quinta-feira, 27 de agosto de 2026

What is the Atlantic cold blob?

 


The cold blob in the North Atlantic (also called the North Atlantic warming hole is a cold temperature anomaly of the surface waters at a region in the North Atlantic Ocean south of Greenland, affecting the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) which is part of the thermohaline circulation, possibly related to global warming-induced melting of the Greenland ice sheet. It is the largest structurally anomalous cold oceanic region on Earth.

 

Discovery

In 2005, British researchers noticed that the net flow of the northern Gulf Stream had decreased by about 30% since 1957. Coincidentally, scientists at Woods Hole in Massachusetts had been measuring the freshening of the North Atlantic as Earth becomes warmer. Their findings suggested that precipitation increases in the high northern latitudes, and polar ice melts as a consequence. By flooding the northern seas with excessive fresh water, global warming could, in theory, divert the Gulf Stream waters that usually flow northward, past the British Isles and Norway, and cause them to instead circulate toward the equator. Were this to happen, Europe's climate would be seriously impacted.

 

Don Chambers from the USF College of Marine Science mentioned, "The major effect of a slowing AMOC is expected to be cooler winters and summers around the North Atlantic, and small regional increases in sea level on the North American coast." James Hansen and Makiko Sato stated, "AMOC slowdown that causes cooling ~1°C and perhaps affects weather patterns is very different from an AMOC shutdown that cools the North Atlantic several degrees Celsius; the latter would have dramatic effects on storms and be irreversible on the century time scale." Downturn of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation has been tied to extreme regional sea level rise.

 

Cause

AMOC is driven by ocean temperature and salinity differences. The major possible mechanism causing the cold ocean surface temperature anomaly is based on the fact that freshwater decreases ocean water salinity, and the colder surface waters cannot sink because they are less dense than the saltier waters underneath them. The observed freshwater increase probably originates from Greenland ice melt.

 

Climate scientists Michael Mann of Penn State and Stefan Rahmstorf from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research suggested that the observed cold pattern during years of temperature records is a sign that the Atlantic Ocean's Meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) may be weakening. They published their findings, and concluded that the AMOC circulation shows exceptional slowdown in the last century, and that Greenland melt is a possible contributor. Tom Delworth of NOAA suggested that natural variability, which includes different modes, here namely the North Atlantic Oscillation and the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation through wind driven ocean temperatures are also a factor. A 2014 study by Jon Robson et al. from the University of Reading concluded about the anomaly, "...suggest that a substantial change in the AMOC is unfolding now." Another study by Didier Swingedouw concluded that the slowdown of AMOC in the 1970s may have been unprecedented over the last millennium.

 

A study published in 2016, by researchers from the University of South Florida, Canada and the Netherlands, used GRACE satellite data to estimate freshwater flux from Greenland. They concluded that freshwater runoff is accelerating, and could eventually cause a disruption of AMOC in the future, which would affect Europe and North America.

 

Another study published in 2016, found further evidence for a considerable impact from sea level rise for the U.S. East Coast. The study confirms earlier research findings which identified the region as a hotspot for rising seas, with a potential to divert 3–4 times higher than the global average sea level rise rate. The researchers attribute the possible increase to an ocean circulation mechanism called deep water formation, which is reduced due to AMOC slow down, leading to more warmer water pockets below the surface. Additionally, the study noted: "Our results suggest that higher carbon emission rates also contribute to increased [sea level rise] in this region compared to the global average".

 

Since 2004 the RAPID program has been monitoring ocean circulation

‘We don’t know where the tipping point is’: climate expert on potential collapse of Atlantic circulation

 


This article is more than 9 months old

‘We don’t know where the tipping point is’: climate expert on potential collapse of Atlantic circulation

 

Oceanographer Stefan Rahmstorf explains why Amoc breakdown could be catastrophic for both humans and marine life

 

Jonathan Watts

Wed 23 Oct 2024 14.00 BST

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/oct/23/we-dont-know-where-the-tipping-point-is-climate-expert-on-potential-collapse-of-atlantic-circulation

 

The dangers of a collapse of the main Atlantic Ocean circulation, known as Amoc, have been “greatly underestimated” and would have devastating and irreversible impacts, according to an open letter released at the weekend by 44 experts from 15 countries. One of the signatories, Stefan Rahmstorf, an oceanographer and climatologist who heads the Earth system analysis department at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany, explains here why he has recently upgraded his risk assessment of an Amoc breakdown as a result of global heating – and what that means for Britain, Europe and the wider world.

 

What is Amoc?

Amoc, or the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation, is a system of ocean currents that brings heat into the northern Atlantic. Warm surface water from the tropics flows north and releases its heat in the subpolar Atlantic, south of Greenland and west of Britain and Ireland. Then it cools and sinks to a depth of between 2,000m to 3,000 metres before returning south as a cold current. Amoc is one of our planet’s largest heat transport systems, moving the equivalent of 50 times the human energy use, and it has a particularly strong impact on the climate in Europe, affects the ocean’s CO2 uptake and oxygen supply, as well as rainfall patterns in the tropics.

 

How is Amoc different to the Gulf Stream?

They are connected because the northwards flow of Amoc goes via the Gulf Stream, which is a warm and swift Atlantic Ocean current that originates in the Gulf of Mexico, then flows through the Florida straits, up the coast of the US and then across towards Europe. Amoc contributes just 20% to the Gulf Stream water flow but most of the heat transport, since Amoc’s deep return flow is very cold. It works like a central heating system.

 

What is happening to Amoc?

There are indications that Amoc has been slowing down for the last 60 or 70 years due to global heating. The most ominous sign is the cold blob over the northern Atlantic. The region is the only place in the world that has cooled in the past 20 years or so, while everywhere else on the planet has warmed – a sign of reduced heat transport into that region, exactly what climate computer models have predicted in response to Amoc slowing as a result of greenhouse gas emissions.

 

Are there other indications that Amoc is weakening?

Yes. There is a region of excessive heating along the east coast of North America, which is predicted by climate models and oceanographic theory as a result of a slowing Amoc, which pushes the Gulf Stream closer to the shore.

 

Another indicator is a reduction in the salt content of seawater. In the cold blob region, salinity is at its lowest level since measurements began 120 years ago. This is probably linked to Amoc slowing down and bringing less salty water and heat from the subtropics.

 

Why is the salt content significant?

When the water is less salty, it is less dense, which makes it harder to sink down. That is important because the sinking process is what drives Amoc. The fresher the water, the slower it gets.

 

What is driving the change in salinity?

Firstly, salinity is directly affected by global heating, which enhances the water cycle so there is more evaporation in the subtropics and more precipitation in the subpolar oceans. This leads to a freshening of the subpolar ocean. Then there are additional contributions from the melting of sea ice and the loss of continental ice from the Greenland ice sheet, which is freshwater that flows into the ocean.

 

It is an amplifying feedback: as Amoc gets weaker, the subpolar oceans gets less salty, and as the oceans gets less salty then Amoc gets weaker. At a certain point this becomes a vicious circle which continues by itself until Amoc has died, even if we stop pushing the system with further emissions.

 

When might Amoc weakening reach a point of no return?

The big unknown here – the billion-dollar question – is how far away this tipping point is. It is very difficult to answer because the process is non-linear and would be triggered by subtle differences in salinity, which in turn depend on amounts of rainfall and cloud cover over the ocean as well as Greenland melting rates. These are hard to model accurately in computers so there is a big uncertainty relating to when the tipping point will be reached.

 

What is the range of forecasts?

Until a few years ago, the general thinking in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was that the probability of crossing the tipping point this century was less than 10%. Since then, there have been a number of studies suggesting a collapse would probably be triggered this century, possibly in the next few decades. So my risk assessment has really changed. I am now very concerned that we may push Amoc over this tipping point in the next decades. If you ask me my gut feeling, I would say the risk that we cross the tipping point this century is about 50/50.

 

Is there any possibility it has already happened?

I wouldn’t rule it out completely, because it would be very hard to tell from observations. Nothing dramatic happens at the tipping point. That just means Amoc is then doomed and it will slowly die, but that process could take 50 to 100 years. Because the Amoc is already weakening we can’t be entirely sure whether we already passed a tipping point, but I would say this is most likely not the case, so it is not too late to prevent this.

 

What would be the warning signs of Amoc collapse?

We need to keep monitoring the flow of water in the Atlantic, which is being done with the Rapid project. We should also monitor deep winter mixing in the northern Atlantic and Nordic seas. If the deep mixing starts to decline a lot, that could be an early indicator that we are approaching a tipping point. There are some signs of this, but we don’t have enough data yet to be sure.

 

What would be the consequences of Amoc breakdown?

This has happened repeatedly in Earth’s history, most recently during the last ice age, when big ice masses slid into the ocean – so-called Heinrich events – adding meltwater that diluted the salinity of the north Atlantic. These are among the most massive upheavals of climate conditions in Earth’s history.

 

The effects include a cooling of the northern hemisphere, particularly northwestern Europe. There would also be a shift of the tropical rainfall belt to the south, which is bad because the rains will move away from the rainforests to regions that are not used to so much rainfall. So this will mean droughts in some regions and floods in others.

 

Amoc collapse would also have a major impact on the northern Atlantic sea level, which would rise by half a metre or so, in addition to the rise caused by global heating. It would also reduce the CO2 uptake of the ocean because Amoc sinking in the northern Atlantic takes a lot of CO2 down into the deep oceans where it is safely locked away from the atmosphere.

 

Amoc collapse would also change the nutrient supply and reduce the oxygen of the deep oceans. This would have a massive effect on marine biology and the entire ecosystem of the northern Atlantic.

 

Many of these things are happening already, aren’t they?

Yes, to some extent. This is partly because Amoc is weakening and so is its counterpart in the southern hemisphere, the Antarctic bottom water formation, according to research by Australian colleagues.

 

Could the cooling effect of Amoc collapse offset the heating caused by human emissions?

I can’t think of anywhere that will be better off. If it were just a case of averages, then somewhere like Germany might see a balance. But weather is not a climate average; it is seasonal and highly variable. Within the average you can get warm air from the south or cold polar air outbreaks from the north. These contrasts will be more pronounced if Scandinavia and Britain cool while Spain and Italy warm. This will drive much greater variability in the weather, which is bad for agriculture, and it will cause more storms. I would expect major extreme weather events that we have not seen in the past.

 

The key thing about climate change is that both the ecosystem of the Earth as well as human settlements and infrastructures are highly adapted to what the climate was like in previous centuries. So any change – whether global heating or global cooling – will always be bad because it will lead to maladaptation. Think of the tremendous flooding we have seen somewhere in the world almost every week in the last months. If it had been like that for centuries, then river and sewer systems would be adapted to take up that water. But because we are not used to that, there are disasters. That is the problem of climate change.

 

How certain is the science about Amoc collapse?

It is well established that Amoc is weakening and that a tipping point exists. The uncertainty is about when we will cross that threshold. We also have very few studies about what the combined effect of Amoc collapse and global heating would exactly look like.

 

It is a question of risk assessment. I compare it to being told that there is a 10% chance of an airplane crashing. Would you get on that plane? I wouldn’t. The disastrous consequences are unacceptable.

 

Why haven’t the IPCC made more of Amoc risks?

They have not done enough risk assessment because they tend to focus on the most probable scenarios for future climate change. Some colleagues say we shouldn’t talk about extreme possibilities like an Amoc collapse because it sounds alarmist and might distract people from more certain impacts of global heating, which are bad enough. But I think those extreme risks are part of the whole picture that we need to consider, to make responsible and rational decisions.

 

How long would an Amoc collapse last and how survivable would it be?

The last time, it took about 1,000 years to recover, though the past is not a direct analogue because there is also massive CO2 forcing this time – CO2 is already higher than any time in 15m years. There are physical reasons why some form of deep overturning circulation will eventually come back.

 

One thing is for sure: humanity will not die out. But for some countries that will be in the midst of this, like Norway, and Scotland, the risks will be existential and raise the question whether people can continue to live there or whether most of them would rather move.

 

How does the Amoc threat compare to other climate tipping points?

That is hard to tell. It is a trade-off between more distant futures and things that are already happening.

 

We have already crossed the tipping point of many coral reefs, which are now in middle of global die-off. This is very depressing because it is already too late to do anything about it, though marine biologists have warned about the risks for a long time. The Amazon rainforest is also dangerously close to a tipping point. As we speak, it is going through the worst drought on record.

 

Then in the very long run, we have the ice sheet tipping points in Greenland and west Antarctica. From Greenland alone, this will lead to a seven-metre global sea level rise that will wipe all major coastal cities off the map. But that will occur over many centuries because ice sheet melt is a slow process.

 

Amoc is on an intermediate timescale because it unfolds over decades to 100 years.

 

I am worried about all of these things to be honest. And the conclusion for all of them is the same: this is all driven mainly by fossil fuel emissions and also deforestation, so both must be stopped. We must stick to the Paris agreement and limit global heating as close to 1.5C as possible. I don’t think it is my job to talk about my feelings, but I do have two children and I am very worried about what future they will live in. I sometimes joke that physicists don’t have feelings. But even physicists care about their kids.

Fri 9 Feb 2024: Atlantic Ocean circulation nearing ‘devastating’ tipping point, study finds

 


Atlantic Ocean circulation nearing ‘devastating’ tipping point, study finds

 

Collapse in system of currents that helps regulate global climate would be at such speed that adaptation would be impossible

 

Jonathan Watts

@jonathanwatts

Fri 9 Feb 2024 20.00 CET

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/feb/09/atlantic-ocean-circulation-nearing-devastating-tipping-point-study-finds

 

The circulation of the Atlantic Ocean is heading towards a tipping point that is “bad news for the climate system and humanity”, a study has found.

 

The scientists behind the research said they were shocked at the forecast speed of collapse once the point is reached, although they said it was not yet possible to predict how soon that would happen.

 

Using computer models and past data, the researchers developed an early warning indicator for the breakdown of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (Amoc), a vast system of ocean currents that is a key component in global climate regulation.

 

They found Amoc is already on track towards an abrupt shift, which has not happened for more than 10,000 years and would have dire implications for large parts of the world.

 

Amoc, which encompasses part of the Gulf Stream and other powerful currents, is a marine conveyer belt that carries heat, carbon and nutrients from the tropics towards the Arctic Circle, where it cools and sinks into the deep ocean. This churning helps to distribute energy around the Earth and modulates the impact of human-caused global heating.

 

But the system is being eroded by the faster-than-expected melt-off of Greenland’s glaciers and Arctic ice sheets, which pours freshwater into the sea and obstructs the sinking of saltier, warmer water from the south.

 

Amoc has declined 15% since 1950 and is in its weakest state in more than a millennium, according to previous research that prompted speculation about an approaching collapse.

 

Until now there has been no consensus about how severe this will be. One study last year, based on changes in sea surface temperatures, suggested the tipping point could happen between 2025 and 2095. However, the UK Met Office said large, rapid changes in Amoc were “very unlikely” in the 21st century.

 

The new paper, published in Science Advances, has broken new ground by looking for warning signs in the salinity levels at the southern extent of the Atlantic Ocean between Cape Town and Buenos Aires. Simulating changes over a period of 2,000 years on computer models of the global climate, it found a slow decline can lead to a sudden collapse over less than 100 years, with calamitous consequences.

 

The paper said the results provided a “clear answer” about whether such an abrupt shift was possible: “This is bad news for the climate system and humanity as up till now one could think that Amoc tipping was only a theoretical concept and tipping would disappear as soon as the full climate system, with all its additional feedbacks, was considered.”

 

It also mapped some of the consequences of Amoc collapse. Sea levels in the Atlantic would rise by a metre in some regions, inundating many coastal cities. The wet and dry seasons in the Amazon would flip, potentially pushing the already weakened rainforest past its own tipping point. Temperatures around the world would fluctuate far more erratically. The southern hemisphere would become warmer. Europe would cool dramatically and have less rainfall. While this might sound appealing compared with the current heating trend, the changes would hit 10 times faster than now, making adaptation almost impossible.

 

“What surprised us was the rate at which tipping occurs,” said the paper’s lead author, René van Westen, of Utrecht University. “It will be devastating.”

 

He said there was not yet enough data to say whether this would occur in the next year or in the coming century, but when it happens, the changes are irreversible on human timescales.

 

In the meantime, the direction of travel is undoubtedly in an alarming direction.

 

“We are moving towards it. That is kind of scary,” van Westen said. “We need to take climate change much more seriously.”

What is the AMOC?

 


An AMOC (Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation) collapse is the weakening or shutdown of a major system of ocean currents that transports heat from the tropics to the North Atlantic. This collapse, a potential "tipping point" for the global climate, could lead to dramatically cooler winters in Northern Europe, accelerated warming in other regions, and significant disruption to global rainfall patterns, impacting food production. While scientific debate continues, recent studies and observations suggest the AMOC is weakening due to the influx of freshwater from melting Greenland ice and increasing air temperatures, raising concerns that a collapse may occur sooner than previously thought.

 

What is the AMOC?

The AMOC is a large-scale ocean current system that includes the Gulf Stream.

It transports warm, salty water from the tropics northwards and brings cold, dense water south.

This process is vital for regulating the global climate and keeping Europe relatively warm.

 

Why is it at risk?

Melting Ice:

Increased rainfall and the melting of the Greenland ice sheet are pouring freshwater into the North Atlantic.

 

Freshening Water:

This freshwater makes the North Atlantic water less salty and less dense.

 

Disrupted Sinking:

The process relies on cold, salty water sinking in the North Atlantic to drive the circulation; lighter, freshwater inhibits this sinking process.

 

Tipping Point:

This weakening is a concern because the AMOC is seen as a "tipping point," a threshold past which a system undergoes abrupt and irreversible changes.

What are the potential consequences of a collapse?

 

Europe:

Drastically colder winters, with temperatures in some regions, like Scandinavia, potentially falling to -40°C or lower.

 

Global Climate:

Accelerated warming in other parts of the world, disrupted precipitation patterns, and altered rainfall crucial for agriculture.

 

Sea Levels:

A potential rise in sea levels, particularly along the eastern coast of North America.

 

Ecosystems:

Increased stress on ecosystems like the Amazon rainforest and Antarctic ice sheets.

 

What is the current scientific view?

There is growing concern and scientific debate about the AMOC's stability.

Recent studies suggest the system is more unstable than previously thought.

Some research indicates a collapse could occur sooner than expected, potentially by 2060.

However, other studies have found a collapse unlikely this century, highlighting the complexity and ongoing scientific inquiry into the tipping point.

The real-life Day After Tomorrow: The Gulf Stream could COLLAPSE at 'any time' from 2025 thanks to climate change – plunging Europe into a deep freeze, warn scientists/ The Day After Tomorrow | #TBT Trailer | 20th Century FOX


The real-life Day After Tomorrow: The Gulf Stream could COLLAPSE at 'any time' from 2025 thanks to climate change – plunging Europe into a deep freeze, warn scientists

 

The current is known formally as the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation

Its collapse was featured in the Hollywood blockbuster 'The Day After Tomorrow'

 



By SAM TONKIN FOR MAILONLINE

UPDATED: 07:47, 26 July 2023

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-12335853/The-real-life-Day-Tomorrow-Gulf-Stream-COLLAPSE-time-2025-thanks-climate-change-plunging-Europe-deep-freeze.html

 

In the Hollywood blockbuster 'The Day After Tomorrow', ocean currents around the world stop as a result of global warming, triggering a new Ice Age on Earth.

 

That may have been science fiction but scientists say the terrifying prophecy could soon become a reality.

 

That's because new research warns that the Atlantic Ocean current which drives the Gulf Stream could collapse at 'any time' from 2025 thanks to climate change.

 

Known formally as the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), the current is the driving force which brings warm water from the Gulf of Mexico up to the UK and is responsible for mild winters in Western Europe.

 

If it collapsed, however, the impact would be devastating.

 

Europe would be plunged into a deep freeze, while most of Africa, the Caribbean, and South American countries such as Colombia, Peru and Bolivia would experience rocketing temperatures.

Fears: New research warns that the Atlantic Ocean current which drives the Gulf Stream could collapse at 'any time' from 2025 thanks to climate change

 

WHAT IS THE AMOC?

The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) is an important component of the Earth’s climate system.

 

The pattern carries warm, salty water in the upper layers of the Atlantic northward, and colder fresh water in the deep Atlantic southward.

 

This ocean circulation system transports a substantial amount of heat from the Tropics and Southern Hemisphere toward the North Atlantic, where the heat is transferred to the atmosphere.

 

High levels in carbon dioxide would cause Arctic and Greenland ice melt, increasing the amount of freshwater run-off into the ocean.

 

This increase in freshwater would dirupt the AMOC, which relies on a balance between fresh and salt water.

 

Scientists at the University of Copenhagen say such a scenario is '95 per cent certain' by the end of this century if current greenhouse gas emissions persist.

 

More likely is that without significant action to tackle climate change it will happen in 2057, the experts added, although there is a chance the collapse could come as early as two years' time.

 

The ocean currents play a vital role in Earth's current climate because they redistribute heat, cold and rainfall between the tropics and the northernmost parts of the Atlantic region.

 

'Shutting down the AMOC can have very serious consequences for Earth's climate, for example, by changing how heat and precipitation are distributed globally,' said Professor Peter Ditlevsen, from the University of Copenhagen's Niels Bohr Institute.

 

'While a cooling of Europe may seem less severe as the globe as a whole becomes warmer and heat waves occur more frequently, this shutdown will contribute to an increased warming of the tropics, where rising temperatures have already given rise to challenging living conditions.'

 

He added: 'Our result underscores the importance of reducing global greenhouse gas emissions as soon as possible.'

 

The researchers used ocean temperature data from the last 150 years and combined it with innovative new statistical tools to come to their conclusion.

 

However, it is at odds with the latest report by the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which cited climate model simulations suggesting such change to the AMOC was very unlikely this century.

 

The Danish researchers' prediction is based on the monitoring of early warning signals which ocean currents exhibit as they become unstable.

 

Although these have been reported previously, the experts say only now has the development of advanced statistical methods made it possible to predict just when a collapse will occur.

 

Analysis: The researchers used ocean temperature data from the last 150 years and combined it with innovative new statistical tools to come to their conclusion

 

Analysis: The researchers used ocean temperature data from the last 150 years and combined it with innovative new statistical tools to come to their conclusion

 

Science fiction: In the Hollywood blockbuster 'The Day After Tomorrow' (pictured), ocean currents around the world stop as a result of global warming, triggering a new Ice Age on Earth

 

Science fiction: In the Hollywood blockbuster 'The Day After Tomorrow' (pictured), ocean currents around the world stop as a result of global warming, triggering a new Ice Age on Earth

 

The researchers analysed sea surface temperatures in a specific area of the North Atlantic from 1870 to today.

 

They referred to these as 'fingerprints' which give an indication to the strength of the AMOC, or Thermohaline Circulation — which has only been properly measured for the past 15 years.

 

'Using new and improved statistical tools, we've made calculations that provide a more robust estimate of when a collapse of the Thermohaline Circulation is most likely to occur, something we had not been able to do before,' said Professor Susanne Ditlevsen, of the University of Copenhagen.

 

Until the 1800s, the AMOC was relatively stable. However, the current declined after the so-called 'Little Ice Age' ended in 1850.

 

This saw temperatures drop so low that the River Thames completely froze over, enabling Londoners to cross the waterway on foot.

 

The last total shutdown of the AMOC is believed to have occurred at the end of the last proper Ice Age around 12,000 years ago, where temperatures in western Europe plummeted by up to 10°C.

 

The new research has been published in the journal Nature Communications.

 

What would the world look like if the Gulf Stream collapsed? 

If the AMOC was to collapse, far less heat would reach western Europe and the region would be plunged into very severe winters, the kind of scenario depicted in an extreme fashion in the movie The Day After Tomorrow.

 

Until the 1800s, it was relatively stable but the current declined after the so-called 'Little Ice Age' ended in 1850.

 

Temperatures dropped low enough that the River Thames completely froze over and records show Londoners crossing the waterway on foot.

 

The last shutdown was probably at the end of the last Ice Age, 12,000 years ago, and it prompted a temperature drop of 5°C to 10°C in western Europe.

 

In the event of another collapse, not only would European winters become much colder but summer droughts, storms and heatwaves would likely become more common.

 

Sea levels could rise up to nearly 20 inches around the North Atlantic Basin, which surrounds the eastern US coast.

 

This would eventually push people living along the coast further inland to escape flooding. A widespread collapse of deep-sea eco-systems would occur.

 

In the US, Florida would be particularly badly affected as the flow of water northwards would be halted, seeing it collect on the state's shoreline. 

 

A study published last year looked at how the cessation of the AMOC may impact the UK specifically.

 

The Little Ice Age, a centuries-long cold period that lasted until about 1850. Experts believe that as the North Atlantic began to warm near the end of the Little Ice Age, freshwater disrupted the system. Pictured is Thames Frost Fair, 1683–84, by Thomas Wyke

 

The Little Ice Age, a centuries-long cold period that lasted until about 1850. Experts believe that as the North Atlantic began to warm near the end of the Little Ice Age, freshwater disrupted the system. Pictured is Thames Frost Fair, 1683–84, by Thomas Wyke

 

University of Exeter researchers made a computer model and found that by 2080 the weather would be 3.4°C colder than it was last year.

 

Rainfall during the growing season is expected to drop by 123mm, they added.

 

This, Ars Technica reports, is enough to reduce the UK's arable land from 32 percent to just seven percent, greatly affecting food production. 

 

The effects would be felt not in Europe and the United States, with forecasts also projecting that the collapse of the AMOC would also increase drought in the Sahel in Africa.


How the far right is tightening its grip over the EU – from the inside

 


How the far right is tightening its grip over the EU – from the inside

Alberto Alemanno

Alberto Alemanno

The centrist coalition that traditionally shaped EU laws is now colluding with MEPs from the AfD and Marine Le Pen’s National Rally

Tue 18 Aug 2026 05.00 BST

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/aug/18/far-right-grip-eu-centrist-coalition-afd-national-rally

 

The EU exists because its nations swore never to repeat the past. European integration is the insurance policy against the oldest temptation of power: that a majority, however large, decides who does not belong. So countries across the continent agreed to share power across borders, and to answer to laws that none of them individually controlled.

The European parliament is where that promise is meant to be kept. Directly elected by nearly 360 million citizens, it co-writes the EU’s laws, elects the president of the European Commission and can dismiss the closest thing Europe has to a government – the commission itself. For decades, a grand coalition of centre-right parties and socialists, later joined by liberals and greens, governed it on that premise. They were committed to closer cooperation, the rule of law and maintaining a firewall against the far right.

In June, in Strasbourg, that promise was broken by the parliament itself.

“Send them back! Send them back!” The chant rose from rightwing MEPs pumping their fists, as the chamber approved the harshest migration law in EU history. The “return regulation”, as this law is called, does exactly what European integration was designed to prevent: it lets a majority decide who does not belong, putting them beyond the law’s reach – and after Ceuta, Europe’s leaders are demanding it should be applied faster. The regulation allows EU countries to deport people to detention centres outside EU territory, placing them further from judicial protection, media scrutiny and public accountability.

Approval of this law was not a rightwing putsch. It was the clearest sign of a quiet shift within an institution that, however overlooked, shapes what kind of union Europeans get to live in.

The political coalition that shaped EU legislation for decades hasn’t formally collapsed, but its largest group, the European People’s party (EPP) – home to Germany’s governing Christian Democrats (CDU/CSU) and political “family” of the commission’s president, Ursula von der Leyen – now operates with two rival majorities. The legacy centrist majority gives it control of Europe’s principal institutions. A second, formed with Giorgia Meloni’s European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR), Marine Le Pen’s Patriots for Europe (PfE) and the more extreme Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN), led by Germany’s Alternative für Deutschland, increasingly enables it to shape Europe’s laws. When socialists, liberals or green MEPs resist its terms, the EPP can turn to the right and pass legislation without them. When it needs centrist votes to control the commission and parliament, however, it turns back to them, and they continue to provide those votes without conditions. The EPP therefore pays no political price for crossing its supposed firewall.

Rightwing MEPs chant ‘send them back’ after controversial deportation plans are passed – video

0:48

Rightwing MEPs chant ‘send them back’ after controversial deportation plans are passed – video

Since 2024, the EPP has voted with the far right more than 20 times. In June alone, a far-right group was decisive in one in five final votes.

The return regulation passed through precisely this alignment. On one of the defining questions facing Europe, conservatives in the EPP – as well as a majority of MEPs from the centrist Renew group – chose not only to accommodate the hard right, but to make it part of its governing majority. This new majority is driving the most sweeping rollback of EU protective standards across migration, climate, corporate accountability and AI that Europe has seen. Under the banner of “simplification”, common European rules are being weakened, their scope narrowed and regulatory power returned to national authorities and private actors.

This is a different Europe, one that is coercive at the border and permissive towards corporate and environmental harm. It is being built by hollowing out the union from within, using European law to repeal European protections. The far right didn’t need to take over Europe’s institutions to do this; it only needed to find a mainstream party willing to translate its priorities into European law.

The hypocrisy is structural, and events in Ceuta exposed it. When tens of thousands of people tried to reach the Spanish exclave in late July, and at least 88 drowned in the process, national leaders raced each other rightwards. Meloni introduced border checks on third-country nationals arriving from Spain, 22 governments blamed Madrid, and Manfred Weber, who leads the EPP in the European parliament, demanded migrant deportation centres in Africa and the accelerated implementation of the return regulation.

At home, the EPP’s German members – Friedrich Merz’s CDU/CSU alliance – still invoke the Brandmauer, the firewall against cooperation with the AfD. In Brussels, its European political grouping breaches the firewall whenever hard-right votes are useful. Nor is the alliance confined to legislation. In July, the EPP joined the far right to block a criminal referral concerning €276,000 (about £236,300) in irregular spending by the PfE, allowing the group to repay the money and close the file. Days later, PfE MEPs helped shield the EPP’s Matej Tonin from prosecution sought by the Slovenian authorities.

None of this works without the complicity of the pro-European mainstream. Socialists, liberals and greens provide the EPP with the votes that enable it to control the commission and the presidencies of parliament, and therefore allowing it to present itself as Europe’s responsible centre. Yet their support does nothing to prevent the EPP’s rightward turn. It only provides a useful cover. The EPP can govern from the right while running Europe under the guise of legitimacy provided by the centre. Granted, walking away would not automatically defeat the rightwing majority. But it would force the EPP to choose and to bear responsibility for the coalition on which it increasingly relies.

The first test will come in January 2027, when parliament elects its president. Roberta Metsola, from the EPP, is seeking a third term, although the socialists say they should get the presidency under a 2024 power-sharing agreement. The PfE has offered Metsola its votes in return for greater institutional recognition. The socialists, liberals and greens should refuse to support her unless the EPP commits to not forming legislative or institutional majorities with the hard right and accepts that any breach will end its institutional cooperation. Without these strings attached, another agreement would cost the EPP nothing to break. Polls already show that the centrist forces that have dominated European politics since the second world war are, for the first time, projected to fall short of a European parliamentary majority.

The fists raised in Strasbourg belonged to the hard right. The power and authority that turn its reactionary demands into European law are still supplied by the centre. In January, Europe’s socialists, liberals and greens can either let the union stray further away from the values they cherish, or end the agreement that has allowed this drift in the first place.

  • Alberto Alemanno is the Jean Monnet professor of EU law at HEC Paris and the founder of The Good Lobby