OpenAI
launches Astra, its powerful (and controversial) new model
11:01 AM
PDT · September 3, 2026
https://techcrunch.com/2026/09/03/openai-launches-astra-its-powerful-and-controversial-new-model/
OpenAI
released Astra on Thursday, its latest AI model and — according to the company
— its most powerful and capable one yet.
OpenAI
claims that Astra represents “a new frontier on computer and browser use,” and
that it handles tasks with unmatched “speed, accuracy, and safety.”
The model
is being made available Thursday to OpenAI customers that use Daybreak, its
cybersecurity program. Over the next week, it will also become available
through OpenAI’s paid plans — including Pro, Plus, Enterprise, and Business
accounts — as well as through its API.
In a call
with journalists on Thursday, OpenAI president Greg Brockman said that Astra
was the company’s “most intelligent and, also very importantly, our most
aligned model yet.” He added that it “brings together years of our research and
big bets, with each breakthrough having built on the last” and that it
represents a “real shift in what kind of work people can delegate to AI and how
it can empower them.”
Much has
been made about Astra’s cyber capabilities. OpenAI published a blog earlier
this week in which it discussed the model’s new capabilities, as well as new
safeguards that have been instituted to make it a safer experience for users.
The company said Thursday that it had tested Astra on a variety of security
benchmarks to ensure its capabilities, and that “Its ability to identify and
develop zero-day exploits can help defenders find and patch weaknesses.”
The
company’s focus on alignment — that is, the tendency of a model to do what a
user wants or is in their best interests — can’t help but seem like a response
to the recent Hugging Face breach, in which an OpenAI agent escaped its
sandboxed testing environment and hacked several companies (a very blatant
example of misalignment).
OpenAI
has also boasted about Astra’s coding abilities, claiming that it is the “best
model for software engineering to date.” To back up that assertion, the company
provides results from a variety of cyber-related benchmarking tests. Those
tests seem to show that Astra scores higher than other existing models —
including OpenAI’s own Sol and Anthropic’s Fable — when it comes to activities
like finding bugs, executing terminal tasks, and answering queries about
codebases.
Astra is
also possibly OpenAI’s most controversial model yet due to its use of a
particular reasoning technique known as opaque recurrence. This technique is
known to obscure an important model-monitoring process known as chain of
thought, which allows researchers to audit how and why an AI model made the
decisions that it did.
OpenAI
has downplayed the degree to which Astra engages in opaque recurrence — and on
the call chief scientist Jakub Pachocki seemed to frame a certain amount of
opacity as a natural outgrowth of model evolution. He stated that monitoring
the reasoning process of a model was a critical form of oversight but that “as
model capabilities are increasing, monitorability is getting more challenging.”
He later
added that one potential reason for this was that “more capable models can
perform harder tasks using fewer language tokens” or “no language tokens,”
which he said then reduces the ability to monitor those particular tasks.
One
reporter on the call wanted to know if OpenAI was actually heralding Astra as
the official arrival of AGI, or artificial general intelligence — the oft
talked about but poorly defined technological juncture at which AI surpasses
human capabilities in all (or most) things.
Here,
Brockman quibbled. “There’s no contractual AGI triggering anymore, so that’s
actually not a relevant concept,” he said. Here Brockman was referring to the
previously existing stipulation in OpenAI’s contract with Microsoft that said
the duo’s partnership would dissolve once AGI had arrived. As Brockman noted,
that stipulation no longer exists.
Instead,
Brockman explained that AGI’s definition had evolved from a contractual
obligation to a “mission concept or spiritual concept.” He added: “I do leave
it up to the reader to decide for themselves if this qualifies for them. For me
personally, I do think we’re there.”

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário