UK must
choose between EU and Trump, trade experts warn
Pascal Lamy,
former head of the WTO, says Britain will have to take sides if new US
administration slaps hefty tariffs on imports, as fears grow over possible
trade war
Toby Helm
Political editor
Sat 16 Nov
2024 20.10 CET
The former
head of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) has said that the UK should side
with the European Union over trade and economic policies rather than a Donald
Trump-led US, as fears grow over a possible global trade war.
Pascal Lamy,
who was head of the WTO from 2005 to 2013, said it was clear that the UK’s
interests lay in staying close to the EU on trade, rather than allying with
Trump, not least because it does three times more trade with Europe than the
US.
His comments
came after a key Trump supporter, Stephen Moore, said on Friday that the UK
should reject the EU’s “socialist model” if it wanted to have any realistic
chance of doing a free trade deal with the US under Trump and, as a result,
avoid the 20% tariffs on exports that the president-elect has promised.
In an
interview with the Observer, Lamy said: “It’s an old question with a new
relevance given Brexit and given Trump. In my view the UK is a European
country. Its socio- economic model is much closer to the EU social model and
not the very hard, brutal version of capitalism of Trump and [Elon] Musk.
“We can
expect that Trump plus Musk will go even more in this direction. If Trump
departs from supporting Ukraine, I have absolutely no doubt that the UK will
remain on the European side.
“In trade
matters, you have to look at the numbers. The trade relationship between the UK
and Europe is three times larger than between the UK and US.
“This is a
very structural inter-dependence which will hardly change unless – which I
don’t think is a realistic assumption – the UK will decide to leave the EU
norms of standards, to move to the US one. I don’t believe that will happen.
“My answer
is that the option to unite politically, economically and socially with the US
and not with Europe makes absolutely no sense. I believe that, for the UK’s
interests and values, the European option remains the dominant one.”
Ivan Rogers,
the former British ambassador to the EU, said it was clear that after Trump’s
re-election the UK would have to choose between the US and EU. “Any free trade
agreement that Trump and his team could ever propose to the UK would have to
contain major proposals on US access to the UK agricultural market and on
veterinary standards. It would not pass Congress without them. If the UK signed
on the dotted line, that’s the end of the Starmer proposed veterinary deal with
the EU. You can’t have both: you have to choose.”
Their
remarks come as Keir Starmer heads to Brazil on Sunday for a meeting of the G20
where issues of global security and economic growth are set to dominate. The
prime minister is expected to hold talks with President Xi of China, on whose
country Trump is proposing slap huge 60% import tariffs. Trade experts expect
that the US will demand that the EU and UK follow suit, which both will
strongly resist for their own trade reasons.
The UK is
seeking to increase trade with Beijing while also stepping up efforts to find
greater ways to access the EU single market. Last week, the governor of the
Bank of England, Andrew Bailey, made clear that leaving the EU had “weighed” on
the domestic economy.
A government
source said that developing a trade strategy in the new world order was now the
top priority. “It has gone from being very important to being number one in the
one tray [following Trump’s re-election].”
However,
João Vale de Almeida, the former EU ambassador to London, said he believed
there was common “territory for agreement” which would involve minimal
pragmatic deals between the EU and the UK, and the US and the UK.
“We know
that Trump will try to divide European member states and divide the UK and EU.
This is already what [Nigel] Farage is trying to do. But I think we can walk
and chew gum at the same.
“Given that
a fully fledged trade deal with the US is not possible because agricultural
issues will get in the way, and an EU deal is limited by UK red lines, any
deals will have to be limited. So there may be a way through.”
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário