Europe’s
crisis reserves weren’t meant for this kind of drought
Dry
seasons have become a fixture of European farming. The EU’s crisis tools still
treat them as a surprise.
August 7,
2026 10:00 am CET
By
Bartosz Brzeziński and Agnes Rønberg
https://www.politico.eu/article/europe-crisis-reserve-agriculture-drought-climate-change/
The rain
stopped in spring and never came back. From France to Czechia, this summer's
harvest is withering — and depleting aid funds built for one-off disasters, not
a crisis that returns every year.
Climate
change has made dry seasons so frequent in Europe that the aid has become
routine, too: national rescue packages, topped up by EU money. Nearly all of it
covers what farmers have already lost; very little goes toward surviving the
next one.
For all
the money the EU spends on farming, none of it is guaranteed to farmers when
drought hits. Every rescue is improvised, decided one at a time. And the
European Commission says it can’t afford a standing fund unless capitals pay in
more, which none have offered to do.
In
Czechia, just 32 millimeters of rain fell across March and April — the driest
spring in more than 60 years. The heat that followed pushed field temperatures
past 50 degrees Celsius. “In some cases maize fields are failing to produce
anything which can be used as fodder for animals,” said Jan Doležal of the
Agrarian Chamber of the Czech Republic farm lobby. He hoped the EU would pay
out for the damage in the fall.
How to
respond to that cycle — damage first, compensation later, repeat next season —
is one of the disputes running through the negotiations on the EU’s next
long-term farm budget.
One
flashpoint is a small emergency fund inside that post-2028 budget, reserved for
when markets crash — collapsing prices, gluts of cheap imports, disease
outbreaks. It can pay for weather damage, but only when the Commission decides
to allow it, case by case. Most governments in the drought belt want ruined
harvests written in as a standard trigger.
The
Commission's answer: No realistic amount of euros would cover the damage.
"Even
900 million” would amount to just “peanuts,” Agriculture Commissioner
Christophe Hansen told reporters in July. While that figure represents the
Commission’s proposal to double the current crisis cache, he noted, “if we have to take everything on board what
[countries] are asking, it would be ridiculously low.”
Dry belt
The EU's
own drought maps show the worst of it cutting straight through the middle of
the Continent.
In
Hungary, where this summer's harvests are coming in 10 to 20 percent below the
five-year average, the agriculture ministry said the tools simply haven't kept
up with the changing climate. Emergency aid and insurance need rebuilding for a
hotter Europe, the ministry said in a statement, with more EU money behind
them, so farmers get help "faster and more predictably."
Together
with six other countries in the dry belt, Hungary backed a declaration in June
demanding a list of changes to the emergency fund's successor.
Those
countries — Poland, Czechia, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Croatia and Romania — want it
to cover weather damage; pay out when a farmer loses a fifth of a crop rather
than a third; and provide the money before the paperwork clears. As things
stand, they wrote, "relief comes too late."
Commissioner
Hansen wants the money to go toward longer-term solutions, rather than purely
padding out farmers’ losses. Ideas include irrigation and water infrastructure
to blunt the damage and an insurance push with the European Investment Bank so
that bad years are covered by premiums rather than emergency funds.
But “we
will never find enough money,” he said, unless richer EU countries put more
into the bloc’s joint budget. So far, those countries are pushing for the pot
to be reduced instead.
Spending
strategy split
Not all
countries suffering drought are in favor of easier access to emergency cash.
In
France, the heat struck just as the corn flowered, and no grain formed. By
mid-July, growers were mowing the plants down for animal feed. The industry
expects its smallest corn crop in at least a quarter-century — down 30 percent
in a single year. However, the country’s agriculture ministry said the EU’s
crisis money should stay what it is: a tool for market shocks. Climate risk,
the ministry said in a statement, belongs with dedicated instruments like
subsidized crop insurance.
For
Polish Agriculture Minister Stefan Krajewski, emergency cash and tools designed
to manage longer-term risk are complementary. "One shouldn't be completely
replaced by the other," he said.
Among
farm groups, the pushback is less about prevention itself than about how it’s
implemented: Farmers ordered into new practices, versus being paid to adopt
them.
In
Germany, the Rhine has dropped so low that cargo ships sail half-loaded,
driving up the cost of moving grain and feed. The German Farmers Association
backs the shift toward prevention and adaptation — as long as it comes with
“investment,” said chief Stefanie Sabet, “not obligation.”
Clea
Caulcutt contributed to this report from Paris.


Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário