Opinion
Guest
Essay
Trump’s
‘Great Gatsby’ Party Did Not Accept SNAP
Nov. 3,
2025
By Molly
Jong-Fast
Ms.
Jong-Fast is a contributing Opinion writer.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/03/opinion/trumps-great-gatsby-party-did-not-accept-snap.html
This year
marks the hundredth anniversary of the publication of F. Scott Fitzgerald’s
“The Great Gatsby,” a book that you were probably required to read in high
school but that makes much more sense when you go back and read it again as an
adult. That’s especially true if you’ve been banged around enough by life to
understand that the glamorous, elusive, self-invented party boy Jay Gatsby was
not, in fact, someone you should aspire to be. He was not the hero. Also, it
ended quite badly for him.
Donald
Trump was clearly never much of a reader, so maybe it wasn’t that surprising —
and it’s also just too perfect, of course — that on Oct. 31, with the federal
government still shut down and SNAP benefits about to be disrupted, leaving
about 42 million Americans without money they were counting on to eat, he was
hosting a “Great Gatsby”-themed party at Mar-a-Lago.
It was
one of those sticky images of Mr. Trump: the most powerful man in the world
surrounded by a cavalcade of activity, the curve of a white feather poking out
from a floral centerpiece, the blur of candles in candelabras and waiters in
black vests affixed with royal-style crests. Next to the crests were bronze
name tags that protruded awkwardly. Next to Mr. Trump was his multihyphenate
secretary of state, Marco Rubio. In a photo, one could make out a smile and a
bit of a laugh coming from Mr. Rubio’s mouth. Next to him was a woman in a
1920s-style headband who was looking out at the wide, lush expanse of Palm
Beach.
The story
of the rise and fall of the self-made semi-criminal Jay Gatsby takes place in
the summer of 1922, during the presidency of Warren G. Harding, who is
remembered for the Teapot Dome bribery scandal, although all manner of corrupt
things went down during his term. The year before “Gatsby” was published,
strict immigration quotas went into effect that drastically restricted the
numbers of Southern Europeans and Jews allowed into the United States, as
neither of those groups was at the time considered white by the WASP
establishment of the era, tipsy on their own Replacement Theory fears.
The 1920s
were a time of extraordinary wealth creation and remarkably lax regulation.
It’s hard imagining that Gatsby and those who partied at his house every night
would have missed out on the kind of get-rich-quick schemes of the crypto and
A.I. booms had they existed back then. It’s just as hard to imagine that our
current Roaring ’20s is going to end any better than theirs ultimately did in
October 1929.
In
present-day America, there are signs of a stock market bubble. Food pantries
are already strained. Inequality is rampant. The top 10 percent of U.S.
households now make up nearly half of all spending, the highest level since the
late 1980s. Many large companies aren’t hiring. More Americans are falling
behind on their car payments. And health insurance rates are expected to
increase for millions of Americans — a major reason that we have a government
shutdown in the first place.
But the
shutdown accurately reflects the administration’s priorities: the “big,
beautiful bill,” which continues the tax cuts from Mr. Trump’s first
administration and makes cuts to Medicaid. Americans aren’t happy about it.
Four months after the signature policy bill was passed into law, according to
polling, its approval rating is underwater by 12 points, and 83 percent of
battleground voters know about it.
To say
Americans are unhappy understates the moment, according to polling from ABC.
Two-thirds of Americans say that the country is “pretty seriously off on the
wrong track.” Mr. Trump successfully rode previous unhappiness to election
twice on promises of “draining the swamp” and fixing a “rigged system,” and he
often did a shtick on the campaign trail that he called the “weave”
(nonsensical rambles) about the price of bacon. Mr. Trump has whipped up a
populist frenzy but has had little interest in enacting populist legislation.
Instead, he hired the richest man in the world, a notably uncharitable
billionaire, Elon Musk, to make the government more efficient, including by
cutting grants to the National Institutes of Health for cancer research; firing
a broad swath of federal employees, many of whom needed to be rehired; and,
according to one estimate, costing taxpayers billions of dollars. But don’t
worry, Mr. Trump has a backup supply of billionaires in his cabinet — the most
of any administration ever.
Americans
didn’t vote for Mr. Trump because they wanted him to demolish the East Wing and
pave the Rose Garden, much less enrich his own family with crypto. They wanted
him to unrig a system they felt was rigged against them.
But does
Mr. Trump care? The most famous passage in “Gatsby” is probably the one in
which the book’s narrator, Nick Carraway, describes the rich couple Tom and
Daisy Buchanan as “careless people” — “they smashed up things and creatures and
then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness or whatever it
was that kept them together, and let other people clean up the mess they had
made.”
The
president’s priority, as a “60 Minutes” interview with him that aired on Sunday
showed, is revenge. And of course getting unnamed companies to pay for that
ballroom, a grift machine where people will come pay him even after it’s done
for his favor.
It’ll be
a good place to host future “Gatsby” parties, too.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário