Trump’s
move to gut South Korea alliance is ‘inane, haphazard decision’, lawmakers say
US
president’s abrupt order to scale back joint exercises with Seoul is meant to
‘flatter’ North Korea’s dictator, top Democrat says
Joseph
Gedeon in Washington
Mon 17
Aug 2026 20.11 BST
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/aug/17/trump-south-korea-alliance
Donald
Trump’s move to gut Washington’s 73-year-old military alliance with Seoul has
been called “inane” and “shortsighted” as lawmakers warned it risked
strengthening Russia’s hand in Ukraine.
The US
president abruptly ordered the Pentagon to scale back joint exercises with
South Korea just days after North Korea test-fired ballistic missiles,
justifying the decision by citing his “very good relationship” with Kim
Jong-un, the nuclear-armed dictator such exercises exist to deter.
Trump
announced the order on social media, directing the US defense secretary, Pete
Hegseth, to scale back Ulchi Freedom Shield, an 11-day exercise due to run from
17 to 27 August involving about 18,000 South Korean troops rehearsing scenarios
including missile strikes, drone incursions and cyber-attacks.
Trump
framed the decision as a courtesy to Kim, writing that the drills “send a
signal that is totally inappropriate and hostile” to a country he described as
“unthreatening and respectful”, despite North Korea’s continued missile testing
and its expanding nuclear arsenal.
Democrats
in Congress said the move handed Kim a propaganda win for nothing, while an
ally was left paying the price for a war in the Middle East it never agreed to
fight.
Jack
Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate armed services committee, called it
“another inane, haphazard decision by President Trump and his chaotic
administration”.
“When
President Trump cuts military exercises to flatter a dictator or punishes South
Korea for declining to join a war he started, all of our allies – and
adversaries – think that America’s commitments are negotiable,” Reed said in a
statement, describing the move as punishing Korea “for no reason beyond Trump’s
ego”.
Reed’s
warning was echoed by Mark Kelly of Arizona, who sits on the same committee,
and argued that the drills were not symbolic but the basis of the alliance’s
ability to function in a crisis. “North and South Korea are still technically
at war,” Kelly said. “Our ability to help defend our ally against the North
Koreans is because our forces are well trained and able to coordinate with the
South Koreans. Hollowing out these joint exercises is shortsighted and a
mistake.”
In the
Oval Office on Monday, Trump claimed Kim had responded to his overtures, but
did not provide details. “I understand him,” the president said. “He
understands me.”
The
alliance Trump is now unwinding dates to the 1953 Mutual Defense Treaty signed
after the Korean war armistice. Roughly 28,500 American troops remain stationed
in South Korea, backed by a combined US-South Korean command structure and
Washington’s pledge to extend its nuclear umbrella over Seoul.
Despite
Trump calling North Korea “unthreatening”, his own administration’s 2026 Annual
Threat Assessment describes an “increasingly confident North Korean regime”,
warning that its weapons of mass destruction, conventional forces and cyber
operations threaten the US, South Korea and Japan. His former director of
national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, testified in March that “North Korea’s
ICBMs [intercontinental ballistic missiles] can already reach US soil”.
Trump
also tied his decision to the Iran war, saying he was unhappy that Seoul had
declined to join the US military campaign against Iran, a campaign that has
drained US missile stockpiles and, after Tehran shut the strait of Hormuz,
helped push up prices at home. He acknowledged the two issues had little to do
with one another, even as he punished Seoul over both.
“While
somewhat unrelated (?), I recently asked the President of South Korea if they
would like to join us in the Denuclearization of the Islamic Republic of Iran,
and they said, ‘No thanks’!” Trump wrote.
Andy Kim,
the New Jersey senator who sits on the Senate foreign relations committee, said
linking the exercises to that refusal exposed a troubling attitude toward a key
partner.
“Our
alliance with the Republic of Korea is critical for US security and prosperity
– and I am concerned that President Trump’s post today suggests a disregard for
this relationship,” Kim said. “South Korea is an essential partner in peace and
security in a part of the world filled with risk; we should treat them that way
instead of venting frustration on social media.”
It is not
the first time Trump has treated the drills as a bargaining chip. After his
2018 summit with Kim in Singapore, he suspended major exercises outright,
calling them costly and provocative, before they were quietly restored once
nuclear diplomacy with Pyongyang broke down.
The
dispute comes as Seoul has spent much of the past year charting its own path on
the Middle East. In February, South Korea’s government said it had “grave
concern” over Israeli measures expanding control in the occupied West Bank and
urged Israel to “reverse its decisions immediately”.
In April,
Seoul’s ambassador to the United Nations told the security council that any
unilateral annexation of Palestinian territory “should be revoked”. Lee Jae
Myung, the president of South Korea, has twice clashed publicly with Israel: in
April over remarks he made comparing footage of an Israeli soldier’s treatment
of a Palestinian man’s body to the Holocaust, and in May after two South Korean
activists were detained on a Gaza-bound aid mission.
Thom
Tillis, the outgoing Republican senator from North Carolina, chimed in making
the point that the butterfly effect of Trump’s decision would inadvertently
benefit Russia.
“South
Korea has been a solid military ally for over 70 years that possesses exquisite
military capabilities,” Tillis wrote on social media. “Reducing joint exercises
with South Korea does nothing more than free up thousands of North Korea’s
troops to support Putin’s systematic kidnapping, torture, rape and murder of
innocent Ukrainian citizens.”

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário