The EPP Group is wrong. The EU's nature
restoration law won't lead to a 'global famine'
By Olivier
De Schutter, Co-Chair, and Emile Frison, Panel Expert, IPES-Food •
Updated: 09/06/2023
The
opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not represent
in any way the editorial position of Euronews.
It’s time
politicians abandon these cynical games and tackle the challenges we are facing
seriously, Olivier De Schutter and Emile Frison write.
Before
walking out of the negotiations on the Nature Restoration Law last week, the
EPP parliamentary group shared a rather dramatic list of problems with the
European Commission’s proposal.
In a series
of tweets in the group’s social media feed, it was claimed that the proposed
law would lead to “increased food prices” and “even a global famine”.
As the
European Parliament prepares to vote on the law on Thursday, we need a reality
check — and an end to scaremongering around NRL and the EU’s Farm2Fork
strategy.
Growing more food is not the solution to rising hunger
The reality
today is that the world already produces more than enough food to feed a
growing population, according to UN data.
Indeed for
the past two decades, the rate of global food production has increased faster
than the rate of population growth.
But unlike
what voices for ever-more intensification claim, this hasn’t stopped rising
hunger.
Rising
hunger has little to do with levels of production — and everything to do with
where that food goes and doesn’t go.
Around a
third of the food we produce is thrown away or left to rot.
A vast
majority of the world’s calories are used to feed animals — livestock takes up
nearly 80% of global agricultural land (factoring in feed) while producing less
than 20% of the calories. And around one-tenth of all grain is turned into
biofuel.
Growing
more food to direct to any of these ends will do nothing to reduce hunger or
famine.
This helps
to explain why, after the invasion of Ukraine, even as global diplomatic
efforts succeeded in getting Ukrainian grain flowing again and emergency measures
enabled the planting of fallow land set aside for nature protection, food price
inflation still remains stubbornly above 5%, and queues for food banks are no
shorter.
It turns
out most of the extra production was used to grow animal fodder. Meanwhile,
rising supermarket prices are connected far more to profiteering than they are
to environmental regulation.
'Feed the world' advocates are missing the point
We have to
be honest about the situation. Never has our food system been so
industrialised, chemically intensive, and global.
Yet it has
resulted in three food price crises in 15 years. And progress on global hunger
is in reverse — thanks to volatile speculation-prone commodity markets and a
debt crisis that is bankrupting countries and preventing them from tackling
hunger.
It has long
been known that the problem of hunger is one of distribution and poverty — but
Big Food lobbyists continue to claim the contrary.
The
"feed the world" advocates of the EPP are missing the forest for the
trees.
The biggest
risk to food production of all is climate change and the current industrial
model that is decimating nature and making it harder to sustain necessary
levels of production in the long term.
Climate
change wiped nearly 10% off EU yields for some crops last year – and is already
ravaging farm incomes on a regular basis.
Farmers are
the victims of the existing system, too
Just last
month, Italy experienced devastating floods destroying swathes of its
agricultural heartland.
Spain and
Portugal, toiling under one of the worst droughts in recent history, have
requested the activation of the European Food Security Crisis Preparedness and
Response Mechanism for the first time ever because their food security is at
risk.
Drought: Agriculture must 'adapt to climate change'
We know
that soil degradation, chemical contamination, water scarcity, and biodiversity
loss are putting crop yields at risk — and that industrial farming is a primary
cause.
European
Commission Vice President Frans Timmermans is right when he says that food
cannot grow “when the soil is dead and that there are crop failures due to
drought”.
Farmers,
the backbone of our food systems, are being hit hard by both economic and
climate instability.
They face
price volatility, both for the inputs they buy and for the products they sell.
Though
giant agri-food corporations are reaping record profits these past two years,
farmers are as much victims of the boom-bust cycle of food markets as consumers
— where price surges lead farmers into overproduction, prompting farmgate
prices to suddenly fall.
Farmers in
some EU countries have even been protesting as they sit on large quantities of
unsold commodities.
This can't continue
We can’t go
on like this. If MEPs are serious about feeding the world, they should jump at
the opportunity that the Nature Protection Law and the Farm2Fork present.
Not only
will it put us on a path to a more sustainable food system, help reduce waste
and put more power in the hands of farmers and communities.
It will
also do this while restoring our natural world, increasing biodiversity, and
making everyone's quality of life better.
It’s time
politicians abandon these cynical games and tackle the challenges facing us
seriously.
Failure to
take action now will leave Europe confronting a future of climate disaster,
decimated biodiversity and water scarcity, with no tools in the box.
It’s time
politicians abandon these cynical games and tackle the challenges we are facing
seriously.
Farmers,
consumers, policymakers and corporations — we need to take action for a food
system that is much more diverse, resilient, healthy and sustainable in every
region.
Will we stay trapped in a cycle of disaster?
There is
ample evidence that farming systems that work with nature, like agroecology,
provide economic performance, reliable yields, resilience to climate change,
and preserve biodiversity.
Further
delaying and diluting the Farm2Fork strategy does nothing for world food
security.
It just
keeps us trapped in a cycle of disaster while depriving Europeans of a more
resilient future.
Olivier De
Schutter is co-chair of the International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food
Systems (IPES-Food) and UN special rapporteur on extreme poverty and human
rights, and Emile Frison is the former director general of Biodiversity
International and an IPES-Food panel expert.
At
Euronews, we believe all views matter. Contact us at view@euronews.com to send
pitches or submissions and be part of the conversation.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário