New EU envoy recognises ‘willingness to rebuild
relationship’ between UK and EU
Resolution of disagreements over Northern Ireland
protocol – along with threat from Russia – responsible for improved relations
Patrick
Wintour, Diplomatic editor
Thu 4 May
2023 06.00 BST
Pedro
Serrano, the new EU envoy to London, senses he may have come to the UK at a
propitious moment, saying there are signs that both sides “want to advance the
relationship on many fronts” now that the disagreements over implementation
over the Northern Ireland protocol are largely resolved.
With a
background as the former chief of staff to the EU high representative Josep
Borrell and, before that, the head of the defence department of the EU external
action service, Serrano is a genuine heavyweight diplomat. After the Russian
invasion of Ukraine, his expertise means he is ideally positioned to make a
pitch to the UK to forge a closer relationship over foreign and defence policy.
“I believe
I have arrived at a good moment with the making and the finalisation of the
agreement on the Windsor framework which has rebuilt trust between the EU and
the UK,” he says in his first interview.
“Obviously
the very rich relationship between the UK and the EU has been affected by
Brexit, but the foundations of the relationship are very strong and we are both
fighting jointly to reestablish security in Europe after the terrible attack by
Russia.”
Asked why
the Northern Ireland negotiations succeeded, he compliments both sides, but
acknowledges the invasion of Ukraine also concentrated minds.
“As with
most things in international relations, there is not one cause for the change,
but many causes. Certainly personalities make a difference. The arrival of
prime minister Rishi Sunak, the foreign secretary James Cleverly and the
Northern Ireland secretary Chris Heaton-Harris, alongside the very clear
willingness on our side shown by vice-president Maroš Šefčovič and the
Commission president Ursula von der Leyen, has been fundamental.
“But what
has also been fundamental is that all Europeans are jointly facing one of the
biggest threats for decades to their security, their livelihood and their
values. So in a way it has been easy to have a group of people, very conscious
of the challenges they are facing and very pragmatically oriented, to show a willingness
to go beyond Brexit and rebuild a strong relationship.”
He is also
careful to suggest the two sides have to learn to walk together before they
run. The meat and drink of his future work will be the implementation of the
revised protocol and future of the trading and cooperation agreement, including
talks on British participation in the Horizon research programme, or the EU
Retained Law bill, a measure ministers are rethinking as they look at the
implications of an automatic end-of-year scrapping of 4,000 EU laws that had
been kept on the statute book to ensure continuity.
He
pointedly flags his concern over the UK’s illegal migration bill if it requires
a breach with the ECHR. “The European Union considers that this is a
fundamental issue, and we do hope that our partners also will continue
supporting both the European Court for Human Rights and, of course, the Council
of Europe, which is one of the backbones for the respect for human rights in
the European continent,” he says.
On the
positive side, he welcomes British involvement in the European Political
Community, a still fledgling institution and the brainchild of the French
president Emmanuel Macron that brings together nearly 50 EU and non-EU states
at heads of government level to discuss common concerns. Britain attended the
first meeting of the EPC under Liz Truss’s leadership and now London has agreed
to host the fourth meeting, expected in the first half of 2024. “The EPC does
fill a vacuum and, as such, is a very useful structure for European leaders,”
Serrano says.
Nor does he
rule out the start of regular EU-UK summits. “It is not on the table yet, but
such meetings are normal for the EU with third countries to which it is very
close. Would it be a normal evolution and development for the future? Probably
yes, but it is for the leaders to decide.”
But it is
in the field of defence, an area left out of the withdrawal agreement, that he
sees as the greatest potential for closer cooperation. He says that “ever since
the agreement between Tony Blair and Jacques Chirac at St Malo in 1998 the UK
has been at the forefront of developing EU defence policy. The UK has always
been behind most of the initiatives that have been developed in the
architecture of security and defence policy.”
He says any
tensions between greater EU strategic autonomy and the role of Nato have been
clarified, and in a way that will assure the British. “It is a pillar of the EU
treaties that the way to address collective defence is Nato. So nothing within
the security defence efforts of the European Union poses any kind of threat to
Nato, quite the contrary.
“All the
instruments of European defence policy are open, be it participation in crisis
management operations, in developing defence capabilities through the European
Defence Fund – all of it is open to third countries. It’s a policy that wants
to work with allies and international partners that can contribute to the
effort. So these policies are open as well to the United Kingdom.”
He points
out the UK has already applied to join a military mobility project, one of 50
or so such projects under what the EU calls Permanent Structured Cooperation
(PESCO). The project already joined by other Nato members – the US, Norway and
Canada – is designed to ease the movement of military personnel and assets
within the borders of the EU.
Serrano
sees this just as a start. “There are many doors for the United Kingdom to
become associated, be it crisis management operations, or a coordinated
maritime presence mechanism, or to the development of capabilities or
cooperation in the field of military request management.
“This war
has exposed weaknesses in the militaries of all member states; no one was
preparing for conventional war in Europe, which is what’s happening in Ukraine.
“The need
to provide such important military assistance to another partner stricken by an
aggressor was not foreseen. And therefore, yes, weaknesses have been revealed,
and we have to address them together.”

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário