sábado, 22 de agosto de 2026

Meghan Markle's rumored casting in the third season of Guy Ritchie's Netflix series The Gentlemen has reportedly been withdrawn following intense public backlash in the United Kingdom.

 

Meghan’s casting in The Gentlemen reportedly withdrawn

Meghan Markle's rumored casting in the third season of Guy Ritchie's Netflix series The Gentlemen has reportedly been withdrawn following intense public backlash in the United Kingdom.

The Backlash and Withdrawal

The news of her potential acting comeback broke just 24 hours prior, with reports indicating she was in early, advanced discussions to join the hit drama series. However, prominent journalist and former editor-in-chief of Vanity Fair and The New Yorker, Tina Brown, revealed on her Substack column Fresh Hell that the decision was abruptly reversed.

Tina Brown wrote: “I learned this morning that the casting of Meghan Markle in season 3 of Guy Ritchie's Netflix series The Gentlemen has been withdrawn. The backlash in the UK was so intense, it became untenable to go forward.” -- [Forbes].

Representatives for the Duchess of Sussex, Netflix, and the talent agency WME (which represents both Markle and Ritchie) have declined to issue an official comment regarding the abrupt cancellation.

Context of the UK Return

The casting controversy coincides with reports that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are planning an imminent move from California back to the United Kingdom. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, alongside their children Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, are reportedly relocating to a private property outside London. Acting opportunities like The Gentlemen were widely considered a primary driving force behind her sudden desire to return to the British entertainment landscape.

Career Impact

Before marrying Prince Harry in 2018, Meghan was best known for her multi-season role as Rachel Zane on the legal drama Suits. The collapse of this high-profile Netflix deal signals immediate friction for her post-royal career re-entry. Observers note that this development could complicate future British television aspirations for the Duchess.

 

Meghan’s casting in The Gentlemen reportedly withdrawn

 


Meghan’s casting in The Gentlemen reportedly withdrawn

 

Duchess of Sussex was believed to have been under consideration for season three of Guy Ritchie’s crime caper

 

Nadeem Badshah

Sat 22 Aug 2026 22.23 BST

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2026/aug/22/meghan-markles-casting-in-the-gentlemen-reportedly-withdrawn-after-uk-backlash

 

The Duchess of Sussex’s reported casting in Guy Ritchie’s The Gentlemen has been withdrawn, it was reported.

 

Tina Brown, the former editor-in-chief of Vanity Fair and the New Yorker, wrote on Saturday: “I learned this morning that the casting of Meghan Markle in season 3 of Guy Ritchie’s Netflix series The Gentlemen has been withdrawn. The backlash in the UK was so intense, it became untenable to go forward.”

 

The development comes a day after reports that the Duchess of Sussex was in talks to make her acting return in The Gentlemen.

 

According to Variety, Meghan was in discussions to join the third season, which has yet to receive an official greenlight.

 

The Gentlemen series is a spin-off from the 2019 crime comedy film of the same name, which starred Matthew McConaughey and Charlie Hunnam, with Guy Ritchie acting as creator of both.

 

The duchess made her name in the legal drama Suits, in which she played the character Rachel Zane for seven seasons.

 

Her other small-screen appearances include CSI: NY and 90210, while film roles have included a small part in the comedy Horrible Bosses and 2015’s crime thriller Anti-Social. She also led two Hallmark movies: When Sparks Fly and Dater’s Handbook.

 

She recently filmed a cameo playing herself in the Amazon comedy Close Personal Friends alongside Brie Larson and Jack Quaid.

 

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are planning to return to live in Britain this month, six years after leaving for the US, it is understood.

 

The couple and their two children, Prince Archie, seven, and Princess Lilibet, five, are expected to relocate to a property believed to be outside London.

 

King Charles was reportedly informed last Sunday that his son and daughter-in-law would return to Britain.

 

Last year the Duke and Duchess of Sussex signed a fresh multi-year film and television deal with Netflix.

 

Harry and Meghan struck the original five-year deal in 2020, reportedly worth $100m (£78m), which resulted in a number of projects.

 

Meghan’s main release with the streamer was the lifestyle series With Love, Meghan. The show received negative reviews from many critics, with the Guardian’s Chitra Ramaswamy calling it “toe-curling stuff” in a one-star review.

Has Melania Quit Her Job? | Inside Trump's Head

Where does WH Chief of Staff Susie Wiles stand on Harp’s closeness to Trump?

BREAKING NEWS: Stephen Miller Defends Natalie Harp Following Leaked Letters To Trump

FULL REMARKS: PM Mark Carney Delivers Blunt Message to Trump After Trade Talks Collapse | AF15

 

‘Attacked’ by Trump on Trade, Canada Is ‘at War’ With U.S., Carney Says

 



‘Attacked’ by Trump on Trade, Canada Is ‘at War’ With U.S., Carney Says

 

Prime Minister Mark Carney gave a powerful speech to Canadians on Saturday morning, hours after ordering negotiators to suspend U.S. trade talks despite President Trump’s punishing tariffs.

 

Ian Austen

By Ian Austen

Reporting from Ottawa

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/22/world/canada/carney-tariffs-trade-trump.html

Aug. 22, 2026

Updated 4:35 p.m. ET

 

The morning after he pulled negotiators from trade talks in Washington and set off a new round of American tariffs, Prime Minister Mark Carney called the U.S. proposal “a bad deal” and said Canada was “at war” with the United States.

 

“We’ve recognized from the start that America has changed,” he said in an address to Canadians on Saturday. “We recognize that sometimes, its signature is written in pencil.”

 

“We cannot accept what they offered and we will not give what they asked,” he added. “We were not prepared to compromise Canada’s sovereignty or undermine our key industries.”

 

In a muscular, 22-minute speech that let Canadians — and Americans — know exactly where he stands, Mr. Carney said that Canada was under attack by President Trump’s punishing tariffs.

 

“You’re at war when you’re attacked, and we got attacked,” Mr. Carney said.

 

But unlike his electrifying speech at Davos that spoke of a rupture in the world order, Mr. Carney explicitly named the United States as an aggressor and a threat to Canada and the global economy.

 

The latest U.S. tariffs, he said, “are designed to hurt and divide us. They are a miscalculation because Canadians will always take care of each other. We know we’re stronger together.”

 

On Friday night Mr. Carney blamed unspecified last-minute demands for the collapse of negotiations, saying that they were “unfair, uneconomic and called into question the reliability of any deal.” Minutes later, the United States went ahead with previous plans and introduced 50 percent tariffs on $20 billion worth of Canadian exports.

 

Want to stay updated on what’s happening in Canada? Sign up for Your Places: Global Update, and we’ll send our latest coverage to your inbox.

Mr. Carney immediately promised that Canada will retaliate “dollar for dollar.”

 

On Saturday, he said that American negotiators “asked too much and offered too little.” Among other things, Mr. Carney said that American negotiators pushed to roll back Canada’s efforts to promote Canadian and French language content in online streaming services, subsidies for industries like publishing and film production and even mandatory labeling in French, an official language in Canada, as well as English on packaging.

 

“We were close to reaching a comprehensive agreement with the U.S., but they made changes, including threats on French language and culture and Canadian culture that would never be acceptable for that reason,” Mr. Carney said in French. “That marked the end of that stage of negotiations.”

 

Mr. Carney added that the United States wanted Canada to align its trade policies toward other countries with American tariffs, something he called “a power play” and “a question of sovereignty.”

 

During negotiations, Mr. Carney said, the U.S. side also refused to budge on including Canadian as well as American parts when calculating tariff payments on Canadian autos, and refused to reduce the rate for medium and heavy trucks. It also offered little for companies that make products the United States deems to be primarily aluminum or steel — a category that ranges from antennas to snowmobiles. Those products currently face 25 percent tariffs.

 

The prime minister’s decision to stand up to President Trump and walk away from negotiations is the latest fracture in the once-close ties between the countries. The relationship has drastically deteriorated since Mr. Trump returned to office, where he has targeted Canada with tariffs, insulted its leaders and repeatedly proposed that it be annexed as the 51st state.

 

Mr. Trump’s trade actions and slights have prompted widespread anger and fear among Canadians.

 

The trade negotiations began in late July, in a bid to ward off new tariffs and to reverse or at least reduce U.S. tariffs of up to 50 percent on the key auto, steel and aluminum sectors that were introduced last year.

 

As he did on Friday night, Mr. Carney suggested on Saturday that Canada would now double down on its strategy of disengaging from the U.S. economy, expanding trade with other countries and diversifying Canada’s economy.

 

“Last spring, I warned that America is trying to break us so that they can own us and I promised: ‘That will never, ever happen,’” Mr. Carney said. “We are keeping that promise. Canada is becoming stronger and less dependent on America.”

 

Unlike the previous tariffs, the new U.S. measures affect a more varied array of business sectors, although they disproportionately target building materials like plywood as well as tissue used for toilet paper, which are significant exports for the forestry industry. Canadian alcohol is also singled out.

 

The new American tariffs only cover a small portion of the $382 billion worth of products the United States imported from Canada last year, in part because they conspicuously avoid oil, gas and electricity imports. They also avoid potash, a key fertilizer not mined in large quantities in the United States.

 

But many of the items hit with tariffs, like men’s suits and honey, are often made by small to midsize companies that will likely be unable to withstand any significant loss of business.

 

Trevor Tombe, a trade economist at the University of Calgary in Alberta, estimates that the new tariffs could cost upward of 90,000 jobs in Canada.

 

Mr. Carney promised 25 billion Canadian dollars in financial assistance to affected companies.

 

Exactly how Canada could retaliate without creating further headaches for Canadian businesses was not clear. Many manufacturers in Canada rely on supplies and materials which generally cannot be readily or economically purchased elsewhere. Canada’s much smaller economic footprint also limits its ability to inflict significant economic pain on the United States.

 

Mr. Carney said that Canada was moving ahead on retaliation “reluctantly, because we recognize that it will raise costs and reduce choice for Canadians. Reluctantly, because we recognize that some U.S. companies and states are innocent bystanders in a dispute they did not want.”

 

He added: “We take this step confident that it is in the best interests of Canada and that by rejecting a bad deal, by standing up for Canada and by focusing on what we can control, we will build Canada strong for all.”

 

Mr. Carney said that Canada’s retaliatory tariffs will come into effect on Sept. 8 and will be focused on “steel, dairy, appliances, agricultural equipment, pulp and paper, electronics.”

 

Jamieson Greer, the U.S. trade representative, said on Fox News on Saturday morning that the Trump administration was “moving forward with measures that respond to Canadian retaliation.”

 

Doug Ford, the premier of Ontario, the most populous province, urged Mr. Carney to look at using oil, gas and electricity as trade weapons in a letter this week. Mr. Carney previously downplayed that idea, saying it would jeopardize Canada’s reputation for reliability.

 

But polls show widespread support for export taxes on energy. On Saturday, after outlining the United States’ energy dependence on Canada, Mr. Carney added: “I don’t think they want us to stop sending it.”

 

Mr. Ford also spoke in defiant terms. “We never started this fight but I assure we’re going to win this fight,” he told reporters on Saturday, saying he was happy that Mr. Carney refused to sign a deal that could hurt his province’s automobile and steel sectors.

 

“We have to make sure that as Donald Trump is trying to inflict pain on every Canadian that we inflict pain right back, until he realizes that we are his number one customer in the world,” the Ontario premier said. “We have to make sure we look at every single asset we have, if it’s critical minerals, steel or nickel, everything is on the table.”

 

Mr. Carney said that the free trade agreement between Canada, the United States and Mexico was “being violated day in, day out” by the Trump administration. On July 1, the United States declined to renew the pact for another 16 years, putting it up for annual reviews instead.

 

Asked on Saturday what the American actions mean for the continued renewal of the agreement, Mr. Carney said, in French: “It certainly isn’t good news.”

 

Ian Austen reports on Canada for The Times. A Windsor, Ontario, native now based in Ottawa, he has reported on the country for two decades. He can be reached at austen@nytimes.com.

Broken DUBAI: 10 Areas Turning Into Ghost Zones as Tourism Collapses in 2026

It's Confirmed! Dubai's $12 Billion Man-Made Island Is Sinking Back Into the Sea

EUROPE’S FOOD CRISIS! Heatwaves & Drought Threaten Massive Price Hikes | ET Now | World News

Europe Drought Crisis? EU’s Explosive Warning As Water Crisis Threatens Millions Across Continent

EXPLAINED: Why Record Drought Is Draining Hungary’s Lakes and the Danube | Times Now World

 

A 17-year-old girl was killed and three other minors were wounded after an 18-year-old man armed with a sword attacked students at Brinell High School in Fagersta, Sweden, on Friday, August 21, 2026.

 


Seventeen-year-old girl killed in sword attack at school in Sweden

A 17-year-old girl was killed and three other minors were wounded after an 18-year-old man armed with a sword attacked students at Brinell High School in Fagersta, Sweden, on Friday, August 21, 2026.

The Attack

  • The Incident: The suspect entered the school just after lunch wearing black clothing, a helmet, and a mask.
  • The Weapon: He carried a sword and methodically attacked individuals inside the building.
  • The Casualties: A 17-year-old female student died from her injuries. Two boys aged 12 and 17 suffered injuries, alongside a third minor who has been discharged from the hospital.

The Suspect and Investigation

  • Arrest: Police responded immediately and detained the 18-year-old suspect. Officers fired service weapons during the arrest, but the perpetrator was not injured.
  • Connection: The attacker is identified as a student or former student of the high school and has a prior conviction for assault.
  • Motive: The official motive remains unclear. Investigators are executing house searches and examining online communities.
  • Online Footprint: Authorities are probing a TikTok account that posted an image of a sword from a school restroom 20 minutes before the assault. The account featured videos referencing past mass violence, including Norwegian far-right extremist Anders Behring Breivik.

National Impact

  • Political Response: Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson and opposition leader Magdalena Andersson paused campaigning for the upcoming general election to visit Fagersta, offering condolences to the victims' families.

Seventeen-year-old girl killed in sword attack at school in Sweden

 


Seventeen-year-old girl killed in sword attack at school in Sweden

 

Three other people wounded after 18-year-old man wielding sword assail students in Fagersta school

 

Nadeem Badshah

Sat 22 Aug 2026 19.11 BST

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/aug/22/seventeen-year-old-girl-killed-in-sword-attack-at-school-in-sweden

 

A 17-year-old girl has been killed after a teenager brandishing a sword attacked students at a school in Sweden, police have confirmed.

 

Three other people were wounded in the incident during classes in the central town of Fagersta on Friday afternoon, including two boys aged 12 and 17 who sustained minor injuries.

 

The third person, who was also under 18, was also left with minor injuries and has been discharged from hospital, Swedish news agency TT reported.

 

The parents of the 17-year-old girl told local newspaper Fagersta-Posten their daughter was killed in the attack.

 

An 18-year-old man has been arrested over the incident at Brinell high school.

 

Swedish police are investigating whether the suspect was involved in online communities promoting school violence, a police source said.

 

Detectives are investigating whether a TikTok account that posted a picture of a sword 20 minutes before the attack belonged to the person responsible, the source told Reuters.

 

The image appeared to have been taken in a restroom at the school, according to the Dagens Nyheter newspaper.

 

Before the image was taken down on Friday, the month-old account contained videos that referred to two episodes of mass violence in Sweden and to the far-right mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik, who killed 77 people in Norway in 2011.

 

One of the videos referenced a 2015 attack in which a masked swordsman killed a teaching assistant and two boys at a school in Trollhättan, western Sweden, before being shot dead by police.

 

“The investigators are looking into various online communities that may have egged on the suspect to carry out the attack,” the police source said.

 

Several party leaders cancelled planned speeches on Saturday, pausing campaigning ahead of Sweden’s 13 September general election.

 

The prime minister, Ulf Kristersson, and opposition leader Magdalena Andersson travelled to Fagersta to offer condolences to the bereaved family and visit the injured.

 

Kristersson told reporters: “What should never happen has happened again. Our thoughts go first and foremost to the families who have been incredibly hard hit by this.”

 

Sweden’s worst mass shooting occurred in February 2025 at a school in the south-central city of Örebro, when a gunman killed 10 people before turning the weapon on himself.

 

On Saturday, the police clarified that the suspect in the Fagersta attack had not been shot, contrary to what they had said on Friday.

 

“Service weapons were used but the perpetrator has not been injured in connection with the arrest, and has not been in need of medical attention,” a police spokesperson told the Aftonbladet daily.

 

Prosecutors ordered the man’s detention on suspicion of murder and several counts of attempted murder.

Here's Everything I Know About Natalie and Melania | Inside Trump's Head

Why are more women joining Europe's hard-right movements?

Woke is Back and It's Worse Than Before

Why They Believed Arday but Not Ray

New footage shows confrontation between French police and Channel migrants

Footage shows clash with French police on beach as dinghy tries to leave for UK

 


Footage shows clash with French police on beach as dinghy tries to leave for UK

 

Film emerges as France says it has stopped 185 small boat ‘events’ in three months since new £660m deal with UK

 

Rajeev Syal Home affairs editor

Fri 21 Aug 2026 09.05 BST

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/aug/21/footage-french-police-clashing-people-beach-small-boats

 

Footage has captured the moment French police officers clashed with people on a beach in northern France as the authorities tried to intercept a dinghy attempting to reach the UK.

 

Men wearing lifejackets appear to throw objects at the police to try to keep them away from their dinghy. The officers then use Pava spray before slashing the inflatable boat with a knife.

 

The footage emerged as the French government said it had prevented 185 “small boat crossing events” in the three months since a new £660m deal with the UK.

 

A small boat event is defined as stopping launches, seizing equipment including boats, engines and lifejackets, and arresting smugglers.

 

Since the signing of the deal in April, extra police units have been active on French beaches, including a 50-person riot squad.

 

Police action has included interceptions on beaches and at sea, the UK Home Office said.

 

Since March, 12 “taxi boats” have been stopped from moving further up the coast and picking up more people.

 

More resources have also been dedicated to seizing boats and engines before they can be used in the Channel.

 

Smuggling gangs appear to have changed their tactics and have started putting more people into single boats. This month, a record 230 people made the journey in one boat.

 

Ministers are keen to stress that the number of successful crossings is falling.

 

Charities, however, have warned that the French police’s increasing activity is putting asylum seekers’ lives at risk.

 

Utopia 56, which three weeks ago gathered evidence of 35 CS gas canisters being fired by riot police near Dunkirk at migrants trying to reach a small boat, said at the time: “We can see police pressure on the beach is putting more people at risk. We saw it last week and we are seeing it now and we have seen it for some time. It is terrible.”

 

A total of 15,897 migrants have crossed the Channel so far this year, down 43% on the same time last year, and an 18% drop from the same point in 2024.

 

Reform UK has proposed using the Royal Navy to intercept and transport people to France or Belgium, describing the scheme as a humanitarian response.

 

But France said the plan “would be a violation of French sovereignty as well as a violation of maritime law and international law”.

 

The UK home secretary, Shabana Mahmood, said: “Our new UK-France deal is already having a real impact, stopping crossings before they happen and disrupting the criminal gangs behind them.

 

“People smugglers should be in no doubt, we’re taking down their operations, seizing their equipment and breaking their business model for good.

 

“Through our joint work with France, we have stopped over 47,000 small boat crossing attempts since the election and we will not let up.”

 

Border Security Command’s Charlie Eastaugh said: “Our partnership with France is stronger than ever. Together, we are piling the pressure on the criminal gangs and preventing these illegal and dangerous crossings.

 

“French officers are not shy in taking bold action to prevent these launches where it is safe and lawful to do so. They work in difficult and dangerous conditions to stop boats launching, seize equipment and disperse large migrant groups as well as saving thousands of lives at sea.

 

“Our joint efforts are delivering results, and we will go further still to restore control of our borders and put these smugglers out of business.”

US-Canada Trade War Escalates as Tariffs Hit $20 Billion in Canadian Goods

Canada says it will match US tariffs ‘dollar for dollar’ as trade talks break down | BBC News

Mark Carney HALTS Trump Trade Talks, Calls US' Move 'Uneconomic' As Canada-US Trade War Explodes

 

Carney Stands Up to Trump in Trade War Despite the Risks

 



news analysis

Carney Stands Up to Trump in Trade War Despite the Risks

 

Canada’s prime minister walked away from what he thought was a bad trade deal with the United States. Many Canadians are behind him, but it will be costly.

 

Matina Stevis-Gridneff

By Matina Stevis-Gridneff

Reporting from Toronto

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/22/world/canada/carney-trump-canada-tariffs.html

Aug. 22, 2026, 5:14 a.m. ET

 

On Friday night, Prime Minister Mark Carney of Canada did something that few other world leaders before him have dared to do.

 

After days of intense trade negotiations with the United States, with less than an hour to go on a midnight deadline for a new round of tariffs from the Trump administration, Mr. Carney instructed his negotiators to walk away.

 

Then, he announced that once 50 percent tariffs came into effect on $20 billion worth of Canadian goods, he would order retaliatory tariffs on the United States “dollar for dollar.”

 

In a statement, Mr. Carney said he had gone into the trade talks in good faith, seeking “the best deal for Canadians” but “never a deal at any price or on any deadline.”

 

By walking away, Mr. Carney chose a road that no major U.S. ally has taken: With his country’s economy on the line, he stood up to President Trump and refused to accept the administration’s offer of a new trade relationship with tariffs permanently baked in. Britain, the European Union and other major U.S. trading partners have agreed to smaller deals that have been volatile and often left them worse off.

 

The collapse of the talks came after Mr. Trump declared on Tuesday that the deal was practically done.

 

Mr. Carney never echoed that. Over the week, as negotiators spent long hours in Washington huddled in the office of the U.S. trade representative, Mr. Carney appeared optimistic but insisted that there was still work to be done.

 

Until there wasn’t.

 

Make no mistake, Mr. Carney has a lot to lose.

 

Canada, which is closely integrated with the United States and relies on it for defense, is heavily dependent on trade with its superpower neighbor. In his statement, Mr. Carney acknowledged the cost of his choice for many Canadians by saying that his government would work to support industries and companies affected by the new tariffs.

 

It will also be costly for U.S. residents, who have been paying for Mr. Trump’s tariff policies through higher prices that have also been driven by the war in Iran and spiraling oil costs.

 

But on Friday, Mr. Carney appeared resolved to shoulder the costs of his decision. And he has risked Mr. Trump’s ire before.

 

In a speech in Davos, Switzerland, in January, he described a new era in which the United States was no longer a guarantor of stability and where middle powers like Canada have to unite to survive. The speech — and its enthusiastic global reception — angered Mr. Trump.

 

Mr. Trump has also been riled by Mr. Carney’s outreach to China, which led to a narrow but significant trade agreement this year; by Canada’s persistence on banning the sale of U.S. liquor; and by the Carney government’s retaliatory measures against the United States for its broad, devastating tariffs on core Canadian industries.

 

 

Since he rose to lead Canada last year, Mr. Carney has put in motion a plan to help his country survive Mr. Trump’s presidency and, in the long run, thrive apart from the United States. One of his favorite lines is that “nostalgia is not a policy,” and he has told everyone who will listen that there is no going back to the old relationship with the United States — a close and familial, if lopsided, bond.

 

Instead, Mr. Carney has been traveling to secure new partnerships in Asia and Europe, a generational shift away from economic dependence on the United States, although that is unlikely to bear fruit fast enough to cushion the blow of the breakdown of the two countries’ relationship.

 

It’s likely that Mr. Trump will not take kindly to Mr. Carney’s trade decision. Just before beginning his second term, Mr. Trump said he was willing to inflict “economic pain” on Canada to get what he wanted. He has repeatedly expressed a desire to make Canada the 51st state, describing it as little more than a vassal that “lives because of the United States.”

 

But Mr. Carney’s vision for Canada, with a surprising assist from Mr. Trump’s needling, has ignited a wave of patriotism. Going into the trade talks, more than half of Canadians — many more than those who voted for Mr. Carney — said they wanted him to give nothing away.

 

Several premiers of different political stripes expressed their support for Mr. Carney after his decision. Doug Ford, a conservative who leads Ontario, cheered him on. David Eby, the progressive premier of British Columbia, said, “We didn’t ask for this, but we’ll keep fighting for as long as it takes.”

 

Not everyone is enthusiastic. Danielle Smith, the conservative premier of Alberta, who has good relations with the MAGA movement, was more circumspect and urged Mr. Carney to return to the negotiating table. Canada’s industry is aghast with the prolonged turbulence and uncertainty that Mr. Trump’s trade war against Canada, and Mr. Carney’s refusal to submit, are causing.

 

But there is little doubt that Mr. Carney will also be cheered, at home and abroad, for doing what he thought was best for his country, and for saying, in his Friday statement, that “we will not allow any nation to determine our future.”

 

Matina Stevis-Gridneff is the Canada bureau chief for The Times, leading coverage of the country.

The all family of Pedro sanchez is rotten to the core

 


The all family of Pedro sanchez is rotten to the core

The family of Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez is currently at the center of high-profile legal battles and corruption investigations. While the conservative and far-right opposition parties argue that these cases reveal systemic corruption within his inner circle, Sánchez and his supporters maintain that the allegations are part of a politically motivated smear campaign ("lawfare").

The legal situations involving his immediate family members include:

David Sánchez (Brother)

  • The Conviction: On July 14, 2026, David Sánchez, a classical musician, was convicted of administrative misconduct by a court in Badajoz.
  • The Penalty: He was handed a nine-year ban from holding public office
  • The Case: The court ruled that a public-sector musical director role was specifically "tailor-made" for him in 2017 without any genuine administrative or public need. However, the court dismissed the more severe charge of influence peddling, which could have carried prison time.

Begoña Gómez (Wife)

  • The Status: Begoña Gómez is facing a jury trial for corruption and influence peddling.
  • The Restrictions: In June 2026, an investigating judge ordered her to surrender her passport and barred her from leaving Spain.
  • The Case: Following a two-year investigation, she is accused of using her influence as the prime minister's spouse to secure a position at Madrid’s Complutense University and to improperly benefit companies with which she had personal and professional ties. She strongly denies any wrongdoing.

Political Context

These family scandals are compounded by separate investigations into Sánchez’s broader political circle, including a 24-year prison sentence handed down to his former transport minister and right-hand man, José Luis Ábalos, in June 2026 for a pandemic-era face mask kickback scheme.

The opposition, led by the center-right People's Party (PP), has used these developments to demand Sánchez's immediate resignation. Prime Minister Sánchez, who initially came to power in 2018 on an anti-corruption platform, has not been directly implicated or named in any of the cases. He has vowed to defend his family's innocence and intends to serve out his full term until August 2027.

 

Sánchez has one year until Spain’s election deadline. The odds are against him.




 Sánchez has one year until Spain’s election deadline. The odds are against him.

 

The prime minister is still facing heat over the Ceuta crisis and a raft of Socialist Party corruption scandals. An early election could make sense.

 

August 21, 2026 4:00 am CET

By Aitor Hernández-Morales

https://www.politico.eu/article/pedro-sanchez-has-one-year-until-spain-election-deadline-the-odds-are-against-him/

 

We are now one year away from the latest possible date — Aug. 22, 2027 — that Spain can hold a general election.

 

For embattled Socialist Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, it looks like it’s going to be a bruising ride to get that far. He insists he will seek reelection, brushing aside the predictions that he is doomed by pointing to his well-established knack for defying political gravity.

 

But this time, the odds are especially stacked against him and his fragile minority government, which has never appeared so isolated.

 

The challenges that lie ahead are so daunting that Sánchez could well chuck the schedule and call for an early vote.

 

Here’s why he’s up against it.

 

Rough rentrée

Summers have historically been kind to Sánchez.

 

In the past, the seasonal break helped reduce the heat generated by crises like the June 2025 arrest of high-ranking Socialist Party official Santos Cerdán for allegedly awarding public works contracts in exchange for kickbacks. The prime minister was no doubt hoping a similar scenario would play out following this spring’s high-profile indictment of his ally, former Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, on money-laundering charges, and after a major raid on his party’s headquarters as part of a separate criminal investigation.

 

But just days before he was due to head off on a beach break on the island of Lanzarote, Sánchez’s summer was upended by a surge of 72,000 migrants into Ceuta, a Spanish exclave in northern Africa. Even though the prime minister did eventually resume his scheduled vacation, the Ceuta crisis has continued to dominate the news. Thousands of unauthorized migrants remain in the city, with local authorities complaining Madrid isn’t doing enough to address overwhelmed hospitals and other public services.

 

The government is bound to face tough grillings over security failures, whether intelligence warnings went unheeded and whether something went badly wrong in relations with Morocco. The Ceuta debacle also left Sánchez looking painfully isolated on the EU stage, with 22 leaders writing a letter suggesting his liberal migration policies could have helped attract the influx.

 

Nearly a third of Sánchez’s ministers have been summoned to testify at extraordinary hearings in the Spanish parliament next week, and the prime minister himself is due to face tough questions when plenary sessions resume in September.

 

So much for a fresh start.

 

Budget bloodbath

The fall promises no relief for Spain’s prime minister, who faces defeat in a battle over the national cashflow.

 

The minority government has been unable to pass a single budget bill during this legislative term, and has been operating on the spending plan approved by Sánchez’s previous government in December 2022. The Socialist leader has vowed to submit a draft budget for 2027 this fall, but it is almost certain to be rejected by lawmakers.

 

A major obstacle is the Catalan separatist Together for Catalonia group, whose support is key to getting any legislation passed. The party voted down the deficit framework for the draft budget this summer, with its spokesperson, Josep Rius, characterizing the long-shot legislation as “yet another Sánchez frivolity.”

 

The separatists were instrumental in getting Sánchez a third stint as prime minister in 2023, but relations have since soured, with the party now accusing the government of reneging on its commitments to Catalonia, and refusing to back budget plans it considers to be Madrid-centric.

 

But the prime minister is determined to move forward, raising questions about his motivation to present a doomed budget bill.

 

“There’s growing speculation that Sánchez may want to call voters to the polls as early as March, and the budget’s failure would provide him with an excuse to do so” said Pablo Simón, a political scientist at Madrid’s Carlos III University, who pointed out that Spain is due to hold local and key regional elections in May 2027.

 

Sánchez’s personal unpopularity has been cited as a key factor in Socialist Party losses in previous local and regional races. Holding national elections earlier in the year could remove the prime minister from the equation when the May vote is held, helping center-left candidates running in key cities and enabling the socialists retain control of regional governments in Castilla-La Mancha, Asturias and Navarre.

 

“There’s no sense in stretching this term to its limits if you’re not only going to lose, but drag others down with you,” Simón said.

 

(More) legal woes ahead

Sánchez’s tumultuous relationship with Spain’s judiciary is also likely to grow even more strained over the next year.

 

In the coming months the prime minister’s wife, Begoña Gómez, could stand trial on charges of influence-peddling and embezzlement. She denies all wrongdoing, and the prime minister has consistently argued that his wife is the victim of so-called “lawfare” targeting his friends and family.

 

Spain’s prime minister sits with his wife Begona Gómez as they attend the 41st congress of the Spanish Socialist Workers Party (PSOE) at the Palacio de

Gómez’s trial follows on this summer’s conviction of the prime minister’s brother on administrative misconduct charges, in connection to the rigged allocation of a public job — a ruling Sánchez called “unjust.”

 

Beyond the cases involving his immediate family, the prime minister faces potentially damaging judicial probes into alleged bid-rigging and kickbacks involving key allies — as well as an explosive investigation into suspected illegal financing of his Socialist Party.

 

Crucial parliamentary allies such as Gabriel Rufián of the Republican Left of Catalonia have warned that illegal financing is a “red line.” Hard evidence could force Spain’s current prime minister to suffer the same fate as his conservative predecessor, Mariano Rajoy, whom Sánchez ousted from power after his People’s Party was proven to have engaged in the same crime.

 

Left-wing logjam

Spain’s fragmented politics make majority governments increasingly unlikely: Power goes to whoever can secure enough parliamentary support to be declared prime minister.

 

For now, the polling suggests the center-right People’s Party and the far-right Vox party are on course to control a majority of seats in the parliament in 2027. The two parties currently govern in coalition in four Spanish regions, and PP leader Alberto Núñez Feijóo in June explicitly endorsed a partnership at the national level.

 

Sánchez faces tougher odds in building an alliance strong enough to keep him in power. In 2023, he formed a coalition with the Sumar group — an amalgam of far-left parties — and won the backing of key regionalist and separatist parties.

 

But this time around, the numbers don’t add up. Sumar has effectively collapsed amid internal infighting, and its unifying leader, Deputy Prime Minister Yolanda Díaz, has ruled out standing as its candidate at the next election. Polls indicate the far left will suffer heavy losses at the national level, leaving Sánchez with fewer viable paths to a parliamentary majority.

 

No relief abroad

There are also signs that Sánchez will no longer be able to boost his fortunes at home through his performances on the global stage.

 

Engagement in international affairs — ranging from his condemnation of Israel’s military operations in Gaza, to his ongoing feud with U.S. President Donald Trump — has previously bolstered his standing in Spain.

 

But political scientist Simón said that the harsh criticism the prime minister from fellow EU leaders for his handling of the Ceuta crisis reveals he is increasingly considered to be a figure on his way out.

 

“As one of the few social democrats still governing in Europe, his positions are out of step with the conservative consensus, and they aren’t taken seriously because he is now seen as a lame duck who is going to lose the next elections,” said Simón.

 

“That leaves him with little capacity to make a difference because he isn’t seen as representing Spain’s position at this point,” he added. “Everyone accepts someone else will be in charge next year, and likely have a very different perspective.”

 

Sánchez’s broader international vulnerabilities will be on display in November, when Madrid hosts a summit of Ibero-American heads of government that will underscore the region’s rightward shift. Roughly half the leaders attending are from the right, and include figures like Argentina’s populist president, Javier Milei, with whom the prime minister has a prickly relationship.

 

“The summit highlights a global political realignment,” said Simón. “One that Spain narrowly avoided in 2023, but seems increasingly inevitable next year".