A direct
cultural threat’: your questions on the rise of the right across Europe
answered
With
support for far right politics well established across Europe, how might
upcoming elections shape its future? Europe correspondents Jon Henley and Ashifa
Kassam answered Reddit users’ questions about their reporting from the
continent
Jon Henley, Ashifa Kassam and Lucy O’Brien
Fri 16 Oct
2026 11.00 CEST
Support for
far-right parties has been growing across Europe, with radical right, populist
parties in coalition governments in Croatia, Czechia, Italy and Finland, and
leading in the polls in Austria, Belgium, France and Germany.
The Guardian
reported this year that nearly
a quarter of voters in Europe voted for far-right parties in their most recent
national elections, a fivefold increase since 1995.
In Germany,
Alternative für Deutschland recently booked a historic
state election victory in Saxony-Anhalt. Elsewhere, though – in the
Netherlands, in Hungary and in Sweden, where the Sweden
Democrats lost vote share – far-right parties have suffered defeats. But
their ideas – and their influence on mainstream politics – are today clearly
visible across the continent, notably on policies around immigration and
law-and-order.
The coming
months will see further crucial elections, beginning in Spain in November and
continuing in France,
Estonia, Finland, Greece, Slovakia, Poland and Italy next year.
How might
these elections shape the political future of Europe? What is the
impact of their policies – and what might prevent their continuing rise?
The
Guardian’s Europe correspondent Jon Henley has reported for the Guardian from
23 of the EU’s 27 member states, while Europe community affairs correspondent
Ashifa Kassam was on the ground in Sweden and Germany’s Saxony-Anhalt state to
speak with people ahead of the elections.
Jon and
Ashifa answered questions about their reporting and experiences. Read the
Q&A below.
Giorgia
Meloni and Marine Le Pen have openly criticised Donald Trump. Photograph: Evan
Vucci/Reuters
One user
asked: It’s no secret in Europe that Donald Trump and his
allies are funding far-right parties all over the continent. Trump is unpopular
enough in Europe that even the majority of people planning to vote for the AfD
et al despise him. So how can so many Europeans who hate Trump still vote for
the far right?
Jon
Henley: You’re
absolutely right about the Trump administration’s efforts to promote far right
parties in Europe. That was made very plain in the US National Security
Strategy policy document last year – I wrote
about that here.
But while
there may be an ideological affinity between European far right and nationalist
voters on issues like anti-immigration, hostility toward the EU, and softer
stances on Russia, Trump’s “America First” policies (demands re Greenland,
tariff threats, etc.) and constant unpredictability pose major problems for
far-right leaders trying to look credible in Europe, because they scare all
European voters – including far-right voters.
Leaders
including Giorgia Meloni in Italy and Marine Le Pen in
France have openly criticised Trump and distanced themselves from his more
erratic pronouncements, conspiracy claims and hostility toward European
security.
European
far-right voters’ support for Trump varies from country to country but is
broadly low – clearly peace and security in Europe matter more than
anti-immigration sentiment. Ultimately, nation-first means putting your nation
first, and Trump has made clear that the US’s interests are not Europe’s
interests.
The evidence
would seem to suggest that many of Europe’s far-right voters think their own
far-right parties will be more responsible as regards (many of) those issues –
though whether they actually will be or not is moot, of course.
00000000000000000000
asked: How do you measure when a grassroots movement represents a genuine
structural shift versus an isolated vocal minority?
Ashifa
Kassam: Our jobs
involve covering a wide range of community actions, whether it’s people
fighting back against
datacentres, protests against
tourism, or the vandalisation
of mobile phone masts by people who seemingly linked them to the coronavirus
pandemic.
Oftentimes
the reporting starts small and local. For example, perhaps it’s focused tightly
on
a protest against tourists in Barcelona or a push to restrict cruise
ship dockings in Dubrovnik. From there, myself and the editors often
continue to watch these movements and their reach; are politicians responding
in any way? Are others joining in? Will the movements lead to policy changes?
These are the kinds of questions that I tend to consider when deciding how much
to make of the grassroots movements and how much coverage to give them.
At times
it’s been incredible to see just where these movements will go, whether it’s
the housing protests in
Spain that led to snap general elections or the opposition movement that
coalesced around Péter Magyar in Hungary in 2024 and which, more than a
year later, saw him oust Viktor Orbán from power.
As
president, Marine Le Pen is unlikely to have a parliamentary majority, which
will limit her room for manoeuvre. Photograph: Stéphanie Lecocq/Reuters
Gramoun-kal asked: Can the
EU survive the rise of the extreme right? What if AfD and RN get into power at
the same time?
Jon
Henley: One of the
very few upsides of Brexit is that hardly any European far right parties now
want their countries to leave the EU. Instead, they want to “transform it from
within”, turning it more into a looser “Europe of nations”.
But that’s
not to say the EU would not be considerably weakened by, say, a President Le
Pen, who could paralyse decision-making, challenge the supremacy of EU law and
push a “France First” agenda undermining the single market and Schengen
free-travel zone and opposing EU expansion, climate action, etc.
I’m not sure
there’s any imminent risk of the AfD coming to national power in Germany (and
if Le Pen wins France’s presidential election, which isn’t certain but looks
highly plausible, she is also unlikely to have a parliamentary majority, which
will limit her room for manoeuvre).
Plus, the
AfD is too extreme even for the RN – Le Pen’s outfit (which kicked the AfD out
of its European parliament grouping a while ago over various issues including
comments to the effect that not all Nazis were bad), has repeatedly made it
clear it is not an ally of the German party and does not share its views on eg.
“remigration” – the mass deportation of immigrants.
But for sure
– if Spain, Italy, France and Poland all see far-right parties in government
after elections due over the next 12 months or so, the EU will face some major
challenges. I don’t think it will collapse, but it will certainly find it even
harder to reach agreement on many major issues than it already does, and so
move (even) more slowly. Natalie Tocci wrote a
great comment piece about this.
OrangeSpaceMan5 asked:
Do you see Nato and the EU disintegrating if we see Far-Right victories across
Britain, Germany and France?
Jon
Henley: No, I don’t
see the EU and Nato disintegrating, just becoming a lot more
complicated/difficult to run … The EU could be “eroded from within” above all
by far right-led governments using their veto (as Orbán did with Hungary) in
major decisions like the EU budget, EU enlargement, the green deal, etc. They
may well also simply ignore EU law, as Orbán also did. And for Nato, see
previous answer – it would survive but become more paralysed in terms of longer
term decision making.
Ashifa
Kassam: I think we
saw a glimpse of how complicated things can become in the European parliament
after an EU vote earlier this year aimed at increasing deportations. The
immediate aftermath laid
bare just how deeply polarised the EU has already become, as right-wing
MEPs chanted “send them back” and centre-left and left-wing MEPs shot back with
“Shame on you.”
The
long-simmering anger over soaring housing costs in Spain burst into public
view. Photograph: Daniel Gonzalez/EPA
ElendX asked: Why and how have
the left and centre parties failed to respond to the concerns of the
electorate? How do they now need to respond?
Ashifa
Kassam: What comes
to mind immediately is the housing crisis in Spain and beyond. It’s been just
over two weeks now since the Spanish protests and encampments over the housing
crisis burst
into public view, laying bare the long-simmering anger over soaring housing
costs.
I think it’s
an issue that has long been overlooked by many left and centre parties across
Europe, even as vulnerable people and minorities have been disproportionately
affected, and analysts warn that the crisis could drive voters into the arms of
the far right. Last year I spoke to Jaume Collboni, the Socialist mayor of
Barcelona, who (along with 21 mayors across Europe) are urging the EU to treat
the surging housing costs as a “new pandemic” by unleashing billions in funding
to boost affordable housing and give mayors a seat at the table to ensure
measures capable of tackling housing speculation. Speaking to me, Collboni
warned: “We cannot remain stuck in the rhetoric of defending democracy,
inclusive societies and equal opportunities if people’s standard of living is
getting worse.”
I also think
left and centre parties have done little to address the precariousness of the
labour market, ie. the rise of gig jobs and, in many cases, the deterioration
of public services. If you keep an eye on the
Eurobarometer, the cost of living constantly ranks among the top concerns
for people across Europe, hinting at the idea that this could be fertile
territory for politicians to focus on. Immigration, in contrast, was in 7th
place in the most recent survey.
Jon
Henley: I think
broadly speaking mainstream parties have failed to adequately address people’s
concerns about the cost of living, declining public services (healthcare,
education, transport), economic/job security, etc. – as I said above, fear
of/anger at some kind of “loss of status” is one of the key drivers of the far
right vote. (I’m not suggesting that’s easy – it clearly isn’t, economies are
struggling.)
I’d also add
that far-right parties are clearly extremely effective at exploiting voters’
concerns politically, including by pointing the finger at the group they think
are most to blame and promising to fix things by getting rid of them.
And I’d also
note that mainstream parties really have not helped themselves by adopting
far-right parties’ framing on several issues in hopes of hanging on to
disillusioned voters – electoral evidence shows that almost never works, mainly
because, as Marine Le Pen’s father Jean-Marie put it, people tend to prefer the
original to the copy.
Dc740 asked: Did you measure any
change in online activity for extremist parties like Vox in Spain after the
Yandex datacentre was targeted by Ukraine?
Ashifa
Kassam: Funny you
should ask – earlier this week, I sent out queries on this to several research
groups, so it’s something we’re looking into. It’s a really interesting
question. Last week, in an interview with news
site Eldiario.es, the Spanish prime minister, Pedro Sánchez was asked
whether he was worried about foreign interference in the elections given his
high profile opposition to Israel’s war on Gaza and the US-Israeli attack on
Iran. His answer: “Yes, and not only by nations, but also by non-state actors.”
Smoke
billows from a Yandex datacentre, after a drone strike. Photograph: Social
Media/Reuters
Capitao_barbosa asked: How much foreign funding,
especially from Russia and America, is being funnelled to these parties? And
can we value how much indirect support (bots, disinformation by state actors,
algorithm meddling on X, etc.) they are receiving?
Jon
Henley: Our data
team looked
at this question a couple of years ago, before the last European parliament
elections. They concluded a quarter of all private money donated to political
parties in the EU was going to far-right, far-left and populist movements –
aided by the fact that only a quarter of EU countries require parties to
identify private donors – with €97m (about one in every seven private donation
euros across the EU) going to far-right parties.
A European
parliament report from 2023 estimated that about $1.18bn in funding towards
organisations targeting LGBTQ+ rights and promoting traditional family policies
flowed into Europe from 2019 to 2023, and a 2022 declassified US intelligence
assessment found the Russian government had covertly funnelled at least $300m
to foreign political parties, often in Europe, from 2014.
Ashifa
Kassam: We’ve also
had some recent reporting on the flow of funds from the US. In July, the
Guardian
reported that Donald Trump’s state department intended to allocate $12m to
organisations in the UK founded by prominent conservatives. Of these funds, $7m
was to go to 878, a thinktank that describes itself as being devoted to “the
rediscovery of our ancient culture” and “ending mass migration.”
In July, the
state department issued a notice of funding, offering grants for organisations
and institutions interested in promoting what
it described as “civilisational self-confidence in Europe”.
While
research out of Europe, such as the Munich-based Ifo Institute, has
found “no correlation” between migration and higher crime rates, the US
state department notice suggested it was hoping the grants would lead to
outcomes including reports on the impact of mass migration on local safety and
tools to analyse impact of mass migration on democratic institutions.
One user
asked: How serious would you describe the threat these far-right parties pose
to democracy? And to what extent do you think there is a collaboration between
them and powerful social media personalities or state sponsored online social
media propaganda?
Jon
Henley: Some far
right parties definitely pose more of a threat to democracy than others.
Political scientists divide far-right parties into those that essentially
operate within basic democratic norms (“radical right” parties), and those that
seek to overturn the system, to the extent even of condoning violence (“extreme
right” parties).
If we take
one example, AfD in Germany could be described as extreme right in some
respects (and some local branches are indeed classified as such by German
domestic intelligence). Some of its positions are in clear contradiction with
liberal democracy: it is openly racist, homophobic, misogynistic. It believes
citizens should be ranked by its own warped criteria, including ethnicity,
gender and religious belief. It flirts continually with Nazi rhetoric, imagery
and symbolism.
On this
question I recommend this
column by Cas Mudde, a top scholar of populism and the far right, after AfD
won in the recent state elections in Saxony-Anhalt. He argues that mainstream
parties have to wake up to the fact that they are not in a battle that’s about
vote share and elections, it’s about democracy itself.
Ashifa
Kassam: I would add
that we’ve seen some fairly high-profile examples of collaboration, from Elon
Musk’s repeated endorsements of the AfD on X to his
2025 X talk with the party’s co-leader, Alice Weidel. The Guardian has also
regularly explored the interplay between the far right and social media, such
as a 2025 investigation that
looked at how a network of far-right Facebook groups had become an “engine
of radicalisation” by exposing hundreds of thousands of people in Britain to
racist and extremist disinformation.
Elon Musk
has repeatedly endorsed the AfD. Photograph: Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP
KilmaSelth asked: Do you
think the hard right parties tend to moderate as they approach power, or do
they maintain their radicalism?
Jon
Henley: Based on
Meloni and Le Pen, I would for a long time have said yes – Meloni basically
struck a bargain to get elected in which she promised to be responsible on the
economy, in the EU and as regards foreign policy, as long as she could do her
culture-wars stuff domestically. Le Pen has spent years “detoxifying” the
National Rally and kicking out over-radical undesirables. But if you look at
AfD, they haven’t moderated their language at all – if anything, they’ve
hardened it – and it manifestly is not doing them any harm. And as Meloni and
Le Pen have moderated their positions, we’ve started to see them being
outflanked on their right, by the likes of Roberto Vannacci and his National
Future in Italy and Eric Zemmour’s Reconquête in France. So I think we may be
heading into a period where the former far right is effectively now part of the
political landscape, like “regular” parties that will sometimes win and
sometimes lose elections, and will be increasingly challenged on their right by
more extreme elements.
Ashifa
Kassam: Vox offers
another way to look at this question, as the party was founded in 2013 by disgruntled
members of the conservative People’s party (PP). Its leader, Santiago
Abascal, is a career politician who was among those who saw an opportunity to
push further on the right flank of Spanish politics when it came to Catalan
separatism, immigration, abortion and LGBTQ+ rights. It was a hardline stance
that was often (but
not always) diluted when Abascal was part of the PP; now as a separate
party, they’ve seized on their electoral momentum in some regions to push
the party to heed their agenda.
What
topic would you like to see a Guardian Conversation on? Email us at
conversations@theguardian.com with your suggestions.





Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário