McConnell and GOP reject House's $2,000 stimulus
checks
The majority leader said the Senate will only consider
“smart targeted aid, not another fire hose of borrowed money."
By BURGESS
EVERETT
12/30/2020
03:42 PM EST
Updated:
12/30/2020 07:21 PM EST
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/30/senate-stimulus-check-increase-452491
Mitch
McConnell and Senate Republicans finished off any imminent chance of approving
$2,000 stimulus checks on Wednesday, ending a push from President Donald Trump
and Democratic leaders to approve bigger direct payments as the congressional
term comes to an end.
The Senate
majority leader said he would not detach the $2,000 checks supported by
President Donald Trump from other matters demanded by the president: Stripping
legal protections from tech companies and establishing an election fraud commission.
He declared that the House’s effort to more than triple the size of $600 checks
approved earlier this week has “no realistic path to quickly pass the Senate.”
“Under the
circumstances, I think that's likely true,” said Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas)
when asked if the checks issue is done until the next Congress convenes on Jan.
3. “Democrats are not willing to consider any other pieces of any other
provisions in the bill, whether it's Section 230 or whether it's liability
relief provision.”
But Democrats
indicated they would not abandon their efforts. Andrew Bates, a spokesman for
President-elect Joe Biden, said he supports the House bill and said “it's
imperative that we build on the bipartisan stimulus downpayment."
Moreover,
the issue has become central to the battle for the Senate. Democrats will
continue to press the issue as two Republican senators, David Perdue and Kelly
Loeffler, try to eke out run-off races that will determine Senate control next
year. After Trump’s new demand, both said this week they support $2,000
payments.
“Mitch
McConnell is effectively blocking people from getting extra help,” said Sen.
Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.), the No. 4 Democratic leader. “Sen. Perdue and Sen.
Loeffler should be urging Mitch McConnell to pass the House bill."
Yet
Republicans unrolled a messaging campaign casting the House's legislation,
which more than 40 House GOP members supported, as directing too much aid to
the wealthy. McConnell said the House’s proposal is too generous for higher
earners and that the Senate will consider only “smart targeted aid, not another
fire hose of borrowed money that encompasses other people who are doing just
fine.”
“It’s very
inefficient and there will be a lot of assistance going to people that haven’t
had any income loss during this time,” said Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.), the GOP
whip. “There are probably people out there that are going to need more and we
ought to figure out a way we can target it to people that need it the most.”
Trump
continued pressing his case: “$2000 ASAP!” he said on Twitter on Wednesday.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) even printed out massive posters of Trump’s tweets
pushing for more cash and read them on the Senate floor.
But
McConnell had plenty of back-up in attacking the House’s passed legislation.
Even retiring Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) said he had little interest in
larger direct payments.
“$600 was
about right and it was targeted. The problem with the $2,000 is it’s not
targeted,” Alexander said. According to the Committee for a Responsible Federal
Budget, the House’s bill would send checks to higher earners more than the two
previous rounds of direct payments.
The issue
has dominated the Senate even as both parties are preparing to roll over
Trump's veto of the annual defense bill. Sens. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) and Cornyn
battled with Democrats on the Senate floor on Wednesday, spurning requests to
hold a roll call vote. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), Sanders
and Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) all tried to force votes, but each request was
rejected.
Sanders and
other Democrats said they would not consent to finishing a critical $740
billion defense bill until they got their vote, as did Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.).
“All that
he has to do is give us an up or down vote on the issue of getting $2,000 to
every working class adult in this country,” Sanders said of McConnell after the
floor fight. “If he wants to bring up another approach, that's fine too. But
give us an up or down straight forward vote."
When Trump
signed a $900 billion stimulus bill providing $600 checks on Sunday, he said
that he wanted Congress to address election fraud, tech company’s legal
protections and the larger checks. He did not explicitly ask for them to be
rolled together, but that’s precisely what McConnell did when he introduced his
bill on Tuesday.
“The Senate
is not going to split apart the three issues that President Trump linked
together just because Democrats are afraid to address two of them,” McConnell
said.
Still,
Hawley said he would support the House’s bill even though he would like to also
repeal tech company’s “Section 230” legal protections. Democrats and some
Republicans oppose a blanket repeal, meaning McConnell’s bill probably can’t
get 60 votes in the Senate anyway. Moreover, the House is gone for the year,
leaving their standalone bill to boost the $600 checks to $2,000 as the only
real option at this point.
“There is
no other game in town besides the House bill. The only way … to get to the
American people the $2,000 checks they deserve and need is to pass the House
bill and pass it now,” Schumer said.
But it’s
not just McConnell who objects to even just holding a quick vote.
“I don't
think we should just have an up or down vote right now on some really bad
policy,” Toomey said on CNBC.
Quint
Forgey contributed to this report.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário