quarta-feira, 19 de agosto de 2026

Yes, Woke 1.0 Was Crazy. Now Where’s the Accountability? Aug. 18, 2026

 


Opinion

Bret Stephens

Yes, Woke 1.0 Was Crazy. Now Where’s the Accountability?

Aug. 18, 2026

Bret Stephens

By Bret Stephens

Opinion Columnist

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/18/opinion/woke-liberals-restitution.html

 

It’s all but official.

“Woke 1.0 was crazy,” Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said this month, quoting a far-left New York City councilman. Given the congresswoman’s own record — she previously insisted that some groups “have no choice but to riot,” called for defunding the police and “prison abolition” and used the demeaning term “menstruating person” to describe a woman — the crazy that she speaks of was also her own.

Good for A.O.C. for acknowledging mistakes. Now can we have some accountability for the vast damage that Woke 1.0 did, not to mention the damage that Woke 2.0 continues to do?

Wokeness, as it commonly came to be known at the start of this decade, wasn’t just an Orwellian linguistic fad or a tedious set of corporate training sessions in cultural sensitivity or wacky policy ideas about addressing racial and socioeconomic inequities. As it was experienced by those on the wrong end of it, it was a system of enforced ideological conformity, policed by social bullying and institutional coercion (or cravenness), which damaged and sometimes even ended reputations, careers and at least one man’s life.

Restitution, if only in the form of honest contrition and perhaps even a public apology, is in order.

Restitution, for instance, for Stan Wischnowski, the top editor of The Philadelphia Inquirer, who in 2020 had to resign from his job and issue a groveling apology for the sin of running an article by the paper’s architecture critic with the headline “Buildings Matter, Too.” Restitution for Mike Pesca, the host of a popular podcast, “The Gist,” who was suspended indefinitely from his job at Slate for making a case, in an interoffice back and forth, that it may sometimes be permissible for a non-Black person to quote a racial slur in narrow contexts. Restitution, yes, for James Bennet, a former editor of The Times’s Opinion section, who was forced from his job after the publication of a controversial guest essay by Tom Cotton, a Republican senator.

Restitution for authors, like my friend Richard North Patterson, who has 16 New York Times best sellers to his name. When he wrote a novel that dealt with racial discrimination and had a Black woman as a leading (and wholly sympathetic) character, roughly 20 major imprints rejected it, with several making it clear it was because he was white. Restitution for every aspiring young fiction writer with the misfortune of being white and male and therefore quietly but efficiently cut out of the game of literary prizes and publication opportunities. As Jacob Savage noted last year in Compact magazine, his research found that at the time, “not a single white American man born after 1984 has published a work of literary fiction in The New Yorker.”

Restitution, also, in academia.

For Jason Kilborn, a University of Illinois, Chicago, law professor, who was barred from campus and placed on administrative leave after he had used the first letter of two slurs in his civil procedure exam, an affront the Black Law Students Association described as “mental terrorism.” For Ilya Shapiro, a legal scholar about to start a position at Georgetown Law School, who had to endure a 122-day university inquest for the crime of a clumsy tweet betraying a conservative worldview. For Carole Hooven, who was railroaded out of Harvard after a TV appearance in which she said that the terms “male” and “female” were scientifically essential even as she insisted that “facts about biology” shouldn’t “prevent us from treating people with respect.”

Restitution for the hapless men who got caught up in a #MeToo maw that made no distinction between Harvey Weinstein-style predation and fumbled romantic advances or unsatisfying hookups. The comedian Aziz Ansari was the most notable victim of this form of public humiliation, but there are many others, without influence or deep pockets, whose lives were permanently scarred in situations where accusations alone were viewed as sufficient to establish guilt and exact professional consequences.

Restitution, not least, for the drive-by victims of Woke 1.0 — sometimes literally so. Emmanuel Cafferty, an employee for San Diego Gas and Electric, was fired from his job when he was pictured with his arm hanging out of the window with his fingers linked in what appeared to be an “OK” gesture, which the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Anti-Defamation League have called a coded symbol of white supremacy. Mr. Cafferty, who is Hispanic, insisted he had merely been cracking his knuckles.

 

Certain readers of this column will be tempted to rejoin that all this is old history. So is the Red Scare of the 1950s, but that’s no reason to forget about it. Other readers may say that what President Trump and his allies are doing is just as bad as Woke 1.0 or far worse. I’ve denounced them, too, but that’s pure whataboutism.

If liberals want to be serious about standing up for liberty, they have a particular obligation to acknowledge and reject the illiberalism that swept so much of the left in recent years. Any politics of moral certitude and promiscuous demonization — whether it comes from MAGA on the right or wokeness on the left — isn’t just unfit for a free society.

It’s crazy.

 

Sem comentários: