On October 8, 2026, a UK High Court judge disclosed that search warrants used to raid the homes of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor (the former Prince Andrew) were ruled unlawful and have been legally quashed.

 

Andrew’s Search Warrants Ruled Unlawful

On October 8, 2026, a UK High Court judge disclosed that search warrants used to raid the homes of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor (the former Prince Andrew) were ruled unlawful and have been legally quashed. Both Thames Valley Police and the High Court agreed that the initial application was mistakenly submitted and approved under the incorrect statutory legislation.

Despite this partial legal victory for the former royal, the ruling does not bring the criminal investigation to an end, nor does it mean the broader probe is unlawful.

Key Details of the Ruling & Case:

• The Investigation: Andrew was arrested in February 2026 on suspicion of misconduct in public office. The probe centers on allegations that he shared sensitive information with late US sex offender Jeffrey Epstein while serving as the UK's trade envoy. He strongly denies all wrongdoing.
• Properties Raided: The unlawful warrants were used by police to raid his residence on the Sandringham estate and his Windsor home, Royal Lodge.
• Fate of the Seized Evidence: Although the warrants were thrown out, police have not returned the seized electronic devices and documentary material. The police are utilizing alternative statutory powers to argue they have a retroactive right to retain the evidence.
• What Comes Next: A private, behind-closed-doors High Court hearing has been scheduled for 2027 to officially determine whether the police can lawfully keep and use the seized items as evidence in their ongoing prosecution.