Neither
Right nor Left
Neither
Right nor Left: Fascist Ideology in France
Author Zeev Sternhell
Original
title Ni droite, ni gauche. L'idéologie
fasciste en France
Translator David Maisel
Language French language
Subject Political history of the French
Third Republic
Publisher Editions du Seuil
Publication
date 1983
Publication
place France
Published
in English 1987 (University
of California Press)
Neither
Right nor Left: Fascist Ideology in France (French: Ni droite, ni gauche.
L'idéologie fasciste en France) is an influential book on the political history
of Interwar France by the historian Zeev Sternhell. It was first published in
French by Éditions du Seuil in 1983. It is part of a trilogy of books by
Sternhell looking at the origins of fascism in France before World War II.
Neither
Right nor Left proposed a revisionist account of fascism which argued that
political and intellectual life in France in the 1930s had become
"saturated" with fascist ideas and argued that all parts of the
political spectrum had been affected. This broke with previous analyses which
had argued that such thinking had been restricted to the far-right and only of
marginal importance before World War II and the emergence of the Vichy regime
in June 1940. It also emphasised fascism's origins in socialist thinking.
According
to one historian, "[f]ew books on European history in recent memory have
caused such controversy and commotion". It was first published in English
translation by University of California Press in 1987.
Context
and argument
Neither
Right nor Left is the third book of Sternhell's trilogy on the intellectual
origins of fascism in France. Sternhell published Maurice Barrès et le
nationalisme français (1972) and La Droite révolutionnaire (1978) which
addressed the intellectual origins of Maurice Barrès and the development of
largely unsuccessful radical right-wing movements in France before 1914.
According to Robert Wohl, in Neither Right nor Left:
Sternhell
recapitulated the central arguments of La Droite révolutionnaire, stated them
with even greater force, escalating them audaciously, and extended them into
the interwar period, claiming (in implicit contrast to earlier books) that by
1940 French political culture was thoroughly saturated (imprégnée) by fascist
ideology. Only this fascist penetration of French political and intellectual
life, Sternhell insisted, could explain the abruptness of the French defeat and
the radical transformation of French political institutions after the creation
of the Vichy regime in June 1940.
Sternhell
did not apply the concept of fascism rigorously to a particular political
movement. Rather, he "described a mood or complex of ideas in which
fascism was one but not the only, or even most important, variant. This
mentality took the form of a general rejection of liberal values and
institutions as they existed under the Third Republic combined with an acute
anxiety about the future of France."] As a result, he argues that fascist
ideas permeated across the political spectrum and drew on various disparate
political traditions from far-right nationalists to personalists and
revisionist Marxists. In particular, Sternhell argued that fascism was chiefly
"a product of the left-wing revisionism of Marxist socialism". As a result, he emphasizes the
commitment to planisme among many authoritarian former socialists such as Henri
de Man, a Belgian, and Marcel Déat.[5] In his argument, the central elements of
fascism were "ultra-nationalism" and "anti-materialist
socialism".
Wohl
argues that the book's radicalism lay in the contrast with the previous
tendency to think of fascism as a marginal or weak force in French politics. It
also broke with the existing consensus that French fascism originated in the
experience of World War I and was imported from Italy and Germany rather than
emerging from France's indigenous political traditions.
Reception
Neither
Right nor Left was considered extremely polemical on its publication in France.
In contrast to earlier studies which were like "earnest
documentaries", Roger Griffin stated the work "can be likened to a
major series originally made from prime-time TV abroad where it caused so much
controversy that it was soon dubbed into English and has now been released on
video".[8] He described it as an "indispensable text" for the
study of fascism.
In the
aftermath of the appearance of the French edition, Sternhell was sued for
defamation by Bertrand de Jouvenel in 1983 after the book described him as
having been a fascist in the 1930s. Jouvenel, on whose behalf the anti-fascist
intellectual Raymond Aron testified, sued him on nine counts. The judge found
Sternhell liable on two counts but imposed only symbolic damages and permitted
Sternhell to retain the offending passages in future editions of the book.
Robert Wohl states that this was a "major defeat" for the plaintiff.
Sternhell
published a revised and expanded edition in French in 1987 with Éditions
Complexe which reaffirmed his earlier thesis.

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário