illegally invaded Ukraine and butchers innocent civilians every single
day,” Mr. Tillis said in a social media post. “If the President wants to
actually bring down energy prices, he can do it by solving the Iran problem,
not by doing a solid for Vladimir Putin.”
But it
appears that Congress has little recourse. Even when Congress mandates
sanctions, the executive branch has broad discretion on whether to deploy them
based on what it believes is best for national security.
“Presidents
have always sort of bridled at congressionally mandated measures,” said Adam M.
Smith, a former senior adviser to the director of the Treasury Department’s
Office of Foreign Assets Control in the Obama administration.
Mr. Smith
said that he was surprised that Mr. Trump had opted against imposing any of the
sanctions and noted that it gave the appearance that the president was turning
away from Ukraine and toward Moscow.
“This
plus the diesel deal will make some people concerned about where the
president’s head is in this space,” Mr. Smith said.
Alex
Zerden, the founder of the risk advisory firm Capitol Peak Strategies and a
former official in the Treasury Department’s Office of Terrorism and Financial
Intelligence, said that Mr. Trump appeared to be adhering to the sanctions law
as it was written. He was perplexed by the political calculus of seeking
economic assistance from Russia after Congress demonstrated bipartisan support
for crippling Russia’s economy.
“The
optics around this are confounding given the bipartisan and presidential
support for the Lindsey Graham legislation,” Mr. Zerden said. “But the
president maintains wide discretion with this Congress.”
During
the Biden administration, the United States imposed more than a thousand
sanctions on Russian targets and corralled allies to put a cap on the price of
Russian oil. The Trump administration has been lenient in enforcing many of
those sanctions and so far has only imposed
new sanctions on Lukoil and Rosneft, Russia’s two largest oil companies.
The
decision to offer Russia relief from sanctions because of fears about energy
prices also represents an about-face for Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.
At his
confirmation hearing last year, Mr.
Bessent said the Biden administration’s sanctions on Russia were not
“fulsome” enough and described Russia’s invasion of Ukraine as one of the
greatest tragedies of his adult life. He warned any Russian officials who were
watching the Senate hearing that he would gladly ratchet up sanctions pressure
to force Russia to the bargaining table.
“I
believe that the previous administration was worried about raising U.S. energy
prices during an election season,” Mr. Bessent said.
Alan Rappeport is an
economic policy reporter for The Times, based in Washington. He covers the
Treasury Department and writes about taxes, trade and fiscal matters.


Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário