US green
card applicants will now have to return to home countries to apply, DHS says
On May 22,
2026, the Trump administration issued a major policy shift requiring most
temporary visa holders seeking green cards to leave the U.S. and apply through
consular processing in their home countries, severely restricting the
long-standing "Adjustment of Status" process.
The U.S.
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services (USCIS) released a policy memorandum declaring that applying for
permanent residency from within the United States will now be treated as an "extraordinary
form of relief" granted only under "extraordinary circumstances".
Key
Mechanics of the Policy Shift
- Target Population: The policy primarily impacts
foreign nationals currently residing in the U.S. on non-immigrant or
temporary visas—including F-1 students, H-1B skilled workers, L-1
corporate transferees, and B-2 tourists.
- The New Mandate: Rather than filing Form I-485 (Adjustment of Status) to adjust their
status while remaining in the country, applicants must return home and
complete their application at a U.S. Embassy or Consulate abroad.
- Defined Exceptions: USCIS noted limited exemptions
for individuals who provide an "economic benefit" or serve
the "national interest." The agency also acknowledged
exceptions for specific dual-intent visa categories and humanitarian
pathways where adjustment of status is the only legal option.
The
Government's Stated Rationale
- Eliminating
"Loopholes": DHS framed the traditional adjustment of status process as a
loophole, asserting that temporary visas are intended for short-term
stays, not as an initial step toward permanent residency.
- Enforcement Efficiency: Authorities stated that
forcing applications to be processed abroad reduces the risk of
individuals "slipping into the shadows" to remain in the U.S.
illegally if their residency applications are denied.
- Resource Allocation: Shifting the bulk of these
cases to the State Department is intended to free up internal USCIS
resources to handle backlogs in naturalization, trafficking visas, and
other high-priority categories.
Criticism
and Potential Fallout
The rule
upends an immigration framework that has been stable for more than 60 years,
under which more than half of all green card applicants typically adjust status
from within the U.S. Critics, including immigration lawyers and advocacy groups
like HIAS, have raised serious concerns:
- Family and Career Disruption: Forcing applicants abroad
could separate families and compel highly skilled professionals—such as
doctors, researchers, and tech workers—to leave their U.S. employers for
months or years while applications slowly process.
- The Re-entry "Trap": Legal analysts warn that
leaving the U.S. may automatically trigger 3-year or 10-year bars on
re-entry for anyone who has accrued previous "unlawful presence"
(such as a minor visa overstay). Furthermore, existing travel bans
affecting dozens of countries could prevent individuals from returning
entirely.
- Impending Legal Battles: Major business groups and
immigration advocacy organizations are widely expected to mount immediate
federal lawsuits to block the policy's implementation.
Note:
Immigration attorneys strongly advise individuals with pending or planned green
card applications to consult directly with legal counsel before making travel
arrangements or altering their current visa status.
.jpeg)
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário