sábado, 2 de maio de 2020

Trudeau: assault-style weapons banned 'effective immediately' / Trudeau announces Canada is banning assault-style weapons




Trudeau announces Canada is banning assault-style weapons

Move comes after murder of 22 people in worst mass shooting in Canada’s history

Leyland Cecco in Toronto
Fri 1 May 2020 16.40 BSTLast modified on Fri 1 May 2020 19.39 BST

Canada has banned assault-style weapons following the murder of 22 people in the worst mass shooting in the country’s history, Justin Trudeau announced on Friday.

“These weapons were designed for one purpose and one purpose only: to kill the largest number of people in the shortest amount of time. There is no use and no place for such weapons in Canada,” said the prime minister. “Effective immediately, it is no longer permitted to buy, sell, transport, import or use military-grade assault weapons in this country.”

After the Nova Scotia shooting last week, Trudeau said his government intended “strengthen gun control” to fulfil a campaign promise to restrict certain weapons – a plan that had initially been derailed by the coronavirus pandemic.

The Royal Canadian Mounted Police said on Tuesday that the Nova Scotia gunman, Gabriel Wortman, had been armed with two semi-automatic rifles and several semi-automatic pistols.

Supt Darren Campbell said that one of the guns could be described “military-style assault rifle”.

The new ban would probably not have stopped Wortman from obtaining his weapons: he did not have a license to possess or purchase firearms, and police have said they believe the guns were obtained illegally in Canada and the United States.

The prime minister announced a two-year “amnesty period” to allow gun owners to comply with the law. The ban covers 1,500 models and variants of firearms.

Canada has one of the highest per capita gun ownership rates in the world, at an estimated 34.7 firearms per 100 people, according to the Small Arms Survey in 2018. The country still trails far behind the US, which has close to 120 guns per 100 people.

While Trudeau promised in 2015 that a Liberal government would make it more difficult for gun owners to acquire certain types of firearms, it wasn’t until the most recent election campaign that the prime minister promised a full ban on “military-style assault weapons” if re-elected.

“As long as Canadians are losing their loved ones to gun violence, not enough has changed,” Trudeau said in September. “We know you do not need a military-grade assault weapon, one designed to kill the largest amount of people in the shortest amount of time, to take down a deer.”

At present, the Firearms Act does not make a distinction between “military-style” weapons and other type of long guns – meaning the government would also need to add amend the law.

Trudeau had also previously promised to ban the Ruger Mini-14 rifle, the weapon used in the 1989 École Polytechnique shooting in Montreal, in which 14 women were murdered.

The move to heavily restrict access to certain firearms will probably prompt anger from the opposition Conservative party and Canada’s gun lobby – but a ban of certain weapons can be carried out through cabinet, bypassing the need for legislation.

“Justin Trudeau is using the current pandemic and the immediate emotion of the horrific attack in Nova Scotia to push the Liberals’ ideological agenda to make major firearms policy changes,” said the Conservative leader, Andrew Scheer, following Trudeau’s comments. “Taking firearms away from law-abiding citizens does nothing to stop dangerous criminals who obtain their guns illegally.”

Ken Price, whose daughter Samantha was hurt in a 2018 mass shooting in Toronto in which two people were killed and 13 injured, said he was “pleased to see movement” on the issue.

“Having weapons that can be configured so that they inflict massive damage just doesn’t seem like the right thing to do – nor is it reflective of what the average Canadian wants,” he said. “And this still leaves plenty of choice for hunters, fishermen and sport shooters.”

Price said Canada should also tighten controls on handguns and introduce “red flag laws” – enabling authorities to remove firearms from individuals deemed a risk to themselves or others – but said he was “pleased to see movement” on assault weapons.

An “overwhelming majority” majority of Canadians – nearly four out of five people – support the ban, according to a poll from the Angus Reid Institute, released Friday.

Covid-19 throws Europe's tourism industry into chaos





Covid-19 throws Europe's tourism industry into chaos

No one knows if summer tourists will arrive, or how businesses will survive if not

Jon Henley and Guardian correspondents
@jonhenley
Sat 2 May 2020 05.00 BST

The coronavirus crisis has flung Europe’s tourism sector into chaos, with borders closed and airlines grounded. But if that is frustrating for holidaymakers, it risks ruining holiday businesses and devastating the economies that depend on them.

From the Algarve in Portugal to the Greek islands, and from the chic resorts of Italy’s Amalfi coast to the pubs and clubs of the Spanish costas, no one knows whether Europe’s holidaymakers will come this year, or how to survive if they do not.

The losses are already dramatic. The European commission estimates that the EU’s hotels and restaurants will lose half their income this year. Tourism revenues fell by 95% in Italy and 77% in Spain in March, according to the banking group UBS.

Across southern Europe, where recovery from the 2008 crisis relied to a significant extent on tourism, the sector is vital to national economies. It accounts for 20% of GDP in Greece, 18% in Portugal, 15% in Spain and 13% in Italy, according to the World Bank.

The EU’s internal market commissioner, Thierry Breton, has called for a “Marshall plan” using funds from Europe’s vast economic stimulus packages to haul hotels, restaurants and tour operators back from collapse, and the EU’s executive has promised guidelines for a coordinated restart to travel.

Increasingly desperate business owners are demanding action, but many governments do not sound positive. Holidays in other EU countries are not yet possible for Germans, the chancellor, Angela Merkel said bluntly on Thursday.

France’s prime minister, Edouard Philippe, said it would “not be reasonable to imagine travelling very far abroad very soon”, and Spain’s foreign minister, Arancha González Laya, said the country would gradually reopen to tourism, but not until “we are in a position to guarantee tourists’ safety”.

The bloc’s internal borders remain closed for leisure travel, with no prospect of an imminent reopening or decision likely before at least the end of May.

Germany this week extended a warning against foreign travel until mid-June. Until further notice, all non-nationals arriving in France, including from EU states, must declare an essential professional or family reason for their journey or they will be turned back.

Even domestic travel is still severely restricted in some countries. Italy’s prime minister, Giuseppe Conte, has said Italians should go on holiday in Italy, but they will not be permitted to journey between regions when restrictions begin to ease on 4 May. French citizens, too, will be limited to a 100km radius of their homes from 11 May.

The EU’s transport and tourism roadmap suggests travel restrictions within the bloc could first be eased “between areas with a comparably low reported circulation of the virus”, prompting the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Croatia, which have reported low numbers of infections, to propose corridors to the Adriatic coast.

These could perhaps be accompanied, it has been suggested, by a common “Covid-19 passport” testifying to the bearer’s health before travel, or by in-resort testing once they arrive.

Germany has rejected bilateral solutions. The country’s foreign minister, Heiko Maas, said an EU “race to see who will allow tourist travel” first would pose unacceptable risks, turning down an offer from Austria for Germans to take their holidays there and pointing to the role of the Austrian ski resort of Ischgl in accelerating the spread of the pandemic in central Europe.

For the destination countries most affected, part of the strategy involves ensuring visitors unable to come this summer return later. In Portugal, which has so far kept its coronavirus death toll below 1,000, vouchers are being issued to those forced to cancel, allowing them to reschedule trips until the end of 2021.

Some hotels and restaurants are still counting on being able to reopen, but the head of the Algarve tourist business association, Elidérico Viegas, has said many will not. Foreign visitors are unlikely to return until April next year, he said.

Spain’s coronavirus outbreak has spiralled into one of the world’s worst, and more than 24,500 people have died, but some of the country’s tourist hotspots have emerged relatively unscathed, allowing some hope that they might yet host a summer season.

“The Balearics rank among the safest areas in Europe with one of the lowest rates of contagion,” said Iago Negueruela, the regional official in charge of economy and tourism for the islands. Officials are cautiously hoping that international tourists could be allowed to visit Mallorca and Ibiza from late July.

Spain was the world’s second most-visited country in 2019, with nearly 84 million tourists. A heavy economic reliance on tourism has left administrations scrambling to develop protocols capable of protecting what travellers do this summer.

“We want to have everything prepared so tourists can arrive as soon as possible,” said Negueruela. The challenge lies in striking a balance between attractions such as the discotecas of Ibiza and the new reality demanded by Covid-19. “Some sectors will have more significant adaptations,” he said. “That much is clear.”

Greece, like Cyprus, is pushing for the EU to agree a common way forward. For both, the question is existential. More than a fifth of their workforces are employed in the sector, almost double the EU average, and tourism is the single biggest contributor to their economies.

“The most important thing now is a common travel protocol to avoid the confusion of different countries having different rules,” said Cyprus’ deputy tourism minister, Savvas Perdios.

Greece says it foresees a July start to the season, with a low rate of infection and Covid-19 deaths fuelling optimism it can project itself as a safe destination. “All bets are on the next two months,” said Grigoris Tasios, the president of the Panhellenic Federation of Hoteliers.

Resorts in northern Greece are looking to boost occupancy from neighbouring Balkan states that have also handled the pandemic well. “Romania, Bulgaria, Serbia and Skopje [Macedonia] together have a population of 40 million and from any of them people can get to us by car,” he said.

Tell us

Italy’s small business federation CNA expects 25 million fewer foreign visitors between July and September. Sicily, one of the country’s flagship destinations for summer tourism, is already reporting 65% of bookings cancelled. The National Tourism Agency forecasts a €20bn fall in income compared with 2019.

Italy’s tourism minister, Dario Franceschini, said the country was working hard to strike a balance between safety concerns and the reopening of tourism facilities. “It won’t be easy, but we’ll see it through,” he said.

Businesses are experimenting with four-metre plexiglass barriers on beachfronts and restaurateurs with glass shields between tables, but all know the impact on tourism will will be felt for years to come. Business is not expected to return to pre-coronavirus levels until 2023.

Additional reporting by Ashifa Kassam in Madrid, Helena Smith in Athens, Lorenzo Tondo in Palermo and Philip Oltermann in Berlin

Kim Jong-un reappears in North Korea after weeks of speculation - reports / ANÁLISE Muitos rezam para que Kim esteja vivo


IMAGEM DE OVOODOCORVO

Kim Jong-un reappears in North Korea after weeks of speculation - reports

North Korean state media has released pictures purportedly showing the leader attending the opening of a fertiliser factory

Justin McCurry in Tokyo and agencies
Published onSat 2 May 2020 03.40 BST

The North Korean leader, Kim Jong-un, has appeared in public for the first time in almost three weeks, according to state media, following speculation that he had been seriously ill following heart surgery.

The state news agency KCNA released photographs purportedly showing Kim opening a fertilizer plant in Sunchon, north of the capital Pyongyang.

KCNA said Kim, accompanied by other senior officials, including his influential younger sister, Kim Yo-jong, cut a ribbon at a ceremony on Friday.

What appeared to be thousands of people attending the event, many of them wearing face masks, released balloons and “broke into thunderous cheers of ‘hurrah!’ for the Supreme Leader,” the agency said.

The images showed Kim smiling and talking to aides, as well as touring the plant. The authenticity of the photos, published on the website of the official Rodong Sinmun newspaper, could not be immediately verified.

Donald Trump, who last week suggested the mystery surrounding Kim’s absence would be solved “soon”, declined to comment on the KCNA report. “We’ll have something to say about it at the appropriate time,” he told reporters at the White House.

The North Korean leader was last seen in public on 11 April when he presided over a Workers’ party politburo meeting. State media did published a single photograph of Kim for well over two weeks after that date, but carried reports of his daily routine, including diplomatic messages sent to other world leaders.

Speculation over his whereabouts gathered pace after he missed the 15 April commemoration of the birthday of his grandfather – and North Korea’s founder, Kim Il-sung – which is the most important event in the country’s political calendar. It was the first time the younger Kim had missed the event since becoming leader.

A day earlier, he was not present at the launch of several short-range missiles, despite having personally overseen similar launches in the past.

Rumours that Kim, who succeeded his father Kim Jong-il in late 2011, was seriously unwell began with a South Korean report claiming he had undergone a “cardiovascular procedure” at Hyangsan hospital near Pyongyang on 12 April and was recuperating at a villa in nearby Mount Myohyang.

Daily NK, a Seoul-based website with secret contacts in the North, claimed Kim’s health had deteriorated since last August due to heavy smoking, obesity and overwork. That report was followed by claims by an unnamed US official, quoted by CNN, that Kim was “in grave danger”.

Days later, 38 North, a Washington-based North Korea monitoring project, said it had analysed satellite images it believed showed Kim’s train parked at Wonsan, a resort on the east coast where the leader has a heavily guarded holiday home.

But the office of the South Korean president, Moon Jae-in, said it detected no unusual signs in North Korea or any emergency reaction by its ruling party, military and cabinet. Seoul said it believed Kim was still managing state affairs but staying at an unspecified location outside Pyongyang.

Defence officials in the US said there was no evidence that Kim had lost control of the country’s military.

North Korean media did not offer an explanation for Kim’s absence in Saturday’s report.

Last week, the South Korean unification minister Kim Yeon-chul, who oversees engagement with Pyongyang, said it was possible that Kim was taking precautions against the coronavirus outbreak.

North Korea continues to claim it has not recorded a single case of Covid-19, despite sharing a border with China, where the outbreak is believed to have started.

Harry Kazianis, senior director of Korean studies at the Center for the National Interest think tank in Washington, said the coronavirus theory was plausible.

The most likely explanation for Kim’s absence is with North Korea declaring the coronavirus pandemic an existential threat ... he most likely was taking steps to ensure his health or may have been impacted in some way personally by the virus,” Kazianis said after KCNA released the report.

It is not the first time that Kim’s failure to appear in public has triggered speculation about his health.

In 2014, he dropped out of sight for nearly six weeks before reappearing with a walking stick. Days later, South Korea’s spy agency said he had undergone surgery to remove a cyst from his ankle.


ANÁLISE
Muitos rezam para que Kim esteja vivo

Em coma ou em quarentena? O temor de uma crise de sucessão em Pyongyang reabriu subitamente a “questão norte-coreana” e o pânico de um colapso do regime. Pequim poderá estar a espreitar uma grande oportunidade.

JORGE ALMEIDA FERNANDES
2 de Maio de 2020, 6:16

Quando o mundo está dominado pelo “monotema” da covid-19, surge uma diversão: que é feito do Presidente Kim Jong-un, “desaparecido” da cena pública há 20 dias? Subitamente, um mero rumor faz temer que à peste global do coronavírus se some uma crise geopolítica na Ásia. O mais interessante é que o rumor encobre, ou descobre, um enigma subjacente, aquilo que preocupa todos os estrategas independentemente de Kim estar às portas da morte ou de perfeita saúde. O enigma é a “questão norte-coreana”.

Há notícias que dão Kim como “gravemente doente”, talvez “em coma”, depois de uma “cirurgia ao coração”. O primeiro a levantar o rumor foi um site sul-coreano especializado na Coreia do Norte, o Daily NK, que apenas falava em “gravemente doente”, mas desencadeou uma escalada de especulações: “Às portas da morte”, “em morte cerebral”, em “estado vegetativo”, ou até “já morto”. Para outros, como o jornal sul-coreano Joang Ang Daily, Kim estaria “em quarentena”, prosaicamente refugiado numa estância balnear para fugir ao contágio da covid-19.

A imprensa aprendeu a ser prudente sobre a Coreia do Norte. Em Novembro de 1986, o New York Times noticiou, na primeira página, a morte de Kim Il-sung (1912-94), o fundador do regime. O maior diário sul-coreano, Chosun Ilbo, inspirado em fontes japonesas, dedicara na véspera sete páginas à morte do líder, “assassinado a tiro”. Dias depois, Kim Il-sung aparecia na recepção a um líder estrangeiro. Também o seu neto, Kim Jong-un, desapareceu seis semanas em 2014, ressurgindo sorridente e apoiado numa bengala.

Que se passa com Kim? “Acreditem em mim, ninguém sabe o que se passa”, garante a analista Sue Mi Terry, antiga analista da CIA para a Coreia do Norte, depois assessora de George W. Bush e Barack Obama. “Não só os americanos como o resto do mundo.” O regime norte-coreano é opaco e talvez a saúde de Kim seja o seu maior segredo de Estado. A própria Coreia do Sul, “ao fim de décadas de trabalho ainda não conseguiu criar uma rede fiável de informação no Norte”, diz à AP o politólogo Du Hyeogn Cha. “Quem diga que sabe alguma coisa está apenas a romancear.”

O governo sul-coreano tem desvalorizado a questão. Mas Yoon Sang-hyun, presidente da comissão das relações inter-coreanas, diz à Bloomberg: “Kim não está aparentemente a dirigir o país como normalmente fazia. E, se o não está a fazer, é um grande problema.”

 “Anomalia histórica”

Saber se o rumor encerra verdade ou é mera invenção não a maior curiosidade: mais cedo ou mais tarde, conheceremos a resposta. O rumor trouxe de volta a “questão norte-coreana”, suscitando imediatas preocupações no Japão, na Coreia do Sul ou nos Estados Unidos. Porquê? Revela que ninguém está preparado para uma “sucessão” na Coreia do Norte.

Imediatamente surgiram especulações sobre os eventuais sucessores. A irmã, Kim Yo Jong, é a mais directa colaboradora do “querido líder”. Teria a seu favor um pesado argumento: apesar de mulher numa sociedade patriarcal, é uma Kim, e a legitimidade do regime assenta no “sangue” da dinastia. Outros dizem o contrário. O analista Scott Seaman, do Eurasia Group, aponta duas alternativas: uma transição ordenada ou uma perfeita “Guerra de Tronos” dinástica. Está sempre presente o fantasma do colapso do regime, vagas de refugiados a correr para a China ou a Coreia do Sul e o pavor da perda de controlo do arsenal nuclear.

O cenário do colapso sempre faz parte do pensamento dos especialistas americanos. Escreve o analista de Defesa Bruce Bennet num estudo para a Rand Corp.: “Há uma razoável possibilidade de que o totalitarismo norte-coreano acabe num futuro próximo, com uma elevada probabilidade desse fim ser acompanhado por elevada violência e motins.”

Oriana Skylar Mastro, outra especialista na Ásia, estudou as dinastias políticas e sublinha um traço fundamental: “Uma característica comum das ‘ditaduras familiares’ é o seu rápido e inesperado colapso. (…) A duração do regime de Kim é uma anomalia histórica. (…) Desde a II Guerra Mundial nenhuma ditadura familiar conseguiu a manutenção no poder por uma terceira geração. A situação é grave na Coreia do Norte onde nem sequer há um sucessor claro. A instabilidade teria imediatas implicações na região e na competição EUA-China.”

E se Kim estiver mesmo a morrer? “Será um terrível momento de instabilidade na potência nuclear mais opaca do mundo”, escreve o analista William Pesek, na revista japonesa Nikkei. Não é a vida de Kim que preocupa analistas e chancelarias. É a possibilidade de um colapso que poderia virtualmente abrir na Ásia uma crise nuclear sem precedentes.

China-América
Na hipótese da morte de Kim, o equilíbrio geopolítico na Ásia Oriental mudará em benefício da China, afirma na Foreign Policy Michael Auslin, historiador e autor de Asia’s New Geopolitics. “Este é o mais perigoso momento em décadas para as três gerações do regime Kim.” E oferece a Pequim a oportunidade de reforçar a sua influência na Coreia do Norte, alterando a relação de forças na região, em detrimento dos Estados Unidos e do Japão.

Não se trata apenas de especulações mas de cálculos sobre o futuro. Auslin faz uma pergunta: “Poderá uma eventual fraqueza do regime de Kim levar a China a tentar estabelecer o seu controlo sobre Pyongyang?” Até agora, os Kim defenderam energicamente a sua independência perante Pequim. Mas uma crise em Pyongyang “poderia tentar o presidente Xi Jinping a uma forte jogada para alterar a balança de poder regional”.

Auslin traça uma hipótese extrema. “A oportunidade de ligar mais estreitamente a Coreia do Norte e a China e fazer dela um Estado-tampão perante os aliados dos EUA, a Coreia do Sul e o Japão, seria uma prenda geopolítica para Xi.”

No caso de uma crise de sucessão em Pyongyang, e “num mundo distraído pela pandemia do coronavírus”, Pequim poderia arriscar “uma intervenção na Coreia do Norte, em nome da paz e da ordem, para alegadamente prevenir um colapso do Governo e uma crise humanitária.” Deixaria, de resto, o Japão isolado na Ásia do Nordeste. Ignora-se se estas coisas fazem actualmente parte das preocupações de Donald Trump. Ou será as utilizará como “diversão” com actual confronto com Pequim.

O cenário “pró-chinês” tem como pressuposto a “morte virtual” de Kim Jong-un. Não surpreenderia que muitos inimigos estejam a rezar pela sua vida e a esperar que deus os ouça.

Cartoons

Cartoons / Collignon / 30 april 2020 / VOLKSKRANT


First published on POLITICO.com, U.S., April 30, 2020 | By Matt Wuerker





First published in Der Spiegel, Germany, April 30, 2020 | By Chappatte

Armed protesters enter Michigan's state capitol demanding end to coronav...





Armed protesters demonstrate against Covid-19 lockdown at Michigan capitol

Police and capitol staff held back protesters – some armed with rifles – attempting to enter floor of legislative chamber





Lois Beckett
 @loisbeckett
Thu 30 Apr 2020 23.54 BSTLast modified on Fri 1 May 2020 08.06 BST

Hundreds of protesters, some armed, gathered inside Michigan’s state capitol on Thursday as state lawmakers debated the Democratic governor’s request to extend her emergency powers to combat coronavirus.

A tightly packed crowd of protesters, some carrying rifles, attempted to enter the floor of the legislative chamber, and were held back by a line of state police and capitol staff, according to video footage posted by local journalists.

“Let us in! Let us in!” the protesters chanted, as they stood shoulder-to-shoulder inside the statehouse. Few of them were wearing face masks.

Some of the protesters shouted anti-government slogans, including comparing the state’s Democratic governor, Gretchen Whitmer, to Hitler.

One Democratic state lawmaker posted a photograph of men with rifles standing in a gallery yelling down at lawmakers below. “Some of my colleagues who own bullet proof vests are wearing them,” the state senator Dayna Polehanki wrote on Twitter.

Thursday’s protest in Lansing, Michigan’s capital, was much smaller than the 15 April “Operation Gridlock” protest when supporters of Donald Trump organized thousands of people to publicly demonstrate against what they said was the overreach of Whitmer’s strict stay-at-home order.

Many people at Thursday’s “American Patriot Rally”, including militia group members carrying firearms and people with pro-Trump signs, appeared to be ignoring state social-distancing guidelines.

Members of the Michigan Liberty Militia were at the protest, armed with guns, and one member said that the group was there as a “security detail” for the event organizers, MLive.com reported. The Southern Poverty Law Center, which monitors American extremist organizations, includes a “Michigan Liberty Militia” among its list of extreme antigovernment groups.

Police allowed several hundred protesters to peacefully enter the capitol building around 1pm, where they crammed shoulder-to-shoulder near the entrance to legislative chambers.

The slow reopening of state economies around the country has taken on political overtones, as Republican politicians and individuals affiliated with Trump’s re-election promoted such protests in electoral swing states, such as Michigan.

State legislative approval of Whitmer’s state of emergency declaration, which gives her special executive powers, was set to expire after Thursday.

Late in the day, the Republican-led legislature refused to extend the state’s coronavirus emergency declaration and voted to authorize a lawsuit challenging Whitmer’s authority and actions.

The governor, unfazed, responded with orders stating that an emergency still exists, while declaring new 28-day states of emergency and disaster.

The declaration is the foundation for Whitmer’s stay-at-home measure, which will remain in effect through 15 May, and other directives aimed at slowing the spread of the coronavirus.

Whitmer accused GOP lawmakers of “putting their heads in the sand and putting more lives and livelihoods at risk. I’m not going to let that happen”.

“Governor Whitmer, and our state legislature, it’s over with. Open this state,” Mike Detmer, a Republican US congressional candidate, told the crowd. “Let’s get businesses back open again. Let’s make sure there are jobs to go back to.”

People had their temperature taken by police as they entered. Inside, they sang the national anthem and chanted: “Let us work.”

Police made only one arrest at the protest, Lt Brian Oleksyk, a Michigan state police spokesman, said. A 35-year-old male protester was arrested for assaulting another protester outside of the capitol building. While there was “a little bit of pushing” by protesters inside the building, Oleksyk said, “after verbally protesting for an hour, things calmed down.”

Michigan’s state senate minority leader, a Democrat, said the protesters had threatened Capitol police staff, press and lawmakers. “This protest wasn’t about the stay-at-home order, it was an opportunity for a small group of folks – very few of whom were engaging in social distancing or wearing masks – to show off their swastika posters, confederate flags, nooses hanging from cars and signs calling for murder,” said Jim Ananich, a Democrat who represents the city of Flint, in a statement.

A spokeswoman for the Michigan senate minority leader confirmed that at least one lawmaker on Thursday “chose to wear a bullet-proof vest”.

It is legal to openly carry firearms inside Michigan’s state capitol building.

Other speakers at the event, which had different organizers than the Operation Gridlock protest, questioned the deadliness of Covid-19. They also said Whitmer’s stay-at-home order violated constitutional rights, and urged people to open their businesses on 1 May in disregard of her order.

Local news outlets reported that Facebook had repeatedly taken down event listings advertising Thursday’s capitol protest. “Events that defy government’s guidance on social distancing aren’t allowed on Facebook,” a Facebook spokesperson said, confirming the removal.

The mayor of Lansing, Andy Schor, said in a statement on Wednesday that he was “disappointed” protesters would put themselves and others at risk, but recognized that Whitmer’s order still allowed people to “exercise their first amendment right to freedom of speech”.

Whitmer has acknowledged that her order was the strictest in the country, but she defended it as necessary as Michigan became one of the states hardest hit by the virus, having already claimed 3,789 lives there.

Protesters, many from more rural, Trump-leaning parts of Michigan, have argued it has crippled the economy statewide even as the majority of deaths from the virus are centered on the south-eastern Detroit metro area. Many states, including Georgia, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Ohio, have already moved to restart parts of their economies following weeks of mandatory lockdowns.

Agencies contributed to this report

TAP precisa de mais de 700 milhões de euros para sobreviver até ao final do ano



TAP precisa de mais de 700 milhões de euros para sobreviver até ao final do ano

Lígia Simões / 30 Abr 2020

Governo diz que empréstimo de 350 milhões de euros não resolve o problema da TAP até ao fim do ano. JE apurou que é preciso mais do dobro.

O Governo sinalizou ontem que “350 milhões de euros não resolvem o problema da TAP” e desafiou os privados a dizerem “a verdade toda e de quanto precisa até ao final do ano”.

Apenas com dinheiro em caixa para pagar contas até ao início de junho, o Jornal Económico sabe que a companhia aérea nacional vai precisar, afinal, de mais do dobro do montante sinalizado pela empresa quando solicitou, em meados de março, à Parpública, a prestação de uma garantia no âmbito de duas possíveis operações de financiamento, de 200 milhões e 150 milhões, respectivamente, do Haitong Bank e do ICBC Spain – Industrial and Commercial Bank of China.

“Até ao fim do ano, a TAP vai precisar mais do dobro do valor de financiamento de 350 milhões de euros já solicitado pela companhia”, revelou ao JE fonte próxima ao processo. Esta fonte sinaliza, assim, que a transportadora vai necessitar de mais de 700 milhões de euros na segunda metade do ano. Objetivo: fazer face aos efeitos da paragem quase total da atividade da TAP provocada pela crise Covid-19, nomeadamente ao nível da quebra de receitas

O ministro das Infraestruturas e da Habitação alertou nesta quarta-feira, 29 de abril, no Parlamento que “sem intervenção pública, a TAP não tem qualquer possibilidade de sobreviver”. Aos deputados, Pedro Nuno Santos garantiu que 350 milhões de euros não chegam, apelando aos privados para “dizerem toda a verdade” e de quanto a empresa precisa até ao fim do ano.

Ao consórcio Atlantic Gateway, que reúne o grupo de privados que detém 45% do capital da TAP, o governante deixou ainda o aviso: “a intervenção na TAP pode ter como consequência que o Estado passe a ser sócio maioritário”, garantindo que, depois desta “ajuda”, o Governo vai acompanhar todas as decisões de gestão que sejam tomadas.

“A música agora é outra na TAP”, disse, deixando claro que o Estado pretende vir a ter um papel na comissão executiva, que atualmente integra apenas elementos ligados ao acionista privado Atlantic Gateway. Em resposta ao deputado do CDS, João Gonçalves Pereira., sobre o empréstimo com garantia do Estado já solicitado, Pedro Nuno Santos realça que “a TAP já não estava a ser bem gerida antes do Covid-19, para questionar a seguir: “com uma dívida de 800 milhões de euros, e com a atividade toda parada, diz-me que um empréstimo de 350 milhões, garantido, vai resolver o problema?”.

Com o Estado a deter 50%, o ministro das Infraestruturas sinalizou ainda no Parlamento que os accionistas privados – Humberto Pedrosa e o empresário brasileiro David Neeleman – “se querem ficar com a TAP e assegurar as suas participações, só têm um caminho: meter dinheiro lá dentro”.

 “Intervenção de elevadíssima dimensão”
Pedro Nuno Santos revelou que estão a ser estudadas “diferentes alternativas de intervenção” para assegurar que a TAP consegue ultrapassar esta fase, sendo certo que será uma “intervenção de elevadíssima dimensão”. E assegura que qualquer intervenção na empresa será feita de “acordo com o interesse nacional”.

Nos cenários em estudo, a possibilidade de nacionalização da TAP não é descartada pelo Governo. Com esta opção no horizonte, o Bloco de Esquerda entregou ontem um projeto de lei que esta opção, justificando-a com a salvaguarda do interesse público nacional. O diploma prevê a promoção de auditoria por uma entidade independente “que identifique e quantifique todas as ações lesivas do serviço público tomadas pela gestão privada” da TAP, resultando numa indemnização a pagar ao Estado que iria contrabalançar a indemnização devida aos titulares de participações sociais na empresa, no âmbito da apropriação pública.

 Bruxelas terá de dar ‘luz verde’ a auxílios
Entretanto, o Executivo está já a preparar um plano de auxílio à TAP, que poderá ascender a várias centenas de milhões de euros e que terá ainda de ter ‘luz verde’ Bruxelas. O pacote de medidas para o setor inclui, entre outras, a isenção e diferimento do pagamento de impostos e contribuições para a Segurança Social, bem como de taxas aeroportuárias, ainda moratórias de créditos e a possibilidade de passar a reforma antecipada a partir dos 60 anos, em regime de adesão voluntária, tal como o JE avançou em primeira mão e foi confirmado há duas semanas pelo chairman da companhia, Miguel Frasquilho, no Parlamento.


A TAP pretende ainda a prestação de uma garantia no âmbito de duas possíveis operações de financiamento, conforme propostas recebidas, respectivamente, do Haitong Bank e do ICBC Spain”, confirmando a notícia avançada em primeira mão pelo JE a 17 de abril de que o maior banco da China é um dos bancos com que a TAP se prepara para negociar um crédito para enfrentar a crise. Em causa está uma emissão de obrigações da TAP, com subscrição particular, num montante de até 350 milhões de euros, com prestação de garantia pelo Estado.

sexta-feira, 1 de maio de 2020

Dreams grounded: Cadet pilots face uncertain future as coronavirus turns shortage to surplus / Ryanair will cut 3,000 jobs and keep 99% of flights grounded through June /: “Easyjet will run out of money” by August if Airbus order is not cancelled



Dreams grounded: Cadet pilots face uncertain future as coronavirus turns shortage to surplus

Jamie Freed, Allison Lampert, Heekyong Yang

SYDNEY/MONTREAL/SEOUL (Reuters) - Mark, 34, quit his job as a town planner in London last year to start flight-training school, buoyed by a conditional offer of employment with budget carrier easyJet (EZJ.L) at a time when the airline industry was desperately short of pilots.

The coronavirus pandemic has changed all that, with carriers furloughing pilots by the thousands and airlines including easyJet, Delta Air Lines Inc (DAL.N) and Germany’s Lufthansa (LHAG.DE) forecasting they will be smaller for years until demand fully returns.

“It is like almost an entire career pulled from under your feet,” said Mark, who declined to provide his last name due to concerns about his future prospects.

He had expected to complete his 109,000 pound ($136,000), 18-month training programme in December but now faces uncertainty over the timing due to lockdowns.

He remains in the dark about whether easyJet will still need new pilots when he completes his training or if he will be forced to look at other airlines or return to his old career.

An easyJet spokeswoman said the airline had instigated a recruitment freeze due to the pandemic impact which reduced the need for new pilots.

“We are continuing to review our pipeline of those cadet pilots set to join easyJet in the coming months and as soon as the situation changes we plan to prioritise roles for them,” she said.

The crisis marks a sharp reversal from recent years when some airlines had been paying sign-on bonuses of $25,000 to $30,000 to lure pilots, said Andre Allard, president of Montreal-based aviation sector recruitment agency AeroPersonnel.

“We used to run after the candidates,” he said. “Now they are running after us.”


Two years ago, some regional airlines grounded planes for lack of pilots and carriers such as Emirates and Australia’s Qantas Airways Ltd (QAN.AX) struggled to fully utilise their jets because of training bottlenecks.

Now Qantas has shelved plans to open a second pilot training school due to the coronavirus, which has led it to ground the bulk of its fleet and place staff on unpaid leave. Major U.S. airlines have frozen pilot hiring.

The previous boom in pilot training could turn into a bust for schools that invested to accommodate more students.

Thierry Dugrippe, head of Canadian pilot training school Air Richelieu, said he expects a decline in enrolment of 30% to 40%.

He said students about to complete the 20-month commercial line pilot training program, which costs C$85,000 ($61,000), are looking at what to do next.

“They are asking a lot of questions,” Dugrippe said.

Training provider CAE Inc (CAE.TO) said two cadet programmes at its Phoenix flight school were suspended at the request of unnamed sponsor airlines due to coronavirus-related travel restrictions.

TOUGH MARKET
In Seoul, a pilot in his 20s who had been hired as a trainee at budget carrier Eastar Jet had his contract cancelled on April 1, alongside around 80 colleagues.

The pilot, who declined to be named because he was concerned about getting a job in the future, paid 150 million won ($124,000) to gain his license at a U.S. flying school, lured by the global pilot shortage.

“A lot of people quit their jobs and headed to aviation schools abroad to get pilot licenses, because carriers were actively recruiting pilots at that time,” he said.

Eastar said it cancelled the contracts of around 80 trainees due to deteriorating financial conditions.

Mark, the easyJet trainee, said one of his hopes was that some pilots would take early retirement due to the downturn, leaving openings for new hires when demand returns.

In the United States, up to 5,000 pilots a year could retire in the next few years, according to Kit Darby, an aviation consultant and former pilot.

U.S. pilot hiring could begin again in two to three years due to those retirements, he said, but that makes it a tough market for pilots finishing their training earlier.

Danny Lynch, 36, who had previously worked in digital marketing, finishes a 99,000 pound, 18-month flight training course in Oxford in mid-2021 and is banking on a quicker recovery.

“I certainly hope that by then, the market has improved,” he said.

Those due to finish training earlier, like Lauren, a trainee in her 30s at a British flight school, are busy coming up with contingency plans.

Lauren, who declined to provide her last name, does not yet know when she will complete her course which was paused during lockdowns, nor whether airlines will be hiring at the end of it.

For her, options if a commercial pilot job is not immediately available could include returning to her old corporate career and flying small planes as a hobby on the side.

“I’m very lucky because I do have a former career to fall back on,” Lauren said. “I have just got to come up with contingency plans A, B, C, D.”

($1 = 0.8017 pounds, 1.3875 Canadian dollars, 1,210.7100 won)

Ryanair will cut 3,000 jobs and keep 99% of flights grounded through June

By Hanna Ziady, CNN Business
Updated 1010 GMT (1810 HKT) May 1, 2020

London (CNN Business)Ryanair is planning to cut up to 3,000 jobs and operate less than 1% of flights through June after warning that passenger demand and pricing will take at least two years to recover from the coronavirus pandemic.

Europe's largest airline by passenger numbers said in a statement Friday that its restructuring program will begin in July and could result in the loss of as many as 3,000 jobs among pilots and cabin crew, or about 15% of its workforce.
Pay cuts of up to 20% and the closure of a number of aircraft bases across Europe are also on the cards, Ryanair (RYAAY) said.
CEO Michael O'Leary will take a 50% pay cut for the rest of the financial year to March 2021, it added.
The news follows a similar announcement by British Airways this week, which said it could cut more than a quarter of its workforce, or 12,000 jobs, as the outlook for aviation deteriorates.
Ryanair usually operates low-cost flights to more than 200 destinations mostly in Europe, playing a vital role in supporting smaller regional airports and the continent's massive tourism industry.
The sector is expected to be particularly hard hit this summer, with countries such as Spain, Italy, France and Greece — among the world's most visited destinations — bracing for a dramatic decline in international visitors.
The budget carrier said it expected to carry fewer than 150,000 passengers in the April to June period, compared with its budget target of 42.4 million. For July to September, it now expects to carry no more than 50% of its original traffic target of 44.6 million passengers.
"Ryanair now expects the recovery of passenger demand and pricing (to 2019 levels) will take at least two years, until summer 2022 at the earliest," it said, adding that it expects to report a net loss of over €100 million ($109.7 million) in the April to June quarter, with more losses to come.
The airline said that when it returns to "meaningful flying" from July, Europe's competitive landscape will be distorted by more than €30 billion ($33 billion) in what it described as "unlawful" state aid given to competitors, including Air France-KLM (AFLYY), Norwegian Air and airlines owned by Lufthansa (DLAKY).
This will allow these carriers to fund "many years of below cost selling," Ryanair said, adding that it plans to challenge these bailouts in court because it believes they are in breach of EU state aid rules.


Stelios: “Easyjet will run out of money” by August if Airbus order is not cancelled

6 Apr 2020 by Mark Caswell

Easyjet’s founder and largest shareholder Stelios Haji-Ioannou has again called for the carrier’s £4.5 billion contract with Airbus to be cancelled.

The entrepreneur said if the order is maintained “I regret to report, Easyjet will run out of money around August 2020, perhaps even earlier”.

Easyjet grounded its entire fleet at the end of March, stating that “At this stage there can be no certainty of the date for restarting commercial flights”.

A statement released by Stelios today (April 6) said:

“My main objective is to terminate the £4.5bn contract between Easyjet and Airbus for 107 additional useless aircraft. That is the only way to preserve the value for all shareholders and all the bondholders too.

“Easyjet’s market capitalisation (value of all the shares) nowadays is hovering around £2 billion. The Haji-Ioannou family owns about 34 per cent of the shares but the other 66 per cent is widely held amongst many individual shareholders and various pension funds paying out pensions tomorrow – and years to come. I will now seek to enlist support of these other shareholders in terminating the Airbus contract.

“The net book value of the assets of Easyjet (net of liabilities) was £3 billion as at 30 September 2019. Even allowing for trading losses during the current grounding there are still many good assets inside Easyjet and we must not allow the current directors to squander our assets by paying Airbus for these unwanted new planes.

“Easyjet has also borrowed c£1.3 billion from bondholders (pension fund money again) that will need to be repaid in full over the next 2-5 years. Today these bonds are trading at 20-30 per cent discount to their original value which means the market feels that Easyjet may become insolvent in that timeframe all the time whilst paying Airbus c £1.35 billion for new aircraft in the next few months (the same value as all the bonds outstanding today).”

Stelios said that the prediction for running out of money around August “is based on the optimistic forecast published by the house stockbroker of easyJet (Neil Glynn at Credit Suisse on April 2, 2020) showing a cash short fall (negative balance) of £164m by September 2020”.

He added that the forecast was based on “wildly optimistic assumptions that the Easyjet fleet will return to the skies in June, bringing in profitable revenues of £1.5bn in the summer months” – something which Stelios referred to as “pure fantasy”.

“It must be noted that almost every country in Europe has now closed its borders to foreigners,” said Stelios. “Nobody really knows when they will open again. And even then, nobody believes that people will be willing to undertake foreign travel in such large number by June 20”.

“Fear has now taken over human behaviour when it comes to any form of foreign travel. Each country will want to keep others out for much longer than the date that their own local national lockdown ends. I think that Easyjet at the end of national lockdowns will feel more like a start-up trying to find a few profitable routes for a few aircraft at a time. How many Brits will want to fly to northern Italy or Spain on holiday this June? Not many I think.”

Stelios said he was calling for two directors to be removed from the Easyjet board, including CFO Andrew Findlay.

“If Easyjet terminates the Airbus contract, then it does not need loans from the UK taxpayer and it has the best chance to survive and thrive in the future with some injection of additional equity provided for by the markets (pari passu to the existing shareholders),” said Stelios.

“But if Easyjet stumbles along whilst taking UK taxpayers money as loans only to pass it on to Airbus, it will have to raise fresh equity anyway in the next 3-6 months – reducing the value of our current shareholdings to close to zero.

“In any event no rational investor would be buying new shares in Easyjet if the money will be used by easyJet to pay £4.5bn to Airbus for new planes it simply does not need. I will certainly not be throwing good money after bad. For the avoidance of doubt, I will not inject any fresh equity in Easyjet whilst the Airbus liability is in place.”

Business Traveller has contacted Easyjet regarding today’ statement, and will post any response