Dons call
for Cambridge leaders to take blame for Jason Arday appointment
Exclusive:
Academics call for inquiry, saying university must be held accountable for
‘grotesque racism unleashed’
Richard
Adams Education editor
Thu 6 Aug
2026 20.54 BST
The
University of Cambridge’s leaders deserve blame for the “grotesque racism
unleashed” by Jason Arday’s appointment as professor, according to academics
calling for the university to hold an independent inquiry.
The
Guardian understands that senior dons at Cambridge are circulating a joint
letter calling for an inquiry into the processes and circumstances around Arday
being given the position, with many suggesting the university wanted a “quick
fix” to improve the diversity of its staff.
Arday was
appointed as professor of sociology of education in 2023 at the relatively
young age of 37 and despite a slim track record of research and publications
compared with those appointed to similar chairs at Cambridge.
Arday
resigned on Wednesday after more than a week of public questions involving
plagiarism in his PhD thesis and other publications, allegations of
exaggerating his academic appointments, mounting controversy over his claims to
have raised millions of pounds for charity, and lurid statements involving
masked attackers and even a pig’s head delivered to his parents’ home in
London.
Arday is
preparing to publish his memoir in the US and UK in the coming days and told
the Guardian that its publisher, Simon & Schuster, is to pay him “1.4
million” for his extraordinary backstory, which includes being unable to speak
until he was 11 years old.
The group
of Cambridge academics want any inquiry to include external members and be
given independent status. They point to concerns over the appointment committee
for Arday’s post, and to previous disputes within the university’s faculty of
education where Arday was based.
Priyamvada
Gopal, professor of postcolonial studies at Cambridge’s English faculty and one
of the group organising the letter, said: “An independent investigation must
scrutinise how such an early-career appointment to a very senior and
prestigious professorial chair was made and what both the faculty of education
and university management may have got very badly wrong.”
She
added: “Whatever the results of any investigation, the university bears no
little responsibility for the grotesque racism which this whole business has
unleashed, and for the harm done both to the individual in the line of fire, to
Black academics as a group, and the broader field of critical race studies.
“This
requires accountability now from those responsible, not a cover-up.”
Other
academics who spoke to the Guardian said they had been surprised by Arday’s
appointment in 2023, with one sociologist admitting to never having heard of
Arday before: “When it was announced I looked for his body of work, and it was
disappointing to say the least.”
Gopal
said Cambridge had been too tempted to “cut corners on the hard work of
fostering equality and inclusion” by opting for a media-friendly appointment.
“The
extent to which this appointment was paraded in the media by the university …
raises questions about whether the university sought public kudos for itself
rather than teaching and research from this appointment.
“It is
highly unusual, to say the least, to appoint such an early-career academic to a
very senior post,” Gopal said.
“Academic
misconduct also needs more robust and transparent procedures in place, as more
than one case at Cambridge indicates.
“The
university must also pay attention to the consequences of putting young people
of colour in highly visible places to carry the burden of representation before
they are ready to withstand scrutiny.”
When the
controversy first erupted, the university briefed journalists that it stood by
its appointment process, and publicly defended Arday as “the victim of a vile
campaign” to discredit him.
But on
Wednesday night the university abruptly announced that it would open a fresh
investigation after receiving “new information” about his qualifications and
appointments.
Shortly
afterwards Arday said he would resign, adding: “I no longer wish to feel as
though I am living under a constant spotlight, where every aspect of my life is
subject to public examination and judgment.”
The
university and other organisations have since distanced themselves from Arday
by deleting webpages and excising references, which one academic described as
“wiping away the traces”.
Jesus
College, Cambridge, and the university’s faculty of education have taken down
Arday’s staff profiles.
Arday had
signed up to speakers’ bureaus and, since his Cambridge appointment, has
addressed a number of commercial organisations, including the annual conference
of the Association of British Insurers in 2025.
Simon
& Schuster’s speakers bureau lists Arday as “an internationally
sought-after speaker for industry conferences, corporate events, university
lectures, and more, and has travelled across the United States for speaking
engagements”.
In 2024
Arday was a keynote speaker at US National Association of Funeral Directors
international convention in New Orleans. His subsequent appearances, however,
may dry up: an appearance in Arizona promised for October this year has also
been removed.
.jpeg)
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário