Senior Tories fear Johnson and Truss will
sabotage Sunak’s election campaign
Concerns that vicious circle of party ill-discipline
is undermining the PM’s ability to restore order
Michael
Savage Policy Editor
Sun 14 Apr
2024 07.00 BST
Senior
Tories fear Rishi Sunak is facing a vicious circle of party ill-discipline,
amid concerns that attacks from Boris Johnson, Liz Truss and Suella Braverman
will signal his inability to restore authority in the months before the general
election.
A rebellion
this week over his plans to ban smoking is set to be the latest flashpoint,
with libertarian MPs, including Truss, preparing to criticise the proposal as a
nanny-state measure that is unconservative.
There is
already anger among Sunak’s allies at Johnson, who has made a series of
criticisms over the past week, despite hopes that the relationship between the
two men had thawed.
One said
the former prime minister remained a “bitter, twisted and vengeful” figure
after Johnson attacked the foreign secretary, David Cameron, for failing to
rule out banning arms sales to Israel and described Sunak’s plan for a gradual
smoking ban as “absolutely nuts”.
During an
appearance in the US, Johnson also refused to rule out a political comeback and
a return to the Commons, only saying he did not think it was likely in “the
short term”.
The
comments came after hopes that Johnson might be willing to help the party
campaign by the autumn.
With the
publication this week of Truss’s book Ten Years to Save the West and the
scheduled appearance of Braverman at a rightwing convention in Brussels, more
criticisms are likely to hit Sunak as MPs return to the Commons from their
Easter break – just weeks before what look likely to be brutal local elections
for the Tories.
It has
caused alarm within the Tory ranks that the discipline the party once boasted
about as its secret weapon has not returned, despite the approach of the
general election. Senior MPs are blaming a fatal loss of authority in Downing
Street, characterised last week by Sunak’s refusal to withdraw the whip from an
MP who, in effect, called on voters in Ashfield to vote for Lee Anderson, the
ex-Tory MP who defected to Reform UK, formerly the Brexit party.
Nick
Fletcher, the MP for Don Valley, endorsed Anderson as Ashfield’s “greatest
champion”, suggesting he needed to be back in Westminster after the election.
Endorsing
rival candidates is forbidden under Tory party rules, but no action was taken
against him.
One senior
Tory said it was a sign of No 10 not having “the authority that it needs”,
risking a downward spiral as the election approached. “Authority is so weak,
we’re so close to the end of the parliament, people think that tilting towards
Reform might save their seats,” they said. “Discipline breaks down because
discipline breaks down. It’s a feedback loop.”
Some senior
figures hope that the increasing scrutiny on Labour as the election approaches
will become a “unifying force” for the Tories, given that only the prospect of
Keir Starmer becoming prime minister is potent enough to unite the warring
factions.
Sunak is
pinning his political hopes on an economic recovery, combined with another
round of tax cuts in an autumn statement held shortly before voters are
expected to go to the polls.
Inflation
figures this week, as well as the expected passing of the Rwanda legislation
allowing asylum seekers to be flown to the east African country, could help him
start that recovery.
However,
the passing of the Rwanda bill brings a potential clash with the European
convention on human rights (ECHR) a step closer – and another party split over
humanitarian concerns.
Many in the
party are braced for a huge battle before the election over whether or not
Sunak will pledge to leave the ECHR as part of the next election manifesto. It
has become the defining issue and a red line for the party’s liberal wing.
Most
suspect Sunak will back away from such a move, instead opting for reform to the
convention and a warning that leaves open the possibility of withdrawing.
“There is a
majority for both staying in and some quite hardball negotiating,” said one
figure on the liberal wing. “That doesn’t feel like it’s a controversial
opinion any more. The question for the manifesto is: does it say ‘we will
renegotiate our position on the ECHR – and if we fail, we’ll leave’? How hard
do you go? This is the million-dollar question.”
.jpeg)
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário