11 hours
ago
GOP calls
off votes after contentious meeting on ‘anti-weaponization’ fund
Acting
Attorney General Todd Blanche spent more than an hour sparring with Republican
senators behind closed doors.
By
Jordain Carney and Calen Razor
05/21/2026,
1:30pm ET Updated: 05/21/2026, 5:38pm ET
Senate
GOP leaders have canceled plans to vote this week on a party-line immigration
enforcement bill, a major setback as lawmakers contend with President Donald
Trump’s personal political agenda.
Several
Republican senators said action on the legislation would wait until after a
weeklong Memorial Day recess — guaranteeing that Congress would blow a
Trump-set June 1 deadline for the immigration funding.
“We will
pick up where we left off,” Senate Majority Leader John Thune told reporters
after a closed-door lunch where he informed GOP senators that they were being
sent home amid the impasse.
House GOP
leaders quickly followed suit and canceled plans for a Friday vote on the
immigration package. Members will instead head home for the recess after votes
wrap up Thursday night.
The
Senate’s decision was driven by fierce internal divides over a politically
sensitive issue not related to the core purpose of the bill — pumping tens of
billions of dollars into Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other
agencies.
It came
after Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche struggled Thursday to quash GOP
concerns over a newly announced $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund. Leaders
had already concluded they would have to omit a $1 billion Secret Service
funding line item that could have gone toward Trump’s White House ballroom due
to internal dissension.
Asked
about the internal furor over the settlement fund, Thune told reporters that
“it makes everything way harder than it should be” and that it “would have been
nice if they had consulted” senators.
Sen. Lisa
Murkowski (R-Alaska) pointed to the weaponization fund, telling reporters that
the White House “dropped a bomb.” A senior Senate GOP aide, granted anonymity
to speak candidly, called the decision “a delay of the administration’s
making.”
“Senators
are still solidly behind the ICE and Border Patrol funding,” the person added.
“A number of concerns remain about the anti-weaponization fund. Those need to
get worked out.”
Republicans
believe it’s now up to the administration to figure out a path forward for
salvaging the immigration enforcement bill.
“They
need to help with this issue, because we have a lot of members who are
concerned obviously about the timing but also about the substance,” Thune said.
Blanche
met privately with Senate Republicans as the administration and GOP leaders
tried to defuse the controversy over the fund.
GOP
leaders believed they had enough members who would support a proposal targeting
the fund that it would ultimately be added into the filibuster-skirting bill,
as POLITICO first reported Wednesday.
Sen.
Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) said that Blanche during the meeting made a
commitment to senators that settlements would not be granted to anyone who
assaulted police during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot — a guarantee he refused
to make when testifying earlier this week.
A memo
that the Justice Department circulated to Senate GOP offices Thursday, however,
did not include that detail, according to a copy reviewed by POLITICO. Sen.
Susan Collins (R-Maine), who noted she missed part of the meeting for committee
meetings, said senators still needed “clarity.”
Asked if
the briefing changed her mind, Collins, who has been critical of the fund, told
reporters, “No.”
Two
people granted anonymity to describe the meeting said the meeting did not go
well for the administration and that Blanche was not persuasive amid a grilling
by dozens of GOP senators.
Sen.
Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who had previously been mum on the settlement fund,
issued a biting statement: “So the nation’s top law enforcement official is
asking for a slush fund to pay people who assault cops? Utterly stupid, morally
wrong – Take your pick.”
Money for
the fund isn’t included in the GOP’s immigration enforcement bill. But because
the bill involves Justice Department funding and the Senate Judiciary Committee
is involved in the bill, senators have a path to add language related to the
fund into the bill with only 51 votes.
Meredith
Lee Hill contributed to this report.

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário