The
Editorial Board
Trump’s
Betrayal of Ukraine
Oct. 20,
2026

Credit...Damon
Winter/The New York Times
The
editorial board is a group of opinion journalists whose views are informed by
expertise, research, debate and certain longstanding values.
It is separate from the newsroom.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/10/20/opinion/russia-ukraine-trump-us.html
Since
President Trump returned to the White House last year, he has vacillated
between appeasing President Vladimir Putin of Russia and reluctantly helping
Ukraine defend itself against Mr. Putin’s invasion. Over the past two weeks,
Mr. Trump has taken a sharp turn toward appeasement. Desperate to reduce gas
prices before the midterms, he is now helping Mr. Putin wage war.
On Oct. 9,
Mr. Trump announced
he would lift sanctions on Russian diesel exports to the United States, a
step that will help Russia’s economy and war production. On Friday, he went
further, signing an executive order that waived
other sanctions. He has also taken steps that do not have a clear economic
rationale and instead seem designed simply to please Mr. Putin. Among them are
new service restrictions for Starshield, the Elon Musk-run satellite network
that Ukrainian forces use to defend against Russian airstrikes. Although the
White House denies involvement, Mr. Musk said that only the U.S. military, and
ultimately the president, could order service restrictions.
Let us be
clear about the scope of Mr. Trump’s cynicism. He is aiding an autocratic
leader and dangerous adversary of the United States who is waging a brutal war
against a democratic neighbor. Mr. Trump is doing so partly in the faint hope
that gas prices, which have
jumped because of his reckless war in Iran, will fall over the next two
weeks and help Republicans avoid big losses in the midterm elections. He is
damaging America’s national interest, and likely sacrificing Ukrainian lives,
for his own political interests.
The stakes
in Ukraine are much larger than the fate of one nation. The war is a test of
whether authoritarian expansion can succeed by military force in the 21st
century — or whether the West can rally to protect democracy and innocent
lives.
Even some
congressional Republicans are aghast. Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina called the sanctions
waiver “beyond irresponsible” and “unconscionable.” Senator Ted Cruz of Texas
said it was a mistake. Two other Republicans — Senator Kevin Cramer of North
Dakota and Representative Mike Turner of Ohio — called for an investigation
into the Starshield disruptions. Senator John Cornyn of Texas said, “Lindsey
would be appalled,” referring
to the late Lindsey Graham, a Trump ally who frequently pushed him to be
tougher on Russia and sometimes succeeded. (The sanctions that Mr. Trump halted
last week stemmed from a law that he signed just last month and that is named
for Mr. Graham.)
We regret
that most Republicans, including the party’s House and Senate leaders, have not
displayed similar independence and moral clarity. A functional Congress would
quickly pass legislation constraining Mr. Trump, on both Russian sanctions and
Ukraine’s satellite access.
Mr. Trump’s
latest policies are particularly disappointing because Ukraine has made
progress this year. Its forces recaptured
roughly 400 square miles of territory between January and
mid-October, and its drones have inflicted damage deep inside Russia. With help
from the United States and Western Europe, Ukraine has a chance to turn Mr.
Putin’s war into a humiliating stalemate or defeat.
Mr. Trump’s
solicitousness of Mr. Putin instead encourages him to become more aggressive,
in Ukraine and beyond. Seeing the West as weak and divided, Mr. Putin has
started a campaign of barely disguised attacks and provocations against other
parts of Europe. Russian drones, missiles and fighter jets have intruded on
NATO airspace, in Poland, Romania and the Baltics. Last week, suspicious
drone attacks in the Black Sea, just outside Bulgaria’s territorial waters,
damaged one commercial cargo ship and sank another. This summer, Germany said
it had discovered
armed Russian drones around an airport near Leipzig, apparently waiting for
remote instructions to attack. “We are already in conflict with Russia,”
Chancellor Friedrich Merz of Germany has said.
Mr. Trump,
by contrast, offered
this disingenuous assessment on Monday: “Russia, frankly, has been fine on
Ukraine.” He has dressed up his pro-Moscow appeasement as a strategy for
achieving peace. On Sunday, he wrote on social media that he had
waived the sanctions because he did not want “to do anything that will
drive, foolishly, Russia away from the bargaining table.” If Mr. Trump actually
believes this, he is misreading Mr. Putin, who responds to meek entreaties for
peace by waging more war.
Both the
Biden administration and Ukraine’s supporters in Congress have rightly drawn
limits on American support for Ukraine. It is not a member of NATO, and the
United States should not send troops to fight in this war. Much of the
financial support for Kyiv should come from Western Europe, which for too long
has outsourced the continent’s protection to the American military.
Nonetheless, Washington can and should play a crucial role in defending
Ukrainian democracy against Russia’s aggression.
Most
urgently, the White House should reverse the
Starshield restrictions. Ukraine relies on the satellite network to defend
itself against Russian missile attacks. The slowdown “will cost many of us our
lives,” a Ukrainian military officer told Politico. The United States and Europe should also
work together to help Ukraine rebuild its stock of missile interceptors and
long-range missiles. And Washington should continue to punish Mr. Putin, the
oligarchs who support him and Russia’s war-making economy.
The way to
do so is straightforward: enforcing the law named for Mr. Graham. It targeted
Russia’s energy, which helps finance the war in Ukraine, with sanctions and
other measures. Those punishments were set to take effect Sunday, until Mr.
Trump signed the executive order.
The people
of Ukraine have shown inspiring bravery over the past four and a half years.
They defied expert predictions and rebuffed Russia’s invasion. More than
125,000 of them have
been killed, and another half million have been wounded. Many live with
daily fear and are preparing for a difficult winter. They are fighting a battle
that benefits the entire free world. Mr. Trump is fighting only for himself.

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário