Trump
disputes Iowa poll showing Harris ahead in red state: ‘It’s not even close!’
Selzer poll,
widely respected organization with good record in Iowa, shows vice-president
leading Trump 47% to 44%
Edward
Helmore
Sun 3 Nov
2024 16.19 EST
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/nov/03/trump-harris-iowa-poll
Donald Trump
has passionately disputed a shock Iowa poll that found Kamala Harris leading
the former president in the typically red state 47% to 44%.
“No
President has done more for FARMERS, and the Great State of Iowa, than Donald
J. Trump,” Trump said in a post on his Truth Social network on Sunday morning.
“In fact, it’s not even close! All polls, except for one heavily skewed toward
the Democrats by a Trump hater who called it totally wrong the last time, have
me up, BY A LOT.”
Trump
continued, in all caps: “I love the farmers, and they love me. And they trust
me.” More than 85% of Iowa’s land is used for farming and it produces more
corn, pigs, eggs, ethanol and biodiesel than any other state.
On Saturday,
the Selzer poll carried out for the Des Moines Register newspaper showed the
vice-president ahead of her Republican rival by three points. Selzer is a
widely respected polling organisation with a good record in Iowa; she shot to
polling fame in 2008 when she predicted that a virtually unknown senator,
Barack Obama, would beat frontrunner Hillary Clinton in the Iowa caucuses.
If Harris
were even competitive in Iowa – which Trump won in both 2016 and 2020 – it
could radically reshape the race.
The pollster
told MSNBC on Sunday that Harris was leading in early voting in Iowa “because
of her strength with women generally, even stronger with women aged 65 and
older. Her margin is more than 2-to-1 – and this is an age group that shows up
to vote or votes early in disproportionately large numbers.”
Earlier on
Sunday, Trump’s campaign released a memo from its chief pollster and its chief
data consultant calling the Des Moines Register poll “a clear outlier” and
saying that an Emerson College poll – also released Saturday – more closely
reflected the state of the Iowa electorate.
Don’t miss
important US election coverage. Get our free app and sign up for election
alerts
The Emerson
poll found 53% of likely voters support Trump and 43% support Harris, with 3%
undecided and 1% planning to vote for a third-party candidate.
The Trump
campaign, which many Democrats believe is setting the stage for a series of
legal challenges to poll results, also said in an email that the Des Moines
Register poll and a subsequent New York Times swing state poll that found
Harris ahead in four of the seven states, is “being used to drive a voter
suppression narrative against President Trump’s supporters.
“Some in the
media are choosing to amplify a mad dash to dampen and diminish voter
enthusiasm,” the statement added.
Last week,
Trump said: “Pennsylvania is cheating, and getting caught, at large scale
levels rarely seen before” but did not provide evidence for the claim. A Harris
campaign official said that the “cheating” claim was an example of how Trump
was trying to sow doubt in the electoral system because he was afraid he would
lose.
The claims
come as a federal judge plans to rule on whether Iowa officials can continuing
trying to remove hundreds of potential noncitizens from its voting rolls
despite critics saying the effort could keep recently naturalized citizens from
voting.
North Dakota
governor Doug Burgum, a Republican, told NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday that
he is confident that Trump is “going to confidently win Iowa”.
Asked if
Trump has a problem winning over women voters, Burgum said: “I’d be surprised,
completely shocked if that comes anywhere close to being the fact in Iowa.”
Burgum
pointed to national polling which shows Harris and Trump tied.
“I think
that’s the feeling that I get on the ground. It’s a very tight race. It’s going
to be decided on Tuesday,” Burgum added.
But speaking
to MSNBC, Maryland governor Wes Moore, a Democrat, said the Des Moines Register
poll putting Harris ahead Iowa, but still within margins of error, “lines up
with what we’re seeing on the ground”, particularly among women voters.
Moore
continued: “We’re watching an energy that I think has not been there for a
while, where we continue to see where women understand firsthand, what is at
stake, that they understand the dynamics and the distinctions between these two
candidates literally could not be more stark about when you’re talking about a
future vision for the country.”
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário