Donald Trump just did Europe a favor
Europe might finally get real about defending itself
now the Republican frontrunner is inviting Putin to attack some of America’s
NATO allies.
FEBRUARY
13, 2024 4:01 AM CET
BY MATTHEW
KARNITSCHNIG
https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-just-did-europe-a-favor/
BERLIN — It
might not be strategic, but at least it’s autonomy.
In one fell
swoop over the weekend, Donald Trump freed Europe from the confines of the
American security bubble.
“I would
not protect you, in fact I would encourage them to do whatever the hell they
want,” Trump claimed to have told a European leader about how he would respond
if their country were attacked by Russia. “You gotta pay!”
Never mind
that Trump was talking about what he would do if other NATO countries didn’t
live up to the alliance’s spending target of 2 percent of economic output. By
casting doubt over America’s commitment to NATO in such a direct and
fundamental way, he effectively drove a stake through the alliance’s heart.
It almost
doesn’t even matter if he wins reelection at this stage; Europe is on its own.
The only
real question the election will resolve for Europe’s security is the timing of
NATO’s collapse.
Of course,
the Biden administration would dispute that, arguing that if their man wins
reelection, NATO would be as safe as ever.
But for how
long?
Much of the
debate on Trump’s comments so far has focused on the consensus among most
right-thinking people that it would run counter to American interests. But for
Europe at this stage, that’s almost irrelevant. Europe would be crazy to leave
its security every four years up to the whims of about 50,000 American
swing-state voters (the rough margin of victory in recent presidential
elections).
The reality
is that whoever wins in November, MAGA will remain a factor in American
politics for some time to come. Whose to say Trump’s Republican heir doesn’t
renew his anti-NATO bent? It’ s a risk Europe can’t afford to ignore.
Even as a
candidate, Trump has shown the extent of his influence over the Republican
party, forcing it last week to block a legislative package that included
another batch of sorely needed military aid for Ukraine. The U.S. Congress may
yet send more help to Ukraine, but may well not.
The bottom
line is that it’s become risky to count on America.
Considering what’s at stake — subjugation to Russia —
Europe has no choice but to start preparing a Plan B.
So far
though, European leaders are still in the anger-cum-denial stage.
“Any
suggestion that allies will not defend each other undermines all of our
security, including that of the U.S., and puts American and European soldiers
at increased risk,” NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said in a statement
over the weekend, one of a flurry of similar statements castigating the former
president.
OK, now
what?
The truth
is, Europe only has itself to blame for the morass. Trump has been harping on
about NATO’s laggards for years, but he hardly invented the genre. American
presidents going back to Dwight D. Eisenhower have complained about European
allies freeloading on American defense.
What
Europeans don’t like to hear is that Trump has a point: They have been
freeloading. What’s more, it was always unrealistic to expect the U.S. to pick
pick up the tab for European security ad infinitum.
After Trump
lost to Biden in 2020, its seemed like everything had gone back to normal,
however. Biden, a lifelong transatlanticist, sought to repair the damage Trump
did to NATO by letting the Europeans slide back into their comfort zone.
Even though
overall defense spending has increased in recent years in Europe — as it should
have, considering Russia’s war on Ukraine — it’s still nowhere near enough.
Only 11 of NATO’s 31 members are expected to meet the spending target in 2023,
for example, according to NATO’s own data. Germany, the main target of Trump’s
ire, has yet to achieve the 2 percent mark. It’s likely to this year, however,
if only because its economy is contracting.
The truth
is, Europe was lulled back into a false sense of security by Biden’s warm
embrace. Instead of going on a war footing by forcing industry to ramp up
armament production and reinstating conscription in countries like Germany
where it was phased out, Europe nestled itself in Americas skirts.
It’s hardly
surprising that the Continent, with its generous social welfare states and
pacifist populations, took the path of least resistance (with the notable
exception of the Baltics and Poland).
Since the
beginning of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in early 2022, the focus
of Germany’s national debate has shifted away from the war to heat pumps and
mass migration. Even as the country increased its support for Ukraine, the
public’s mind drifted elsewhere. Over the past year, Russia has slipped from
first place to seventh in the Germans’ perception of threats to the country,
according to a study published this week.
Trump’s
thunderbolt should help refocus Europe’s strategic compass.
French
President Emmanuel Macron talks a good game about pursuing European “strategic
autonomy,” but his country hasn’t actually done anything to make that a
reality.
One place
to start would be to address the nuclear question. Between France and the U.K.,
Europe would have about 500 nukes at its disposal, fairly modest when compared
to Russia’s nearly 6,000 warheads. Neither country has committed to use them to
protect the rest of the Continent, however.
Resolving
such issues is both time consuming and complicated. Europe doesn’t just need to
rebuild its armies, it needs to reprogram its collective mindset. Even as the
second anniversary of Vladimir Putin’s failed march on Kyiv approaches, the war
and its implications for European security remain far too abstract for many
Europeans, especially those in western Europe.
Even if
Europe does wake up to the realities it faces, it may well be too late. On
paper, Europe, with collective military spending about triple Russia’s and an
economy many times its size, should be able to fend for itself. The problem is
that Europe is running out of time.
Replacing
the American capability NATO would lose without the U.S. would take decades and
untold billions. And most European leaders haven’t even accepted the cold
reality that American protection is already effectively gone.
Imagine,
for argument’s sake, that Trump is inaugurated in early 2025 and Putin decides
to test NATO’s resolve that spring by marching into Estonia. Will Trump risk a
nuclear confrontation with Putin over little Estonia? We already know the
answer.
A more
fundamental question is whether the Europeans even have it in themselves to
come together and defend themselves without Washington’s guiding hand. History
suggests they will just revert to type and descend into chaos. Witness Europe’s
handling of the disintegration of Yugoslavia in the 1990s.
“Europe
can’t stay united without the United States,” Biden said in a speech to the
Senate in 1995 during the crisis in Bosnia. “There is no moral center in
Europe.”
Europe now
has a chance to prove him wrong.
If they
succeed, they’ll have only one person to thank.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário