‘They’re drowning us in regulations’: how
Europe’s furious farmers took on Brussels and won
Mass demonstrations across the EU against
environmental directives have become a politically charged issue
Jon Henley
in Paris and Sam Jones in Pamplona
Sat 10 Feb
2024 14.00 GMT
On the
outskirts of the northern Spanish city of Pamplona, a green, red and blue
stream of New Holland, John Deere, Massey Ferguson, Fendt and Deutz-Fahr
tractors trundled forwards, horns honking and orange lights flashing.
Under
drizzly grey skies and escorted by navy blue Policía Nacional vans, few were in
the mood to explain the motives for their demonstration, but a young farmer
from the nearby town of Estella threw open his cab door to share his
grievances. “They’re drowning us with all these regulations,” he said. “They
need to ease up on all the directives and bureaucracy. We can’t compete with
other countries when things are like this. We’re … drowning.”
If Europe’s
farmers have called a temporary halt to their protests in France and Germany –
awaiting what one French farmer called “proof of love, not just words of love”
from their respective governments – they have only just got going in Spain.
In scenes
now familiar from Poland to Portugal, angry farmers last week blocked roads, a
port and a large wholesale market, and plan to continue through February.
Italian farmers also took to their tractors last week, converging on the
outskirts of Rome and staging a symbolic drive-past of the Colosseum on Friday.
In recent
weeks, large conurbations including Paris and Lyon have been blockaded. City
centres in Brussels and Berlin have been choked to a standstill. Farmers have
closed down motorways, dumped manure, hurled eggs, trashed supermarkets, set
fire to hay bales and pallets, and clashed, sometimes violently, with police.
Away from
the heat of the protests, in TV interviews and parliamentary speeches, their
cause has been enthusiastically adopted by a resurgent populist far right,
which sees in the farmers’ revolt a promising new front in its long-running war
on “out-of-touch elites”, “radical environmentalism” and “Brussels diktats”.
Months from
European parliament elections in which far-right and “anti-European” parties
are projected to make big gains, farming – which represents just 1.4% of EU
gross domestic product – has climbed, suddenly, to the top of the political
agenda.
“Everywhere
in Europe, the same questions are coming up,” said France’s prime minister,
Gabriel Attal. “How do we continue to produce more, but better? Continue to
tackle climate change? Avoid unfair competition from foreign countries?”
They are
questions to which Europe needs rapid answers. The first stirrings came,
appropriately, in the Netherlands – Europe’s most intensively farmed country,
home to more than 110 million livestock, including cows, pigs and chickens,
and, largely as a consequence, to nitrogen emissions four times the EU average.
Five years
ago, officials said “drastic measures” were needed, including buying up and
shutting down farms. The government unveiled plans to cut nitrogen emissions in
half by 2030, partly by slashing livestock numbers by up to a third. Dutch
farmers did not wait for the details to make their feelings known. In October
2019, more than 2,000 tractors trundled from all corners of the country to the
seat of government in The Hague, causing 620 miles of motorway tailbacks. “No
farmers no food,” their placards read, and “Proud of the farmer”. It was the
start of a movement that has since snowballed cross the bloc, accelerating
rapidly in recent months to leave – so far - only Austria, Denmark, Finland and
Sweden untouched.
Many
protests – as in the Netherlands – are at least partly country-specific. In
Italy, demands included reinstatement of an income tax exemption that had been
in force since 2017 but was due to be scrapped in the 2024 budget. In Germany,
where protests have briefly paused after an estimated 30,000 farmers and 5,000
tractors paralysed Berlin in mid-January, the most explosive issue is a
government plan to phase out tax breaks on agricultural diesel to balance its
budget.
But uniting
them all are concerns shared across mainland Europe: falling product prices,
rising costs, over-powerful retailers, cheap foreign imports and – in
particular – EU environmental rules that many farmers see as unfair and
economically unrealistic. “There are many issues,” said Arnaud Rousseau,
president of France’s biggest farmers union, the FNSEA. “But the seeds of these
protests are the same: lack of understanding between the reality on the ground
and the decisions taken by governments.”
Spain’s
agriculture minister, Luis Planas, said last week that the causes of the
protests sweeping Europe were diverse and complicated, but boiled down to
longstanding dissatisfactions and farmers feeling underappreciated. “Farmers
want to be listened to and respected,” said Planas. “And they often feel they
aren’t respected – especially in Brussels, but also sometimes in Madrid, or in
the urban or political sphere.”
Some
problems are structural. The EU’s common agricultural policy (CAP), the €55bn
(£47bn) annual subsidy on which mainland Europe’s postwar food security has
rested for more than 60 years, has always been based on economy of scale:
bigger farms, common standards. Increasingly, that has encouraged consolidation
(the number of farms in the bloc has fallen by more than a third since 2005),
leaving many larger operations overburdened with debt and many smaller ones
struggling to stay competitive on product price.
Others are
temporal. The past two years have brought a vicious squeeze on already tight
margins, triggered by the pandemic and, more significantly, Russia’s war on
Ukraine. Farmers’ costs – fuel, electricity, fertiliser and transport – have
soared.
At the same
time, efforts by governments and retailers to limit the impact of the cost of
living crisis on consumers have hit prices. Eurostat data shows the prices
farmers get for their products fell on average by almost 9% between late 2022
and late 2023.
That
squeeze is being further exacerbated by an avalanche of imports, often from
countries and regions where farmers are not generally subject to the same
strict standards and regulations as in the EU – and so can compete unfairly on
price. A flood of cheap agricultural produce, especially grain from Ukraine –
on which the EU initially waived quotas and duties after Russia’s full-scale
invasion – prompted furious Polish farmers to begin blocking cross-border roads
as early as the spring of 2023.
Free-trade
agreements with non-EU countries are also a source of anger, particularly a
forthcoming deal with the Mercosur bloc of Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and
Uruguay – all of which use hormones, antibiotics and pesticides banned in the
EU.
“We have to
deal with all these rules and yet we face competition from goods from outside
the EU that simply aren’t produced in the same conditions,” said Emmanuel
Mathé, a French farmer, during a recent motorway blockade outside Paris.
Completing
the catalogue of woes, the climate crisis – droughts, floods, heatwaves and
other extreme weather events – is increasingly affecting output, particularly
in southern Europe. Besides Italy, large farmers’ protests are due in Greece
this week.
The
readiest focus for farmers’ ire, however, is EU environmental legislation. For
an already struggling industry, the European green deal, aimed at achieving
climate neutrality across the bloc by 2050, looks very much like a bridge too
far. The plan’s targets for agriculture included halving pesticide use by 2030,
cutting fertiliser use by 20%, devoting more land to non-agricultural use – for
example, by leaving it fallow – and doubling organic production to 25% of all
EU farmland.
Copa-Cogeca,
the leading agricultural lobby in Brussels, has described much of the deal’s
“Farm2Fork” strategy as a “top-down … poorly designed, poorly evaluated, poorly
financed” proposal that “offered few alternatives to farmers”.
In response
to the growing wave of rural revolt, Europe’s politicians are running scared.
The European Commission has made multiple recent concessions in an effort to
ease tensions, with its president, Ursula von der Leyen, insisting the bloc had
heard farmers’ concerns. Last week, the commission shelved plans to cut
pesticide use, saying it had become “a symbol of polarisation”. Last month, it
unveiled an “emergency brake” on the most sensitive Ukrainian products and
delayed rules on setting aside more land. Presenting the EU’s latest
recommendations for cuts to greenhouse gas emissions, the executive last week
also eased up on agriculture, removing from a previous draft the stipulation
that farming would have to cut non-CO2 emissions by 30% from 2015 levels.
While
farming would have to transition to a “more sustainable model of production”,
von der Leyen said, farmers were undeniably being confronted with a range of
problems and “deserved to be listened to … We should place more trust in them”.
At a
national level, too, governments have scrambled to respond: Berlin watered down
its plans to cut diesel subsidies while the Italian prime minister, Georgia
Meloni, on Friday agreed to partially reinstate the suspended tax exemption,
at least for low earners. Paris scrapped a diesel tax increase and promised
measures worth €400m, plus €200m more in cash aid.
Farmers deserve to be listened to… We should place
more trust in them
Ursula von der Leyen
Attal also
said it was now “out of the question” that France would agree to the planned
EU-Mercosur trade deal as it stood and promised the government would stop
imposing stricter rules on its farmers than EU regulations demanded.
Will it all
be enough? The growing politicisation of the movement is a real concern. In the
Netherlands, a new populist party, the Farmer-Citizen Movement (BBB), emerged
from the “nitrogen wars”, channelling rural resentment and opposition to
“radical environmentalism”. The BBB swept the board in provincial elections
last year and while it failed to repeat that performance in November’s general
election, it is one of the parties negotiating to form the next Dutch
government with far-right, anti-Islam provocateur Geert Wilders.
The
far-right Alternative for Germany – now second in the polls – has forcefully
backed the farmers, as have members of Marine Le Pen’s National Rally in
France, which has said it wants the “abolition”, pure and simple, of the
European green deal. The farmers’ protests make an undeniably appealing
bandwagon for far-right and populist parties, an extension of the culture wars
that allows them to rail against what they portray as an increasingly
dictatorial EU, as well as an urban, international elite ignoring – or
attacking – oppressed rural workers.
While most
farmers reject any far-right connection, many have acknowledged that they feel
trebly misunderstood: by politicians who impose unrealistic regulations,
consumers who know little about how food is produced, and environmentalists who
cast them as evildoers.
In last
month’s protests in Germany, a surprisingly large number of tractors bore
placards complaining about Teslas. Elon Musk’s US electric car brand is, it
seems, emblematic of the kind of urban wealth that votes green, but knows
nothing about farming.
Back
outside Pamplona, the list of Spanish farmers’ grievances sounded all too
familiar: they want less bureaucracy, fairer prices, a revision of the European
green deal, safeguarding of CAP subsidies and stronger protection against
non-EU competition.
And in
Madrid, Planas was well aware of the political risk, with the agriculture
minister saying he was worried that opposition parties were deliberately
exploiting the farmers’ protests for political gain. He was particularly
bothered, he said, by comments made in congress by Alberto Núñez Feijóo, the
leader of the conservative People’s party, who accused the socialist-led
government of alienating farmers through its pursuit of what he called
“environmental dogmatism”.
Planas
said: “That’s an expression we’ve heard a lot from many sectors that – let’s be
clear – are climate deniers and anti-EU. I find it very worrying because I
believe that Spaniards understand very well that climate change is here.”
Such talk
by the likes of Feijóo, he added, called into question the bloc’s approach to
fighting the climate emergency, whose effects – most notably a prolonged
drought that is having a devastating impact on water supplies – were already
being keenly felt on the Iberian peninsula.
“Spain is a
country that is pro-EU,” Planas said. “That doesn’t mean we don’t sometimes
disagree with the odd decision.
“But I
think what’s happening now is directly linked to the forthcoming European
elections.”
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário