G.O.P. Revolts Over Debt Limit Deal as Bill Moves
Toward a House Vote
Despite growing Republican opposition, a key committee
voted to move the bill forward to the House floor.
Video
TRANSCRIPT
House
Freedom Caucus Slams Biden-McCarthy on Debt Limit Deal
Hard-right
members of the House Freedom Caucus urged Republicans not to vote for Speaker
Kevin McCarthy’s deal with President Biden to raise the debt ceiling.
“The
speaker himself has said on numerous occasions the greatest threat to America
is our debt, and now is the time to act. We had the time to act. And this deal
fails. Fails completely. And that’s why these members and others will be
absolutely opposed to the deal. And we will do everything in our power to stop
it.” “The Republican conference right now has been torn asunder, and we are
working hard to try to put it back together again this weekend by making sure
that this bill gets stopped. I want to be very clear, not one Republican should
vote for this deal. Not one. We will continue to fight it today, tomorrow and
no matter what happens, there’s going to be a reckoning about what just occured
unless we stop this bill by tomorrow.”
Carl Hulse Catie
Edmondson
By Carl
Hulse and Catie Edmondson
Reporting
from Washington
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/30/us/debt-limit-bill-house-rules-committee.html
May 30,
2023
A
bipartisan deal to suspend the federal debt ceiling advanced on Tuesday night
toward a climactic House vote despite a rebellion by hard-right Republicans who
said the party was squandering a chance to force fundamental changes in
government spending.
In the
legislation’s first test, the House Rules Committee voted to clear the way for
debate on the plan to be held Wednesday. Seven Republicans voted to send the
measure on, while two others joined with Democrats to oppose doing so.
“Not one
Republican should vote for this bill,” Representative Chip Roy, a Texas
Republican and influential member of the ultraconservative House Freedom
Caucus, said hours before the committee vote. “We will continue to fight it
today, tomorrow, and no matter what happens, there’s going to be a reckoning
about what just occurred unless we stop this bill by tomorrow.”
Mr. Roy and
Representative Ralph Norman of South Carolina, another ultraconservative member
of the panel, broke with their party to oppose allowing the plan to be
considered, but a third right-wing Republican on the committee, Representative
Thomas Massie of Kentucky, voted to move it to the floor despite some
misgivings.
It was a
boost to Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s effort to push through the agreement that he
hammered out with President Biden in days of difficult talks, and which must
pass the House and clear the Senate by Monday to be enacted in time to avert a
default.
The
compromise has drawn the ire of right-wing Republicans, leaving open the
possibility that its passage could jeopardize Mr. McCarthy’s standing on
Capitol Hill, where any one lawmaker has the power to call a snap vote to oust
him thanks to a rule Mr. McCarthy agreed to while he was grasping for support
from the far right to be elected speaker in January.
Some
prominent conservatives said a challenge to his leadership now would be premature,
but one member of the ultraconservative Freedom Caucus, Representative Dan
Bishop of North Carolina, said on Tuesday that he considered the debt and
spending deal grounds for ousting Mr. McCarthy from his post.
“I’m fed up
with the lies. I’m fed up with the lack of courage, the cowardice,” Mr. Bishop
said, adding later of Mr. McCarthy’s negotiations on the debt limit bill,
“Nobody could have done a worse job.”
Despite the
outcry, Mr. McCarthy continued to express optimism that the legislation would
pass, shrugging off the criticism and dismissing any concern for his own
survival with a terse “no” during brief comments at the Capitol.
Lifting the
debt ceiling. The deal reached by President Biden and Speaker Kevin McCarthy
would suspend the nation’s debt limit until January 2025. This would allow the
government to keep borrowing money so it can pay its bills on time.
Spending
caps and cuts. In exchange for suspending the debt ceiling, Republicans
demanded a range of concessions. Chief among them are caps on some spending
over the next two years. The deal also claws back $10 billion in I.R.S.
funding.
Food
stamps. The bill would place additional work requirements on older Americans
who receive assistance through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program,
but it also would expand food stamp access for veterans and homeless people.
Student
loans. The legislation would officially end Biden’s freeze on student loan
repayments by the end of summer. It would also prevent the president from issuing
another last-minute extension, as he has done several times.
Environmental
impact. Both sides agreed to new measures to get energy projects approved more
quickly. The deal includes a win for Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia, a
Democrat who strongly supports fossil fuels, by fast-tracking the construction
a contentious pipeline.
“I’m
confident we’ll pass the bill,” Mr. McCarthy told reporters. Ticking off what
he described as major savings in the package, he added: “If people are against
saving all that money, or work reforms in welfare reform — I can’t do anything
about that.”
With some
Republicans in an uproar as more details of the compromise trickled out, the
Biden administration was treading carefully, hailing the agreement as a good
one while emphasizing that neither side emerged with an overwhelming victory
over the other.
“We are in
divided government,” said Shalanda Young, the White House budget director who
was a chief negotiator of the package. “This is what happens in divided
government. They get to have an opinion and we get to have an opinion, and all
things equal, I think this compromise agreement is reasonable for both sides.”
Even as Mr.
McCarthy battled to line up support, new details of the deal were emerging that
threatened to further undermine G.O.P. support. The Congressional Budget Office
estimated on Tuesday that the package would reduce the accumulation of debt by
about $1.5 trillion over the course of a decade, largely by cutting and capping
certain discretionary spending for two years. It also said a series of changes
in work requirements for food stamp eligibility — tightening them for some
adults, but loosening them for others including veterans — would actually
increase federal spending on the program by $2 billion.
While
Republicans demanded stricter work requirements be a part of the compromise,
the White House bargained to lessen the impact, and the budget office estimated
that overall, the deal would increase the ranks of the program, making an
additional 78,000 people eligible for nutrition assistance.
Even after
avoiding a blockade by his own party in the Rules Committee, Mr. McCarthy was
still facing a steep challenge in rounding up the 218 votes needed to pass the
plan on the floor. Republican opposition was coming from beyond the most
conservative wing of the party, including from some members seen as closely aligned
with the speaker.
“The
concessions made by the speaker in his negotiations with President Biden fall
far short of my expectations and the expectations of my friends and neighbors
in Congressional District 38,” Representative Wesley Hunt, a first-term
Republican from Texas who backed Mr. McCarthy in the speaker’s fight, wrote on
Twitter on Tuesday.
The
backlash to the plan from the right appeared to be fueled in part by mounting
public opposition from conservative advocacy groups with strong ties to
Republican lawmakers, including the Heritage Foundation, the Club for Growth
and FreedomWorks. The groups were promising to include the vote in their
ratings of lawmakers, effectively threatening to downgrade anyone who supported
it.
“The
legislation does not meet the moment, and I urge House Republicans to
reconsider their support and take a stand to stop reckless spending,” said Adam
Brandon, the president of FreedomWorks.
With
Republicans experiencing ample defections, Representative Hakeem Jeffries, the
New York Democrat and minority leader, warned that they would still have to
deliver a significant number of votes in support.
“Initially
we heard that 95 percent of the House Republican conference would support the
agreement,” said Mr. Jeffries, alluding to a comment Mr. McCarthy made after
briefing his rank and file about the deal. “That doesn’t appear to be the case.
But what we are also committed to making sure occurs is that the House
Republicans keep their promise to produce at least 150 votes.”
As for
where Democrats stood, Representative Pramila Jayapal, Democrat of Washington
and chairwoman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, said the group was
polling its members to decide whether to take an official position on the bill.
She said the legislation included provisions that she and her members were
extremely concerned about, including restrictions on nutritional assistance
programs and the greenlighting of the Mountain Valley Pipeline, but did not vow
to oppose it.
The bill
was finalized on Sunday after Mr. Biden and Mr. McCarthy sealed their deal, and
aides rushed to draft it into legislation that will have to be considered
swiftly to avoid a default as soon as June 5, when Treasury Secretary Janet L.
Yellen has estimated the federal government will run out of cash to pay its
bills without action by Congress.
The rules
panel was just one of the hurdles the legislation will have to clear in what is
likely to be a nearly weeklong push to passage before next Monday.
With dozens
of Republicans declaring their opposition, the bill will need a combination of
Republican and Democratic votes to pass the House. It would then head to the
Senate, where conservative Republicans are also unhappy with the framework and
can at minimum slow its passage with procedural tactics.
“Conservatives
have been sold out once again!” Senator Rand Paul, a Kentucky Republican who
has been known to throw up procedural obstacles to legislation in the past,
declared on Twitter.
As senators
sifted through the legislation, there was growing unease among Republican
senators that the level of Pentagon spending was too low, according to an aide
who insisted on anonymity to discuss private conversations, and who said the
reservations did not appear to be enough to derail the bill with a default
looming.
Mr. Biden
sought to relieve concerns about military spending on Monday, telling reporters
at the White House that “obviously if there’s any existential need for
additional funding, I have no doubt we’ll be able to get it.”
He remained
confident the legislation would be approved before a default.
“There is
no reason it shouldn’t get done by the 5th,” he said. “I’m confident that we’ll
get a vote in both houses and we’ll see.”
But the
outcry from the House conservatives was looming as a threat to the package if
it stirred other factions among House Republicans to join in.
“Absolutely
and completely unacceptable,” said Representative Scott Perry, Republican of
Pennsylvania and chairman of the Freedom Caucus, in describing the legislation.
“Trillions and trillions of dollars in debt for crumbs. For a pittance.”
Annie
Karni, Jim Tankersley and Michael D. Shear contributed reporting.
Carl Hulse
is chief Washington correspondent and a veteran of more than three decades of
reporting in the capital. @hillhulse
Catie
Edmondson is a reporter in the Washington bureau, covering Congress. @CatieEdmondson
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário