Review
Downfall
by Nadine Dorries review – wild wild Westminster
The former
culture secretary’s ‘real-life political thriller’ takes in sex parties and
pasta plotters – but raises more questions than it answers
Zoe Williams
Thu 21 Nov
2024 14.00 GMT
Does Nadine
Dorries know, in Downfall, she’s borrowing her title from a much-giffed film
about the last days of Hitler? When the publishers blurb on the back that this
is an “astonishing real-life political thriller”, do they mean its facts are as
lurid as fiction, or are they trying to gloss the account as fiction to avert
legal challenge? Why, in her anonymous, deep-throat encounters, do her sources
tend to start by telling her how much they enjoyed her last book, The Plot?
This is
nominally the story of Christmas 2023 to July 2024, and how the so-called
“pasta plotters” tried to get rid of Rishi Sunak. There is no way on God’s
Earth you would ever get that from the narrative, which doubles back on itself
so often, to praise and defend Boris Johnson and castigate his enemies, that
you never have any idea where you are, chronologically, or what point Dorries
is trying to land. It’s like trying to map terrain by following a dog. You have
to take that time period, and that subject matter, on trust from the author,
and I just cannot stress strongly enough how much you shouldn’t do that.
Dorries
introduces herself from her writing desk: her snack (Christmas cake and
stilton); her drink (tea); her domestic idyll (offspring, grandchild nearby).
It’s very like The Plot, except there she had shortbread and tea from fine
china (Royal Doulton), and makes you wonder whether she has some quick keys set
up (control+1 ENGLISH SNACK; control+2 ENVIABLE LIFESTYLE). She’s sold an
awesome number of romance books.
Her
insinuations are wild, both in a generalised way - “Some of the characters who
had removed Boris Johnson and had worked very hard to destabilise and topple
Liz Truss in order to impose Rishi Sunak, appeared to be living high on the
hog” - and on the specifics. One of the plotters has a yacht, which is pointed
out to her while she’s on holiday in Majorca. One of them eats lobster for
lunch, at Christmas, on white sandy beaches, for £350. There is never, but
never, enough information to stick anything on anyone. It feels like any time
you can get a handle on a real event that could be verified, it’s because it’s
already been printed in the Daily Mail. I think that solves the mystery of how
she got all this past the lawyers, but there’s an ongoing question mark – she
has “collaborate” when she means “corroborate” – over how she got it past the
proofreader.
She asks one
question persistently, “who pays?” and I have to be honest, I have a similar
question, about the rightwing grifters who write blogs about net zero being
unattainable and suchlike. Also, I kind of love how nuts she is. But the
writing gets to you in the end. How does a person start three consecutive
thoughts “however” without brooking the possibility that they might be
contradicting themselves? “They [Tory grandees] live by the political mantra;
never complain, never explain,” she writes. “A variation on the original of
‘never complain, never explain’ used by the Royal family.” How is that a
variation?
As soon as
she goes anywhere near territory you know anything about, it reads like
insinuation passed off as an insider’s certainty, cobbled together with the
generous assistance of Messrs Google and Daily Express. She says with great
authority that Waheed Alli was parachuting prospective Labour MPs into plum
seats, and there’s certainly a connection – Matthew Faulding, in charge of
candidate selection, was seconded to Alli’s office, as reported by the Daily
Telegraph. But it’s a mixed bag. Morgan McSweeney’s wife, for instance, now MP
for Hamilton and Clyde Valley, looks much more like the choice of Morgan
McSweeney.
Otherwise,
it’s mainly long quotes that don’t sound like quotes or nonsensical claims,
quickly disavowed with a chummy: “that was the Gavi speaking”. According to one
source, the Tory party had to be destroyed, most likely by a foreign power, for
geopolitical reasons: Boris Johnson was just too effective at “[knocking] heads
together” (before his intervention, “world leaders were happy to let Putin
invade Ukraine”). According to another, Chris Pincher was a stand-up guy, who
only behaved like a predator because someone spiked his drink.
In one wild
section, the author describes two unnamed (of course!) young people coming to
her with photographic proof of sex parties in Portcullis House, the shocking
sight of the erect penises said to belong to MPs she knew personally, and other
unnamed (of course!) sights so horrific they couldn’t be unseen.
But if you
were having a sex party, would you have it Portcullis House, which is like a
Best Western without a mini bar? Would you film yourself in your office? Would
you, or anyone you’d ever met, show it to Nadine Dorries?
The Plot was
very similar, and this is just how Dorries rolls, with a mix of blether and
eyebrow-raising assertions. Wherever anybody does have a name in her “political
thrillers”, they’re caught red-handed doing some anodyne thing that we already
knew – going to a cocktail party; knowing Dominic Cummings. As much as it may
make one indignant, this is how she is and she has nothing to apologise for.
But HarperCollins should be ashamed.
Downfall: The Self-Destruction of the
Conservative Party by Nadine Dorries is published by HarperCollins (£25). To
support the Guardian and the Observer order your copy at guardianbookshop.com.
Delivery charges may apply.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário