News
Analysis
At
Summit, Xi Sought to Tilt Trump’s Stance on America’s Place in Asia
In his
talks with President Trump, the Chinese leader used praise, warnings and
wartime history to challenge American support for Taiwan and Japan.
Chris
Buckley David
Pierson
By Chris
Buckley and David Pierson
Sept. 26,
2026
Updated
10:11 a.m. ET
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/26/world/asia/summit-xi-trump-taiwan-japan.html
China’s
leader, Xi Jinping, is not known for lightheartedness. Yet during his White
House summit with President Trump, he sometimes smiled and even laughed,
projecting a warmth unusual for a meeting between superpower rivals.
Behind
the show of geniality, Mr. Xi’s carefully chosen words revealed a cooler
calculus: an effort to steer Mr. Trump toward Beijing’s positions on Taiwan,
Japan and the broader security order in Asia.
On
Taiwan, Mr. Xi pressed Mr. Trump to limit American support for the self-ruled
island that Beijing claims as its territory. On Japan, Mr. Xi invoked history
to portray Tokyo, an American ally, as a resurgent military threat, while
reminding the president that China and the United States had once fought on the
same side.
Mr. Xi
appeared to be testing for opportunities to shape Mr. Trump’s views, rather
than hoping for a decisive breakthrough, Matt Pottinger, who served as a deputy
national security adviser to Mr. Trump in his first term as president, said in
an interview. Mr. Xi and Mr. Trump have met three times since October last
year, and they may meet two more times by the end of this year.
“Xi sees
frequent meetings with his American counterpart as an opportunity to probe for
weaknesses in the U.S. positions,” said Mr. Pottinger, now the chairman of the
China Program at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.
Outwardly,
the summit between Mr. Xi and Mr. Trump achieved little.
China and
the United States agreed to extend their truce in the trade war, but only by
two months. The leaders discussed the wars in the Middle East and Ukraine but
announced no apparent advances on ending either conflict. They toasted each
other, and spoke loftily of partnership and stability in relations, yet
announced no concrete agreements on the most contentious of issues: the trade
imbalance, technology restrictions and Taiwan.
The trip
was certainly a propaganda boost for Mr. Xi, who has sought to cast himself as
an equal to Mr. Trump on the world stage.
Coverage
of the summit was splashed across the front page of the People’s Daily, the
Communist Party’s mouthpiece, with images of Mr. Xi being honored at the White
House with a military flyover and being greeted by Mr. Trump at Joint Base
Andrews. A top trending hashtag on Chinese social media was about how rare it
was for an American president to receive a world leader on the tarmac.
“This is
historic validation of China’s strength. It’s seen as a point of arrival and
adds to Xi Jinping’s effort to portray China as an equal partner, which has
been the brass ring of Chinese foreign policy” for decades, said Evan Medeiros,
a professor of Asian studies at Georgetown University who was senior Asia
director on the National Security Council under President Barack Obama.
The
summit served Mr. Xi’s purposes in a more subtle but important way. He used
verbal finesse to suggest that Mr. Trump was sympathetic to Beijing’s positions
— even if members of Mr. Trump’s own administration disagree with them.
Most
notably, Mr. Xi appeared to imply that Mr. Trump had shifted closer to
Beijing’s views on Taiwan, including that the island’s government is scheming
for independence. Continued stability in relations between China and the United
States, he indicated, rested on Mr. Trump heeding Chinese positions.
“I hope
that the United States adheres to the correct position of opposing ‘Taiwan
independence’ and handles the Taiwan issue prudently,” Mr. Xi said in his
meeting with Mr. Trump on Thursday, according to an official summary issued by
Chinese news outlets. That approach would, Mr. Xi said, “lay a solid foundation
for U.S.-China strategic cooperation and the development of bilateral
relations.”
Successive
U.S. administrations have said they do not support outright Taiwanese
independence. But U.S. presidents have generally rejected Chinese calls for
Washington to declare that it flatly “opposes” independence. Such a shift,
experts say, could suggest that the United States believes that Taiwan’s
policies, and not Beijing’s threat of forcible unification, are the primary
source of cross-strait tensions.
Mr. Xi’s
use of the word “adhere” (“jianchi” in Chinese) appeared intended to create the
impression that “Beijing believes Trump has already absorbed some of its red
lines on Taiwan,” said Craig Singleton, a China Program senior director at the
Foundation for Defense of Democracies. “Beijing is steadily wrapping its
preferred language around the summit.”
The
official Chinese summary of Mr. Xi’s remarks did not go into specifics, but the
implied warning was clear, several experts said. If Mr. Trump went ahead and
approved a proposal to sell $14 billion worth of weapons to Taiwan, he could
damage or even undo the fragile détente between Beijing and Washington.
The
package includes missiles, anti-drone equipment and air-defense systems. It
would follow a separate $11 billion package Mr. Trump approved late last year.
After his last summit with Mr. Xi in Beijing in May, though, Mr. Trump said
that the arms sales were a “very good negotiating chip” with China. He has
since held off on approving the new package, raising unease in Taiwan and
across Asia about how far he could go in subordinating U.S. security
commitments to better ties with China.
“What is
important is in practice the U.S. should stop selling arms to Taiwan and be
very careful in the dealing with Taiwan,” said Wu Xinbo, an American studies
scholar at Fudan University in Shanghai who advises China’s Foreign Ministry.
Many
experts expect Mr. Trump to eventually sign off on more arms sales, however.
China could retaliate with military intimidation of Taiwan or economic
punishment of the United States, such as further restrictions of rare earth
exports to U.S. companies.
Taiwan’s
Ministry of Foreign Affairs said Mr. Xi’s comments “distorted the facts” in an
effort to support Beijing’s claim over the island.
Ali Wyne,
a senior researcher on U.S.-China ties at the International Crisis Group, said
Mr. Xi recognizes that Mr. Trump was “not going to dwell on semantic
considerations, especially if he can frame them as part of an appeal to Trump’s
ego.”
For that,
Mr. Xi leaned into a familiar maritime metaphor that appealed to Mr. Trump’s
preference for leader-to-leader diplomacy. “I am ready to work with you to
steer the giant ship of the China-U.S. relationship on a steady course,” Mr. Xi
told Mr. Trump.
Mr. Trump
said on Friday that he would attend the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation
summit in Shenzhen, China, in November, and that Mr. Xi would attend the Group
of 20 summit in Florida in December.
Mr. Xi
also used his time to try to drive a wedge between Washington and one of its
stalwart allies in Asia — Japan.
He
reminded Mr. Trump that the United States and China fought together against a
common Japanese enemy during World War II. He described Imperial Japan as
“fascist” and “militarist” aggressors, reviving an image of Japan as an “enemy
state” that cannot be trusted on the global stage.
His
remarks were in line with a monthslong effort by Beijing to punish Japan over
comments Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi made in defense of Taiwan in November.
“The
message is, ‘They are the bad guys, and we are the good guys that are trying to
change the world order, and the Americans should cooperate with us,’” said Akio
Takahara, a visiting professor at Tokyo Woman’s Christian University who
specializes in Chinese politics.
The risk
for Japan, he said, is that Mr. Xi’s narrative could gain traction if repeated
enough times.
Ms.
Takaichi told reporters in Tokyo on Friday that Japan had achieved “genuine
reconciliation” with the United States and they now had a “relationship of
mutual trust as allies bound by very strong bonds.”
Javier C.
Hernández contributed reporting from Tokyo, and Xinyun Wu from Taipei.
Chris
Buckley, the chief China correspondent for The Times, reports on China and
Taiwan from Taipei, focused on politics, social change and security and
military issues.
David
Pierson covers Chinese foreign policy and China’s economic and cultural
engagement with the world. He has been a journalist for more than two decades.


Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário